<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
fix sleepmode level2 e2e test
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
no
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
use e2e tests
Signed-off-by: wangx700 <wangxin700@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR repalce the vision tower in Qwen2.5-Omni-Thinker model,
Qwen2_5_VisionTransformer, with AscendQwen2_5_VisionTransformer, which
use QKV padding for padding performance.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: Ting FU <futing10@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Make kv-transfer env variable take effect & Fix load-balance proxy.
Cherry Pick from #3981
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add new ut case for aclgraph enable
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This is cherry-pick from #3986 .
This PR fixes a bug where the workspace of `_npu_paged_attention` in
setup is smaller than execution. For current implementation of
FULL_DECODE_ONLY with `_npu_paged_attention`, we use
`_npu_paged_attention_get_workspace` when capturing with `max_model_len`
as `seq_lens`. This assumes that PA with larger `seq_lens` inputs should
have larger workspace than smaller `seq_lens`. However, there are rare
cases where PA with smaller `seq_lens` incurs larger space. So I add
`get_workspace` directly into `update_attn_params`.
This change might introduce slight(≈1%) performance degradation for
small num_tokens(such as 1) in decode phase, and there is no other known
memory issues. So I think this change is acceptable. We can remove this
if new attention op (such as `npu_fused_infer_attention_score`) does not
have such problems.
Signed-off-by: Angazenn <supperccell@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix#3891.
The empty of `moe_comm_method` in the above issue is due to the wrong
check for MoE models. To be specific, the method `is_moe_model` only
checks whether a text-only model is a MoE model, without considering
multi-modal models, e.g., `VL` and `Omni`.
Check the config dict recursively to find if it has a key contains
"expert", without checking the model architecture.
It is worth noting that, we can't verify a model by if it contains
`FusedMoE` module because `is_moe_model` is called somewhere before the
model loading, e.g., it's called when updating the ACLGraph config in
platform initialization.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
This PR upgrade CANN from 8.2rc1 to 8.3rc1 and remove the CANN version
check logic.
TODO: we notice that UT runs failed with CANN 8.3 image. So the base
image for UT is still 8.2. We'll fix it later.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to fix weak memory ordering problem in share memory by
patching message queue with an additional lock. The detailed issue can
be found here https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/27858. The key
point is to use the writer lock to enforce memory fence before the ready
flag `metadata_buffer[0] = 1` is set.
This is a temporary solution, and you can use it by setting env
`SHM_BARRIER=true`. By default, we disable this modification.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`SHM_BARRIER=true` enables this change while `SHM_BARRIER=false`
disables this change. The latter is the default choice.
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Set adxl engine as the default Mooncake backend, because Ascend
Transport is no longer maintained.
Update README to include instructions for installing the adxl backend
Mooncake.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Users need to compile and install the mooncake backend for adxl
according to the revised README instructions.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Protect the scene where the first problem occurs. The execution should
be interrupted when the video memory application fails, rather than
waiting until an illegal address is accessed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
NA
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix 2 breaks of aclgraph with MTP:
1. deepseekmtp in vllm 0.11.0 does not support aclgraph and lack the
`support_torch_compile` decorator
2. There is a d2h synchornization in the original forward of mtp
predictor. The fix pr in vllm
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27643
As we'll fix it in vllm main, this fix pr is only needed in branch
v0.11.0-dev
The profling shows that MTP replays in aclgraph now:
<img width="1612" height="1866" alt="a7d7f04155df4ed454b7eb20a92b2e2a"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eaa4b9ff-aeb0-416d-964f-5a06e497f155"
/>
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR temporarily bypasses the scenario where some models in vLLM
trigger a `ValueError` during the process of storing values in
`static_forward_context` when no `prefix` is specified for the linear
layers, which is a bug in some models in vLLM. The official fix will be
addressed by submitting a PR to the vLLM community that specifies a
prefix for the linear layers in each model.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the issue of MTP being enabled and setting
Imhead_tensor_parallel_size=16 causing the inference to hang.
Signed-off-by: wyh145 <1987244901@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add new test model for aclgraph single_request v0.11.0
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Revert [bugfix for mtp in
fullgraph](0948483642)
and support it when vllm supports
2. raise error when cudagraph_capture_sizes can't be an integer multiple
of uniform_decode_query_len
3. bugfix when max_num_seqs=14 in mtp=2 scenario
---------
Signed-off-by: zouyida2052 <zouyida2002@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add new e2e tests case for aclgraph memory to v0.11.0
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
cancel tokenize for layerwise_proxy
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the precision issue caused by the inconsistency between the group
list type used by mc2 and that of eplb.
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
After refactoring vllm_ascend/models and FusedMoE, we are unable to pass
`gate` from deepseekv2.py to `AscendFusedMoE.forward`, which will result
in error when running deepseek v3/r1 with allgather.
Hence, this pr removes `gate` related computations from FusedMoE module
in eager/aclgraph mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`rm_router_logits` is deprecated in eager/aclgraph.
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
This PR fixes a mlapo accuracy problem related with weight processing.
Furthermore, modify mlapo related e2e test with quantized deepseek model
to make it effective.
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
bugfix for mtp in fullgraph
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
---------
Signed-off-by: zouyida2052 <zouyida2002@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When using multi connector, the multi connector does not define
get_finished_count, which will cause the kv cache to be released ###
Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: baxingpiaochong <771405853@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: baxingpiaochong <771405853@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
force with_prefill true after allreduce in kv producer. This is a backport of #3768 and #3849
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
To adapt the torch_npu version to avoid the precision problem of
torchair deepseek. The torch_npu version may result in the different
branches in the ops register, the rms_norm ops has two branches
according to the verson_check, this pr unify the rms_norm in torchair by
patch method. #3862
Signed-off-by: hust17yixuan <303660421@qq.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
cherry pick https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/3677
Remove redundant operations from `model_runner` and `forward_context`.
This optimization can significantly reduce the idle time (bubble) before
decoding when running models with small parameter counts (e.g.,
Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B).
Testing on 800I A2, bubble is reduced from 3.8ms to 2.8ms :
Before
<img width="1655" height="696" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d7608e52-2438-46dd-8fc9-391fd6274495"
/>
After
<img width="1607" height="774" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56daf081-2dba-4d2e-99d4-e055187d9806"
/>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
No
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
---------
Signed-off-by: realliujiaxu <realliujiaxu@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The current MatmulReduceScatter operator experiences performance
degradation in small-shape scenarios, so it determines whether to use
this operator by judging the size of the shape.
---------
Signed-off-by: ZYang6263 <zy626375@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix proxy decode bug while parsing non-UTF-8 characters.
---------
Signed-off-by: CHEN <116010019@link.cuhk.edu.cn>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The cache for MLA decode graph parameters was holding strong references
to tensors, preventing them from being garbage collected and leading to
increased memory usage.
This change wraps the cached tensors in weak references, allowing them
to be deallocated when no longer in use and reducing overall memory
pressure.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
None.
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- `qkv_proj.weight` prefetching has been implemented with `Quant` op,
when `AddRmsNormQuant` is enabled (#3465) `qkv_proj.weight` prefetching
won't work
- Implement `qkv_proj.weight` prefetching with `AddRmsNormQuant`, which
has been merged on `main` branch (#3517)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on `Qwen3-235B-A22B-W8A8`
<img width="1868" height="109" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0bc28082-0287-4d5c-b8f6-f907c3134d36"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: zhoux77899 <zhouxiang100@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
vllm requires opencv-python-headless >= 4.11.0 which requires
(numpy<2.3.0,>=2), but vllm-ascend numpy version must be less than
2.0.0, so limit opencv-python-headless less than 4.11.0.86 will fix this
conflict.
backport of
afc58184ec
Signed-off-by: 22dimensions <waitingwind@foxmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 22dimensions <waitingwind@foxmail.com>
This PR moves the communication operation of shared experts out of extra
stream because I found that this might cause rtMemcpy related errors
when running shared experts multistream with aclgraph.
Furthermore, I utilize a global variable as extra stream object to avoid
allocating streams for each layer in full-graph mode.
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Caps the calculated maximum number of tokens at 512.
This prevents allocating an excessively large buffer when a cudagraph
capture size is not specified, mitigating the risk of out-of-memory
errors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
None.
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add mrope fusion op for qwen2.5-vl. This mrope operator dosen't
support Qwen3-VL currently. Thus could only take affect in qwen2.5-vl
cherry pick from 39b994a987888f7ba78df28b1ccb41a5e8d6eaf5
CI passed with existing test
Signed-off-by: shaopeng666 <shaopeng666@noreply.gitcode.com>
Co-authored-by: shaopeng666 <shaopeng666@noreply.gitcode.com>
This PR comments out newly added vlm e2e test of ascend scheduler
scenario because I found that when running in multi-batch this will
stuck. Need to add this back after dealing with this issue.
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
This PR cherry-picks the bugfix related with running multi-modal models
with AscendScheduler to v0.11.0-dev
Signed-off-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Modify the recalculation logic to prevent waiting requests from filling
up the D node KVCache
Signed-off-by: underfituu <hzhucong@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR boosts performance by introducing a fused kernel for the matrix
matmul and reduce scatter operations. It supports both unquantized
(e.g., BFloat16) and W8A8 quantized models.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: ZYang6263 <zy626375@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In multi-Tensor Parallel (TP) scenarios, the KV pool only queries the
first GPU card. When keys on other cards are released, the query result
still returns as successful, introducing accuracy issues. This PR
modifies the KV pool's query logic to check all cards, resolving this
problem.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In certain scenarios, the performance of synchronously loading data from
the pool is better than that of asynchronously loading data. Therefore,
a control logic (or switch) for asynchronous loading from the pool has
been added.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix bug: In the mooncake pooling scenario, when the client closes the
request, the server fails to locate the request, leading to the server
hanging.oling scenario, when the client closes the request, the server
fails to locate the request, leading to the server hanging.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Pull up the PD separated pooling service, send requests using aisbench,
press CTRL+C twice, and check if the vllm_ascend service exit.
---------
Signed-off-by: linhebiwen <linhebiwen@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Check all expert maps when using muilty instance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
Qwen 235B in double A3.
case1：master has expert map, slave has not expert map.
case2: master has expert map, slave has error expert map.
case3: master has expert map,slave has correct expert map.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
On Arm systems, os.sched_yield() does not take effect, causing the GIL
(Global Interpreter Lock) to remain unrelinquished and resulting in CPU
bound issues. This PR applies a patch to sched_yield in vLLM, making the
process execute time.sleep(0) instead to release the GIL. ### Does this
PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: fems14 <74094523+fems14@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The #3624 PR fix the precision of deepseek torchair, but don't consider
the limitation of torch compile which results in the recompile, This PR
fixs this problem. PR to main #3678
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: hust17yixuan <303660421@qq.com>
Resolves a `TypeError: got an unexpected keyword argument 'layer_type'`.
A recent change (PR #3311) started passing the `layer_type` argument
when calling `get_pergroup_param()`. This specific implementation does
not use this parameter, causing the error.
This patch adds `layer_type=None` to the method signature to maintain
API compatibility and ignore the unused argument.
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
