### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the issue where no exception is thrown when graph capture fails.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: WithHades <244036962@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently when tp>1, we have extra processes on tp rank0 device which
consumes extra HBM memory. This is caused by `import
torch_npu._inductor` before set_device which introduces extra
initialization of device.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
All ci passed.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
# Feature: FlashLB algorithm
## Purpose
This Pull Request enhances the EPLB (Expert Parallelism Load Balancing)
system by introducing a novel load balancing algorithm: FlashLB.
1. The default algorithm adopts two separate sub-procedures to optimize
expert replication and placement independently:
a. **Expert Replica Allotment Sub-procedure** : Determines the number of
replicas for all experts. At each step, it greedily adds one more
replica to the expert with the highest per-replica load, aiming to
minimize load skew at the expert replica granularity (Min Max Replica,
MMR).
b. **Expert Replica Placement Sub-procedure** : Distributes all replicas
across devices. First, it sorts the generated replicas in descending
order of hotness, then iteratively places the currently hottest replica
onto the device with the lowest cumulative load and available slots.
However, this simplistic combination of two separate procedures lacks
synergy and often leads to sub-optimal load balancing. For example, in
the simple scenario illustrated below: Given 8 logical experts with
hotness values [600, 560, 120, 120, 20, 10, 10, 10], and 2 replicas
allocated per device across 8 devices, the default EPLB algorithm
results in a maximum per-device hotness of 232 (peak-average load ratio
1.28), while our proposed FlashLB algorithm reduces this value to 205
(peak-average load ratio 1.13).
<figure><img
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b9b10fab-651e-4524-9942-adbca8d044a4"
width="90%"</figure>
2. The default algorithm simply aggregates hotness measurements across
the entire profiling window. While this provides a coarse approximation
of the hotness distribution, it fails to capture the time-phased
variations and temporal correlations in expert hotness (both within and
between experts) across iterations—phenomena that have been observed in
real-world scenarios. Such single-point hotness estimation degrades the
solution quality of the load balancing algorithm.
3. The default algorithm regularly recalculates updated expert placement
results for all layers without discrimination. Considering that
excessive expert updates can impact Service Level Objectives (SLOs),
such full-scale redeployment leads to excessively high adjustment
overhead, which negatively affects end-to-end performance.
## FlashLB Algorithm Principle
### 1. Joint Optimization of Replica Allotment and Placement
FlashLB achieves joint optimization of replica allotment and placement
through a novel tree search approach, combined with carefully designed e
Fl fficient pruning and lightweight look-ahead estimation. We partition
all experts into several subsets, and for each subset, hierarchically
determine the optimal replica count and placement. Leveraging efficient
pruning and lightweight look-ahead estimation, the process consistently
aims to optimize the globally expected inter-device load balance degree
(considering both deployed and unexplored experts) while ensuring
sufficient computational efficiency. Additionally, precompilation
techniques are employed for acceleration, delivering load balancing that
is both high-quality and practically efficient.
### 2. Multi-Episode Enhancement
Instead of performing full-duration averaging like the default
algorithm, FlashLB partitions each profiling interval (e.g., 1024
iterations) into multiple consecutive smaller episodes (e.g., 16
iterations). This preserves hotness fluctuation and correlation
information. It then constructs a multi-objective optimization problem
to co-optimize these episodes simultaneously, enabling adaptability to
interleaved hotness patterns and improving statistical robustness.
### 3. Layer-wise Cherry-Picking Redeployment
To reduce the overhead of frequent expert redeployment, FlashLB
introduces a cherry-picking redeployment scheme. During each algorithmic
decision cycle, it real-time tracks load balance degree of all layers
and triggers expert placement updates only for those layers whose
peak-average ratio exceeds a predefined threshold. This avoids
unnecessary redeployment for stable layers, significantly reducing
adjustment overhead and thereby improving end-to-end performance gains.
## Co-author:
Co-authored-by: Skywalker-EP 173723846@qq.com
This PR mainly introduces two key optimizations for load balancing
scheduling:
1. **Add per-step heat collection function**:
Support real-time collection of per-step heat information during model
inference. This enables more fine-grained load balancing decisions by
taking per-step heat as the optimization target, improving scheduling
accuracy for dynamic and fluctuating workloads.
2. **Update FlashLB algorithm**:
Upgrade the FlashLB scheduling logic to better adapt to multi-stage heat
distribution scenarios. The improved algorithm can comprehensively
perceive and utilize multi-stage heat characteristics, achieving more
stable and efficient load balancing under complex expert deployment and
dynamic traffic patterns.
---------
Signed-off-by: Mercykid-bash <ruanche0218@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: xuzewei28 <xuzewei2@h-partners.com>
Co-authored-by: xuzewei28 <xuzewei2@h-partners.com>
…the quantization layer name
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR modifies the loading logic for layer name prefixes in quantized
models. The goal is to reduce or eliminate the need for point-to-point
(hardcoded) modifications by leveraging the built-in mapper mechanism
already provided in vLLM's model code. For models that do not yet have a
corresponding mapper, the original point-to-point modification approach
has been retained to ensure backward compatibility.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The changes were validated using an offline deployment script to launch
and verify multiple multimodal models. Testing confirmed that the
updated loading logic correctly handles layer name prefixes across
different model architectures, with no regression in model
initialization or inference behavior.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: Matrix_K <zhangke144@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng-xiaosuo <tengchang1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Matrix_K <zhangke144@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fixed the error of speculative decoding in FULL mode when `num_spec + 1`
not in `cudagraph_capture_sizes`.
Now, we can run speculative decoding in FULL mode, but with drafter as
eager.
It depends on https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/7144 .
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
Test code is shown as below:
```python
prompts = [
"1.Who are you?",
"2. Who are you?",
]
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.0, top_p=0.95, top_k=40, max_tokens=200)
llm = LLM(
model="/home/some-model/Meta-Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct",
tensor_parallel_size=1,
max_num_seqs=32,
# enforce_eager=True,
disable_log_stats=False,
distributed_executor_backend="mp",
gpu_memory_utilization=0.7,
async_scheduling=True,
speculative_config={
"enforce_eager": True,
"model": "/home/some-model/EAGLE3-LLaMA3.1-Instruct-8B",
"disable_padded_drafter_batch": False,
"method": "eagle3",
"num_speculative_tokens": 2,
},
compilation_config={
"cudagraph_mode": "FULL",
"cudagraph_num_of_warmups": 1,
},
max_model_len=4096,
enable_prefix_caching=False,
)
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
```
The result before:
```text
File "/vllm-workspace/vllm/vllm/v1/cudagraph_dispatcher.py", line 140, in _create_padded_batch_descriptor
assert num_tokens_padded % uniform_decode_query_len == 0
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError
```
The result after:
```text
--------------------------------------------------
total_num_output_tokens: 400
num_drafts: 249
num_draft_tokens: 498
num_accepted_tokens: 149
mean acceptance length: 1.60
--------------------------------------------------
acceptance at token 0: 0.43
acceptance at token 1: 0.17
```
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
related to vllm PR #34043 this pr delete func
‘relax_for_mixed_batch_cudagraphs’, num_reqs no longer equals the actual
number of requests, due to fia operator requires that
query_start_loc[-1] equals the total number of computed tokens, so this
func delete cause the ifa error.
In full graph mode, set num_reqs_paded = num_reqs to fix the error
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We should only display this log message when layer_sharding is enabled.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds support for the Ascend950 chip. This includes:
- Updating build scripts (`CMakeLists.txt` and `setup.py`) to recognize
the Ascend950 chip and set appropriate compilation flags.
- Disabling a set of custom operators that are not yet supported on the
Ascend950 hardware target.
- Performing a codebase-wide refactoring of `pipe_barrier()` calls to
the namespaced `AscendC::PipeBarrier<>()` for improved code consistency
and adherence to the latest API standards.
Ascend950DT e2e passed (Qwen3-32B-MXFP8) and CI passed
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix penality ops for new version, and achieved a 10% performance
improvement
### How was this patch tested?
pytest
tests/e2e/nightly/single_node/ops/singlecard_ops/triton/test_penality.py
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: shiyuan680 <917935075@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the issue #6143 .
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Allow to start the server with "--enable-lora && --fully-sharded-loras
&& --tensor_parallel_size 2".
### How was this patch tested?
pytest -sv tests/e2e/multicard/2-cards/test_llama32_lora_tp2.py
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, we call lookup_client for looking up token hit in KV Pool,
however, when token length < block size, the key will be empty and there
is no point to lookup in KV Pool backend since there will never be a
hit.
Hence, add early return in `get_num_new_matched_tokens` when `token_len`
< `block_size`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: Pz1116 <zpbzpb123123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the wrong usage of `model_type`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Initial version to support minimax-m2.5 on vllm-ascend.
This commit coverting original fp8 weight to a quantilized bf16 to
support Minimax-m2.5 on NPU.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
### Test Report
Self tested precision summary, where the official precision score of
AIME2025 is 86.3
<img width="426" height="84" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a3ce2452-92fa-4713-962e-862248e0b61a"
/>
---------
Signed-off-by: limuyuan <limuyuan3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: SparrowMu <52023119+SparrowMu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: limuyuan <limuyuan3@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Mooncake Layerwise Connector supports hybrid attention manager with
multiple kvcache groups.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The ops `torch_npu.npu_recurrent_gated_delta_rule` currently does not
support `ssm_state` inputs in float32 format,
we temporarily retain the _forward_core implementation with triton for
Qwen3_5
---------
Signed-off-by: pppeng <zepengliu912@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: pppeng <60355449+ppppeng@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This is a bug fix to resolve the issue where the MOE model fails to load
quantized weights in w4a8 format when EP is not enabled.The parameters
["weight_scale_second", "weight_offset_second", "scale_bias"] shall be
parsed in per-group mode, regardless of other conditions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: 李少鹏 <lishaopeng21@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix acceptance and high-concurrency bug in eagle3 and cp enabled
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
tests and ut
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
New Quantization Method: Introduced support for the W8A8SC static linear
quantization scheme specifically for 310P hardware, enabling more
efficient model compression.
Refactored the save_sharded_state_310.py to avoid multi-process issue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
W8A8SC quant E2E test.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the LoRA e2e test accuracy issue that introduced by the upstream PR
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32005
### How was this patch tested?
pytest -sv tests/e2e/singlecard/test_llama32_lora.py
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: yupeng <507435917@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request introduces support for the Qwen3.5 MoE model on Ascend
devices. The key changes are:
* **Quantization Configuration for Qwen3.5 MoE**: Adds necessary prefix
mappings and packed module definitions for `qwen3_5_moe` in
`vllm_ascend/quantization/modelslim_config.py` to enable ModelSlim
quantization.
* **Triton Kernel Fix**: Corrects a bug in the `fused_gdn_gating` Triton
kernel. The calculation for `BLK_BATCHES` had an operator precedence
issue which is now resolved. The calculation has also been made more
robust with added clamping to prevent potential out-of-bounds memory
access in the unified buffer.
These changes enable the correct and efficient execution of Qwen3.5 MoE
models on Ascend hardware.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI should be used to verify the correctness of these changes. It is
recommended to run tests with the Qwen3.5 MoE model to ensure the new
configurations and the kernel fix work as expected.
Signed-off-by: xmpp777 <yangming2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Previously implemention of triton rope_siso missing the storage of
second half of rope results, which will result in:
1. accuracy problem in neox-style scenario
2. ub overflow in non neox-style scenario
This PR fixes it and supplement nightly test case for it.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support chunked prefill for Qwen3Next with PCP&DCP
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
If expert_map is on the device, there may be occasional repeated answers
in long output scenarios.
dsv3.2-exp-w8a8
No garbled characters are displayed in the output.
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-stream-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2025 | ef2f4f | accuracy | gen | 60.00 |
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
## Summary
- Fix incorrect layer count calculation for MTP (Multi-Token Prediction)
models in `update_aclgraph_sizes()` function
- For MTP models, the draft model's layer count is stored in
`num_nextn_predict_layers` or `mtp_num_hidden_layers` (for Qwen3.5), not
in the standard `num_hidden_layers` field
- Directly accessing `draft.hf_config.num_hidden_layers` returns the
main model's layer count instead of the MTP draft model's layer count
## Bug Description
In `vllm_ascend/utils.py`, the `update_aclgraph_sizes()` function
calculates `resources_per_graph` for speculative decoding scenarios.
When calculating the resources needed for the draft model, the original
code directly accessed:
```python
resources_per_graph += draft.hf_config.num_hidden_layers + 1
```
This works correctly for standard draft models, but **fails for MTP
models** (like DeepSeek-V3's MTP or Qwen3.5's MTP) because:
1. MTP models store their layer count in model-specific fields:
- `num_nextn_predict_layers` (DeepSeek-V3 MTP)
- `mtp_num_hidden_layers` (Qwen3.5 MTP)
2. The `num_hidden_layers` field in these models contains the **main
model's** layer count, not the MTP layer count
3. This leads to **grossly overestimating** the `resources_per_graph`,
which in turn causes the calculated `max_batch_sizes` to be
unnecessarily small
## Fix
Use `draft.get_total_num_hidden_layers()` instead of directly accessing
`draft.hf_config.num_hidden_layers`. This method correctly handles
different model types through the `model_arch_config_convertor`
infrastructure, returning the appropriate layer count for:
- Standard draft models → `num_hidden_layers`
- DeepSeek-V3 MTP → `num_nextn_predict_layers`
- Qwen3.5 MTP → `mtp_num_hidden_layers`
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: wanghuanjun2113 <wanghuanjun2113@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We need to support quant config in glm46v
.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
We used the 'Ascend/msit' quantization method to test the w8a8 weights.
Successfully ran on NPU using vllm-ascend by the w8a8 weights.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: g00887675/loganJane <g00887675/loganJane73@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: g00887675/loganJane <g00887675/loganJane73@hotmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes a bug in the `_merge_multimodal_embeddings` function where
the parameter order was incorrect. The `multimodal_embeddings` and
`is_multimodal` parameters were swapped, which would lead to runtime
errors when the function is called with positional arguments.
This change corrects the function signature to align with its expected
usage, ensuring that multimodal embeddings are correctly merged.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is a bug fix for an internal utility function and has no
user-facing impact.
### How was this patch tested?
The correctness of this fix is validated by existing tests for
multimodal functionality. With the incorrect function signature, these
tests would fail due to argument type mismatches. CI passing confirms
the fix is effective.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: tanhaoan333 <tanhaoan@huawei.com>
## Summary
- Move `_update_states_after_model_execute` call from after main model
sampling to after draft model execution
- This reordering reduces pipeline bubbles between main model and draft
model execution
- No accuracy impact - the state update operation is independent of
draft token proposal
## Performance Impact
Reduces idle time between main model and draft model execution stages,
improving overall MTP (Multi-Token Prediction) performance.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wanghuanjun2113 <wanghuanjun2113@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Supports contiguous tensor hybrid-attn kv-cache on fullattn-mamba hybrid
model, such as Qwen3Next and Qwen3.5.
Due to the restrictions of Ascend operators, all KV tensors, conv
tensors, and SSM tensors must be contiguous. Therefore, this PR uses the
following solution to generate the KV cache:
tensor1: [(kv_padding), conv , ...]
tensor2: [k , ssm , ...]
tensor3: [v , (mamba_padding), ...]
Under this scheme, although some waste may occur, the tensors of all
caches are guaranteed to be contiguous.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The index-select operation `mrope_positions.gpu[:,
:total_num_scheduled_tokens].copy_(...)` triggers a CPU-NPU
synchronization, which blocks subsequent operator dispatch and causes
bubbles visible in Profiling.
This PR changes to full tensor copy
(`mrope_positions.gpu.copy_(mrope_positions.cpu)`) to eliminate the sync
point. The trade-off is a negligible increase in memory usage since
`mrope_positions.cpu` is a small tensor.
**Result:** ~2-3% TPOT improvement with the profiling bubbles
eliminated.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Verified via Profiling that the CPU sync bubble is eliminated and TPOT
is reduced by 2-3%.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wanghuanjun2113 <wanghuanjun2113@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Change recurrent_gated_delta_rule ops from triton to ascend C version
for better performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request addresses a bug related to the fused mc2 functionality
within the EPLB (Expert Parallelism Load Balancing) system, specifically
impacting quantization and MoE communication.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
Signed-off-by: Spicy-Stick <873805887@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: root <root@localhost.localdomain>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to fix incorrect slot mapping in qwen35 due to mismatched
block size. In qwen35, we should use `kernel_block_size` so that we can
compute it in a correct way, and it is obtained in `load_model` when we
have a chance to grab `draft_attn_layers`.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The community has added a cleaning mechanism for the metadata after the
main model finishes running. The MTP layer should not clean the
metadata, and a new condition has been added to avoid cleaning it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR creates and registers `ascend_multi_connector`, which allows the
`mooncake_layerwise_connector` to use the kv_pooling feature.
We unregister the original vllm's `MultiConnector` and replace it with
`AscendMultiConnector` when registering the connectors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. User can use `MultiConnector` to initialize `AscendMultiConnector`.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
If some `eagle3` model without embed_tokens works with `quarot` target
model, the acceptence rate will drop.
We solve it in this PR.
The relative vllm pr is https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/36225.
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When eagle and cp are enabled at the same time, there is an error in
pcp_allgather due to hidden_states. This PR fixes this issue.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[bugfix]Qwen-Omni quantization bugfix
fix Qwen-Omni quantization weight mapping to float weight
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: tanhaoan333 <tanhaoan@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support FlashComm1 for Qwen3-Next. Fix some padding problems in Sequence
Parallel (SP)
and resolve precision problems in shared_out when both FlashComm1 is
enabled.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: zhaojiangjiang <zhaojiangjiang1@h-partners.com>
Co-authored-by: zhaojiangjiang <zhaojiangjiang1@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
**NOTE: This PR is re-pull of #7016 since ci mistakenly marked
unfinished pr as having passed.**
This PR aims to delete mtp_proposer. By fixing a bug in both dsv32 and
glm5, now it should be ok to remove mtp_proposer. The bug is actually
about unnecessary slicing of `slot_mapping`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds split_qkv_rmsnorm_mrope kernel with interleaved for qwen3.5
and qwen3-vl to improve performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Does not.
### How to use?
```python
real_q, real_k, real_v, real_gate = torch.ops.vllm.triton_split_qkv_rmsnorm_mrope(
qkv=qkv,
q_weight=q_weight,
k_weight=k_weight,
cos_sin=cos_sin,
num_q_heads=num_q_heads,
num_kv_heads=num_kv_heads,
head_size=head_size,
eps=eps,
mrope_section=mrope_section,
is_interleaved=is_interleaved,
rope_dim=rope_dim,
has_gate=has_gate,
)
```
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- Accuracy test script：
```shell
pytest tests/e2e/nightly/single_node/ops/singlecard_ops/triton/test_split_qkv_rmsnorm_mrope.py
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Fager <865071616@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Fager10086 <77871921+Fager10086@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: fager <865071616@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adapt the graph mode (piecewise and full_decode_only) of PCP and DCP for
DeepSeek v3.2.
### How was this patch tested?
Test output:
{"object":"text_completion","model":"deepeek_v3","choices":[{"index":0,"text":"
the head of state and head of government of the United States,
indirectly elected to a four-year term by the American people through
the Electoral College. The officeholder leads the executive branch of
the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United
States","logprobs":null,"finish_reason":"length","stop_reason":null,"token_ids":null,"prompt_logprobs":null,"prompt_token_ids":null},{"index":1,"text":"
Paris. This is the largest city in France and its main political,
cultural and commercial center. The modern location of the city is the
north of the central part of the country, on the banks of the Seine
River Seine River Seine in
3\n\n","logprobs":null,"finish_reason":"length","stop_reason":null,"token_ids":null,"prompt_logprobs":null,"prompt_token_ids":null},{"index":2,"text":"
now\n\n# AI future is now\n\nThe world is changing at a rapid pace, and
artificial intelligence (AI) is at the forefront of this transformation.
From self-driving cars to virtual assistants, AI is already making a
significant impact on our daily
lives","logprobs":null,"finish_reason":"length","stop_reason":null,"token_ids":null,"prompt_logprobs":null,"prompt_token_ids":null},{"index":3,"text":"
a 3rd year student at the University of Lincoln studying Media
Production. This blog is about my work throughout my final year on the
course.\n\n## Tuesday 3 May 2016\n### Final Major Project -
Evaluation\n\nFor my final project
I","logprobs":null,"finish_reason":"length","stop_reason":null,"token_ids":null,"prompt_logprobs":null,"prompt_token_ids":null}],"service_tier":null,"system_fingerprint":null,"usage":{"prompt_tokens":27,"total_tokens":227,"completion_tokens":200,"prompt_tokens_details":null},"kv_transfer_params":null}
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: xiaocongtou6 <2066962956@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: xiaocongtou6 <105542647+xiaocongtou6@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, we are using
e2b31243c0/vllm/model_executor/layers/conv.py (L219-L232)
for convolution computation, which is used in patch embedding for VL
models.
After profiling, we find that this linear method will take about **6.87
ms**, which is much slower than just using `F.conv3d()`. In
`F.conv3d()`, it will call aclnn `BatchMatMulV2` with optimization on
Ascend NPU, which only take about **2.50 ms** and is **2.7x faster**
than linear method.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the moe_forward error when setting enable_static_kernel to true.
When static kernels are enabled, the forward pass runs twice
(compilation + capture), causing moe_layer_index to overflow. Wrap the
index to prevent out-of-bounds errors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: p00465316 <panchao13@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: p00465316 <panchao13@huawei.com>
