### What this PR does / why we need it?
To intuitively show the effect of the eplb algorithm, we print the
expert heat before and after eplb.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR optimizes the `split_qkv_rmsnorm_rope` operator by introducing a
new Triton kernel, `split_qkv_rmsnorm_rope_prefill_kernel`, for the
prefill stage (i.e., large batch sizes). The implementation now
dynamically selects between the existing decode kernel and the new
prefill kernel based on the batch size, which improves performance for
large batch scenarios.
Additionally, the RoPE implementation is updated to support partial
rotation dimensions (`rope_dim`), making the operator more flexible.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is a performance optimization and is not expected to introduce
any user-facing changes.
### How was this patch tested?
CI should pass with existing tests. The new prefill path is triggered
when the batch size is larger than the number of available vector cores.
The partial RoPE feature can be tested by passing the `rope_dim`
argument.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: guzhiyong <guzhiyong5@h-partners.com>
Signed-off-by: frank <2547457096@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: guzhiyong <guzhiyong5@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to delete mtp_proposer. By fixing a bug in both dsv32 and
glm5, now it should be ok to remove mtp_proposer. The bug is actually
about unnecessary slicing of `slot_mapping`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix: support model-specific routed_scaling_factor in muls_add fusion
Previously, MulsAddFusionPass used a hardcoded scale=1.0, which failed
to match the x * routed_scaling_factor + y pattern in models like GLM5
that use routed_scaling_factor=2.5. This caused the muls_add fusion to
be skipped, leaving unoptimized mul+add operations.
This fix reads routed_scaling_factor from model config (defaulting to
1.0
for backward compatibility) and uses it as the pattern scale, enabling
correct fusion for GLM5 and other models with custom scaling factors.
Fixes: Unoptimized mul+add in GLM5 attention blocks
Tested: GLM5-W8A8 with routed_scaling_factor=2.5
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: liuchenbing <chenliumail@163.com>
Co-authored-by: liuchenbing <chenliumail@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
## Problem
When MTP is enabled, prefill requests with `prompt_tokens ==
num_spec_tokens + 1` are incorrectly classified as decode requests,
causing accuracy issues.
## Root Cause
The `uniform_decode` condition only checked:
- `max_num_scheduled_tokens == uniform_decode_query_len`
- `num_tokens == max_num_scheduled_tokens * num_reqs`
This is insufficient because a prefill request with specific prompt
length satisfies these conditions as well.
## Fix
Add `is_all_decode` check to ensure all requests have
`num_computed_tokens > 0` before classifying as uniform decode, since
decode requests must have computed at least one token.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
For GQA model, when we enable both dp and dcp (disable pcp), the
key-value pairs were not being captured correctly; we have now fixed it.
Signed-off-by: dsxsteven <dsxsteven@sina.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[bugfix]Qwen-Omni quantization model_type bugfix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: tanhaoan333 <tanhaoan@huawei.com>
## What this PR does / why we need it?
Implements [RFC
#6954](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/6954):
NPUWorker Profiler profile_prefix full adaptation for API parity with
upstream vLLM.
### Changes
- **Lazy profiler init**: Defer profiler creation until first
`profile(is_start=True)` call
- **profile_prefix param**: Add `profile_prefix` to `profile()`; compute
`trace_name` from prefix + `get_worker_rank_suffix()`
- **Refactor `_init_profiler` → `_create_profiler(trace_name)`**: Pass
`worker_name` to `tensorboard_trace_handler` for unique trace files per
worker
- Unique trace files per worker; no collision in multi-worker setups
### Testing
- Unit tests updated/added in `tests/ut/worker/test_worker_v1.py`
- `pytest tests/ut/worker/test_worker_v1.py::TestNPUWorker` passed
## Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes. Trace file naming may differ (more descriptive with worker rank
suffix). `profile(is_start=True, profile_prefix="warmup")` now
supported.
## How was this patch tested?
- Unit tests:`pytest tests/ut/worker/test_worker_v1.py::TestNPUWorker`
- Manual: vLLM serve with profiler config, start/stop profile, verified
trace files
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: realliujiaxu <realliujiaxu@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. New Custom NPU Operation: Introduced npu_gemma_rms_norm in
csrc/torch_binding.cpp to provide optimized Gemma RMS Normalization
support for Ascend NPUs. This function includes logic to handle dynamic
shapes for the gamma tensor.
2. PyTorch Operator Registration: The new npu_gemma_rms_norm operation
has been registered with the PyTorch custom operator library, making it
accessible from Python.
Meta-Implementation for ACLGraph: A corresponding meta-implementation,
npu_gemma_rms_norm_meta, was added in csrc/torch_binding_meta.cpp. This
is crucial for symbolic tracing and allowing the custom kernel to be
captured and optimized by ACLGraph.
3. Python Frontend Integration: The vllm_ascend/ops/layernorm.py file
was updated to utilize the newly added
torch.ops._C_ascend.npu_gemma_rms_norm for Gemma RMS Normalization,
replacing the generic torch_npu.npu_rms_norm
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: LeeWenquan <83354342+SunnyLee151064@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
To analyze the overhead of the dynamic eplb adjustment framework in
detail, we added the time consumption of the adjustment to the print
information in profiling mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request optimizes the fused_qkvzba_split_reshape_cat Triton
kernel for Qwen3-Next GatedDeltaNet model and removes the previous
conditional restrictions in the forward pass.
Key changes:
1. Refactored Triton kernel implementation: The
fused_qkvzba_split_reshape_cat_kernel has been optimized with a new
loop-based approach that supports arbitrary num_v_heads / num_k_heads
ratios and batch sizes. The kernel now uses configurable ROWS_PER_ITER
for better memory utilization .
2. The optimized kernel now handles all scenarios directly without
requiring a fallback path using fix_query_key_value_ordering and
torch.cat.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is an internal optimization of the Triton kernel implementation
and does not introduce any user-facing changes.
### How was this patch tested?
CI is expected to pass with existing tests.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea
---------
Signed-off-by: songjianquan <songjianquan1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: songjianquan <songjianquan1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
This pull request refactors the speculative decoding proposer interface
to align with upstream vLLM, removing the local `Proposer` interface and
renaming methods to `propose`.
This is the first step. In the future we should remove the class
register and just add few Ascend specified method once the arch in vLLM
is ready.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR refactors sfa_v1.py to improve code readability and usability,
fixes a code bug, and enhances performance through the replacement of
certain operators.
### changes
- **improve code readability**: Optimizes parts of the code structure in
sfa_v1.py, supplementary comments for key code blocks, removes some
unused variables, and improves the naming of certain functions and
variables.
- **resolved a duplicated double write to k_cache**: Fixed redundant
double writes of k_cache in the indexer_select module (in both the
`forward` function and `indexer_select_post_process`), improving
performance to some extent.
- **replace `scatter` ops with `reshape_and_cache`**: This optimization
replaces two separate cache storage operations on `k_nope` and `k_pe`
with a single call to the `reshape_and_cache` operator, improving
performance. The original `scatter` operator involves reordering
slot_mapping for generality, introducing significant scalar
computations. In contrast, the `reshape_and_cache` operator eliminates
this redundant reordering step, thus reducing unnecessary computation
time and enhancing the operator's performance.
### performance comparison
4*A3, 1P1D, P dp2tp16, D dp8tp4, input/output: 64K/3K
origin:
TTFT: **28s**, TPOT: 26ms, TPS: **820 token/s**
fixed redundant double writes of k_cache:
TTFT: **24s**, TPOT: 26ms, TPS: **840 token/s**
replace scatter ops with reshape_and_cache:
TTFT: **24s**, TPOT: 26ms, TPS: **850 token/s**
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR add docs of batch invariance and make some extra operators
according to validation result.
please see https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5487 to
track progress.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The attention mechanism in the ViT model architecture of Qwen2.5VL
consists of two parts and does not support using cache to pass sequence
lengths.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
remove seq_lens_cache
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: tanhaoan333 <tanhaoan@huawei.com>
What this PR does / why we need it?
When using a draft model (e.g., in MTP speculative decoding) with shared
expert data parallelism (enabled via flashcomm), a shape mismatch error
occurs in the rotary embedding calculation for models like GLM-4.7. This
is because the positions tensor has an incorrect shape for this specific
configuration.
This PR fixes the issue by adding a check in
AscendRotaryEmbedding.forward_oot. If the model is a draft model and
shared expert DP is enabled, it processes the positions tensor using
torch.ops.vllm.maybe_all_gather_and_maybe_unpad to ensure its shape is
correct before applying the rotary embedding. This resolves the shape
mismatch error.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jiyang <zhujiyang2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When using the target model after rotational quantization, the
acceptance rate decreases because the fc weight of the draft model has
not undergone rotational quantization(issue: #6445). We fixed this issue
by performing rotation quantization on the fc weight of the draft model
in the same way as the main model when loading draft model.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: zhaomingyu <zhaomingyu13@h-partners.com>
## Summary
- Enhanced `check_gdn_layer()` function to properly detect GDN layers in
multimodal models
- Added support for checking `text_config.layer_types` in addition to
root-level `layer_types`
- Fixed potential None reference errors when `layer_types` attribute is
missing
## Changes
- Modified `vllm_ascend/utils.py`:
- Replaced `hasattr()` check with safer `getattr()` approach
- Added fallback to empty list when `layer_types` is None
- Added secondary check for `text_config.layer_types` to support models
like Qwen-Omni
## Motivation
Previous implementation only checked `layer_types` at the root config
level, which failed to detect GDN layers in multimodal models where this
information is nested under `text_config`. Additionally, it could raise
errors when `layer_types` was None.
---
Co-authored-by: wanghuanjun2113 <wanghuanjun2113@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wanghuanjun2113 <wanghuanjun2113@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
ds3.2 pcp supports the combination of MTP and chunkprefill features.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces global CPU slicing for Ascend NPUs to ensure
non-overlapping CPU partitions, addresses IRQ binding logical errors on
A3, and enhances the logic for determining total NPUs in CPU allocation.
These changes are necessary to optimize CPU resource management and
improve system stability.
- **Global CPU Slicing**: Introduced a global CPU slicing mechanism for
Ascend NPUs to ensure non-overlapping CPU partitions across multiple
processes or data parallel groups, preventing resource contention.
- **Improved IRQ Binding for A3 Devices**: Refined the IRQ binding logic
specifically for Ascend A3 devices, correctly mapping logical NPU IDs to
physical card and chip IDs for accurate npu-smi queries and preventing
multi-process overwrite of IRQ settings.
- **Enhanced NPU Count Determination**: Improved the logic for
determining the total number of logical NPUs, prioritizing NPU mapping
information to ensure more accurate CPU allocation.
- **Minimum CPU Requirement**: Established a minimum requirement of 5
CPUs per NPU for binding, reserving specific cores for IRQ, main, ACL,
and release operations to ensure stable operation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No user-facing changes are introduced.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing tests.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: c00818886 <chenchuwei@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request refactors the dispatch mechanism for the
**triton-ascend-specific operators** `insert_slice`, `extract_slice`,
and `get_element` to ensure compatibility with both CANN 8.5 and 9.0.
A unified helper function, `_resolve_triton_ascend_op`, has been
introduced in `vllm_ascend/ops/triton/triton_utils.py`. This function
dynamically resolves these operators by first attempting to import them
from the `triton.language.extra.cann.extension` module, which is present
in newer CANN versions. If that fails, it falls back to the standard
`triton.language` module.
This approach centralizes operator dispatch logic, allowing individual
Triton kernels to use these functions without being aware of the
underlying Triton/CANN version. All call sites have been updated to use
these new unified functions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is an internal refactoring of operator implementations and does
not introduce any user-facing changes.
### How was this patch tested?
CI is expected to pass with existing tests.
**Testing Context:**
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main: `15d76f74e2fdb12a95ea00f0ca283acf6219a2b7`
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- This PR fixes an issue with weight format conversion for unquantized
models running on Ascend 310P devices.
- The changes refactor the logic for converting weights to the
FRACTAL_NZ format. Previously, this was handled in a 310P-specific
linear layer implementation (`AscendUnquantizedLinearMethod310`). This
implementation has been removed, and the logic is now centralized in the
`maybe_trans_nz` utility function. This function now checks if the
device is a 310P and applies the NZ format cast accordingly for
`float16`/`bfloat16` weights.
- This refactoring simplifies the code by removing platform-specific
duplication and ensures correct weight handling for unquantized models
on 310P.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
ut and local test
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request is for quantization adaptation of Qwen3Omni, and it
achieves operator-level optimization and AUT (Auto-Quantization Tuning)
component optimization through patch-based modifications.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: tanhaoan333 <tanhaoan@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adapt the recompute feature to vLLM 0.16.0, where the D node forwards
recompute requests to the P node.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request introduces significant enhancements for 310P device
support, primarily by enabling W8A8S quantization and facilitating the
saving of models with W8A8SC state outputs. It provides an example
script for saving sharded and compressed model states, implements the
core W8A8S quantization method, and integrates metadata generation
within the 310P worker to accurately describe the quantization types of
saved parameters. These changes aim to improve efficiency and
compatibility for quantized models on 310P hardware.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
W8A8S accuarcy test and W8A8SC states save.
<img width="886" height="184" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9bcac54-1f69-4d3a-a5b8-221a147ef99d"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
`mxfp_compat` only provides dtype/symbol compatibility helpers for
different `torch_npu` versions, but it was placed under
`vllm_ascend.quantization`. Importing it from device/ops paths could
trigger `quantization/__init__.py` and pull in heavy quantization method
dependencies, increasing startup coupling and causing import-cycle risk
(especially on 310P paths).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No functional behavior change intended.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add muls_add triton kernel with related fusion pass. What's more, this
PR refactors `AscendCompilationConfig` and delete `NpugraphExConfig`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix a bug for PD disaggregate of PCP/DCP, some conditions only consider
MLA while ignoring DSA.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
- vLLM Ascend main: 81fb7d5779
Signed-off-by: tongyuzhou <tongyuzhou1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: tongyuzhou <tongyuzhou1@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
310p aclgraph mode, but has some problems:
- the event-id hardware limit, the num of graph will be limited.
- the cann version support this feature cannot be get from external of
huawei.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
local test
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Rework CpuAlloc.handle_no_affinity() to build available NUMA nodes
after allowed_cpus filtering, assign NPUs to NUMA nodes via round‑robin,
and split CPUs per NPU with disjoint slices for better balance.
- Improve bind_memory() robustness by deriving the target NUMA from each
NPU’s CPU pool, validating NUMA existence, and skipping binding when
data is missing.
- bind_memory() now only bind the single NUMA node that corresponds to
NPU id, instead of 2 NUMA nodes.
- Fix the issue that all NPUs bind to 0th NUMA node when DP16 due to
global NPU id is not visible across DP domain.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Added/updated unit tests:
test_cpu_binding.py
1. test_binding_mode_table covers A2 vs A3 binding mode mapping.
2. test_build_cpu_pools_fallback_to_numa_balanced covers fallback when
affinity info is missing.
3. TestBindingSwitch.test_is_arm_cpu covers ARM/x86/unknown arch
detection.
4. test_bind_cpus_skip_non_arm covers non‑ARM skip path in bind_cpus.
test_worker_v1.py
1. Updated mocks for enable_cpu_binding default True to align with new
config default.
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: chenchuw886 <chenchuw@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chenchuw886 <chenchuw@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
PR #5632 introduced a bug by replacing some branches gated by enable_sp
with enable_flash_comm_v1. As a result, when enable_shared_expert_dp is
enabled alone (i.e., VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_FLASHCOMM1=0 and
VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_FLASHCOMM=0), the behavior becomes inconsistent with
the previous logic and leads to accuracy issues. This PR restores the
original enable_sp-based branching to recover expected behavior and
accuracy.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
#### 1. start server
``` bash
vllm serve /home/weights/DeepSeek-V2-Lite-W8A8/ \
--port 8001 \
--served-model-name auto \
--max-model-len 1024 \
--enforce-eager \
--tensor-parallel-size 2 \
--data-parallel-size 2 \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.9 \
--enable-expert-parallel \
--additional-config '{"enable_shared_expert_dp": true}'
```
#### 2. curl
```bash
curl -s http://localhost:8001/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "auto",
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": "Hello. I have a question. Who are you?"}
],
"max_tokens": 10,
"temperature": 0.0,
"ignore_eos_token": true
}'
```
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
Signed-off-by: realliujiaxu <realliujiaxu@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This was meant to be merged in #6536, but I accidentally restored a
commit. You can find the relevant discussion
[here](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/6536#issuecomment-3882883471).
Since `self.pass_config.enable_sp` is forcibly set to `False` in the
[source
code](f176443446/vllm/config/compilation.py (L1066)),
this section will no longer verify whether the generated cudagraph
shapes are multiples of both `uniform_decode_query_len`
(`num_speculative_tokens + 1`) and `tensor_parallel_size`.
This PR enables the `num_speculative_tokens + 1` and
`tensor_parallel_size` check upfront. Therefore, it won't silently round
up the `cudagraph_size` and throw a cryptic error for the user.
A typical example of this cryptic error looks like:
```
ValueError: could not broadcast input array from shape (196,) into shape (14,)
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no.
### How was this patch tested?
Have passed all test.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support platform.get_device_uuid function.
currently, the pytorch.npu.get_device_properties return uuid as full
zero, vllm-ascend implement the interface at first, once the
pytorch.npu.get_device_properties return the real uuid, vllm-ascend will
support without modification.
more details see
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/6669
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea
root@localhost:/workspace/l00614971/vllm_test# python vllm_test.py
INFO 02-24 09:43:48 [__init__.py:43] Available plugins for group
vllm.platform_plugins:
INFO 02-24 09:43:48 [__init__.py:45] - ascend -> vllm_ascend:register
INFO 02-24 09:43:48 [__init__.py:48] All plugins in this group will be
loaded. Set `VLLM_PLUGINS` to control which plugins to load.
INFO 02-24 09:43:48 [__init__.py:217] Platform plugin ascend is
activated
device_uuid = 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: luomin2005 <luomin2005@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <56102866+liziyu179@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
There will be random ouputs if we run model with GDN attention in graph
mode:
```python
prompts = [
"1. Who are you?",
]
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.6, top_p=0.95, top_k=40, max_tokens=32)
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.0, top_p=0.95, top_k=40, max_tokens=5)
llm = LLM(model="/home/model/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct",
tensor_parallel_size=4,
distributed_executor_backend="mp",
gpu_memory_utilization=0.7,
speculative_config={
"method": "qwen3_next_mtp",
"num_speculative_tokens": 3,
},
compilation_config={
"cudagraph_mode": "FULL_DECODE_ONLY",
"cudagraph_capture_sizes": [8],
},
max_model_len=4096,
enable_prefix_caching=False)
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
prompt = output.prompt
generated_text = output.outputs[0].text
print(f"{output.prompt_token_ids=}")
print(f"{output.outputs[0].token_ids=}")
print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}")
```
Before appling this change, the outputs was:
```text
output.prompt_token_ids=[16, 13, 10479, 525, 498, 30]
output.outputs[0].token_ids=[3555, 323, 279, 1112, 279]
Prompt: '1. Who are you?', Generated text: ' What and the... the'
```
After applying this change, the output is:
```text
output.prompt_token_ids=[16, 13, 10479, 525, 498, 30]
output.outputs[0].token_ids=[3555, 374, 697, 829, 30]
Prompt: '1. Who are you?', Generated text: ' What is your name?'
```
**Why does this change sovle the problem?**
Now, `query_start_loc` is padded because of `fia`.
But, for `gdn-attention`, padded version of `query_start_loc` will cause
accuracy problem.
So, we need an unpadded version of `query_start_loc` named
`gdn_query_start_loc` and use it in `gdn-attention`, it works fine.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
As described aboved.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
Signed-off-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[Refactor][EAGLE] 7/N Merged PCP and disable_padded interface into
eagle_proposer.py
This pull request significantly refactors the speculative decoding
mechanism by merging Parallel Context Processing (PCP) and Multi-Token
Prediction (MTP) functionalities directly into the eagle_proposer.py.
The changes aim to enhance the efficiency and correctness of distributed
speculative decoding, particularly by enabling the Eagle feature to work
seamlessly with the disable_padded interface. This involves detailed
adjustments to attention metadata, input/output processing, and state
management to ensure proper operation in parallel environments.
1. The PCP and MTP features are migrated to the eagle_proposer.py
2. The Eagle and PCP features are integrated
3. Enable the eagle feature to use the disable_padded interface
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Tests and UT
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
**BUG**
When using prefill-decode disaggregation + MTP + full graph
+asynchronous scheduling, the KV cache pulled by decode nodes from
prefill decodes does not include spec tokens. As a result, the
total_num_scheduled_tokens obtained by decode nodes from the scheduler
lacks spec tokens. When determining whether to enqueue the full graph on
decode nodes, the condition for uniform_decode `
scheduler_output.total_num_scheduled_tokens == self.input_batch.num_reqs
* max_query_len` is not met, leading to the current instance not being
enqueued into the full graph.
The above situation leads to both full graph and eagle mode instances
coexisting in the decode instances. Due to the synchronization wait of
MoeDispatch, the decode instances in full graph are significantly slowed
down by the instance in eagle mode.
**Solution**
The scenario is PD separation + MTP + Full Graph + asynchronous
scheduling.
On the decode nodes, the spec tokens of the request with KV cache from P
need be padded. Then, the padded spec tokens will be rejected by
sampling. This operation ensures that the uniform_decode condition is
satisfied when determining whether decode nodes are included in the full
graph, thereby guaranteeing that all decode instances are present in the
full graph and avoiding synchronous waiting for MoeDispatch.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803
Signed-off-by: chenmenglong <chenmenglong1@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR performs a cleanup and update of the patch mechanism in
`vllm-ascend`.
- Removes several obsolete patches: `patch_deepseek.py`.
- Updates the central patch documentation in
`vllm_ascend/patch/__init__.py` to reflect these removals and additions,
re-numbering and re-organizing the patch list for better clarity.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. These are internal changes to the patching mechanism and should not
affect users.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request resolves an attention accuracy issue by enhancing the
AttentionMaskBuilder310 to correctly handle the maximum model length.
The change ensures that the attention mask generation process is
properly parameterized by the model's configuration, rather than relying
on a fixed internal value. This leads to more accurate attention mask
creation, which is crucial for the correct functioning of the attention
mechanism.
Update fused_moe to main branch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Qwen3 dense mode & moe model e2e test
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Part of #5304.
We have align with vLLM's latest change for `RotaryEmbeddingBase`. Don't
need this patch anymore.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: gcanlin <canlinguosdu@gmail.com>
## Summary
- Add automatic quantization format detection, eliminating the need to
manually specify `--quantization` when serving quantized models.
- The detection inspects only lightweight JSON files
(`quant_model_description.json` and `config.json`) at engine
initialization time, with no `.safetensors` reads.
- User-explicit `--quantization` flags are always respected;
auto-detection only applies when the flag is omitted.
## Details
**Detection priority:**
1. `quant_model_description.json` exists → `quantization="ascend"`
(ModelSlim)
2. `config.json` contains `"quant_method": "compressed-tensors"` →
`quantization="compressed-tensors"` (LLM-Compressor)
3. Neither → default float behavior
**Technical approach:**
Hooked into `NPUPlatform.check_and_update_config()` to run detection
after `VllmConfig.__post_init__`. Since `quant_config` is already `None`
at that point, we explicitly recreate it via
`VllmConfig._get_quantization_config()` to trigger the full quantization
initialization pipeline.
## Files Changed
| File | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `vllm_ascend/quantization/utils.py` | Added
`detect_quantization_method()` and `maybe_auto_detect_quantization()` |
| `vllm_ascend/platform.py` | Integrated auto-detection in
`check_and_update_config()` |
| `vllm_ascend/quantization/modelslim_config.py` | Improved error
handling for weight loading |
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd
---------
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
New FIA operator requires queryT equal to the last element of
actualSequenceLengthQ.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Passed existing test (test_mtp_eagle_correctness.py).
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea
---------
Signed-off-by: Wangbingjie <wangbj1207@126.com>
Signed-off-by: Wangbingjie <w30061490@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Wangbingjie <w30061490@china.huawei.com>
