3.0 KiB
license, library_name, pipeline_tag, language, tags, base_model, datasets
| license | library_name | pipeline_tag | language | tags | base_model | datasets | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| apache-2.0 | transformers | text-generation |
|
|
|
|
CRISP-Qwen3-8B-v1
Qwen3-8B trained with CRISP (Compressed Reasoning via Iterative Self-Policy Distillation) using the v1 conciseness teacher. Step-99 checkpoint.
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05433
CRISP teaches a reasoning model to think concisely by distilling its own concise behavior back into
itself: the teacher is the same model conditioned on a conciseness instruction, the student has no
instruction, and training minimizes per-token reverse KL from student to teacher on the student's own
rollouts (teacher refreshed every M=50 steps). No ground-truth answers, token budgets, or
difficulty estimators enter the loss.
This checkpoint uses the v1 teacher prompt: v1 (uniform): "Solve concisely and correctly. Be direct — avoid unnecessary elaboration, redundant steps, or restating the problem."
Other CRISP checkpoints: Qwen3-8B (v2), Qwen3-14B (v2), DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B (v2). Training data: pb09204048/CRISP.
Usage
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("pb09204048/CRISP-Qwen3-8B-v1")
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("pb09204048/CRISP-Qwen3-8B-v1", device_map="auto")
Benchmark results (Qwen3-8B)
Accuracy (mean@8, %) and token reduction (Red., % vs. base) at a 30K-token budget. Math is scored with
a dual-path grader (Answer: or \boxed{}); GPQA-Diamond and MMLU use exact letter-match. This
model is the CRISP (v1) row.
| Setting | MATH-500 | AIME 2024 | AIME 2025 | GPQA-D | MMLU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base | 95.7 / — | 76.2 / — | 70.4 / — | 61.5 / — | 81.9 / — |
| Concise prompt (v2) | 94.2 / 21.5% | 74.6 / 9.8% | 63.7 / 5.3% | 59.5 / 30.7% | 82.8 / 26.8% |
| Concise prompt (v1) | 95.6 / 38.9% | 74.2 / 20.2% | 62.1 / 13.9% | 56.8 / 29.5% | 83.0 / 26.8% |
| CRISP (v2) | 95.7 / 31.6% | 75.0 / 17.1% | 65.8 / 17.5% | 58.3 / 17.2% | 81.2 / 22.4% |
| CRISP (v1) | 95.7 / 56.9% | 72.9 / 32.9% | 58.8 / 28.4% | 58.5 / 36.2% | 80.9 / 44.7% |
Citation
@article{sang2026crisp,
title={Crisp: Compressed reasoning via iterative self-policy distillation},
author={Sang, Hejian and Xu, Yuanda and Zhou, Zhengze and He, Ran and Wang, Zhipeng and Sun, Jiachen},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05433},
year={2026}
}