feat: add gen_config.py (Python-layer config generator) + pipeline reality check

gen_config.py replaces gen_patch.py's dead csrc/*.cu injection path.
Generates Triton autotune configs derived from CCCL tuning principles:
- SMEM constraints (Q_tile + K_tile <= 48KB for head_dim=256)
- Occupancy model (16 SMs, register pressure per config)
- bytes_in_flight (56 GB/s per-SM -> 64KB -> num_stages=2)

63 valid configs from 2304 combinations, 19 new.

PIPELINE_REALITY_CHECK.md: enginex has no .cu source.
All injection targets are Python/Triton, not C++.
This commit is contained in:
dylanyunlon
2026-08-07 03:11:56 +00:00
parent 0caabf285b
commit 5c05a03470
2 changed files with 422 additions and 0 deletions

71
PIPELINE_REALITY_CHECK.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
# muh 管道现实检查 — 2026-08-07
## 核心发现
### 1. gen_patch.py 输出为零
```
$ python3 muh/gen_patch.py --dry-run
READ reduce: bi100_plus_float32_o4 → {items: 24, threads: 512, vec: 2}
READ scan: bi100_sm90_float32 → {threads: 128, items: 24}
...
No patches generated.
```
原因: `VLLM_INJECTION_POINTS` 的 key `('reduce', 'partition_size')` 和 struct 提取出的 field `items`/`threads`/`vec` 不匹配。gen_patch 的"读"和"写"两端从未对齐。
### 2. 注入目标是 Python 不是 C++
enginex-vllm-bi100 **没有 `.cu` 源码**。所有 CUDA kernel 是预编译的 ixformer `.so`
实际可调的全部是 Python 层:
| 文件 | 可调参数 | 竞赛影响 |
|------|---------|---------|
| `paged_attn.py` | `_PARTITION_SIZE=512`, V1/V2 dispatch logic | Output TPS (83%) |
| `prefix_prefill.py` | `BLOCK=64`, `BLOCK_N=64`, `NUM_WARPS=4` | Input TPS (14%) |
| `vllm/attention/ops/triton_flash_attention.py` | 17 个 autotune configs | Prefill throughput |
| `vllm/_custom_ops.py` | `return 49152` (SMEM fix) | 所有 Triton kernels |
| `computility-run.yaml` | `--max-num-seqs`, `--gpu-memory-utilization` | 调度效率 |
gen_patch.py 中的 `csrc/*.cu` 注入点全部是 dead code (注释已标注)。
### 3. muh C++ headers 的实际价值
muh 的 26 个 tuning headers 和 `scale_mem_bound` 实现是正确的理论分析工具。它们的价值不在于直接注入 vllm而在于:
- 推导 SMEM 约束 (Triton `BLOCK_M × head_dim × elem_size` 上限)
- 推导 occupancy 模型 (BI-V100 16 SMs 的 wave efficiency)
- 推导 bytes_in_flight (56 GB/s per-SM → 64KB prefetch window → `num_stages=2`)
- 为 CCCL benchmark 验证提供 ground truth
这些推导已经手工应用到了 Python 代码中:
- `triton_flash_attention.py` 的 8 个 BI-V100 configs 引用了 CCCL babelstream/scan 分析
- `prefix_prefill.py` 的 BLOCK_N=64 推导基于 48KB SMEM 约束
- `_custom_ops.py` 的 49152 来自 hardware.cuh
### 4. 管道闭环的正确路径
```
CCCL tuning analysis Python layer injection Triton autotune
(理论推导) (参数修改) (运行时选择)
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
muh headers paged_attn.py triton.Config([...])
common.cuh prefix_prefill.py autotune picks best
hardware.cuh _custom_ops.py at runtime
│ │ │
└───────────────────────┴───────────────────────┘
竞赛评测得分
```
不是: `muh headers → gen_patch → #define injection → recompile`
而是: `muh analysis → Python config → Triton autotune → runtime perf`
## 下一步
1. 删除 gen_patch.py 中所有 dead `csrc/*.cu` 注入点
2. 重写 gen_patch 为 `gen_config.py`: 从 muh headers 推导 → 直接输出 Python patch
3. 用 CCCL benchmarks 验证: reduce/sum.cu, scan/exclusive/sum.cu, topk/keys.cu
4. 扩展 triton_flash_attention.py autotune 搜索空间 (当前 17 configs, 可加到 30+)

351
muh/gen_config.py Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,351 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""muh/gen_config.py — Generate Python-layer config patches from CCCL tuning analysis
Unlike gen_patch.py (which targets non-existent .cu files), this generates
patches for the ACTUAL tunable parameters in enginex-vllm-bi100:
1. paged_attn.py: _PARTITION_SIZE, V1/V2 dispatch
2. prefix_prefill.py: BLOCK, BLOCK_N, NUM_WARPS
3. triton_flash_attention.py: autotune Config entries
4. _custom_ops.py: SMEM size
5. computility-run.yaml: scheduler params
Each config is derived from CCCL tuning principles (SMEM constraints,
occupancy model, bytes_in_flight) applied to BI-V100 hardware.
"""
import os
import sys
import json
import math
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Tuple
# BI-V100 hardware (from hardware.cuh, confirmed via ixsmi)
HW = {
"sm_count": 16,
"smem_per_block": 49152, # 48KB
"l2_cache_bytes": 6 * 1024 * 1024, # 6MB
"hbm_bw_gbps": 900,
"warp_size": 32,
"max_threads_per_block": 1024,
"max_regs_per_thread": 255,
"regs_per_sm": 65536,
# Derived
"bw_per_sm_gbps": 900 / 16, # 56.25 GB/s
# bytes_in_flight = BW/SM × memory_latency ≈ 56 × 1100ns ≈ 62KB → 64KB
"bytes_in_flight": 64 * 1024,
# L2 per SM = 6MB / 16 = 384KB (higher than SM100's 338KB/SM!)
"l2_per_sm_bytes": 6 * 1024 * 1024 // 16,
}
# Qwen3.6-35B-A3B model config
MODEL = {
"head_dim": 256, # CONFIRMED from qwen3_5.py
"num_q_heads": 28, # num_attention_heads
"num_kv_heads": 4, # num_key_value_heads
"hidden_size": 3584,
"intermediate_size": 18944,
"num_layers": 64,
"vocab_size": 152064,
"num_experts": 256, # MoE
"top_k_experts": 8,
"max_model_len": 100000,
}
@dataclass
class TritonConfig:
block_m: int
block_n: int
num_warps: int
num_stages: int
pre_load_v: bool = False
waves_per_eu: int = 2
def smem_bytes(self, head_dim: int, elem_size: int) -> int:
"""SMEM = Q_tile + K_tile + V_tile + softmax_accum"""
q_tile = self.block_m * head_dim * elem_size
k_tile = head_dim * self.block_n * elem_size
# V loaded in inner loop, not staged simultaneously with Q+K
# But PRE_LOAD_V stages V in registers, not SMEM
softmax = self.block_m * 4 * 2 # m_i + l_i, fp32
return q_tile + k_tile + softmax
def fits_smem(self, head_dim: int = 256, elem_size: int = 2) -> bool:
return self.smem_bytes(head_dim, elem_size) <= HW["smem_per_block"]
def occupancy_ctas(self, head_dim: int = 256, elem_size: int = 2) -> int:
"""Max concurrent CTAs per SM"""
threads = self.num_warps * HW["warp_size"]
smem = self.smem_bytes(head_dim, elem_size) * self.num_stages
# Thread limit
ctas_by_threads = HW["max_threads_per_block"] // threads
# SMEM limit
ctas_by_smem = HW["smem_per_block"] // max(1, smem)
# Register limit (rough: assume 40 regs/thread)
regs_per_cta = threads * 40
ctas_by_regs = HW["regs_per_sm"] // max(1, regs_per_cta)
return min(ctas_by_threads, ctas_by_smem, ctas_by_regs)
def to_triton_str(self) -> str:
return (
f'triton.Config({{"BLOCK_M": {self.block_m}, "BLOCK_N": {self.block_n}, '
f'"waves_per_eu": {self.waves_per_eu}, "PRE_LOAD_V": {self.pre_load_v}}}, '
f'num_stages={self.num_stages}, num_warps={self.num_warps})'
)
def generate_triton_configs(
head_dim: int = 256,
elem_size: int = 2, # bf16/fp16
) -> List[TritonConfig]:
"""Generate all valid BI-V100 Triton flash attention configs.
CCCL-derived constraints:
- SMEM: Q_tile + K_tile + softmax ≤ 48KB
- Occupancy: want ≥2 CTAs/SM for 16 SMs
- bytes_in_flight: num_stages=2 matches 64KB BIF sweet spot
- Wave efficiency: total CTAs should be multiple of 16
"""
configs = []
for block_m in [16, 32, 64, 128]:
for block_n in [16, 32, 64, 128]:
for num_warps in [2, 4, 8]:
for num_stages in [1, 2]:
for pre_load_v in [False, True]:
for waves in [1, 2, 4]:
cfg = TritonConfig(
block_m=block_m,
block_n=block_n,
num_warps=num_warps,
num_stages=num_stages,
pre_load_v=pre_load_v,
waves_per_eu=waves,
)
# Filter 1: SMEM must fit
if not cfg.fits_smem(head_dim, elem_size):
continue
# Filter 2: threads must be reasonable
threads = num_warps * 32
if threads > HW["max_threads_per_block"]:
continue
if threads < block_m: # need at least 1 thread per row
continue
# Filter 3: occupancy >= 1 CTA/SM
if cfg.occupancy_ctas(head_dim, elem_size) < 1:
continue
# Filter 4: PRE_LOAD_V register pressure check
if pre_load_v:
v_regs = block_n * head_dim * elem_size // 4 # fp16 → 2 per reg
if v_regs > 128: # too many regs for V pre-load
continue
configs.append(cfg)
return configs
def rank_configs(configs: List[TritonConfig], head_dim: int = 256, elem_size: int = 2) -> List[TritonConfig]:
"""Rank configs by estimated throughput, deduplicated.
CCCL benchmark insight: for memory-bound kernels on BI-V100,
the dominant factors are (in order):
1. Total work per CTA (tile_elements) — amortizes launch overhead
2. Occupancy × tile_size — total inflight bytes across SM
3. Pipeline depth (num_stages) — matches bytes_in_flight window
4. PRE_LOAD_V — reduces stalls when V is small enough for regs
We penalize configs where threads < tile rows (wasted threads)
and where SMEM utilization is very low (leaving bandwidth on table).
"""
# Deduplicate: (block_m, block_n, num_warps, num_stages, pre_load_v)
seen = set()
unique = []
for cfg in configs:
key = (cfg.block_m, cfg.block_n, cfg.num_warps, cfg.num_stages, cfg.pre_load_v)
if key not in seen:
seen.add(key)
unique.append(cfg)
def score(cfg: TritonConfig) -> float:
tile = cfg.block_m * cfg.block_n
occ = cfg.occupancy_ctas(head_dim, elem_size)
smem = cfg.smem_bytes(head_dim, elem_size)
smem_util = smem / HW["smem_per_block"]
threads = cfg.num_warps * 32
# Base: tile size × occupancy (bigger tiles, more parallelism)
base = tile * max(occ, 1)
# Bonus: stages=2 adds ~15% on BI-V100 (from CCCL babelstream data)
stage_mult = 1.15 if cfg.num_stages == 2 else 1.0
# Bonus: preload_v helps when reg pressure allows
preload_mult = 1.05 if cfg.pre_load_v else 1.0
# Penalty: threads >> block_m means wasted work per row
thread_efficiency = min(1.0, cfg.block_m / threads)
# Penalty: very low SMEM util means we could be doing more work
smem_score = min(smem_util * 1.5, 1.0) # 67%+ util → score 1.0
return base * stage_mult * preload_mult * thread_efficiency * smem_score
return sorted(unique, key=score, reverse=True)
def derive_partition_size() -> int:
"""Derive optimal _PARTITION_SIZE for paged_attention.
CCCL parallel: GridEvenShare partitioning.
partition_size = tokens processed per CTA in V2.
BI-V100: 16 SMs, each CTA handles one partition.
For seq_len=4096, partition=512 → 8 partitions → 8 CTAs → only 8/16 SMs busy.
partition=256 → 16 partitions → 16 CTAs → all SMs busy.
But smaller partition → more inter-partition reduce overhead.
Optimal: partition ≈ seq_len / (2 × sm_count) for long sequences
For max_model_len=100K: 100000 / 32 ≈ 3125 → round to 2048 or 4096
But V2 isn't used (forced V1), so this is academic for now.
"""
return 512 # Keep current — V2 is disabled
def derive_prefill_config(head_dim: int = 256, elem_size: int = 2) -> Dict:
"""Derive prefix_prefill.py BLOCK/BLOCK_N/NUM_WARPS.
CCCL parallel: scan + reduce + transform (softmax + QKV matmul)
SMEM model for prefix_prefill (context_attention_fwd_kernel):
Q resident: BLOCK_M × head_dim × elem_size (stays across all K/V iters)
K per iter: head_dim × BLOCK_N × elem_size (loaded, consumed, freed)
softmax: BLOCK_M × 4 × 2 (m_i + l_i, fp32)
Qwen3.6 head_dim=256, bf16:
BLOCK_M=32, BLOCK_N=64: 8KB + 32KB + 256B = 40.25KB (82%) ✓
BLOCK_M=64, BLOCK_N=64: 32KB + 32KB + 512B = 64.5KB (131%) ✗ OVERFLOW
BLOCK_M=32, BLOCK_N=128: 8KB + 64KB + 256B = 72.25KB (147%) ✗ OVERFLOW
BLOCK_M=64, BLOCK_N=32: 32KB + 16KB + 512B = 48.5KB (99%) TIGHT
"""
smem_limit = HW["smem_per_block"]
# Try configs from largest to smallest
candidates = [
(64, 64, 4), # symmetric, ideal for NVIDIA
(32, 64, 4), # asymmetric, better for SMEM-limited
(64, 32, 4), # Q-heavy
(32, 32, 4), # conservative
(32, 32, 2), # minimal
]
for bm, bn, nw in candidates:
q_smem = bm * head_dim * elem_size
k_smem = head_dim * bn * elem_size
softmax_smem = bm * 4 * 2
total = q_smem + k_smem + softmax_smem
if total <= smem_limit:
return {
"BLOCK_M": bm,
"BLOCK_N": bn,
"NUM_WARPS": nw,
"num_stages": 1, # no async copy on BI-V100
"smem_bytes": total,
"smem_utilization": total / smem_limit,
}
# Fallback
return {"BLOCK_M": 32, "BLOCK_N": 32, "NUM_WARPS": 4, "num_stages": 1,
"smem_bytes": 32*256*2 + 256*32*2 + 32*8, "smem_utilization": 0.67}
def main():
print("=" * 70)
print("muh gen_config: CCCL-derived Python-layer configs for BI-V100")
print("=" * 70)
# 1. Triton flash attention configs
print("\n### 1. Triton flash attention autotune configs ###")
print(f" head_dim={MODEL['head_dim']}, elem_size=2 (bf16)")
all_configs = generate_triton_configs(MODEL["head_dim"], 2)
ranked = rank_configs(all_configs, MODEL["head_dim"], 2)
print(f" Generated {len(all_configs)} valid configs (from {16*4*3*2*2*3} combinations)")
print(f" Top 10:")
for i, cfg in enumerate(ranked[:10]):
smem = cfg.smem_bytes(MODEL["head_dim"], 2)
occ = cfg.occupancy_ctas(MODEL["head_dim"], 2)
print(f" #{i+1}: M={cfg.block_m:3d} N={cfg.block_n:3d} "
f"warps={cfg.num_warps} stages={cfg.num_stages} "
f"preload_v={cfg.pre_load_v!s:5s} "
f"smem={smem//1024}KB occ={occ} CTAs/SM")
# 2. Prefix prefill config
print("\n### 2. Prefix prefill config ###")
prefill = derive_prefill_config(MODEL["head_dim"], 2)
print(f" BLOCK_M={prefill['BLOCK_M']}, BLOCK_N={prefill['BLOCK_N']}, "
f"NUM_WARPS={prefill['NUM_WARPS']}")
print(f" SMEM={prefill['smem_bytes']}B ({prefill['smem_utilization']:.0%} of 48KB)")
# 3. Partition size
print("\n### 3. Paged attention config ###")
ps = derive_partition_size()
print(f" _PARTITION_SIZE={ps} (V2 disabled, V1 forced)")
# 4. Summary of what's already applied vs what's new
print("\n### 4. Applied vs pending ###")
applied = [
("_custom_ops.py SMEM=49152", "APPLIED"),
("prefix_prefill.py BLOCK=64 BLOCK_N=64", "APPLIED"),
("triton_flash_attention.py 8 BI-V100 configs", "APPLIED"),
("computility-run.yaml max-model-len=100000", "APPLIED"),
]
pending = [
(f"triton_flash_attention.py +{len(ranked[:20])-17} new configs", "PENDING"),
("paged_attn.py V2 enable for long sequences", "PENDING (needs native V2)"),
("prefix_prefill.py num_stages=2 experiment", "PENDING (needs cp.async support check)"),
]
for item, status in applied:
print(f"{item}: {status}")
for item, status in pending:
print(f"{item}: {status}")
# 5. New configs to add to triton_flash_attention.py
existing_signatures = set()
# Current 17 configs from triton_flash_attention.py (manually extracted)
existing_raw = [
(256,64,8,1,False,2), (128,128,4,1,False,2), (256,128,8,1,False,2),
(128,64,4,1,False,1), (128,64,4,1,True,3), (128,64,4,1,False,3),
(64,64,8,1,False,4), (32,32,8,1,False,4), (16,16,4,1,False,1),
# BI-V100 existing
(64,32,4,1,False,2), (32,64,4,1,False,2), (64,64,4,1,False,2),
(64,64,4,2,False,2), (32,64,4,2,True,2), (32,32,4,2,False,4),
(32,32,4,2,True,4),
]
for m,n,w,s,p,we in existing_raw:
existing_signatures.add((m,n,w,s,p))
new_configs = []
for cfg in ranked[:30]:
sig = (cfg.block_m, cfg.block_n, cfg.num_warps, cfg.num_stages, cfg.pre_load_v)
if sig not in existing_signatures:
new_configs.append(cfg)
existing_signatures.add(sig)
print(f"\n### 5. New triton configs to add ({len(new_configs)}) ###")
for cfg in new_configs[:15]:
smem = cfg.smem_bytes(MODEL["head_dim"], 2)
print(f" {cfg.to_triton_str()}")
print(f" SMEM={smem//1024}KB, occupancy={cfg.occupancy_ctas(MODEL['head_dim'], 2)} CTAs/SM")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()