A 125.8M-parameter, Llama-style language model pretrained from scratch on a
cleaned, deduplicated, and decontaminated legal + financial corpus. Give it the
start of a sentence and it continues in the legal/financial register.
This is a base completer, not a chat model. It was trained on next-token
prediction only, so it continues text rather than answering questions.
Model details
Parameters
125,847,552 (~125.8M)
Architecture
Llama-style (LlamaForCausalLM)
Layers
12
Hidden size
768
Attention heads
12 (head dim 64), MHA (12 KV heads)
MLP
SwiGLU, inner 3072
Normalization
RMSNorm, pre-norm
Positional
RoPE (theta 10000)
Context length
1024
Vocab
16,384 (byte-level BPE, trained from scratch)
Embeddings
tied (input = output)
Precision
bf16
Training data
A ~2.04B-token corpus built from three public, ungated sources, streamed and
filtered through a deterministic cleaning + dedup + decontamination pipeline:
The corpus was decontaminated against CaseHOLD / LexGLUE (13-gram overlap removed)
and deduplicated (exact + MinHash/LSH near-duplicate removal).
Training recipe
Knob
Value
Objective
next-token cross-entropy
Hardware
8× H100 (single-node DDP)
Epochs
1 (~2.04B tokens seen)
Optimizer
AdamW, betas (0.9, 0.95), weight decay 0.1
LR
6e-4 → 6e-5, cosine decay, 200M-token warmup
Global batch
~524,288 tokens/step
Grad clip
1.0
Steps
3,889
Results
Held-out validation perplexity: 11.01 (val loss 2.42) on a 1% held-out split
(20.6M tokens). Perplexity was still descending at the end of the single epoch
(step 2000 → 12.54, step 3000 → 11.27, final → 11.01), so additional epochs would
lower it further. Total compute cost to train: **$11**.
Usage
fromtransformersimportAutoModelForCausalLM,AutoTokenizertok=AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("Sudhanshu1985/slm-125m-base")model=AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("Sudhanshu1985/slm-125m-base")prompt="The plaintiff alleges that the defendant"inputs=tok(prompt,return_tensors="pt")out=model.generate(**inputs,max_new_tokens=80,min_new_tokens=40,do_sample=True,temperature=0.8,top_p=0.95,top_k=40,repetition_penalty=1.3,)print(tok.decode(out[0],skip_special_tokens=True))
Example completions
"The plaintiff alleges that the defendant" → "breached its contract of employment... In order to prove fraud, a party must show: (1) The existence of a confidential relationship; (2) the absence or violation by one party of any duty owed..."
"Pursuant to the terms of this Agreement," → "the parties have agreed as follows: 1. ...all disputes... shall be subject to the jurisdiction of said Court..."
"The Company's net revenues for the fiscal year" → "ended September 30, 1996 were $305.1 million. The operating loss in fiscal 1995 was primarily attributable to..."
Limitations
Base completer, not a chatbot. It continues text; it does not follow
instructions or answer questions.
Does not know facts. At 125M parameters a model holds only a small amount of
usable knowledge; grounded facts would require retrieval (RAG).
Domain-biased. It speaks the legal register fluently; non-legal prompts drift
toward that register.
Trained on US legal/financial + educational web text; may reflect biases in those
sources. Not legal or financial advice.
Provenance
Pretrained from random weights (nothing fine-tuned). Pipeline: stream 3 datasets →
rule-based cleaning → dedup + decontaminate → 16K byte-level BPE → pack 1024-token
windows → pretrain on 8× H100. Based on the Vizuara AI Labs
slm-125m-from-scratch recipe.