Model: RefinedNeuro/VibeThinker-3B-Hermes-GGUF Source: Original Platform
license, base_model, datasets, language, pipeline_tag, tags
| license | base_model | datasets | language | pipeline_tag | tags | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| apache-2.0 | WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B |
|
|
text-generation |
|
👉 Newer model: RefinedToolCall-V5-3B — multi-turn agentic ~3.7×, single-turn 0.707, recovery 0.896, reasoning intact.
ollama run refinedneuro/refinedtoolcallv5-3b
VibeThinker-3B-Hermes — GGUF (Research Preview)
⚠️ Research preview / experimental. Read Limitations before use. Known issues: repetition loops on out-of-distribution multi-turn input, and over-eagerness to call tools.
GGUF quantizations of a LoRA fine-tune of
WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B that adds
Hermes-style function calling (<think>…</think> + <tool_call>…</tool_call>) while
preserving reasoning. See the full (transformers) model card for training details and
benchmarks.
Files
| File | Quant | Size |
|---|---|---|
…-Q6_K.gguf |
Q6_K | 2.4 GB |
…-Q8_0.gguf |
Q8_0 | 3.1 GB |
…-f16.gguf |
F16 | 5.8 GB |
Why only Q6_K and up? We measured tool-call fidelity on a multi-step agentic task: Q6_K, Q8_0 and F16 pass; Q3/Q4/Q5 fail (they emit malformed/incomplete tool calls and can loop). Since this is a tool-calling model, the lower quants were removed to avoid shipping a broken experience. Use Q6_K for the best size/quality balance.
Usage (llama.cpp)
# use Q6_K+ for tool-calling
llama-cli -m VibeThinker-3B-Hermes-Q6_K.gguf \
--temp 0.6 --top-p 0.95 --repeat-penalty 1.1 \
-p "<your Hermes-formatted prompt>"
Recommended settings
- Use a stop on
</tool_call>for single-call settings — essential to avoid the model appending duplicate/hallucinated calls. - temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, repeat-penalty ≈ 1.1.
- Stop tokens:
<|im_end|>(151645) and<|endoftext|>(151643). - Hermes system prompt with a
<tools>block; the model emits<think>…</think>then<tool_call>\n{"name": …, "arguments": …}\n</tool_call>.
Benchmarks (summary)
- Reasoning (AIME 2024): base avg@4 0.842 → this model 0.783; pass@4 0.867 unchanged.
- Tool-calling (BFCL single-turn, with stop fix): live_simple ~60 %, live_multiple ~31 %, live_relevance 87.5 %, live_irrelevance ~34 % (over-eager).
Limitations
- Repetition loops on OOD multi-turn input (emits the same call many times; avg ~25 calls/turn
vs ~1.3 expected). Mitigate with
stop=["</tool_call>"]+ repeat-penalty. - Over-eager to call tools (does not always decline when it should).
- Single-turn exact-match is poor without the stop fix.
- ~6-pt avg@4 reasoning dip vs base; trained 1 epoch on one dataset config.
Not recommended for production agents as-is.
License
Apache-2.0. Built on WeiboAI/VibeThinker-3B and lambda/hermes-agent-reasoning-traces
(both Apache-2.0).