### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch bump the mooncake version to the latest
[release](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/releases/tag/v0.3.8.post1)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
test is locally
>>> from mooncake.engine import TransferEngine
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request integrates comprehensive support for Mixture of
Experts (MoE) models on the Ascend 310P device within the vllm-ascend
framework. It achieves this by introducing specialized modules for
expert selection, fused MoE layers, and optimized all-gather
communication. The changes also refine existing NPU operations, making
them more consistent and efficient for 310P, ultimately enhancing the
performance and compatibility of MoE models on this hardware.
Highlights
310P MoE Support: Introduces dedicated implementations for Mixture of
Experts (MoE) models on Ascend 310P devices, including new modules for
expert selection, fused MoE layers, and communication.
All-Gather Communication: Enforces the use of ALLGATHER communication
for MoE operations on 310P, optimizing data transfer and leveraging
NPU-specific token dispatching.
Simplified NPU Operations: Removes conditional type casting for
npu_swiglu and enables custom rotary embedding kernels unconditionally,
suggesting improved native support for 310P.
New MoE Classes Registered: Registers AscendFusedMoE310 and
AscendSharedFusedMoE310 to integrate 310P-specific MoE layers into the
system's custom operation registry.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
offline test and server test, with qwen3-30b-a3b,tp/ep 4 on 310p
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0
---------
Signed-off-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Backport 0.13.0 release note to main branch and update related doc link
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
yes
### How was this patch tested?
by doc CI
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR updates the CI runner from `linux-aarch64-a2-*` to
`linux-aarch64-a2b3-*` in various test configuration files. This change
is necessary to adapt to updates in the CI infrastructure.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The changes are configuration updates for CI tests. The correctness will
be verified by the CI pipeline.
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the incorrect use of the `output` parameter in
`_forward_fia_slidingwindow`:
```
# Original (incorrect)
output, _ = torch_npu.npu_fused_infer_attention_score(...)
output= output.view(batch_size, self.num_heads, self.head_size)
```
In the original writing, the `output `parameter was directly assigned a
new value, which is inconsistent with the interface definition,
resulting in the inability to directly update `output `when calling
externally.
```
attn_output, _ = torch_npu.npu_fused_infer_attention_score(...)
attn_output = attn_output.view(batch_size, self.num_heads, self.head_size)
output[:batch_size] = attn_output[:batch_size]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No change.
Co-authored-by: GoCHug<gch59135228@163.com>
### How was this patch tested?
vLLM ascend version: v0.13.0rc1
Signed-off-by: acat-rw <892882856@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When running the Qwen3-0.6B model using the npugraph_ex backend, the
last few characters of the generated results changed. We have modified
the relevant test cases to ensure the CI runs smoothly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0
---------
Signed-off-by: chencangtao <chencangtao@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chencangtao <chencangtao@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes an accuracy issue that occurs when using Prefill/Decode
Context Parallelism (PCP/DCP) in conjunction with speculative decoding
(MTP). The issue is caused by an irregular attention mask shape when
both features are enabled.
The fix involves flattening the `block_table` for speculative decoding
requests under PCP/DCP to ensure a regular attention mask. This PR also
introduces a `use_cp` property for cleaner code and updates dummy runs
to handle this scenario correctly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is a bug fix that improves accuracy and should not have
user-facing API changes.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0
---------
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
**Optimization:** Replaces fixed block sizes (128x128x128) in
`linear_persistent_kernel` with adaptive selection logic that considers:
- Matrix dimensions (M, N, K)
- Device NPU vector core count
- Data type (float32 vs others)
**Why:** Fixed block sizes lead to suboptimal hardware utilization
across different matrix shapes. Adaptive sizing maximizes occupancy and
memory efficiency for varied workload patterns, improving throughput for
batch-invariant linear operations in LLM inference.
**Details:**
- Small matrices (M < 256): Size-proportional allocation
- Medium matrices (256 ≤ M < 1024): Balanced distribution based on grid
capacity
- Large matrices (M ≥ 1024): Optimized for dominant dimension
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is a performance optimization. The API and numerical results
remain unchanged; only kernel execution efficiency improves.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0
Signed-off-by: DDCHY <843049740@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: zjchenn <zjchenn@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: DDCHY <843049740@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR reverts "[ModelRunner] Revert [Fix] Pads query_start_loc to
satisfy FIA/TND constraint #6459 (commit
5b0a6bcfe9)" and fixes a check in
`model_runner_v1`.
**A key change is that we remove the strict assertion in the latest
commit, as it turns out MLA + PIECEWISE will slice during computing,
leaving our assertion uncalled for and will only cause false alarm.**
This handles both uniform and mixed batches (by inserting a dummy
request for mixed batches), consolidates ad-hoc padding into a single
helper, copies the updated buffer to the device, which prevents kernel
mismatches or failures and ensure correct shapes for FIA/TND execution
in full graph modes.
We currently place this helper in `execute_model`. My original design
was to include it in `_prepare_inputs`, but that doesn’t work because it
must run after padding. While I’d prefer to minimize the impact and
reuse as much of the base class as possible in the future, it doesn’t
seem achievable at the moment.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
Test cases added.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces four new patterns to support the fusion of RMSNorm
and DynamicQuant operators. After replacing the fusion operators, the
execution time has been reduced from 22.8us to 16.9us.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
d7de043d55
Signed-off-by: Bryan <250470359+Zhang-Bryan@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Following [PR
#4233](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/4233), a
synchronization mechanism was introduced between steps in asynchronous
scheduling with ACL Graph to address a hanging issue. However, full
device-level synchronization is unnecessary—only the operations on the
current stream need to be synchronized. Otherwise, if other background
operations (such as send and recv) are running concurrently, they may
negatively impact inference performance for the instance.
hang problem
Synchronizing only the current stream can also resolve the hang issue.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: For_YL <zhangtangwei@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: For_YL <zhangtangwei@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR enhances the test_deepseek3_2_w8a8_pruning_mtp_tp2_ep E2E test
by adding both short and long prompt test cases:
- Short test: Validates basic functionality with minimal input ("Hello
")
- Long test: Validates the model can handle prompts near its maximum
context length (~163K tokens, approaching the max_position_embeddings
limit of 163,840)
Additionally, explicitly sets max_model_len=163840 to ensure the test
properly exercises the model's full context window capability.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This change only affects internal E2E testing infrastructure.
### How was this patch tested?
The modified test case will be executed as part of the E2E test suite
and has been validated
[here](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21620195055/job/62308026205?pr=6499).
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0
Signed-off-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor MLP weight prefetch to consistency with MoE Model's prefetching
in terms of code and usage.
Environments VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_PREFETCH_MLP,
VLLM_ASCEND_MLP_DOWN_PREFETCH_SIZE and
VLLM_ASCEND_MLP_GATE_UP_PREFETCH_SIZE is removed, usage as following:
--additional-config '{"weight_prefetch_config": { "enabled": true,
"prefetch_ratio": {"mlp": { "gate_up": 1.0, "down": 1.0} }}}'
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When the draft model also uses vllmbackend for graph compilation, the
fusion pass registration occurs again, resulting in errors due to
duplicate patterns.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0
---------
Signed-off-by: chencangtao <chencangtao@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chencangtao <chencangtao@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Allreduce rmsnorm fusion pass has an additional check condition, which
requires fusion of the Fx graph only when the start of compile_range is
greater than 512. We previously overlooked this check.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: chencangtao <chencangtao@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chencangtao <chencangtao@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove kv_cache nz test case for test_mla_preprocess_nq.py. This case is
added by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/3072 but has
not been tested on bf16 scenario. Results show that this is not
currently supported.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[CI] Update doctest from 0.9.1 to 0.13.0, and copy doc test workflow to
nightly CI for better monitor.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add E2E for Prefix Caching cp & Chunked Prefill cp
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: F.Liu <liufeng248@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Liu <46866849+ader47@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: F.Liu <liufeng248@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Suffix Decoding is a CPU-based speculative decoding optimization that
accelerates inference by pattern matching and frequency-based prediction
from both prompts and generated content.
This document provides a step-by-step guide for deploying and evaluating
**Suffix Speculative Decoding** on the **Ascend** platform. By analyzing
performance gains across diverse datasets, it demonstrates the
significant advantages of this technology in inference acceleration. Our
goal is to empower developers to achieve high-efficiency model
optimization using Ascend hardware.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: zhangmuzhibangde <1037640609@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix a bug in the repo and add a test case for MTP + Full Decode Only +
Qwen3Next.
The _build_dummy_attn_metadata function in NPUModelRunner seems losed a
query_star_loc.copy_to_gpu operation, which will lead to difference
between query_start_loc and query_start_loc_cpu, and they are required
to be same in MTP + Full Decode Only + Qwen3Next case.
Before this pr:
`self.query_start_loc = [0, 0, 0, 0, ... , 0]
self.query_start_loc_cpu = [0, 2, 4, 6, ... ,128]`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Introduced 310P W8A8 Quantization Support: New modules and methods have
been added to enable W8A8 static quantization specifically for the
Ascend 310P platform.
Platform-Specific Quantization Configuration Loading: The system now
dynamically loads the appropriate quantization configurations
(AscendCompressedTensorsConfig, AscendModelSlimConfig) based on whether
the current hardware is an Ascend 310P device.
Implemented AscendW8A8LinearMethod310P: A dedicated linear quantization
method for 310P is provided, handling the specifics of weight and
activation quantization, including input parameter broadcasting and
weight data manipulation.
Extended AscendModelSlimConfig for 310P: A specialized configuration
class for 310P integrates the new W8A8 linear method for both standard
linear layers and vocabulary parallel embeddings, ensuring proper
quantization application.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxu Cheng <2906339855@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
As #2947 describe, we need to transpose kv cache layout after GQA kv
transfer when prefill and decode tensor parallel size are heterogeneous,
in the previous implementation, we use `npu_paged_cache_load ` +
`tranpose` + `_npu_reshape_and_cache` to do this work.
But obviously, it is not an efficient plan, the ops above need to be
called for each layer, which introduces 3 * layer_num kernel launch, and
6 * layer_num data movement between L1 Cache and HBM for one request on
decode node. Usually, decode node uses graph mode, so these op kernels
will be called between decode forward launched by an async thread in
mooncacke connector, this kernels maybe last for several decode forward
and TTFT will increase by 3~4 decode forward time.
In this PR, we implement an AscendC fused op
`transpose_kv_cache_by_block` to do this with only once kernel launch
and move data between L1 Cache and HBM only once.
After using this fused op, the time cost in transpose kv cacke layout
can be decreased to 0.24ms from 7ms in UT on 910C, and in PD
disaggregation scenario, TTFT can decrease about 90 ~ 110 ms in
qwen3-235B.
| request_num | original | fused_op|
|:----------------------:|:---------------:|:-------------------:|
| 1 | 643 ms | 578 ms |
| 128 | 1480 ms | 1368 ms |
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Use fused op by default, incase the op has bug in any scenario, provide
fallback choice using env to disable it.
**DISABLE fused op by add following env**
`export VLLM_ASCEND_FUSION_OP_TRANSPOSE_KV_CACHE_BY_BLOCK=0`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: lidenghui <lidenghui1110@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Disable the feature to exit early upon encountering an error in order
to complete all tests.
2. Within each partition, tests are re-sorted by `estimated_time` in
ascending order. This allows the CI to cover as many test cases as
possible in the early stages.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add New Output for Expert Token Count
An additional output tensor expert_token_nums is added to both operators
to meet the requirement of tracking token distribution among experts:
Tensor Name: expert_token_nums
Dimension: 1D tensor
Shape: (local_expert_num,)
Data Type: int32
Semantics: Represents the number of tokens actually received by each
expert on the current card.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: guanguan0308 <1546542263@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: guanguan0308 <162653673+guanguan0308@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Improve Triton stability on Ascend for large grids
set `TRITON_ALL_BLOCKS_PARALLEL=1` when grids > 65535
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[Bugfix] fix hash conflict due to reset incompatible configuations
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
# What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR reverts commit 8134146ab6, which
modified the DeepSeek V3.2 (W8A8) single-node nightly test
configuration. as there is no limit between tp_size and MTP.
# Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. This PR only affects CI/CD test configurations and does not
introduce any user-facing changes.
# How was this patch tested?
N/A for a revert PR. The changes restore the previously known working
configuration.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0
Signed-off-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Added a check in the may_reinitialize_input_batch method to verify
whether the backend implements the get_supported_block_size method
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no user-facing change
### How was this patch tested?
Only a few lines of code within the methods were modified, and the
format check test has been passed.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: Debuuuuger <huangzr@cmbchina.com>
Signed-off-by: debuger <102402761+huangazazaz@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Debuuuuger <12110718@mail.sustech.edu.cn>
Co-authored-by: Debuuuuger <huangzr@cmbchina.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Overview: This pull request refactors speculative decoding for Eagle and
MTP proposers on Ascend hardware. It fixes a bug related to
draft_attn_metadatas being lost, migrates the lmhead feature, and adds
routing logic in MtpProposer.
Details:
1. Migrated the lmhead feature from mtp to eagle and normalized it in
eagle_proposer.
2. Fixed the bug where draft_attn_metadatas was lost after enabling
eagle mode in the merge graph.
3. Added the routing for pcp and disable padded drafter batch; in mtp
mode, if pcp and disable padded drafter batch are not enabled, the
normalized file eagle_proposer will be used.
RFC: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5467
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
ut and test
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When using Mooncake on Ascend NPU, AscendDirectTransport randomly
allocates ports within range `[20000, 20000 + npu_per_node × 1000)`.
Reference:
[ascend_direct_transport.cpp#L554](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/blob/v0.3.7.post2/mooncake-transfer-engine/src/transport/ascend_transport/ascend_direct_transport/ascend_direct_transport.cpp#L475)
If `kv_port` overlaps with this range, users may encounter intermittent
startup failures:
```bash
zmq.error.ZMQError: Address already in use (addr='tcp://x.x.x.x:30012')
RuntimeError: KV Cache sending/receiving thread failed to start.
```
This pr fix intermittent kv_port conflict with AscendDirectTransport in
`Qwen3-235B-W8A8-EPLB.yaml`, and add Added `kv_port Configuration Guide`
section in `pd_disaggregation_mooncake_multi_node.md`.
test
Results(tests/e2e/nightly/multi_node/config/Qwen3-235B-W8A8-EPLB.yaml):
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21540138907/job/62073265259
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
While using the LLM Compressor quantization tool from the VLLM community
to generate quantized weights, the VLLM Ascend engine needs to be
adapted to support the compressed tensors quantization format.
1. Support Moe model W4A8 dynamic weight.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df
---------
Signed-off-by: LHXuuu <scut_xlh@163.com>
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Replace the RoPE operator implementation.
- Refactor some leftover implementations of 300I DUO in the main branch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR upgrades the vLLM dependency from `v0.14.1` to `v0.15.0`. This
involves:
- Updating the `VLLM_TAG` in all `Dockerfile`.
- Updating the vLLM version in `docs/source/conf.py`.
- Removing conditional code paths specific to `v0.14.1` across the
codebase, which simplifies maintenance.
- Fix `TypeError: MMEncoderAttention.__init__() got an unexpected
keyword argument 'multimodal_config'` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/31972.
- Fix `_shared_experts: 'NoneType' object is not callable` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32082 by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/6335.
- Fix `ReshapeAndCacheOperation setup failed!` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25954 by overriding attention
metadata slots.
This upgrade is necessary to keep the project aligned with the latest
features, bug fixes, and API changes in the vLLM project.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this is an internal dependency update and does not introduce any
user-facing changes.
### How was this patch tested?
CI is expected to pass with these changes, ensuring that all existing
tests are successful with the new vLLM version.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
co-authored-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[Misc] Print triton info in collect_env.py, help us to collect more info
when user create an issue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
# What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes the single-node nightly test for DeepSeek V3.2 (W8A8)
model to ensure CI stability. The changes include:
1. Simplified nightly test matrix (nightly_test_a3.yaml):
- Temporarily reduced to only run deepseek3_2-w8a8 test case for
debugging
- Changed trigger from schedule/workflow_dispatch to support
push/pull_request for faster iteration
2. Updated DeepSeek V3.2 test configuration
(test_deepseek_v3_2_w8a8.py):
- Adjusted cudagraph_capture_sizes from [3, 6, 9, 12] to [8, 16, 24, 32]
for better performance
- Increased max-num-seqs from 4 to 8
- Increased gpu-memory-utilization from 0.92 to 0.98
- Increased num_speculative_tokens from 2 to 3
3. Added PR checkout step (_e2e_nightly_single_node.yaml):
- Added ability to checkout a specific PR (#6241) for testing
# Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. This PR only affects CI/CD test configurations and does not
introduce any user-facing changes.
# How was this patch tested?
Mock nightly test has passed, see
[here](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21574655952/job/62159656622?pr=6241).
<img width="1053" height="714" alt="a2f2ee359febb13e1f6330b1bd3c116b"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3262ad0f-adec-4c71-871f-d9cf2db06fbc"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The kernel internals had an issue with maxoutputsize overflow in the
swiglu section, which has been fixed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: LQLlulu <39671654+LQLlulu@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
**Scope of Changes**:
| File Path |
| :--- |
|`vllm_ascend/worker/model_runner_v1.py`|
|`vllm_ascend/worker/pcp_utils.py`|
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
Make image and wheel build CI job work with workflow_dispatch way
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR removes the custom `ProfileExecuteDuration` utility and its
usages across the codebase. This utility was used for profiling
execution duration of different stages in the inference process. It is
replaced by the standard `vllm.v1.utils.record_function_or_nullcontext`,
which integrates with PyTorch's profiler.
This change simplifies the code by removing a custom implementation in
favor of an upstream utility, improving maintainability. Associated
documentation and tests for `ProfileExecuteDuration` are also removed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`VLLM_ASCEND_MODEL_EXECUTE_TIME_OBSERVE` env is removed now.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed. The changes are a cleanup and replacement with a standard
utility. Existing tests cover the functionality. The removed feature had
its own tests which are also removed.
Related RFC: #5304
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
There is an issue with the current default logic for MLAPO (MLA Policy
Optimization). By design, MLAPO should only be enabled by default on
Decode (D) nodes. However, in hybrid (collocated prefill and decode)
scenarios, the strategy is erroneously activated during the Prefill
stage.
This PR corrects the default behavior to ensure that MLAPO is
exclusively enabled for the Decoding phase. This prevents unexpected
policy interference during Prefill and ensures optimal performance in
hybrid deployment environments.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
This reverts commit 56f5d3bd49.
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The patch https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/6357 which
break the functionality availability in the spec_decode scenario, let's
revert and make CI happy first
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Let the output of gemini is more readable
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
