### What this PR does / why we need it?
Unify Model Usage via ModelScope
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR supports torchair graph mode with non-mla backend on both 800IA2
and 300I Duo platforms. The main change is to add
`attention_v1_torchair.py` to support specific attention related
operations that are required by torchair.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Before this PR, vLLM-Ascend only allows deepseek to use torchair. Now we
can also use it with pangu. Besides, we add a support model list to
control which type of models that can use torchair.
### How was this patch tested?
We have test it with PanguProMoE on both 800IA2 and 300I Duo platforms,
and model generates answer normally.
---------
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pr supports w8a8 on 300I Duo platform. The main change is to use
`npu_quant_grouped_matmul_dequant` to replace `npu_grouped_matmul`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
offline inference on 310p runs normally.
---------
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix lint
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The `os.environ["VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE"] = "True"` should be placed before
module imports
if not
```
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/xleoken/projects/vllm-ascend/examples/offline_embed.py", line 48, in <module>
model = LLM(model="Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B", task="embed")
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/vllm/entrypoints/llm.py", line 243, in __init__
self.llm_engine = LLMEngine.from_engine_args(
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/vllm/engine/llm_engine.py", line 494, in from_engine_args
vllm_config = engine_args.create_engine_config(usage_context)
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/vllm/engine/arg_utils.py", line 1018, in create_engine_config
model_config = self.create_model_config()
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/vllm/engine/arg_utils.py", line 910, in create_model_config
return ModelConfig(
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_dataclasses.py", line 120, in __init__
s.__pydantic_validator__.validate_python(ArgsKwargs(args, kwargs), self_instance=s)
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/vllm/config.py", line 528, in __post_init__
hf_config = get_config(self.hf_config_path or self.model,
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/vllm/transformers_utils/config.py", line 321, in get_config
config_dict, _ = PretrainedConfig.get_config_dict(
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/configuration_utils.py", line 590, in get_config_dict
config_dict, kwargs = cls._get_config_dict(pretrained_model_name_or_path, **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/configuration_utils.py", line 649, in _get_config_dict
resolved_config_file = cached_file(
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/utils/hub.py", line 266, in cached_file
file = cached_files(path_or_repo_id=path_or_repo_id, filenames=[filename], **kwargs)
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/utils/hub.py", line 491, in cached_files
raise OSError(
OSError: We couldn't connect to 'https://huggingface.co' to load the files, and couldn't find them in the cached files.
Checkout your internet connection or see how to run the library in offline mode at 'https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/installation#offline-mode'.
[ERROR] 2025-07-03-15:27:10 (PID:333665, Device:-1, RankID:-1) ERR99999 UNKNOWN applicaiton exception
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Local.
Signed-off-by: xleoken <xleoken@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix word spelling in DOC.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
No.
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
mla attention still using the gpu_input_batch's attr:`swap_states`, which will lead to
an error `AttributeError: 'InputBatch' object has no attribute 'swap_states'`
This PR fixed the mla input patch error
### How was this patch tested?
will be tested by #1136
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add test for chunked prefill and prefix cache on v1/AscendScheduler
Covered scenarios:
- `Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base` and `deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat` ---
multicard CI time increased by 19 min
- `V1 + default scheduler` vs `V1 + default scheduler + enable prefix
cache`
- `V1 + Ascend scheduler` vs `V1 + Ascend scheduler + enable prefix
cache` vs `V1 + Ascend scheduler + enable prefix cache + enable chunked
prefill`
- `Qwen/Qwen3-0.6B-Base` --- singlecard CI time increased by 8 min
- `V1 + Ascend scheduler` vs `V1 + Ascend scheduler + enable chunked
prefill`
should rebase after #1498 and #1446
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. drop some useless code for w8a8 fusedmoe
2. Add in8 kv cache check
3. Add more ut.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
---------
Signed-off-by: zhuyilin <809721801@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
test kv data transfer contains connect,pipe,buffer
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
---------
Signed-off-by: lixudong <lixudong@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: lixudong <lixudong@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Co-authored-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Only enable single version for wheel pr build to speedup PR triggered CI
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add LoRA user guide to DOC. The content refers to [LoRA
Adapters](https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/features/lora.html).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Make sure that None parameters are not passed in for `--error`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed locally
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR (adapted from
2863befce3)
updates the CachedRequestData definition to use a single instance shared
across all requests in a batch, instead of creating a new instance per
request.
Found ci boken by the vllm's model_runner change: `ERROR 07-01 09:53:53
[core.py:521] TypeError: 'CachedRequestData' object is not iterable`,
Modify the model_runner to fix it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
pass ci will verify this.
---------
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since, `vllm bench` cli has optimized enough for production use(support
more datasets), we are now do not need to copy vllm codes, now , with
vllm installed, we can easily use the benchmark cli
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Update Altlas 300I series doc: cleanup unused parameters and enable
optimized ops
- Fix code spell CI
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Previous, the DeepSeek V3 Pruning weight is not correct, the moe layer
is not tested. We update a new Pruning model to enable moe layer
compute.
This PR fix the CI to address the new weight.
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
When use AscendScheduler with prefix-cache enabled and chunk-prefill
disabled, there will be accuray problem because there is no branch in
mla_v1 to process this scenario. This PR fixes it.
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Change as little existing code as possible to add v1 pooling task's
support, notice that i move down the `vllm.v1.worker.gpu_input_batch` to
vllm-ascend, Considering the frequent changes in upstream interfaces, in
order to decouple, so i move it here
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test, and I have a simple test was
first conducted locally which is adapted from
https://www.modelscope.cn/models/Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B, just like
bellow：
```python
import os
import torch
from vllm import LLM
os.environ["VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE"]="True"
def get_detailed_instruct(task_description: str, query: str) -> str:
return f'Instruct: {task_description}\nQuery:{query}'
# Each query must come with a one-sentence instruction that describes the task
task = 'Given a web search query, retrieve relevant passages that answer the query'
queries = [
get_detailed_instruct(task, 'What is the capital of China?'),
get_detailed_instruct(task, 'Explain gravity')
]
# No need to add instruction for retrieval documents
documents = [
"The capital of China is Beijing.",
"Gravity is a force that attracts two bodies towards each other. It gives weight to physical objects and is responsible for the movement of planets around the sun."
]
input_texts = queries + documents
model = LLM(model="Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B", task="embed")
outputs = model.embed(input_texts)
embeddings = torch.tensor([o.outputs.embedding for o in outputs])
scores = (embeddings[:2] @ embeddings[2:].T)
print(scores.tolist())
# [[0.7620252966880798, 0.14078938961029053], [0.1358368694782257, 0.6013815999031067]]
```
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wangli <858794774@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wangli <858794774@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add Pangu MoE Pro for 300I series docs
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This fix the shape of block_table which was introduced by hybrid kv
groups several weeks ago.
Error will be raised when enable prefix-cache (eager or not) and Ascend
Scheduler at the same time, just send two identical requests and it will
reproduce.
v0.9.1: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1297
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Test manually
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
support pangu moe w8a8c8
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
Signed-off-by: zhuyilin <809721801@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces an expert rearrange algorithm for PanguProMoE model.
Different from the original grouped topk, it filters out the top experts
that are allocated more tokens. Therefore, we can load less experts when
calculating gmm.
We have test this algorithm for PanguProMoE-72B on 300I Duo platform and
800I A2 platform. On 300I Duo platform, we find that `num_voted_experts`
set to 5 achieves both good performance and accuracy. While on 800I A2,
we still set it to 8 to use original pangu grouped topk.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In this PR, we support H2P communication optimization when running
PanguProMoE with dp_size > 1. H2P use `reduce_scatter` and `all_gather`
to replace `all_reduce` to improve performance:
original layer:
input_layernorm --> attn --> tp all_reduce --> post_attention_layernorm
--> dp all_gather --> moe/mlp --> dp reduce_scatter --> tp all_reduce
now:
input_layernorm --> tp all_gather --> attn --> tp reduce_scatter -->
post_attention_layernorm --> all_rank all_gather --> moe/mlp -->
all_rank reduce_scatter
Besides, because `reduce_scatter` requires num_tokens that can be
divided by group size, we need pad the seqs based on
`max_tokens_across_dp`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This PR has been tested with both offline and online inference using
PanguProMoE-72B.
---------
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes a bug that use broadcast with cpu_group when running dp.
The `broadcast310p` patch will take effects for both cpu_group and
device group, but we only need it for device group. Hence a wrapper is
added to allow cpu_group use native torch broadcast and it solves the
bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
With this PR, DP on 310p runs normally and generates reasonable answers.
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix version conflict on transformers:
`pip._vendor.pkg_resources.ContextualVersionConflict: (transformers
4.53.0 (/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages),
Requirement.parse('transformers<4.53.0'), {'vllm-ascend'})`
Fix
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/15933263325/job/44947231642
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Fix broken build
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new existing test.
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support prompt logprobs in V1. This also enable lm_eval to test accuracy
on V1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
support prompt logprobs output
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with accuracy test.
Using lm_eval, which use prompt logprobs as output to test accuracy, to
test:
```python
VLLM_USE_V1=1 lm_eval \
--model vllm \
--model_args pretrained=Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct,max_model_len=4096,block_size=4 \
--tasks ceval-valid_computer_network \
--batch_size 8
```
After this pr, the accuracy test results of `Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct`
on V1 is:
```bash
| Tasks |Version|Filter|n-shot| Metric | |Value | |Stderr|
|----------------------------|------:|------|-----:|--------|---|-----:|---|-----:|
|ceval-valid_computer_network| 2|none | 0|acc |↑ |0.7368|± |0.1038|
| | |none | 0|acc_norm|↑ |0.7368|± |0.1038|
```
Closes: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1043
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Fix vLLM EPLB break
e9fd658a73
by recovering load_weights back to [v0.9.1
version](07b8fae219)
temporarily.
- Fix transformers>=4.53.0 image processor break
Related: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1470
- Mirror torch_npu requirements to pyproject.toml
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add guidance on how to implement and register new models.
Modified based on PR
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1126, thanks for the
contribution of @linfeng-yuan.
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
Add the release checklist issue template.
Every release manager should create and follow the checklist to do the
release step by step.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Add static build_info py file to show soc and sleep mode info. It helps
to make the code clean and the error info will be more friendly for
users
This PR also added the unit test for vllm_ascend/utils.py
This PR also added the base test class for all ut in tests/ut/base.py
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Sometimes the performance benchmark workflow may fail. We hope to add a
prompt when the operation fails and not upload the dirty data of the
failed operation.
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add ut for parallel_state.py
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
python -m unittest test_parallel_state.py
---------
Signed-off-by: wangyanhui-cmss <wangyanhui_yewu@cmss.chinamobile.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
After #1094, decode might be executed with non-compiled mode, despite of
`torchair_graph_config.enabled`, causing multistream mla to fail, which
assumes torchair compiled mode for decode when
`torchair_graph_config.enabled == True`.
Augment that assumption to fix this.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested both offline, and by graph mode mla e2e testcase.
---------
Signed-off-by: sdmyzlp <lrwei2@petalmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Reset all unused positions in `NPUModelRunner` to prevent out-of-bounds
asserts in the `GatherV3` operator.
Currently, in
[`get_splitfuse_attn_mask`](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/blob/main/vllm_ascend/attention/attention.py#L124),
the `position` tensor may contain values that exceed the dimensions of
the attention mask, triggering a `GatherV3` boundary check failure.
These invalid indices originate from stale “dirty” entries left over in
`position` due to padding logic in the ACL graph. Specifically, in
[`_process_reqs`](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/blob/main/vllm_ascend/worker/model_runner_v1.py#L989),
the variable `num_input_tokens` is always greater than or equal to
`total_num_scheduled_tokens`, so any positions not explicitly cleared
from a previous batch will persist and cause this sporadic error.
BTW, in the original vLLM implementation, masks are constructed
internally using other args, so these lingering values do not surface.
However, on the Ascend platform—where split-fuse attention requires
externally supplied masks—these residual indices become critical and
lead to this elusive, hard-to-reproduce failure.
The fix is to explicitly reset or zero out all unused entries in the
`position` tensor before passing it to `GatherV3`, ensuring that every
index lies within the valid range of the attention mask.
Closes: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1038
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Use fused ops torch_npu.npu_top_k_top_p(logits, p, k) when p and k are
not None, otherwise fallback to the original one. The replacement will
take place automatically when `VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_TOPK_OPTIMIZE=1` .
This patch are using `npu_top_k_top_p` which required
torch_npu>=2.5.1.post1.dev20250619
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Tested by DeepSeek R1 and UT passed
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to address a long-standing **CI bug** and remove unused
code. The specific changes include:
1. **Fixing CI Bug**: Resolves the root cause of CI test failures or
instability. This often stems from incorrect environment configurations,
dependency version conflicts, or flawed test script logic. This fix
ensures the reliability and consistency of the CI pipeline.
2. **Removing `patch_eagle.py`**: Deletes the `patch_eagle.py` file,
which is no longer utilized by the project. This file was likely legacy
code, experimental code, or its functionality has since been replaced by
other modules. Its removal helps reduce codebase complexity, improves
maintainability, and prevents potential confusion.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this PR primarily focuses on internal CI stability maintenance and
code cleanup. It does not introduce any user-visible changes to APIs,
interfaces, or other behaviors.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed. Specifically:
1. **Existing CI Pipelines Passed**: After fixing the CI bug, all
existing CI tests and pipelines were verified to run correctly and pass
successfully.
2. **Code Cleanup Verified**: Following the removal of `patch_eagle.py`,
it was ensured that any related functional modules (if applicable)
continue to work as expected, without introducing new regressions. This
was typically verified by running the project's main test suite.
Signed-off-by: yuancaoyaoHW <a2749322671@gmail.com>
