### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Implement a **high-performance Triton custom kernel** for the rotary
position embedding (RoPE) operator on **Ascend NPU** platform
2. Fix critical bugs in the Triton RoPE kernel registration and
invocation process: including incorrect fake impl function name
matching, wrong torch ops namespace for kernel call, missing self
parameter in cos/sin slice fetching, and syntax errors in function type
annotations.
3. Achieve **extreme performance optimization** for the core RoPE
operator: the single inference latency is reduced from **57.1 μs** to
**9 μs**, with **6.34x performance improvement** and **84.24% latency
reduction**.
4. The RoPE operator is a **hot path** that is executed in every
transformer layer during LLM inference, the optimization will directly
reduce the overall inference latency and improve the throughput of LLM
serving on Ascend NPU.
5. Keep full backward compatibility: the Triton kernel is enabled only
when `HAS_TRITON=True`, and automatically fall back to the original
Ascend NPU native implementation if Triton is not available, no
functional regression.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
**NO**
- No changes to any public APIs, interfaces or inference behaviors of
vLLM.
- No impact on the text generation quality and correctness of the large
model.
- The optimization is transparent to end users, only the inference speed
(latency/throughput) is improved without any functional change.
### How was this patch tested?
1. **Environment Validation**: Tested on Ascend NPU platform with
vLLM-Ascend framework, Triton library installed and enabled
(`HAS_TRITON=True`).
2. **Kernel Registration Test**: Verified the Triton RoPE kernel
(`rope_forward_triton`) is successfully registered to
`torch.ops._C_ascend` namespace without any
`ValueError/NameError/SyntaxError`.
3. **Functional Correctness Test**: Run large model (GLM4/MoE) inference
on the Ascend NPU platform, the generated text content is **completely
correct** (no garbled text, no logical errors), consistent with the
original implementation.
4. **Performance Benchmark Test**: Measure the single execution latency
of the RoPE operator before/after optimization, confirm the latency is
stably reduced from 57.1 μs to 9 μs, the performance gain is valid and
stable.
5. **Fallback Mechanism Test**: Manually disable Triton
(`HAS_TRITON=False`), verify the code correctly falls back to the
original Ascend NPU native RoPE implementation, no service crash and
normal inference.
6. **Compatibility Test**: Test with different tensor shapes/sizes of
query/key, all cases work correctly with the Triton kernel, no shape
mismatch error.
- operator supply by Hexiang Wang
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
---------
Signed-off-by: ZCG12345 <2097562023@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update causal_conv1d_update ops for better perf.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In [PR 5040](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/5040), the
`dispatch_gmm_combine_decode` operator was configured with an incorrect
global_bs parameter. This PR is to fix the bug.
The global_bs provided as input should have the same meaning as in the
`moe_distributed_dispatch` operator, specifically: (the maximum batch
size across all cards) * (expert parallel world size).
However, the implementation incorrectly used the variable
max_num_tokens, which does not account for tensor parallelism. This
error likely resulted in an unnecessarily large (overestimated) value.
More info about this operator, please refer to RFC: issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5476
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Acc
test qwen3-235b eplb on a single A3 node(ep16),
with dispatch_gmm_combine_decode
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-stream-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 80.00 |
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
Signed-off-by: wangqiankun <wangqiankun13@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add layernormFn triton op for qwen3Next model for better performance.
<img width="248" height="526" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/27b47157-5df5-4db1-aa88-1dae799b2bf6"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Set a additional config parameter to control whether the gmmswigluequant
fuseion operator is enabled; it is enabled by True. / When enabled with
a small number of GPUs, the gmmswigluquant fused operator can cause some
performance degradation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
#### Perf
test model: GLM 4.6(w8a8)
- single A3 node(ep16, tp16), async-scheduling, mtp, FULL_DECODE_ONLY
- bs=1, input_lens=32000, ouput_lens=1024
Without this PR: TPOT 32.22.ms
With this PR: TPOT 30.23ms
---------
Signed-off-by: zjks98 <zhangjiakang4@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: zjks98 <zhangjiakang4@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When enable VLLM_ASCEND_FLASHCOMM2_PARALLEL_SIZE>1, we need index
operation to reorganize the batch, because that we need ensure the
correct batch-id for each rank after the reduce-scatter op in
VLLM_ASCEND_FLASHCOMM2_PARALLEL_SIZE>1. But we do not need it when
VLLM_ASCEND_FLASHCOMM2_PARALLEL_SIZE=1, which dose not need
reduce-scatter.
Signed-off-by: Levi-JQ <yujinqi2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Levi-JQ <yujinqi2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. If the model has dense layers, the current code will attempt to
obtain the routing experts of the dense layers, which will cause an
error. This should be fixed by modifying the code to skip the dense
layers when obtaining the routing experts.
2. The global_expert_map that the function directly outputs a affects
the performance of dsv3.2.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
DeepSeek V3.1 conversation is normal.
#### aime precision test (dsv3.1)
baseline without eplb
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 66.67 |
eplb
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 70.00 |
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Rename num_iterations_eplb_update to expert_heat_collection_interval.
2. Rename num_wait_worker_iterations to algorithm_execution_interval.
3. Rename init_redundancy_expert to num_redundant_experts because the
variable with the same meaning in vLLM is named this way.
4. Delete gate_eplb because we don't need this feature.
5. Move eplb config into a dict in additional config.
6. Depend on pr5817
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
before this pr：
`--additional-config '{"dynamic_eplb":true,
"num_iterations_eplb_update": 4000, "num_wait_worker_iterations": 150,
"init_redundancy_expert": 16, "expert_map_path": "xxx.json"}'`
after this pr:
`--additional-config
'{"eplb_config":{"dynamic_eplb":true,"expert_heat_collection_interval":4000,
"algorithm_execution_interval":150,"num_redundant_experts": 16,
"expert_map_path": "xxx.json"}}'`
### How was this patch tested?
#### test qwen3-235b eplb num_redundant_experts=16
without pr5817
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 83.33 |
with pr5817
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 86.67 |
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix acc bug when enbale dispatch_gmm_combine_decode and eplb.
After eplb, expert table may change, so mapping is needed, while
fused_mc2 miss the mapping.
More info about this operator, please refer to RFC: issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5476
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
without this pr, qwen3-235b eplb with dispatch_gmm_combine_decode get
acc 3.33% on aime2024.
with this pr,
test qwen3-235b eplb on a single A3 node(ep16)
without dispatch_gmm_combine_decode
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-stream-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 86.67 |
with dispatch_gmm_combine_decode
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-stream-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 86.67 |
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: wangqiankun <wangqiankun13@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Use upstream util function (`_pre_process()` and `_post_process()`) to
reduce redundant codes. (Find more details at
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/vllm/model_executor/layers/rotary_embedding/common.py#L184-L213)
- Merge Q/K split to simplify the logic of calling
`torch_npu.npu_rotary_mul()` for better performance (TPOT has been
reduced by **6.22%**).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no.
### How was this patch tested?
#### ✅ Functional test
Launch the server:
```bash
export VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE=True
vllm serve /root/.cache/modelscope/hub/models/Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct \
--dtype bfloat16 \
--limit-mm-per-prompt '{"image": 1}' \
--max-model-len 16384 \
--max-num-batched-tokens 16384
```
Query the server:
```bash
curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "/root/.cache/modelscope/hub/models/Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct",
"messages": [
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."},
{"role": "user", "content": [
{"type": "image_url", "image_url": {"url": "https://modelscope.oss-cn-beijing.aliyuncs.com/resource/qwen.png"}},
{"type": "text", "text": "What is the text in the illustrate? How does it look?"}
]}
],
"max_tokens": 100
}'
```
Output:
```
{"id":"chatcmpl-b2911ab6989ef098","object":"chat.completion","created":1768202780,"model":"/root/.cache/modelscope/hub/models/Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct","choices":[{"index":0,"message":{"role":"assistant","content":"The text in the illustration is \"TONGYI Qwen.\" The word \"TONGYI\" is written in blue, and \"Qwen\" is written in gray. The text appears to be part of a logo or branding design, with \"TONGYI\" being more prominent and \"Qwen\" being slightly smaller and positioned below it. The font style is modern and clean, with \"TONGYI\" having a slightly bolder appearance compared to \"Qwen.\"","refusal":null,"annotations":null,"audio":null,"function_call":null,"tool_calls":[],"reasoning":null,"reasoning_content":null},"logprobs":null,"finish_reason":"length","stop_reason":null,"token_ids":null}],"service_tier":null,"system_fingerprint":null,"usage":{"prompt_tokens":78,"total_tokens":178,"completion_tokens":100,"prompt_tokens_details":null},"prompt_logprobs":null,"prompt_token_ids":null,"kv_transfer_params":null}
```
#### ✅ Benchmark
Run:
```bash
export VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE=False
export HF_ENDPOINT="https://hf-mirror.com"
vllm bench serve \
--model /root/.cache/modelscope/hub/models/Qwen/Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct \
--backend openai-chat \
--endpoint /v1/chat/completions \
--dataset-name hf \
--hf-split train \
--dataset-path lmarena-ai/vision-arena-bench-v0.1 \
--num-prompts 10 \
--no-stream
```
Before this PR:
```
============ Serving Benchmark Result ============
Successful requests: 10
Failed requests: 0
Benchmark duration (s): 5.96
Total input tokens: 7191
Total generated tokens: 996
Request throughput (req/s): 1.68
Output token throughput (tok/s): 167.05
Peak output token throughput (tok/s): 261.00
Peak concurrent requests: 10.00
Total token throughput (tok/s): 1373.16
---------------Time to First Token----------------
Mean TTFT (ms): 964.43
Median TTFT (ms): 858.48
P99 TTFT (ms): 1691.45
-----Time per Output Token (excl. 1st token)------
Mean TPOT (ms): 63.08
Median TPOT (ms): 40.86
P99 TPOT (ms): 241.30
---------------Inter-token Latency----------------
Mean ITL (ms): 40.16
Median ITL (ms): 33.61
P99 ITL (ms): 250.30
==================================================
```
After this PR:
```
============ Serving Benchmark Result ============
Successful requests: 10
Failed requests: 0
Benchmark duration (s): 5.71
Total input tokens: 7191
Total generated tokens: 996
Request throughput (req/s): 1.75
Output token throughput (tok/s): 174.45
Peak output token throughput (tok/s): 279.00
Peak concurrent requests: 10.00
Total token throughput (tok/s): 1433.95
---------------Time to First Token----------------
Mean TTFT (ms): 992.14
Median TTFT (ms): 938.30
P99 TTFT (ms): 1728.71
-----Time per Output Token (excl. 1st token)------
Mean TPOT (ms): 59.16
Median TPOT (ms): 37.65
P99 TPOT (ms): 234.89
---------------Inter-token Latency----------------
Mean ITL (ms): 36.55
Median ITL (ms): 30.73
P99 ITL (ms): 170.72
==================================================
```
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
this pr support use triton mrope like cuda_forward, which performance is
equal to ascendc ops
this triton ops should use cann 8.5.0
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
test in qwen3-vl-235b acc textvqa
native 81.82
npu triton 81.58
cuda triton 81.52
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: shiyuan680 <917935075@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes the precision issue from improper Tensor maintenance in
`vllm_ascend/ops/linear_op.py` under the Verl reinforcement learning
(RL) scenario. issue:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5747
Key changes:
1. Remove the custom class member `self.weight_t` in
`vllm_ascend/ops/linear_op.py`;
2. Adjust the input logic of the `npu_mm_all_reduce_base` operator to
directly fetch weight parameters from the model's `nn.Parameters`,
instead of using pre-created Tensors.
> In the vllm model, it is recommended to avoid creating additional
parameter copies (such as self.weight_t) for computation; if already
created, they must be synchronized with the model's original parameters.
This is because parameter synchronization between training and inference
in the Verl reinforcement learning (RL) scenario may cause memory
address changes to nn.Parameters, and unsynchronized extra Tensors will
reference old memory without updating with the parameters—ultimately
leading to precision issues.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: icerain-alt <450125138@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Shangwei-Li <lishangwei@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
To support tensorList for dispatch_ffn_combine, to adjust eplb
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
Single Operator Testing
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: lhchg <lhao_cheng@163.com>
Co-authored-by: lihaocheng <lihaosheng1@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR enables custom op `aclnnMoeInitRoutingCustom` introduced in PR
#5251
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: QianChenxi <chenxi.qian.cq@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. MagicMTP (paper: "Block Verification Accelerates Speculative
Decoding") was introduced to consider the influence among multiple draft
tokens, improving the acceptance rate without compromising accuracy.
2. Added Triton and PyTorch implementations, and added E2E test cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
MagicMTP will automatically take effect when the parameter
"num_speculative_tokens" >= 3.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
Signed-off-by: chenaoxuan <cax1165@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Delete the environment variable
`VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_FLASHCOMM2_OSHARED`
- Introduce layer_sharding as a configurable feature in
additional_config
- Revise the term "shared weight" to "shard weight."
Configuration : The feature is opt-in via the additional_config
argument:
```
--additional-config '{
"layer_sharding": ["o_proj", "q_b_proj"]
}'
```
This is orthogonal to standard tensor parallelism and weight replication
strategies. It is treated as a separate, explicit feature.It can be used
in any scenario, combined with the
flashcomm2https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/3232 feature
or the ShardedCP #4702 feature, to achieve significant performance.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: zzhxx <zhangzihang23@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: chenxiao <Jaychou1620@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: clrs97 <524936896@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Levi-JQ <yujinqi2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chenxiao <Jaychou1620@Gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.replace moe_gating_top_k from torch_npu with custom op
2.enable the renorm function of moe_gating_top_k in softmax scenerio
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No need test
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
---------
Signed-off-by: ZCG12345 <2097562023@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Import global var form vllm instead of overwirte it, so that we could
use the correct global variant value
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
#### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adapt DispatchGmmCombineDecode operator to eplb tensor list and
expert token numbers.
This operator support gmm1, gmm2, gmm1Scale and gmm2Scale in format of
list.
This operator support couting how many token each local expert recieves
by expertTokensNum .
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
More info about this operator, please refer to RFC: issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5476
#### Overview
This PR fixes a shape mismatch bug between `expert_placement_map` and
`log2phy_expert_map` when **redundant experts** are enabled in the
vLLM-Ascend platform. The issue occurred during the initialization of
expert maps and their updates via EPLB (Expert Load Balancer)
adjustment, leading to potential tensor shape errors and incorrect
expert routing in distributed MoE deployments.
#### Key Changes
1. **Unify expert map shape calculation logic**
- Ensure the shape of `expert_placement_map` and `log2phy_expert_map`
strictly aligns with the total number of experts (including redundant
experts) during initialization.
- Update the shape adjustment logic in EPLB dynamic update process to
match the initial expert map dimensions.
2. **Add shape consistency checks**
- Add assertion statements to verify the shape consistency of the two
maps after initialization and EPLB adjustment, preventing silent shape
mismatches in subsequent operations.
#### Impact
- Resolves tensor shape errors when using redundant experts with EPLB on
Ascend platform.
- Ensures correct expert routing and load balancing for MoE models with
redundant expert configurations.
- No breaking changes to existing functionality; compatible with
non-redundant expert deployments.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Che Ruan <cr623@ic.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Che Ruan <cr623@ic.ac.uk>
Co-authored-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
This reverts commit fb9fdcdbe4.
### What this PR does / why we need it?
this pr breaks the smoke test because of that leads the error of
aclnnNeScalar:Kernel Run failed. opType: 25, NotEqual
launch failed for NotEqual, errno:361001
<img width="1149" height="166"
alt="A6C9453D-4F0B-4256-DD80-A9C181DAB2D9"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cab9c4b8-3fd1-4c6b-b424-474b46042726"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
Signed-off-by: zxwang <1476209578@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add nightly test for triton split_rmsnorm_rope
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Angazenn <supperccell@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In scenarios where models like
[Moonlight](https://modelscope.cn/models/moonshotai/Moonlight-16B-A3B-Instruct)
(using MLA but without `rope_scaling` in config.json) invoke
`AscendRotaryEmbedding`. `_cos_cache` and `_sin_cache` are not recorded
correctly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
Signed-off-by: Debonex <719893090@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This fixes a bug that occurred when running `test_camem.py` in the
triton-ascend environment `NPU function error:
aclrtGetMemInfo(ACL_HBM_MEM, &device_free, &device_total)`
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803
---------
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Replace multiple PyTorch operations with a fused Triton kernel to
determine token indices for sampling during speculative decoding. This
reduces kernel launch overhead and memory traffic, improving overall
performance on Ascend hardware.
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Previously, it was necessary to set the environment variables
HCCL_INTRA_PCIE_ENABLE=1 and HCCL_INTRA_ROCE_ENABLE=0. This PR enables
hierarchical MC2 operations on A2 by default.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
Signed-off-by: hwhaokun <haokun0405@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add LongCat-Flash support.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: chuyuelin <923822139@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: chuyuelin <chuyuelin1@huawei.com>
Currently in the Fused MoE module, functions of classes like
MoECommMethod and MoETokenDispatcher output data in dictionary or tuple
format, which hampers code maintainability, readability, and
extensibility. This PR introduces dataclasses for these key output types
to address these issues.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803
---------
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The float kernel of MOE_init_routing_v2 in the dispatch allgather
operation does not support tensor format for active_expert_range; it
only supports int.
PR5311 To unify the variables `local_num_experts` and
`self.local_num_experts`, `self.local_num_experts` was used
consistently, which led to the subsequent integer type parameter being
converted to a tensor type.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
gsm8k | exact_match,strict-match: ground_truth=0.89 | measured=0.8939 |
success=✅
gsm8k | exact_match,flexible-extract: ground_truth=0.85 | measured=0.856
| success=✅
ceval-valid | acc,none: ground_truth=0.84 | measured=0.8373 | success=✅
Model Parameters:
{'pretrained': 'Qwen/Qwen3-30B-A3B', 'tensor_parallel_size': 2, 'dtype':
'auto', 'trust_remote_code': False, 'max_model_len': 4096,
'gpu_memory_utilization': 0.6, 'enable_expert_parallel': True}
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
1. What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR supports the moe_gating_top_k operator, which enables
post-positioned renormalization (renorm) on the basis of softmax.
2. Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No user-facing changes are required.
3. How was this patch tested?
This patch was tested with the test_npu_moe_gating_top_k test case.
vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: ZCG12345 <2097562023@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <34335947+zzzzwwjj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: zzzzwwjj <34335947+zzzzwwjj@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR moves reject sample related triton kernels into `ops/triton`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
#5051 only implement a basic framework for model runner v2, but there
are still some bugs for e2e functionality, this PR aim to enable basic
functionality.
model runner v2 plans:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5208
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Unify the loading logic for expert_map and log2phy.
1. The map generated when enabling the redundancy expert is incorrect.
The community generation map function only accepts the number of global
experts. When we pass in the number of logical experts plus redundant
experts, the local expert ID of the last card will index to an expert ID
that does not exist. Now we ensure that the index points to a real
existing expert ID, and each expert can be accessed. Moreover, when
redundant experts are not enabled, the output of our function remains
consistent with the community's function.
2. The map we generate is based on the length of the physical expert,
but in reality, we only need to use the length of the logical expert.
Later on, we will need to pad it accordingly, so we can simply generate
a map with the length of the logical [expert.]
3. Unify the initialization logic across different scenarios and
simplify the code for fused_moe.
**Before refactoring**
- map path is not None：
expert map: get_rank_placement_map from _'expert_load_balancer.py'_,
maintains the map for all ranks and all layers.
log2phy: get_rank_log2phy_map from _'expert_load_balancer.py'_,
maintains the map for all ranks and all layers.
- map path is None:
expert map: determine_expert_map from '_vllm.laye_r', The function does
not support the redundant experts of vllm-ascend.
log2phy: determine_default_log2phy_map from _'eplb_utils.py'_. The
function does not support the redundant experts of vllm-ascend.
**Refactoring**
eplb_utils.py
init_eplb_config
generate placement
generate expert map
generate log2phy
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Expert Mapping Test Generation:
ep size: 16, num of experts: 256, num of redundant experts: 16
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Expert Mapping (Non-1 indicates the expert responsible for this rank)
for Rank 15:
vllm map：
[-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Improved map：
[16 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15]
Expert Mapping Test Generation:
ep size: 16, num of experts: 256, num of redundant experts: 0
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Expert Mapping (Non-1 indicates the expert responsible for this rank)
for Rank 15:
vllm map：
[-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Improved map：
[-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
-1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15]
dsr1 baselie：
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| gsm8k-lite | 7cd45e | accuracy | gen | 100.00 |
dsr1 eplb：
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| gsm8k-lite | 7cd45e | accuracy | gen | 100.00 |
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
We'll release 0.13.0 soon. The main branch is freeze. Let's revert the
newest change and redo it once 0.13.0 is released.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
81786c8774
Signed-off-by: realliujiaxu <realliujiaxu@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Previously, it was necessary to set the environment variables
HCCL_INTRA_PCIE_ENABLE=1 and HCCL_INTRA_ROCE_ENABLE=0. This PR enables
hierarchical MC2 operations on A2 by default.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: hwhaokun <haokun0405@163.com>
Co-authored-by: realliujiaxu <realliujiaxu@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Rollback causal_conv1d_fn ops from triton to torch version to fix
hanging issues，meanwhile update Qwen3Next doc
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
