### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove restrictions on mooncake for IPv6
Dependencies: cann8.5、mooncake v0.3.8.post1
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
ucm_connector add has `has_connector_metadata` interface to adapt to the
latest KV connector in vLLM.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
this PR doesn't introduce _any_ user-facing change.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: UnifiedCacheManager <unifiedcachem@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Rectify the problem that the pcp and pd separation and kv pooling
scenario.
In the pooling scenario, multi_nodes_meta_mapping is empty. As a result,
an error is reported when the remote_host information is obtained
through the get_remote_port_send_num method.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When the P node accesses the proxy meteserver, add the SSL certificate
and the CA certificate path to improve security.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Drop vLLM 0.13.0 support, upgrade to 0.14.0
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The issue of the D node mistakenly sending the pull-end signal twice,
leading to the P node printing logger errors abnormally, has been
resolved.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch purpose to optimize the lint check term. The main idea is to
reduce unnecessary installation time.
1. The installation of vllm is not must, only append the path of vllm
src to the `PATHONPATH` is effective
2. This installation of `requirements-dev.txt` is not must, we have a
pre-built image `quay.io/ascend-ci/vllm-ascend:lint` with all the
requirements installed in advance.
**NOTE**: the conditions for triggering image builds are: 1).Daily
scheduled build; 2) Build when requirements are modified; 3) Manual
build. This ensures that the dependencies in our image are up-to-date to
the greatest extent possible.
3. The `mypy` was separated from the `pre-commit` hook for performance
reasons; we found that integrating `mypy` into the `pre-commit` hook
resulted in poor performance.
4. Reduce the CPU core consumption from 16 -> 8
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The end-to-end lint time was optimized from 20min/per PR to 8min/per PR
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
This PR addresses a request ID mismatch issue in the PD
(Prefill-Decoding) separation deployment scenario for vllm-ascend.
Upstream vLLM recently mitigated request ID collisions by appending a
random suffix to each request_id (e.g., req-123 → req-123-abc), refer to
[PR-27987](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27987 ) &
[PR-29665](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/29665). While this
works in single-node deployments, it breaks compatibility in
PD-separated setups: the Producer (Prefill node) and Consumer (Decoding
node) end up with different request_id values, preventing the Consumer
from correctly retrieving the KV cache generated by the Producer.
To resolve this, this PR introduces a new field remote_request_id in the
metadata passed via mooncake_connector. The Producer preserves and
forwards the original (unmodified) request_id as remote_request_id. The
Consumer then uses this remote_request_id—instead of its locally
generated suffixed ID—to fetch the correct KV cache from the Prefill
node.
This ensures consistent request identification across PD nodes while
maintaining compatibility with upstream vLLM’s request ID deduplication
mechanism.
<img width="1279" height="781" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/274238c1-dab6-4d3a-9ee4-6e578679b762"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: ghphotoframe <854746559@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: jiangweixiang <jwx02384838@antgroup.com>
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
> Extracted from PR #5513
Based on the Sharded-CP feature PR:#4702;
RFC:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/30055
### Support FULL_DECODE_ONLY Mode under PD-Mixed Scenario:
Extends DSA-CP to handle the FULL_DECODE_ONLY execution mode when
running in a prefill-decode mixed (PD-mixed) serving environment,
improving throughput and resource utilization for decode-intensive
workloads.
**In pure prefill nodes:**
- Both q_proj and o_proj are sharded across world ranks, using
**broadcast** for weights distribution.
**In PD-mixed nodes (supporting both prefill and decode):**
- q_proj is fully replicated (not sharded) to avoid communication
overhead during decoding.
- o_proj Using the original TP `RowParallelLinear` method to store
weights
**During prefill execution:**
- o_proj forwards through all_gather to collect weights, reconstructing
the complete o_proj weights on each card.
**During decode (graph replay phase):**
- Additional all_to_all (before o_proj) and reduce_scatter (after
o_proj) are introduced to enable sequence-parallel output aggregation
while maintaining correctness under SFA CP.
### benchmark:
- TTFT increased by **527%**
- TPOT increased by **180%**
<img width="1550" height="938" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9b7a03d8-a3db-4a99-8923-6e5bfcfecf72"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: zzhxx <zhangzihang23@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Co-authored-by: clrs97 <524936896@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Resolved a double-free memory vulnerability in the pooling layer under
re-computation scenarios.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In PD disaggregation case, when P has multi nodes, mooncake fails to
send data. Fix the issue in this PR.
The details:
If a P rank does not need to transfer kv cache to any one D rank, D node
should send a message to P node to release the kv
cache in P node. If P has multi nodes, D node should know the
corresponding IP in each P node, then D node can send message to the
right P node. Otherwise, send data error will happen. This PR fix this
issue by providing P nodes IP to D node through Parameter
`remote_port_send_num`.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaochao <w00642655@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaochao <w00642655@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR refactors `get_kv_cache_spec` method to delegate AttentionSpec
creation to each attention module's own `get_kv_cache_spec()` method,
aligning with the vllm source code structure.
**Changes:**
- Simplify `get_kv_cache_spec` in `model_runner_v1.py` and
`cpu_offload_connector.py`
- Remove manual `AttentionType` checks for `Attention` modules
- Delegate spec creation to each attention module's `get_kv_cache_spec`
method directly
- Let `MambaBase` layers use their own `get_kv_cache_spec` method
- Keep `use_sparse` hack for `MLAAttention` (DeepSeek DSA mode) as
Ascend-specific handling
This change follows RFC #5463 item 12: move AttentionSpec to Attention
module.
- Fixes#5463 (item 12)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is an internal refactoring that simplifies code structure
without changing any external behavior.
### How was this patch tested?
- Syntax validation passed via `python -m py_compile`
- CI tests will verify the changes work correctly with existing test
cases
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: lico67373 <918688502@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The force-free secondary release request causes the node to crash. When
requests are pulled too quickly, they should not be added to the
delay-free queue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
As issue #5948 reported，when using cpu_offload_connector with TP=1, the
server will hang on starting, we found several bugs here to fix.
1. some crash error encountered because of code changed with vllm
version updating, some of them can be fixed as #5948, and this PR fixed
all of them.
2. hang problem described in #5948, the direct reason is that in
cpu_offload_connector, RPC client using the same client id in scheduler
and worker when tensor_parrallel_size is 1, this PR force the client id
to be different, then it is fixed.
- Why we didn't find this hang problem before?
Because we using --distributed-executor-backend mp or
tensor_parrallel_size > 1 in our test, in our old test case, the
scheduler and workers are different procceses, then client ids build by
`worker-{os.getpid()}` are not the same. But when using
tensor_parrallel_size=1, vllm will use uniproc as
distributed-executor-backend by default, the scheduler and worker will
by in the same proccess, then client ids are the same and hang.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
Signed-off-by: lidenghui <lidenghui1110@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Based on the RFC:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5604
This PR is a refactoring of vllm_ascend/distributed.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
Signed-off-by: lty <linhebiwen@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Based on the RFC:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5604
This PR is a refactoring of vllm_ascend/distributed, moving all
kv_transfer realtaed codes into a dedicated folder, which has already
been done in vLLM
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: lty <linhebiwen@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the bug where the P-node's schedule dead after it force-frees a
request due to timeout and then receives the completed kv cache pulled
by the D-node again. By add list to recode all requests.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
81786c8774
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix layerwise connector for decoder tp size > num kv heads. In this case
prefiller should push kv cache to all decoder npu.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When running memcache in the A2 environment, the logic for registering
memory needs to be added. Additionally, there is a link establishment
conflict between memcache and HCCS during initialization in A2, so the
link should be established in advance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
---------
Signed-off-by: fangjianwei <f30058701@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: fangjianwei <f30058701@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
> Extracted from PR #5513
Based on the Sharded-CP feature PR:#4702;
RFC:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/30055
### All-gather KV Cache for Communication Overlap:
- This PR adjusts the calculation order in the SFA.
- split `index_select` into `indexer_select_pre_process` and
`indexer_select_post_process`.
- Combine `nope`, `rope` and `index-k` into a tensor to perform
asynchronous all-gather.
### benchmark:
input=40k && num_batch_token=20k
- before:
```
Mean TTFT (ms): 2614.52
Median TTFT (ms): 3148.03
P50 TTFT (ms): 3148.03
P90 TTFT (ms): 3163.48
P99 TTFT (ms): 3170.20
```
- after:
```
Mean TTFT (ms): 2529.92
Median TTFT (ms): 3051.69
P50 TTFT (ms): 3051.69
P90 TTFT (ms): 3067.31
P99 TTFT (ms): 3072.15
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add new function to mooncake layerwise connector, including:
1. supports sparse attention, for DeepSeek-V3.2
2. Distribute transfer tasks to redundant kv_head cards
This PR is related to [[RFC]: CDCP Scheduling for Disaggregated
Prefilling with KV Cache Layerwise Push
Support](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4842)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the PCP port mapping error issue.In a multi-node PD separation
scenario, when the PCP feature is enabled, there is an issue with the
ZMQ transmission port. Specifically, the IP and port received by Side D
do not match. The cause of this issue is an error in the port mapping
update strategy logic.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Fixed memory retention on certain GPUs caused by missing PUT
operations.
2.Fixed performance degradation resulting from architectural
incompatibilities in the underlying refactor.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
func `get_kv_cache_spec` in model_runner changed a lot and caused error
in cpuoffloading connector which is copied from model_runner, this PR
adapts to new implemented `get_kv_cache_spec` to fix it.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
Signed-off-by: lidenghui <lidenghui1110@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Delete the environment variable
`VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_FLASHCOMM2_OSHARED`
- Introduce layer_sharding as a configurable feature in
additional_config
- Revise the term "shared weight" to "shard weight."
Configuration : The feature is opt-in via the additional_config
argument:
```
--additional-config '{
"layer_sharding": ["o_proj", "q_b_proj"]
}'
```
This is orthogonal to standard tensor parallelism and weight replication
strategies. It is treated as a separate, explicit feature.It can be used
in any scenario, combined with the
flashcomm2https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/3232 feature
or the ShardedCP #4702 feature, to achieve significant performance.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: zzhxx <zhangzihang23@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: chenxiao <Jaychou1620@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: clrs97 <524936896@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Levi-JQ <yujinqi2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chenxiao <Jaychou1620@Gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix pre-create link parameter error, `batch_transfer_sync_write`
requires list.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Import global var form vllm instead of overwirte it, so that we could
use the correct global variant value
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
To adapt different shapes of the KV cache, UCM optimized the
initialization of store by moving it into `register_kv_caches`.
Therefore, this update adds `register_kv_caches` interface to
UCMConnectorV1.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: UnifiedCacheManager <unifiedcachem@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[P/D] Performance enhancement of Layerwise connector in TP asymmetric
scenarios
1. Session fusion: For transmission tasks at each layer, aggregate
transmission tasks with the same destination and merge them into a
single task for assignment.
2. Alltoall aggregation: For TP asymmetric scenarios, perform all
alltoall operations at once according to the block granularity for all
requests.
[RFC]: CDCP Scheduling for Disaggregated Prefilling with KV Cache
Layerwise Push Support
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4842
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In mooncake kvpool, `local_hostname` is not used. Instead, the local IP
is obtained directly via `get_ip()`. Therefore, remove this parameter to
avoid confusion.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
Signed-off-by: LCAIZJ <leichao139636@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
kvpool decode save kvcache
now only support mla
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: baxingpiaochong <771405853@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Chao Lei <leichao139636@163.com>
PR #4892 was revert in #4981, we recover it now. For the potential bug
break deepseek3.2 in PD case, we will find it out and fix it.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
---------
Signed-off-by: lidenghui <lidenghui1110@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, when the MooncakeConnector interacts via ZeroMQ, it throws
the following exception upon send/receive failure:
**Issue 1:** The currently used `zmq.REQ` socket follows a strict
request-reply pattern, requiring an alternating sequence of send →
receive → send → receive... If either a send() or receive() operation
fails, the ZeroMQ socket becomes unusable.
**Solution:** When a send() or receive() exception occurs, close and
delete the ZeroMQ socket, and recreate it upon next use.
**Issue 2:** In `_handle_request`, if `_send_done_recv_signal` raises an
exception, the exception is thrown immediately and subsequent code is
not executed, causing the decode logic to fail to properly release the
request.
**Solution:** Move the call to `_send_done_recv_signal` to the end of
the function.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
Signed-off-by: LCAIZJ <leichao139636@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Improve the performance of Layerwise Connector, mainly includes the
following points:
1. Use event synchronize to replace stream synchronize.
2. Access metaserver when scheduling.
3. Transfer kvcache each Chunk prefill segmentation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
By converting the KV cache from ND to NZ format when the decode node
receives it, this PR ensures that the KV NZ feature works correctly
during the decoding phase in disagg-prefill scenario.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
---------
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: ghphotoframe <854746559@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: alex101-ops <alex1015718386@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. This PR is proposed to support complicated pcp/dcp parallelisms in
Prefill and Decode nodes in Mooncake, such as Prefill: TP8/PCP2DCP8 and
Decode: TP8/DCP4/DP2, which is not supported now. We establish the link
mappings to transfer KVCache between prefill and decode nodes. The main
function is realized in Function of `_get_kv_split_metadata` in
Mooncake_connector.py
2. After a prefill rank is pulled KVCache by a decode rank, the decode
rank will send `DONE_RECVING_MSG` to the prefill rank and the prefill
rank will free its KVCache blocks. If a prefill rank is pulled KVCache
more than one time by several decode ranks and it surely could happen in
complicated pcp/dcp parallelisms, it will cause the prefill rank free
its KVCache blocks for several times, which could cause memory issue.
This PR solve this issue by counting the times of prefill rank would be
pulled KVCache and in the last time, it will free the prefill rank
KVCache blocks. The related code is in Function of `run_busy_loop` in
Mooncake_connector.py
3. If a prefill rank is not pulled KVCache by any decode ranks, the
first rank in decode node will send "DONE_RECVING_MSG" to free its
blocks. The related code is in Function of
`_send_done_signal_to_free_remote_port` in Mooncake_connector.py
### How was this patch tested?
This PR is tested in many pcp/dcp parallelisms, and the accuracy are all
correct.
MLA model:
Prefill node: TP8/DP2, Decode node: TP8/DP2
Prefill node: TP8/PCP2/DCP8, Decode node: TP8/DP2
Prefill node: TP8/PCP2/DCP8, Decode node: TP8/DCP4/DP2
Prefill node: TP8/PCP2/DCP4, Decode node: TP4/DCP2/DP4
Prefill node: TP8/PCP2/DCP2, Decode node: TP4/DCP4/DP4
Prefill node: TP8/PCP2, Decode node: TP4/DCP2
GQA model:
Prefill node: TP8/DP2, Decode node: TP8/DP2
Prefill node: TP8/PCP2/DCP2, Decode node: TP8/DP2
Prefill node: TP8/PCP2/DCP2, Decode node: TP8/DCP2/DP2
Prefill node: TP8/PCP2/DCP2, Decode node: TP4/DP4
Prefill node: TP16/DCP2/PCP1, Decode node: TP8/DCP2/DP2
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
- Co-author by: Daishixun dsxtsteven@sina.com
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaochao <w00642655@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaochao <w00642655@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.KV Pool for KV Transfer in PD Disaggregation Scenarios Error
Resolution
2.Update KV Pool Documentation
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
---------
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In code files such as`mooncake_connector.py`,
`vllm_config.model_config.hf_config` is used to get the LLM configs.
This approach works for LLMs, but not for multi-modal models. For
multi-modal models, `vllm_config.model_config.hf_text_config` must be
used instead to get the LLM configs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix VL model mooncacke PD smoke test error
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: 李少鹏 <lishaopeng21@huawei.com>
#4257 This PR implements the dense_ffn TP of the first three layers of
the deepseek model, I have refactored this PR and used very little code
to support the implementation of this feature.
This PR adds a function `is_moe_layer` to mlp_tp, which supports MLP TP
in models with both mlp and moe, such as deepseek or chat GLM.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: 子潜 <ziqian@U-DMKXH32D-2015.local>
Co-authored-by: chenxiao <Jaychou1620@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The mooncake_connector.py file was importing the wrong arguments to the
file, which could cause errors when use PCP; this issue has been
corrected.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: daishixun <dsxsteven@sina.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
pd disaggregated support cross-machine.
We send the primary and secondary node information of node p to node d.
When node d pulls the KV data, it retrieves the corresponding primary or
secondary node information from the mapping.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The current KVPool has a accuracy issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4412. This PR aims to
fix the precision problem without impacting prefill performance.
Note：Due to a bug in ADXL, calling `current_event.synchronize()` may
occasionally hang. This issue will be fixed in Cann version 8.5.rc1. You
can manually build the master branch of the project at
https://gitcode.com/cann/hixl to resolve this issue before the 8.5.RC1
release.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: LCAIZJ <leichao139636@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces the initial integration of **UCM (Unified Cache
Management)** into the vllm-ascend distributed KV-cache system.
Specifically, it adds:
- A new `UCMConnector` implementation under the distributed KV-transfer
framework.
- Support for offloading KV-cache blocks to external UCM backends (DRAM
/ NFS / Localdisk), depending on UCM configuration).
- Integration with vLLM V1 KV connector interface, including metadata
handling and role registration.
**Why it is needed:**
- UCM provides a unified, high-performance storage layer for KV-cache
externalization.
- This enables vllm-ascend to support out-of-core KV-cache workloads,
improve memory efficiency, and leverage hardware-accelerated storage
paths (RDMA / NFS / hybrid modes).
- This connector is a required component to allow future work on
multi-node inference + UCM-based scaling.
---
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, but limited:
- A new `kv_connector=UCMConnector` option becomes available through the
configuration interface.
- When selected, vllm-ascend workers may initialize UCM and offload
KV-cache blocks externally.
- No default behaviors are changed. Users must explicitly enable this
connector.
This PR does **not** modify:
- existing APIs,
- default execution paths,
- model runner behavior,
- user workflow unless `UCMConnector` is configured.
---
### How was this patch tested?
---
### Prefix Caching Benchmark
We provide preliminary measurements for TTFT (ms) under VLLM benchmark.
Tests run on 2 * Ascend 910B3, vllm-ascend 0.11.0, Tensor Parallel size
2, with UCM (Localdisk) enabled.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: UnifiedCacheManager <unifiedcachem@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In the current KV Pool scenario for models like MLA and GQA, where
different TP ranks generate identical KV caches, the system is designed
to store only a single copy. The previous approach allowed each card to
query storage requirements dynamically, but inconsistent query results
across cards led to incorrect storage. To fix this, the new solution
pre-allocates storage responsibilities; each card now simply stores its
pre-assigned blocks, bypassing the inconsistent query step and ensuring
data correctness.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When kv caches are evicted from the key-value pool, it's possible that
the kv cache for pp0 is still active, but the kv cache for pp1 has
already been evicted. Therefore, a unified check is needed during the
get operation.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: baxingpiaochong <771405853@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
