### What this PR does / why we need it?
Set a additional config parameter to control whether the gmmswigluequant
fuseion operator is enabled; it is enabled by True. / When enabled with
a small number of GPUs, the gmmswigluquant fused operator can cause some
performance degradation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
#### Perf
test model: GLM 4.6(w8a8)
- single A3 node(ep16, tp16), async-scheduling, mtp, FULL_DECODE_ONLY
- bs=1, input_lens=32000, ouput_lens=1024
Without this PR: TPOT 32.22.ms
With this PR: TPOT 30.23ms
---------
Signed-off-by: zjks98 <zhangjiakang4@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: zjks98 <zhangjiakang4@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[Feature] Adapt DispathGmmCombineDecode opertor to align with weight
scale dtype of small operators.
- **Before**: weight scale must be float32
- **After**: weight scale can be float32/float16 when x is float16,
float32/bfloat16 when x is float32/bfloat16. And w1 scale can use
different dtype with w2 scale.
More info about this operator, please refer to RFC: issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5476
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
#### Perf
> When scale is of type fp16 or bf16, it will be cast to fp32 internally
within the operator, while the subsequent computations remain unchanged.
Therefore, this PR will introduce an additional cast operation but halve
the memory copy operations for scale . Furthermore, since the scale data
is only a few KB in size and participates in relatively few
computations, its impact is almost negligible compared to major
operations like matrix multiplication. Thus, the theoretical performance
change should be minimal.
test single operator cases from qwen3-235b,
- single A3 node(ep16), 64 moe experts, 4 experts / die (like qwen3-235b
ep32)
- batch=18/32, token_hidden_size 4096, moe_intermediate_size 1536
The test was conducted for 100 rounds, and the average of the last 95
rounds was taken.
| | bs18(us)| bs32(us)|
| -----| -----| -----|
|Without this PR|96.28|108.83|
|With this PR|96.06|107.90|
Note: Single-operator benchmarks represent an ideal scenario. They are
usually only useful for referencing relative changes and may not fully
align with performance data observed within the full model.
#### Acc
test qwen3-235b eplb on a single A3 node(ep16),
with dispatch_gmm_combine_decode
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-stream-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 83.33 |
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: wangqiankun <wangqiankun13@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Rename dynamic_ep to default_eplb.
2. Rename dynamic_ep_v2 to swift_balancer
3. Discard func compose_expert_update_info_bipartite.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Migrate the torch profiler configuration from deprecated environment
variables (`VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_DIR`, `VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_WITH_STACK`,
`VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_WITH_PROFILE_MEMORY`) to the explicit
`ProfilerConfig` object, aligning with vLLM's configuration best
practices.
The profiler environment variable approach is deprecated in vLLM and
will be removed in v0.14.0 or v1.0.0.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
yes, for deverlopers who want to fetch profiler, he should use `--profiler-config` instead of `VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_DIR`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. If the model has dense layers, the current code will attempt to
obtain the routing experts of the dense layers, which will cause an
error. This should be fixed by modifying the code to skip the dense
layers when obtaining the routing experts.
2. The global_expert_map that the function directly outputs a affects
the performance of dsv3.2.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
DeepSeek V3.1 conversation is normal.
#### aime precision test (dsv3.1)
baseline without eplb
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 66.67 |
eplb
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 70.00 |
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add basic 310p support. Only dense models work with eager mode now.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxu Cheng <2906339855@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fix the input constraints checks for the mlapo and bmm_transpose
operators.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
### Perf
64K/3K，1P1D，bs=32
before this pr:
TPOT 29ms, TTFT 47s，TPS 606 token/s
after this pr:
TPOT 29ms, TTFT 48s，TPS 636 token/s
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Fix DeepSeek-V3.2-W8A8-Pruning mtp
2. Add DeepSeek-V3.2-W8A8-Pruning e2e test
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Upgrade vllm commit to releases/v0.14.0
- Re-open cases in `tests/e2e/singlecard/pooling/test_scoring.py`, since
the errors before have been fixed by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32243
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
Signed-off-by: wjunLu <wjunlu217@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add DeepSeek R1 W8A8 HMB nightly ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Skip bad UT test_models_chunked_prefill_with_empty_kvcache temporarily,
which is inadaptable with main2main 20260114.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280
Signed-off-by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
This PR add 310 e2e test back to ensure the related PR will be tested on
310.
1. for light e2e, we'll run 310p test if the changed files are located
in `vllm_ascend/_310p`
2. for full e2e, we'll always run 310p test
3. for main2main test, we'll stop run 310p test
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add tutorials for `Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct`.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Rename num_iterations_eplb_update to expert_heat_collection_interval.
2. Rename num_wait_worker_iterations to algorithm_execution_interval.
3. Rename init_redundancy_expert to num_redundant_experts because the
variable with the same meaning in vLLM is named this way.
4. Delete gate_eplb because we don't need this feature.
5. Move eplb config into a dict in additional config.
6. Depend on pr5817
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
before this pr：
`--additional-config '{"dynamic_eplb":true,
"num_iterations_eplb_update": 4000, "num_wait_worker_iterations": 150,
"init_redundancy_expert": 16, "expert_map_path": "xxx.json"}'`
after this pr:
`--additional-config
'{"eplb_config":{"dynamic_eplb":true,"expert_heat_collection_interval":4000,
"algorithm_execution_interval":150,"num_redundant_experts": 16,
"expert_map_path": "xxx.json"}}'`
### How was this patch tested?
#### test qwen3-235b eplb num_redundant_experts=16
without pr5817
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 83.33 |
with pr5817
| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-chat |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| aime2024 | 604a78 | accuracy | gen | 86.67 |
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to extract common methods from eagle_proposer and
mtp_proposer. This is a small step towards merging eagle and mtp.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Based on the RFC:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5604
This PR is a refactoring of vllm_ascend/distributed, moving all
kv_transfer realtaed codes into a dedicated folder, which has already
been done in vLLM
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: lty <linhebiwen@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since we have upgrade all the nodes' `cann` HDK version to `25.3rc1`, we
should not limit nightly schedule to the specific nodes
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix bug : https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5634
Intermittent CI failure due to a compilation error in the triton
operator
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When there is no kv cache in some devices, the `_compute_prefill_context
func` will return `None`, which is unexecpted. This PR replaces None
with full zeros/-inf tensors to avoid TypeError.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
```bash
pytest tests/e2e/multicard/4-cards/long_sequence/test_chunked_prefill.py -k test_models_chunked_prefill_with_empty_kvcache
```
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
this pr implement eagle spec decoding for model runner v2, please see
RFC https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5208
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
vLLM version: v0.13.0
---------
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
While using the LLM Compressor quantization tool from the VLLM community
to generate quantized weights, the VLLM Ascend engine needs to be
adapted to support the compressed tensors quantization format.
1. Support Moe model W8A8 Int8 dynamic weight.
2. Specify W4A16 quantization configuration.
Co-authored-by: menogrey 1299267905@qq.com
Co-authored-by: kunpengW-code 1289706727@qq.com
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: LHXuuu <scut_xlh@163.com>
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fixed an accuracy problem when using eagle3 with sp.
The problem is described in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5825.
It also adds a much more precise way to determine whether drafter should
use `sp` or not.
Also, it changes the `eager` of drafter to be a real `eager` in frontend
to avoid a `fx-graph` problem.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
For simpilicity, we test it as in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5825.
And we get the same result of `eagle3` with `sp` disabled.
```text
--------------------------------------------------
total_num_output_tokens: 1000
num_drafts: 437
num_draft_tokens: 1311
num_accepted_tokens: 564
mean acceptance length: 2.29
--------------------------------------------------
acceptance at token 0: 0.62
acceptance at token 1: 0.40
acceptance at token 2: 0.27
acceptance at token 3: 0.00
acceptance at token 4: 0.00
acceptance at token 5: 0.00
```
* vLLM version: v0.13.0
* vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR depends on PR
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/4046. And only if the
latter merged, it will work.
This PR aims to solve the issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/3240.
The new-added Llama-2-7b-hf and Qwen3-0.6B testcases will cover the
senarios that the LoRA weights are added to q_proj, v_proj, k_proj,
o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj, embed_tokens and lm_head modules.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
pytest -sv tests/e2e/singlecard/test_llama2_lora.py
pytest -sv tests/e2e/singlecard/test_qwen3_multi_loras.py
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
[Refactor] Modify the binding logic to allocate CPU cores for each NPU
card
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Modify the binding logic to allocate CPU cores for each NPU card based
on NUMA affinity, while isolating acl_thread/release_thread and other
processes to prevent mutual interference.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
c85cc045f8
Signed-off-by: rowzwel_dx <1392851715@qq.com>
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
Signed-off-by: Rozwel-dx <1392851715@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
According to the official documentation, the parameter
"draft_tensor_parallel_size": 1 is supposed to be applied to the Eagle3
model. However, based on actual debugging, it was found that the number
of tensor parallelisms (tp) of the Eagle model is consistent with that
of the target model. The setting of tp for the draft model did not take
effect as expected.
**Note:** This feature has not been superimposed and tested with `sp`
and `dp`. It will be adapted later
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
```python
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
def main():
prompts = [
"The future of AI is",
]
# Create a sampling params object.
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95)
# Create an LLM.
llm = LLM(
model="meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct",
tensor_parallel_size=4,
gpu_memory_utilization=0.9,
enforce_eager=True,
speculative_config={
"method": "eagle3",
"model": "yuhuili/EAGLE3-LLaMA3.1-Instruct-8B"
"draft_tensor_parallel_size": 1,
"num_speculative_tokens": 3,
},
)
# Generate texts from the prompts.
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
print(f"Outputs: {outputs}")
for output in outputs:
prompt = output.prompt
generated_text = output.outputs[0].text
print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}")
```
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1Fixesvllm-project/vllm#31345
Signed-off-by: zhaomingyu <zhaomingyu13@h-partners.com>
Co-authored-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
this pr support use triton mrope like cuda_forward, which performance is
equal to ascendc ops
this triton ops should use cann 8.5.0
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
test in qwen3-vl-235b acc textvqa
native 81.82
npu triton 81.58
cuda triton 81.52
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: shiyuan680 <917935075@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch initial testing involved connecting two nodes from the HK
region to nightly A2.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Align multi-node nightly test paramter with tutorials documents.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
Test locally and nighly e2e multi-node test cases.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add new function to mooncake layerwise connector, including:
1. supports sparse attention, for DeepSeek-V3.2
2. Distribute transfer tasks to redundant kv_head cards
This PR is related to [[RFC]: CDCP Scheduling for Disaggregated
Prefilling with KV Cache Layerwise Push
Support](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4842)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the PCP port mapping error issue.In a multi-node PD separation
scenario, when the PCP feature is enabled, there is an issue with the
ZMQ transmission port. Specifically, the IP and port received by Side D
do not match. The cause of this issue is an error in the port mapping
update strategy logic.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Fixed memory retention on certain GPUs caused by missing PUT
operations.
2.Fixed performance degradation resulting from architectural
incompatibilities in the underlying refactor.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The customized ascend operator sgmv_expand and sgmv_shrink applies only
to the scenario where rank is 8,16,32,64. When rank >= 128, the operator
is out of range, causing the model to report an error.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Depends on this commit https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/31408
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
---------
Signed-off-by: ZT-AIA <1028681969@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: ZT-AIA <63220130+ZT-AIA@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
To support tensorList for dispatch_ffn_combine, to adjust eplb
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
Single Operator Testing
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: lhchg <lhao_cheng@163.com>
Co-authored-by: lihaocheng <lihaosheng1@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Close the **Full Graph** mode to temporarily avoid accuracy issue for
**Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct-W8A8**.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: InSec <1790766300@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add Qwen3Next CI
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR enables custom op `aclnnMoeInitRoutingCustom` introduced in PR
#5251
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: QianChenxi <chenxi.qian.cq@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
