### What this PR does / why we need it?
Due to the update of the Bisheng version's installation path, the
corresponding source path in the environment variables needs to be
updated.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
---------
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add DeepSeek-R1-W8A8 and Qwen3-235B-W8A8 configs in multi-nodes and
longseq (PCP&DCP) scenario
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: daishixun <dsxsteven@sina.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We should also trigger image build when nightly test related files are
changed to ensure the image is valid for nightly tests. Please note that
this only applies to image with the tag `main*`(which means build
triggered by PR).
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Upgrade vllm commit to 1230
Affected by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27614 (and the
core PR https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/26866), we have to
make the following changes:
1. Modify `tests/e2e/multicard/test_aclgraph_capture_replay.py` to keep
compatible with both vllm version of `v0.13.0` and latest main commitID,
while vllm enables async scheduling by default
2. Skip `test_guided_decoding.py` due to xgrammar errors
(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5524)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
---------
Signed-off-by: wjunLu <wjunlu217@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Refactor the current test with mtp and eagle cases
2. Add new necessary cases with mtp and eagle
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch is a series of refactoring actions, including clarifying the
directory structure of nightly tests, refactoring the config retrieval
logic, and optimizing the workflow, etc. This is the first step:
refactoring the directory structure of nightly to make it more readable
and logical.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
update triton-ascend version to 1229 and bisheng version in 1225;
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
---------
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Fixes vllm break:
1. [[BugFix] register quant scale tensors as buffer #31395]
(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/31395)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
#5051 only implement a basic framework for model runner v2, but there
are still some bugs for e2e functionality, this PR aim to enable basic
functionality.
model runner v2 plans:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5208
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pacth mainly do the following things:
1. Bugfix for multi_node_tests log, log names must be unique when
uploading logs.
2. Optimize `get_cluster_ips` logic, increase the max retry times for
robustness
3. Abandoned the existing gh-proxy temporarily until it is stable
enough.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
81786c8774
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Last month the interface of `OffloadingSpec` has
changed(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27743). This PR fixes
this bug and adds e2e test for cpu offloading.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Qwen3-235B-A22B belongs to the TopN model, but there is currently a lack
of care for the test cases of the wen3-235B-A22B model on Atlas A2, and
most of the machines currently owned by users in the community are A2.
When users encounter problems, we currently have no way of knowing
whether the model runs normally on the corresponding version of the
code, so we added it. In addition, we currently see TopN models such as:
qwen-dense, qwen3-30b-a3b, Qwen3-Next, Qwen2.5-Omni, but Qwen3-235B-A22B
is missing.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
Test with multi-node, result as following:
1. Accuracy test (Time for executing this test case: 25 minutes)
test running successfully, accuracy as following:
```
dataset version metric mode vllm-api-general-chat
--------- --------- -------- ------ -----------------------
gsm8k 7cd45e accuracy gen 95.68
```
2. Perf test (Time for executing this test case: 1h15 minutes)
test running successfully, throughput as following(This is the atlas A3,
for A2 the result about A3/1.3):
```
╒══════════════════════════╤═════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤══════╕
│ Performance Parameters │ Stage │ Average │ Min │ Max │ Median │ P75 │ P90 │ P99 │ N │
╞══════════════════════════╪═════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪══════╡
│ E2EL │ total │ 384086.3958 ms │ 214767.0486 ms │ 528014.771 ms │ 387621.5746 ms │ 388776.7492 ms │ 390164.3559 ms │ 488105.8512 ms │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ TTFT │ total │ 159409.9868 ms │ 1849.4588 ms │ 302439.6965 ms │ 162183.7007 ms │ 162965.477 ms │ 164274.1936 ms │ 262578.6041 ms │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ TPOT │ total │ 149.8842 ms │ 130.2175 ms │ 151.2625 ms │ 150.473 ms │ 150.6978 ms │ 150.9102 ms │ 151.2131 ms │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ ITL │ total │ 149.6789 ms │ 0.0099 ms │ 283.0242 ms │ 150.3276 ms │ 156.8649 ms │ 168.1372 ms │ 199.378 ms │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ InputTokens │ total │ 3654.3079 │ 3108.0 │ 4280.0 │ 3629.0 │ 3728.0 │ 3842.1 │ 4079.0 │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ OutputTokens │ total │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ OutputTokenThroughput │ total │ 3.935 token/s │ 2.8408 token/s │ 6.9843 token/s │ 3.8698 token/s │ 3.8799 token/s │ 3.9916 token/s │ 6.2137 token/s │ 2800 │
╘══════════════════════════╧═════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧══════╛
╒══════════════════════════╤═════════╤═══════════════════╕
│ Common Metric │ Stage │ Value │
╞══════════════════════════╪═════════╪═══════════════════╡
│ Benchmark Duration │ total │ 4391524.3389 ms │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Total Requests │ total │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Failed Requests │ total │ 0 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Success Requests │ total │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Concurrency │ total │ 244.8903 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Max Concurrency │ total │ 256 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Request Throughput │ total │ 0.6376 req/s │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Total Input Tokens │ total │ 10232062 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Prefill Token Throughput │ total │ 22.924 token/s │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Total generated tokens │ total │ 4200000 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Input Token Throughput │ total │ 2329.9568 token/s │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Output Token Throughput │ total │ 956.3877 token/s │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Total Token Throughput │ total │ 3286.3445 token/s │
╘══════════════════════════╧═════════╧═══════════════════╛
```
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update vllm pin to 12.26
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
81786c8774
---------
Signed-off-by: ZT-AIA <1028681969@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: ZT-AIA <63220130+ZT-AIA@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, MHA models (eg: minicpm-2b, Baichuan-7b) will encounter
errors when running in piecewise graph mode, with error messages similar
to:
```
(E89999): When layout is TND and PA not enabled, keyT(8) and valueT(8) must be equal to the last element of actualSeqenceLengthKV(5)[FUNC:CheckInputShapeWhenLayoutIsTND][FILE:prompt_flash_attention_tiling.cpp][LINE:3618]
```
The error occurs because the qkv in the Prefill stage is also padded,
causing the shape to be inconsistent with actual_seq_lengths.
Add unpadding logic for kv.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Fix vllm break in the pr:
1.[Drop v0.14 deprecations
]https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/31285
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: ZT-AIA <1028681969@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, our multi-node logs only show the master node's logs (via the
Kubernetes API), which is insufficient for effective problem
localization if other nodes experience issues. Therefore, this pull
request adds the ability to upload logs for other nodes.
Next plan: Output structured directory logs, including logs from each
node and the polog.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When matmul_and_reduce is enabled, the prefix attribute is required.
However, in some models, the prefix is not passed correctly, causing
errors when starting the service.
The issue of incorrect prefix passing will be fixed in vLLM in the
future.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request introduces an L2 normalization kernel implemented in
Triton, specifically optimized for Ascend NPUs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this PR does not introduce any user-facing changes.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: Ascendyh <hw7osiris@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Revert [KV-Sharing] Support KV-Sharing feature in CLA models (#4138) as
it causes deepseek v3.2 hang error
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
`VLLM_ENABLE_FUSED_EXPERTS_ALLGATHER_EP` is not used anywhere, let's
remove it.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Skip some failed ops tests
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Some E2E testcases are not in our CI workflow, this PR add them back.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Fix vllm break:
1. [Enable cuda graph for deepepHT, 5.3% throughput improvement, 4.4%
TTFT improvement] (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/29558)
Fix Solution: Add the now-necessary `all2all_backend` parameter. The
impact of this parameter on the original `set_splitting_ops_for_v1`
implementation is only that graph mode is disabled in `vllm` if
`deepep_high_throughput` is enabled; it has no effect on the
`vllm-ascend` logic.
2.[Migrate legacy ViT MultiHeadAttention to new MMEncoderAttention
interface ] (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/30684)
Fix Solution: The reason why the GPU does not need to convert qkv to 3D
is that the GPU's flash_attention operator is compatible with 3D and 4D
(b s h d and s b ( h d)), but the NPU's flash_attention_unpad operator
only supports 3D (s b ( h d)). Therefore, we need to introduce the
reshape_qkv_to_3d operation.
4.Skip Tencent-Hunyuan/HunyuanOCR test case, as it has following issue
in upgrade vllm code:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5297
### How was this patch tested?
Co-authored-by: zxwang <1476209578@qq.com>
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: zxwang <1476209578@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: zxwang <1476209578@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
efect e2e ci test：
1. tests/e2e/singlecard/pooling/test_embedding.py: remove the eager
parameter and rename test case
2. tests/e2e/singlecard/pooling/test_scoring.py: Rename test cases
3. tests/e2e/singlecard/pooling/test_classification.py: Rename test case
4. tests/e2e/singlecard/test_quantization.py: remove the eager parameter
and chage model to vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.6B-W8A8 and Rename test case
5. tests/e2e/multicard/test_shared_expert_dp.py: Rename test cases
6. tests/e2e/singlecard/test_sampler.py: Rename test cases
7. tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_accuracy.py: Rename test cases
8. tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py: Rename
test cases and remove the eager parameter
9. tests/e2e/multicard/long_sequence/test_accuracy.py: Rename test cases
and remove the eager parameter
10. tests/e2e/multicard/long_sequence/test_basic.py: Rename test cases
and remove the eager parameter
11.tests/e2e/multicard/test_expert_parallel.py:remove the eager
parameter
12.tests/e2e/multicard/test_full_graph_mode.py:remove the eager
parameter
13.tests/e2e/multicard/test_ilama_lora_tp2.py:remove the eager parameter
14.tests/e2e/singlecard/spec_decode_v1/test_v1_mtp_correctness.py:remove
the eager parameter
15.tests/e2e/singlecard/spec_decode_v1/test_v1_spec_decode.py:remove the
eager parameter
16.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_accuracy.py:remove the eager
parameter
17.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_camem.py:remove the eager parameter
18.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_ilama_lora.py:remove the eager parameter
19.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_multistream_overlap_shared_expert.py:remove
the eager parameter
20.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_vlm.py:remove the eager parameter
21.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_xli:remove the eager parameter
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Using `spawn` in continuous testing scenarios
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Standardize test case naming in `vllm-ascend/tests/e2e/multicard/` to
follow the `<model>_<feature>_<distributed>` convention.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: root <root@LAPTOP-VQKDDVMG.localdomain>
Co-authored-by: root <root@LAPTOP-VQKDDVMG.localdomain>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support KV-Sharing feature in CLA (cross layer attention) models, which
sharing kv cache in some layers.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add pcp accuracy e2e test case
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
We decided to release v0.13.0 soon. So no need to support 0.12.0 now.
Let's drop it.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
For single node test, the lack of a retry mechanism for accessing
ModelScope resulted in an HTTP 400 error sometimes. I recommend using a
local offline cache instead.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In the past time, we used a hybrid architecture cross-compilation
approach for image building. This method had a problem:
cross-compilation performance was very poor, leading to extremely long
build times(abort 4h) and even a probability of failure(see
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/20152861650/job/57849208186).
Therefore, I recommend using a separate architecture build followed by
manifest merging, which significantly reduces image build time(20min).
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
support basic long_seq feature st
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: LookAround <lixushi@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR add w4a8 accuracy testcase for e2e test
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By running the test
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: cuikai (C) <c00827167@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: cuikai (C) <c00827167@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Upstream vLLM PR #30212https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/30212
refactored the attention backend selection interface, This PR adapts
vllm-ascend's get_attn_backend_cls to align with the new upstream
standard, ensuring compatibility and reducing maintenance overhead.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
co-author:[leo-pony][nengjunma@outlook.com](mailto:nengjunma@outlook.com)
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: zxwang <1476209578@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds triton-ascend installation to nightly e2e single card
environment.
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
