--- license: apache-2.0 base_model: HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct datasets: - RomanTeucher/text2cypher-curated language: - en library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: text-generation tags: - text2cypher - cypher - neo4j - lora --- # SmolLM2-135M-text2cypher A fine-tune of [`HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct`](https://huggingface.co/HuggingFaceTB/SmolLM2-135M-Instruct) that turns a natural-language question + a graph schema into a **Cypher** query. Trained with LoRA on [`RomanTeucher/text2cypher-curated`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/RomanTeucher/text2cypher-curated) (1000 train / 75 val / 50 test); the adapters are **merged into the base weights**, so this is a standalone full model that loads like any HF checkpoint — no PEFT needed. **This model is a submission for an interview.** ## Usage The model expects the same ChatML prompt it was trained on: a fixed system message plus a user turn of `Schema:` + `Question:`. ```python from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer model_id = "rizwan261/smollm2-135m-text2cypher" tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_id) model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_id) SYSTEM = ("You are a text-to-Cypher engine for Neo4j. Given a graph schema and a " "question, output a single valid Cypher query that answers the question. " "Use only labels, relationship types and properties that appear in the " "schema. Output the Cypher query and nothing else: no explanation, no " "comments, no markdown code fences.") schema = "Graph schema: Relevant node labels and their properties (with datatypes) are:\nUpdateDate {update_date: DATE}" question = "Which nodes are connected to UpdateDate where update_date is 2008-01-29, and also to another node?" messages = [ {"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM}, {"role": "user", "content": f"Schema:\n{schema}\n\nQuestion:\n{question}"}, ] inputs = tok.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_tensors="pt") out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=256, do_sample=False) print(tok.decode(out[0, inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)) ``` ## Training LoRA (r=16, α=32, dropout=0.05) on the attention + MLP projections, completion-only loss (the prompt is masked, loss is on the target Cypher only), then merged. | | | |---|---| | epochs | 20 | | learning rate | 5e-5, cosine, 5% warmup | | effective batch | 16 (bs 4 × grad-accum 4) | | max length | 1024 | | best val loss | ~0.32 (by `eval_loss`) | ## Evaluation Test split (n=50), greedy decoding. **Translation / structural metrics** over the whole split — surface proxies for correctness: | metric | base | this model | | --- | ---: | ---: | | exact_match | 0.00 | 0.26 | | structural_f1 | 0.18 | 0.81 | | google_bleu | 0.07 | 0.70 | | well_formed | 0.00 | 0.98 | **Execution-based** evaluation against the live Neo4j demo databases, on the 18/50 samples that carry a database reference — predicted and gold queries are run and their *result sets* compared. This is the honest measure, and each stricter layer peels back the previous one's optimism: | how strict | metric | base | this model | | --- | --- | ---: | ---: | | real parser + live schema | CyVer KG-Valid-Query | 0.00 | 0.61 | | runs on the DB | query executes | 0.00 | 0.72 | | **returns the right rows** | exec ExactMatch (non-trivial) | 0.00 | **0.00** | The surface metrics jump, but execution accuracy stays at zero: the model writes well-formed, schema-valid, runnable Cypher that returns the *wrong data*. ## Limitations A 135M model produces Cypher that often *looks* right but isn't: only ~26% are exact matches, and **non-trivial execution accuracy is ~0** — well-formed, runnable queries that return the wrong rows. It reliably gets node labels, clauses and the query skeleton, but struggles with same-node/co-reference patterns, multi-stage aggregation, and occasionally hallucinates functions. Execution numbers come from a small (n=18) subset run against live demo databases, so they can drift. ## License Apache-2.0, inherited from the SmolLM2 base model.