初始化项目,由ModelHub XC社区提供模型
Model: nv-community/Nemotron-Cascade-8B Source: Original Platform
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
dataset_name: international_law
|
||||
description: The following are multiple choice questions (with answers) about international
|
||||
law.
|
||||
fewshot_config:
|
||||
sampler: first_n
|
||||
samples:
|
||||
- question: 'How the consent to be bound of a State may be expressed?
|
||||
|
||||
(A) The consent of a State to be bound is expressed only by ratification (B)
|
||||
The consent of a state to be bound by a treaty may be expressed by signature,
|
||||
ratification, acceptance, approval or accession (C) The consent of a State to
|
||||
be bound is expressed by signature (D) The consent of a State to be bound is
|
||||
expressed by whatever means they choose'
|
||||
target: Let's think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia articles on international
|
||||
law for help. Article 11 of Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties signed
|
||||
in 1969 states that "the consent of a State to be bound by a treaty may be expressed
|
||||
by signature, exchange of instruments constituting a treaty, ratification, acceptance,
|
||||
approval or accession, or by any other means if so agreed." (B) is the most
|
||||
precise and accurate answer. The answer is (B).
|
||||
- question: 'What is the judge ad hoc?
|
||||
|
||||
(A) If a party to a contentious case before the ICJ does not have a national
|
||||
sitting as judge, it is entitled to nominate someone as a judge solely for that
|
||||
case, with the title of judge ad hoc (B) Judge ad hoc is the member of the bench
|
||||
of the ICJ with a casting vote (C) Judge ad hoc is a surrogate judge, in case
|
||||
a judge is disqualified or passes away (D) Judge ad hoc is the judge that each
|
||||
party will always nominate in every contentious case'
|
||||
target: Let's think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia articles on international
|
||||
law for help. As "ad hoc" implies, a judge ad hoc is appointed only for a specific
|
||||
case or period, when a party to a contentious case before the International
|
||||
Court of Justice does not have a regular national sitting as judge. The answer
|
||||
is (A).
|
||||
- question: 'When ''consent'' can serve as a circumstance precluding the wrongfulness
|
||||
of a State conduct?
|
||||
|
||||
(A) Consent can serve as a circumstance precluding the wrongfulness whenever
|
||||
it is given (B) Consent can never serve as a circumstance precluding wrongfulness
|
||||
(C) Consent can serve as a circumstance precluding wrongfulness, provided the
|
||||
consent is valid and to the extent that the conduct remains within the limits
|
||||
of the consent given (D) Consent can always serve as a circumstance precluding
|
||||
wrongfulness, no matter which organ of the State gives it'
|
||||
target: Let's think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia articles on international
|
||||
law for help. Valid consent can serve as a circumstance precluding the wrongfulness
|
||||
of a State conduct if the conduct remains within the limits of that consent,
|
||||
according to Chapter V of the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful
|
||||
Acts, 2001, United Nations. The answer is (C).
|
||||
- question: 'Would a reservation to the definition of torture in the ICCPR be acceptable
|
||||
in contemporary practice?
|
||||
|
||||
(A) This is an acceptable reservation if the reserving country''s legislation
|
||||
employs a different definition (B) This is an unacceptable reservation because
|
||||
it contravenes the object and purpose of the ICCPR (C) This is an unacceptable
|
||||
reservation because the definition of torture in the ICCPR is consistent with
|
||||
customary international law (D) This is an acceptable reservation because under
|
||||
general international law States have the right to enter reservations to treaties'
|
||||
target: Let's think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia articles on international
|
||||
law for help. For it contravenes the object and purpose of the ICCPR, this is
|
||||
an unacceptable reservation in contemporary practice. The answer is (B).
|
||||
- question: 'What types of force does Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibit?
|
||||
|
||||
(A) Article 2(4) encompasses only armed force (B) Article 2(4) encompasses all
|
||||
types of force, including sanctions (C) Article 2(4) encompasses all interference
|
||||
in the domestic affairs of States (D) Article 2(4) encompasses force directed
|
||||
only against a State''s territorial integrity'
|
||||
target: 'Let''s think step by step. We refer to Wikipedia articles on international
|
||||
law for help. Article 2(4) of the UN Charter prohibits states from using armed
|
||||
forces in their international relations. The answer is (A).'
|
||||
tag: mmlu_flan_cot_fewshot_humanities
|
||||
include: _mmlu_flan_cot_fewshot_template_yaml
|
||||
task: mmlu_flan_cot_fewshot_international_law
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user