--- license: apache-2.0 base_model: Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 tags: - martech - analytics - event-taxonomy - json - structured-output - sft - lora library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: text-generation --- # Qwen3-4B EventSpec — MarTech Event Taxonomy Generator (merged) Fine-tuned **Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507** that converts free-form marketing tracking requests into clean, implementation-ready **analytics event specifications** as strict JSON. This repository contains the **fully merged weights** (LoRA adapter merged into the base model), so it loads like any standard model — no PEFT/adapter step required. - **Base model:** [Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507) - **LoRA adapter (pre-merge):** [joshelu/qwen3-4b-Instruct-eventspec-martech-sft](https://huggingface.co/joshelu/qwen3-4b-Instruct-eventspec-martech-sft) - **Method:** Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) + LoRA, then merged - **Task:** marketing tracking request → strict-JSON EventSpec ## Intended use Give the model a plain-English marketing/analytics tracking request; it returns a single JSON object specifying the events to implement (event names, parameters, triggers, consent and deduplication requirements, QA criteria, risk flags, etc.). Useful for MarTech / analytics engineering, GA4 / GTM instrumentation planning, and taxonomy standardization. ## ⚠️ Prompt format (required for correct output) The model was trained with a specific chat format. **You must reproduce it** or output quality degrades sharply. **System prompt (use verbatim):** ``` You are EventSpec, an expert MarTech analytics engineer. You convert free-form marketing tracking requests into clean, implementation-ready analytics event specifications. Given a marketing tracking request, respond with a SINGLE valid JSON object and nothing else: no prose, no markdown, no code fences. The JSON must be strictly parseable. The specification captures: a concise `request_summary`; the `business_goal`; the `tracking_scope` (platforms, page_or_screen, user_action, conversion_type); and a list of `recommended_events`. Each recommended event defines `event_name` (snake_case), `event_description`, `platform`, `event_type`, `required_parameters`, `optional_parameters`, `trigger_condition`, `consent_requirements`, and `deduplication_requirements`. Use consistent snake_case event and parameter names, follow analytics best practices (GA4/GTM conventions where relevant), and respect privacy/consent requirements. Output only the JSON object. ``` **User message format:** ``` Convert this marketing tracking request into a clean analytics event specification. Request: ``` ## Usage (transformers) ```python import torch from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer repo = "joshelu/qwen3-4b-eventspec-martech-merged" tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(repo) model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(repo, dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto") SYSTEM_PROMPT = ( "You are EventSpec, an expert MarTech analytics engineer. You convert free-form " "marketing tracking requests into clean, implementation-ready analytics event " "specifications.\n\n" "Given a marketing tracking request, respond with a SINGLE valid JSON object and " "nothing else: no prose, no markdown, no code fences. The JSON must be strictly " "parseable.\n\n" "The specification captures: a concise `request_summary`; the `business_goal`; the " "`tracking_scope` (platforms, page_or_screen, user_action, conversion_type); and a " "list of `recommended_events`. Each recommended event defines `event_name` " "(snake_case), `event_description`, `platform`, `event_type`, `required_parameters`, " "`optional_parameters`, `trigger_condition`, `consent_requirements`, and " "`deduplication_requirements`.\n\n" "Use consistent snake_case event and parameter names, follow analytics best " "practices (GA4/GTM conventions where relevant), and respect privacy/consent " "requirements. Output only the JSON object." ) USER_PREFIX = "Convert this marketing tracking request into a clean analytics event specification." request = ("A pharmacy app wants to track refill reminders, refill started, refill submitted, " "refill ready, and pickup completed, but no medication names or prescription numbers " "should be sent.") messages = [ {"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM_PROMPT}, {"role": "user", "content": f"{USER_PREFIX}\n\nRequest:\n{request}"}, ] prompt = tok.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True) inputs = tok(prompt, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device) out = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=2048, do_sample=False, pad_token_id=tok.eos_token_id) print(tok.decode(out[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)) ``` ## Usage (Inference Endpoints / chat_completion) ```python from huggingface_hub import InferenceClient client = InferenceClient("https://YOUR-ENDPOINT.endpoints.huggingface.cloud", token="hf_...") resp = client.chat_completion( messages=[ {"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM_PROMPT}, {"role": "user", "content": f"{USER_PREFIX}\n\nRequest:\n{request}"}, ], max_tokens=2048, temperature=0, ) print(resp.choices[0].message.content) ``` ## Recommended generation settings - `temperature = 0` (greedy) — best for stable, strictly parseable JSON. - `max_new_tokens >= 2048` — specs are long; a lower limit will truncate the JSON mid-string. - Parse the output with `json.loads`; retry with a higher token limit if parsing fails. ## Output schema The model produces a single JSON object. Core keys: - `request_summary` — one-line summary of the request. - `business_goal` — the measurement objective. - `tracking_scope` — `{ platforms, page_or_screen, user_action, conversion_type }`. - `recommended_events` — list of events, each with `event_name` (snake_case), `event_description`, `platform`, `event_type`, `required_parameters`, `optional_parameters`, `trigger_condition`, `consent_requirements`, `deduplication_requirements`. Richer examples in the training data also include `implementation_notes`, `qa_criteria`, `open_questions`, and `risk_flags`, which the model produces as appropriate. ## Training - **Dataset:** `joshelu/martech-event-taxonomy-mapper-training-data` (private). - The 100-row `train` split, **minus** every `id` appearing in the `validation` or `test` split → **80 training rows** (held-out eval stays honest). - Eval during training used the `validation` split (10 rows). - Assistant targets are compact, strict JSON (`json.dumps(output, separators=(",", ":"))`), validated as parseable before training. - **Method:** SFT + LoRA, then merged. - LoRA: `r=16`, `alpha=32`, `dropout=0.05`, target modules `q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj`. - 3 epochs, effective batch size 4 (per-device 1 × grad-accum 4), lr `2e-4`, warmup ratio `0.05`, cosine schedule, max length 2048, bf16, gradient checkpointing. - Hardware: a10g-small (HF Jobs). - **Metrics (final):** eval loss ≈ `0.320`, eval mean token accuracy ≈ `0.924`. ## Limitations - Trained on a small (80-row) dataset — coverage is limited to the taxonomy and styles seen in training; unusual domains may produce weaker specs. - Output is a strong **draft**, not a substitute for review by an analytics engineer, especially for consent/privacy and PII handling. - With very low `max_new_tokens`, long specs will be truncated and fail JSON parsing — keep the limit high and validate the parse.