初始化项目,由ModelHub XC社区提供模型
Model: exploitintel/cve-cwe-qwen3-8b Source: Original Platform
This commit is contained in:
117
README.md
Normal file
117
README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
license: apache-2.0
|
||||
base_model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B
|
||||
datasets:
|
||||
- exploitintel/cve-cwe-consensus
|
||||
language:
|
||||
- en
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- cybersecurity
|
||||
- vulnerability
|
||||
- cve
|
||||
- cwe
|
||||
- text-classification
|
||||
- qlora
|
||||
- unsloth
|
||||
pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
||||
library_name: transformers
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# CVE → CWE Classifier (Qwen3-8B)
|
||||
|
||||
A QLoRA fine-tune of **Qwen3-8B** that maps a free-text **CVE description** to the **CWE weakness
|
||||
ID(s)** it corresponds to. The LoRA adapter is merged into the base and released in 16-bit, so it
|
||||
loads directly with `transformers`. A higher-quality (larger) variant is at
|
||||
[`exploitintel/cve-cwe-qwen3-32b`](https://huggingface.co/exploitintel/cve-cwe-qwen3-32b).
|
||||
|
||||
Trained only on labels where **NVD and the CNA agree** after roll-up to **CWE View-1003** — see the
|
||||
[`cve-cwe-consensus`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/exploitintel/cve-cwe-consensus) dataset.
|
||||
|
||||
## Results (held-out test split, 6,802 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Score |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Exact-match | **0.676** |
|
||||
| Micro-F1 | **0.702** |
|
||||
| Macro-F1 | **0.511** |
|
||||
|
||||
By difficulty (does the description *name* the weakness, or must it be inferred?):
|
||||
|
||||
| Stratum | n | Exact-match | Micro-F1 |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Easy (weakness named) | 2,046 | 0.841 | 0.870 |
|
||||
| Hard (must infer) | 4,756 | 0.605 | 0.628 |
|
||||
|
||||
The macro-F1 reflects a dataset that caps majority CWEs (e.g. CWE-79) so rare weaknesses are
|
||||
learned rather than drowned out.
|
||||
|
||||
**Reading the numbers:**
|
||||
- **Macro-F1 is computed over the union of gold and predicted labels** (125 = 117 gold + ~8 the model predicted outside the gold set). Those out-of-label predictions score ~0 and pull macro *down*, so 0.511 is a **conservative** figure.
|
||||
- **Exact-match has an inherent ceiling of ~98.3%:** ~1.74% of the test set (273 groups / 1,205 rows) are identical descriptions mapped to *different* CWEs (e.g. a bare "Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability"), which a description-only model cannot disambiguate.
|
||||
- Scores are on the **capped/balanced** test split (~30% "easy" rows), so they are **not** directly comparable to metrics measured on a different (e.g. natural-distribution) split.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import torch
|
||||
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
|
||||
|
||||
mid = "exploitintel/cve-cwe-qwen3-8b"
|
||||
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(mid)
|
||||
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(mid, torch_dtype="auto", device_map="auto")
|
||||
|
||||
messages = [
|
||||
{"role": "system", "content": "You are a vulnerability analyst. Given a CVE description, "
|
||||
"reply with only the CWE ID(s) it maps to, comma-separated."},
|
||||
{"role": "user", "content": "A SQL injection vulnerability in the login endpoint allows an "
|
||||
"unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL via the username parameter."},
|
||||
]
|
||||
inputs = tok.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
|
||||
out = model.generate(inputs, max_new_tokens=32, do_sample=False)
|
||||
print(tok.decode(out[0][inputs.shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
|
||||
# -> CWE-89
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### GGUF / Ollama
|
||||
|
||||
A `Q4_K_M` GGUF is included in this repo for local runners:
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
ollama run hf.co/exploitintel/cve-cwe-qwen3-8b:Q4_K_M
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Set the same system prompt (`/set system You are a vulnerability analyst...`) so it returns bare CWE IDs.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Note:** This Ollama command has not been verified end-to-end. This is a standard `qwen3`
|
||||
> model so the embedded template should apply normally — but if `ollama run` ignores the
|
||||
> system prompt and produces rambling text instead of a bare CWE ID, supply an explicit
|
||||
> ChatML Modelfile `TEMPLATE` as shown in the [Qwen3.5-4B card](https://huggingface.co/exploitintel/cve-cwe-qwen35-4b).
|
||||
|
||||
## Training
|
||||
|
||||
- **Base:** `Qwen/Qwen3-8B` (trained 4-bit via `unsloth/qwen3-8b-unsloth-bnb-4bit`)
|
||||
- **Method:** QLoRA (4-bit) with Unsloth, merged to 16-bit · released checkpoint: **checkpoint-960** (final; eval loss declined monotonically through training)
|
||||
- **Dataset:** [`exploitintel/cve-cwe-consensus`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/exploitintel/cve-cwe-consensus) — 69,386 rows (55,810 / 6,774 / 6,802), majority CWEs capped at 2,500
|
||||
- **Settings:** 2 epochs · context 512 · LR 2e-4 · AdamW 8-bit · linear schedule · packing on · train-on-completions-only off · seed 3407
|
||||
- LoRA fine-tune, adapter merged into the base. Exact per-run **LoRA rank/alpha, batch size, and weight decay were not logged to the repo.**
|
||||
|
||||
## Prompt format
|
||||
|
||||
ChatML (Qwen3 standard). System prompt fixed; the description is the only user input — never feed the
|
||||
label or CVE-ID.
|
||||
|
||||
- **system:** `You are a vulnerability analyst. Given a CVE description, reply with only the CWE ID(s) it maps to, comma-separated.`
|
||||
- **user:** the CVE description
|
||||
- **assistant:** `CWE-79, CWE-80`
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
- CWEs below the dataset's 50-example floor are not in the label space and won't be predicted.
|
||||
- Outputs CWE IDs as text and can occasionally emit a malformed/non-existent ID — validate against
|
||||
the official CWE list.
|
||||
- English-only; descriptions only (no code, CVSS, or references).
|
||||
- A triage/assist aid, not an authoritative CWE assignment — human-review before acting.
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
Apache-2.0 (inherited from Qwen3-8B). Dataset derives from public upstreams (NVD, MITRE CVE/CWE).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user