--- base_model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B library_name: transformers license: apache-2.0 language: - en tags: - math - reasoning - gsm8k - synthetic-data - qwen3 - qlora - unsloth - fine-tuned - grade-school-math - chain-of-thought datasets: - clarkkitchen22/SynthGSM8K-50K pipeline_tag: text-generation model-index: - name: Qwen3-8B-GSM8K-Synth-50K results: - task: type: text-generation name: Math Reasoning dataset: name: GSM8K type: openai/gsm8k metrics: - name: GSM8K Accuracy type: accuracy value: 86.2 verified: true - name: Training Loss (final) type: loss value: 0.266 --- # Qwen3-8B-GSM8K-Synth-50K A **Qwen3-8B** model fine-tuned on **50,418 synthetic grade-school math problems** using QLoRA, designed for step-by-step mathematical reasoning with chain-of-thought. ## What This Model Does Given a math word problem, the model produces a structured reasoning chain inside `` tags, then outputs the final numerical answer. ### Example **Input:** > If 3x + 7 = 22, what is x? **Output:** ``` Step 1: Subtract 7 from both sides: 3x = 22 - 7 Step 2: Calculate: 3x = 15 Step 3: Divide both sides by 3: x = 15 / 3 Step 4: Calculate: x = 5 The answer is 5.0. ``` ## Evaluation Results Evaluated on the **full GSM8K test set** (1,319 questions) with greedy decoding and 4-bit quantization. | Model | GSM8K Accuracy | Correct / Total | Time | |---|---|---|---| | Base Qwen3-8B | 79.4% | 1,047 / 1,319 | 121.8m | | **Qwen3-8B-GSM8K-Synth-50K** | **86.2%** | **1,137 / 1,319** | 45.1m | **Fine-tuning improvement: +6.8 percentage points** over the base model. The fine-tuned model also runs ~2.7x faster at inference due to shorter, more structured outputs (the base model produces verbose markdown formatting while the fine-tuned model outputs concise step-by-step solutions). ### Cross-Model Comparison | Model | Params | Training Data | GSM8K Accuracy | vs Base | |---|---|---|---|---| | Base Qwen3-4B | 4B | — | 74.7% | — | | Qwen3-4B-GSM8K-Synth-35K | 4B | 35K synthetic | 85.0% | +10.3% | | Base Qwen3-8B | 8B | — | 79.4% | — | | **Qwen3-8B-GSM8K-Synth-50K** | **8B** | **50K synthetic** | **86.2%** | **+6.8%** | Key takeaways: - Synthetic data fine-tuning provides a substantial accuracy boost at both model scales (+10.3% for 4B, +6.8% for 8B) - The 8B fine-tuned model achieves the highest absolute accuracy (86.2%) - Scaling from 4B to 8B improves base performance by +4.7% and fine-tuned performance by +1.2% ## Training Details ### Base Model & Method | Parameter | Value | |---|---| | **Base model** | [Qwen/Qwen3-8B](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-8B) | | **Method** | QLoRA (4-bit NF4 quantization) | | **Framework** | [Unsloth](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) + HuggingFace TRL | | **Merge** | Fully merged to 16-bit (no adapter needed at inference) | ### QLoRA Configuration | Parameter | Value | |---|---| | **LoRA rank** | 16 | | **LoRA alpha** | 16 | | **Target modules** | q_proj, k_proj, v_proj, o_proj, gate_proj, up_proj, down_proj | | **Dropout** | 0 | | **Trainable parameters** | 43.6M / 8.23B (0.53%) | ### Training Hyperparameters | Parameter | Value | |---|---| | **Epochs** | 3 | | **Batch size** | 1 (per device) | | **Gradient accumulation** | 64 (effective batch = 64) | | **Learning rate** | 2e-4 (cosine schedule) | | **Warmup steps** | 10 | | **Optimizer** | AdamW 8-bit | | **Precision** | bf16 | | **Max sequence length** | 1024 | | **Max grad norm** | 1.0 | | **Seed** | 42 | | **Total steps** | 2,364 | ### Memory Optimizations (fitting 8B in 12GB VRAM) Training Qwen3-8B in 4-bit still uses ~7.2GB for weights alone, leaving only ~4.4GB on a 12GB GPU. The following optimizations made training possible: - **Embedding offloading** (`offload_embedding=True`) — input embeddings kept on CPU - **Chunked fused CE loss** (`UNSLOTH_CE_LOSS_N_CHUNKS=8`) — splits the large 151,936-vocab logits computation into smaller chunks - **Unsloth gradient checkpointing** — auto-offloads activations for long sequences - **Reduced sequence length** (1024 vs 4096) — data is short (median ~100 tokens, max ~260) - **PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True** — reduces CUDA memory fragmentation - Peak VRAM usage: **11.8GB / 12.3GB** (96%) ### Training Loss Curve ``` Epoch 1: 0.735 → 0.304 (rapid descent) Epoch 2: 0.292 → 0.277 (steady refinement) Epoch 3: 0.271 → 0.266 (final polish) Final training loss: 0.302 (avg over 3 epochs) ``` | Milestone | Loss | Epoch | |---|---|---| | Step 50 | 0.735 | 0.06 | | Step 250 | 0.333 | 0.32 | | Step 500 | 0.316 | 0.63 | | Step 788 (Epoch 1) | 0.304 | 1.02 | | Step 1000 | 0.292 | 1.27 | | Step 1250 | 0.291 | 1.59 | | Step 1576 (Epoch 2) | 0.277 | 2.03 | | Step 1750 | 0.270 | 2.22 | | Step 2000 | 0.266 | 2.54 | | Step 2364 (Epoch 3) | 0.266 | 2.98 | ### Comparison with 4B Model | Metric | Qwen3-4B (35K) | Qwen3-8B (50K) | |---|---|---| | **Training data** | 34,818 examples | 50,418 examples | | **Final loss** | 0.291 | 0.266 | | **LoRA rank** | 32 | 16 | | **Training time** | 3h 18m | 9h 25m | | **Peak VRAM** | ~8.1 GB | ~11.8 GB | ### Hardware & Time | Metric | Value | |---|---| | **GPU** | NVIDIA RTX 4070 SUPER (12GB VRAM) | | **Training time** | 9h 25m (33,890 seconds) | | **Throughput** | 4.46 samples/sec, 0.07 steps/sec | | **Peak VRAM** | ~11.8 GB | ## Training Data Trained on the **full 50,418 examples** from [clarkkitchen22/SynthGSM8K-50K](https://huggingface.co/datasets/clarkkitchen22/SynthGSM8K-50K) — a synthetic grade-school math dataset generated by Claude Haiku 4.5 via Anthropic's Batch API, then filtered through an 8-stage quality pipeline. ### Data Format Each training example follows the Qwen3 ChatML format with thinking tags: ``` <|im_start|>user {math word problem}<|im_end|> <|im_start|>assistant {step-by-step solution} The answer is {number}.<|im_end|> ``` GSM8K-style calculation annotations (e.g., `<<24*3=72>>`) are stripped from solutions during preprocessing. ### Dataset Highlights - **50,418 problems** — full dataset used for this training run - Generated via few-shot prompting from 200 real GSM8K seed problems - 8-stage filter pipeline: structure, answer range, solution quality, AI detection, math verification, exact dedup, fuzzy dedup (TF-IDF @ 0.85), seed overlap - Average 3.0 math operations per solution - 92.6% integer answers, range 0-225,000 - ~$55 generation cost (Haiku 4.5 Batch API at 50% discount) ## Usage ### With Transformers ```python from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer model_name = "clarkkitchen22/Qwen3-8B-GSM8K-Synth-50K" tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name) model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_name, torch_dtype="auto", device_map="auto") messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "A store sells apples for $2 each and oranges for $3 each. If Sarah buys 5 apples and 4 oranges, how much does she spend?"}] text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True) inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512, temperature=0.6, top_p=0.95) response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs.input_ids.shape[-1]:], skip_special_tokens=True) print(response) ``` ### Answer Extraction ```python import re def extract_answer(text): """Extract numerical answer from model output.""" match = re.search(r"answer\s*(?:is|:)\s*([-\d,]+\.?\d*)", text, re.IGNORECASE) if match: return float(match.group(1).replace(",", "")) matches = re.findall(r"([-\d,]+\.?\d+)", text) return float(matches[-1].replace(",", "")) if matches else None ``` ## Intended Use - **Math tutoring**: Step-by-step solutions to grade-school math problems - **Research**: Studying the effect of model scale and synthetic data on math reasoning - **Distillation baseline**: Comparing synthetic-data-trained small models against larger models - **Further fine-tuning**: Starting point for domain-specific math reasoning tasks ## Limitations - Trained on synthetic data generated by Haiku 4.5 — bounded by that model's math ability - Optimized for GSM8K-style word problems (arithmetic, basic algebra) — not calculus, geometry, or advanced math - All training answers are non-negative; may struggle with problems requiring negative answers - Solutions use a specific `` tag format — other prompting styles may give worse results - Evaluated on GSM8K only — performance on other math benchmarks (MATH, MMLU-Math) not yet tested ## How It Was Built ### End-to-End Pipeline ``` 200 GSM8K seeds → Claude Haiku 4.5 (Batch API) → 83K raw problems → 8-stage filter → 50K clean dataset → QLoRA fine-tune Qwen3-8B → Merge to 16-bit → Push to HuggingFace ``` ### Pipeline Code The full data generation pipeline and training code is available at: [github.com/goldbar123467/SynthDataGSM8K](https://github.com/goldbar123467/SynthDataGSM8K) ## Citation ```bibtex @model{qwen3_8b_gsm8k_synth_50k, title={Qwen3-8B-GSM8K-Synth-50K}, author={clarkkitchen22}, year={2026}, base_model={Qwen/Qwen3-8B}, training_data={clarkkitchen22/SynthGSM8K-50K}, url={https://huggingface.co/clarkkitchen22/Qwen3-8B-GSM8K-Synth-50K} } ``` ## Acknowledgements - **Base model**: [Qwen/Qwen3-8B](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen3-8B) by Alibaba - **Training data**: [SynthGSM8K-50K](https://huggingface.co/datasets/clarkkitchen22/SynthGSM8K-50K) — synthetic math problems from Claude Haiku 4.5 - **Training framework**: [Unsloth](https://github.com/unslothai/unsloth) (2x faster QLoRA) - **Seed data**: [OpenAI GSM8K](https://github.com/openai/grade-school-math)