初始化项目,由ModelHub XC社区提供模型
Model: aifeifei798/Supra-Router-51M-zh-cn Source: Original Platform
This commit is contained in:
35
.gitattributes
vendored
Normal file
35
.gitattributes
vendored
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|||||||
|
*.7z filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.arrow filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.bin filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.bz2 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.ckpt filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.ftz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.gz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.h5 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.joblib filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.lfs.* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.mlmodel filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.model filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.msgpack filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.npy filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.npz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.onnx filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.ot filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.parquet filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.pb filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.pickle filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.pkl filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.pt filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.pth filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.rar filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.safetensors filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.tar.* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.tar filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.tflite filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.tgz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.wasm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.xz filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
|
*tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
|
||||||
332
README.md
Normal file
332
README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
|
|||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
library_name: transformers
|
||||||
|
tags:
|
||||||
|
- router
|
||||||
|
- orchestrator
|
||||||
|
- slm
|
||||||
|
- edge-computing
|
||||||
|
- mixture-of-experts
|
||||||
|
- text-generation
|
||||||
|
- TRL
|
||||||
|
pipeline_tag: text-generation
|
||||||
|
model_type: llama
|
||||||
|
datasets:
|
||||||
|
- aifeifei798/Prompt-Routing-Dataset-zh-cn
|
||||||
|
language:
|
||||||
|
- en
|
||||||
|
- zh
|
||||||
|
base_model:
|
||||||
|
- SupraLabs/Supra-Router-51M
|
||||||
|
license: apache-2.0
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<h1 align="center">Supra-Router-51M-zh-cn · Multi-Task Infrastructure Routing Model</h1>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
你好!请问大熊猫主要生活在中国的哪个省份?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Domain: English Language | Complexity: 2 | Math: False | Code: False | Route: small model | Justification: Automated override: Simple text or factual task with low complexity (2), perfectly optimized for an edge SLM.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
请用 Python 写一段快速排序算法的代码,并简单解释它的时间复杂度。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Domain: Programming | Complexity: 2 | Math: False | Code: True | Route: big model | Justification: Automated override: Task complexity is high (2) or involves technical logic (Math: False, Code: True), requiring frontier capabilities.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
如果一个等差数列的首项是3,公差是5,请问第12项是多少?让我们逐步思考。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Domain: Mathematics | Complexity: 2 | Math: True | Code: False | Route: big model | Justification: Automated override: Task complexity is high (2) or involves technical logic (Math: True, Code: False), requiring frontier capabilities.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 使用
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```python
|
||||||
|
import torch
|
||||||
|
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
MODEL_ID = "aifeifei798/Supra-Router-51M-zh-cn"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
print("[*] Initializing local infrastructure router...")
|
||||||
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID)
|
||||||
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
|
||||||
|
MODEL_ID, dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
model.eval()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Example prompt showcasing keyword-trap evasion
|
||||||
|
user_prompt = "如果一个等差数列的首项是3,公差是5,请问第12项是多少?让我们逐步思考。"
|
||||||
|
print(user_prompt)
|
||||||
|
# Format to match internal SFT attention alignment
|
||||||
|
formatted_input = f"Task: {user_prompt}\nAnalysis: "
|
||||||
|
inputs = tokenizer(formatted_input, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
with torch.no_grad():
|
||||||
|
outputs = model.generate(
|
||||||
|
**inputs,
|
||||||
|
max_new_tokens=128,
|
||||||
|
do_sample=False,
|
||||||
|
pad_token_id=tokenizer.pad_token_id,
|
||||||
|
eos_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id,
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
generated_ids = outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[1] :]
|
||||||
|
print(tokenizer.decode(generated_ids, skip_special_tokens=True).strip())
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### TRL 训练脚本
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```Python
|
||||||
|
import torch
|
||||||
|
from datasets import load_dataset
|
||||||
|
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
|
||||||
|
from trl import SFTTrainer, SFTConfig
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# ================= 1. 基础配置 =================
|
||||||
|
MODEL_ID = "./Supra-Router-51M"
|
||||||
|
DATA_PATH = (
|
||||||
|
"./Prompt-Routing-Dataset-zh-cn/router_dataset_openai_gpt-oss-120b-zhcn.jsonl"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
OUTPUT_DIR = "./Supra-Router-51M-zh"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
print("[*] 正在加载 Tokenizer 和 模型...")
|
||||||
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID)
|
||||||
|
if tokenizer.pad_token is None:
|
||||||
|
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# 加载模型
|
||||||
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
|
||||||
|
MODEL_ID, device_map="auto", torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
print(f"[*] 正在加载中文数据集: {DATA_PATH}")
|
||||||
|
dataset = load_dataset("json", data_files=DATA_PATH)["train"]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# ================= 2. 数据格式化与双列拆分 =================
|
||||||
|
def format_prompts(batch):
|
||||||
|
prompts = []
|
||||||
|
completions = []
|
||||||
|
for i in range(len(batch["prompt"])):
|
||||||
|
raw_prompt = batch["prompt"][i]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if len(raw_prompt) > 1500:
|
||||||
|
raw_prompt = raw_prompt[:1500] + "\n...[Text Truncated]..."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# 1. 输入部分:去掉冒号后面的空格,防止 BPE 分词器边界混淆
|
||||||
|
task_input = f"Task: {raw_prompt}\nAnalysis:"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# 2. 输出部分:在开头 Domain 前面主动加一个空格,确保无缝对齐
|
||||||
|
output_label = (
|
||||||
|
f" Domain: {batch['primary_domain'][i]} | "
|
||||||
|
f"Complexity: {batch['complexity_score'][i]} | "
|
||||||
|
f"Math: {batch['math_task'][i]} | "
|
||||||
|
f"Code: {batch['coding_task'][i]} | "
|
||||||
|
f"Route: {batch['routing_choice'][i]} | "
|
||||||
|
f"Justification: {batch['routing_justification'][i]}"
|
||||||
|
f"{tokenizer.eos_token}"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
prompts.append(task_input)
|
||||||
|
completions.append(output_label)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return {"prompt": prompts, "completion": completions}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
print("[*] 正在格式化数据集并进行双列映射...")
|
||||||
|
dataset = dataset.map(format_prompts, batched=True, remove_columns=dataset.column_names)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# ================= 3. 训练参数配置 =================
|
||||||
|
training_args = SFTConfig(
|
||||||
|
output_dir=OUTPUT_DIR,
|
||||||
|
max_length=2048,
|
||||||
|
completion_only_loss=True, # 开启原生答案专注模式
|
||||||
|
per_device_train_batch_size=8,
|
||||||
|
gradient_accumulation_steps=4,
|
||||||
|
learning_rate=3e-5,
|
||||||
|
logging_steps=10,
|
||||||
|
num_train_epochs=4,
|
||||||
|
save_strategy="epoch",
|
||||||
|
bf16=True,
|
||||||
|
optim="adamw_torch",
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
trainer = SFTTrainer(
|
||||||
|
model=model,
|
||||||
|
train_dataset=dataset,
|
||||||
|
args=training_args,
|
||||||
|
processing_class=tokenizer,
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# ================= 4. 启动微调 =================
|
||||||
|
print("[*] 万事俱备,开始以新版原生【答案专注模式】进行微调!")
|
||||||
|
trainer.train()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
print(f"[*] 训练大功告成!正在保存至 {OUTPUT_DIR}")
|
||||||
|
trainer.save_model(OUTPUT_DIR)
|
||||||
|
tokenizer.save_pretrained(OUTPUT_DIR)
|
||||||
|
print("[[*] 全部任务结束。")
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## completion_only_loss
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`completion_only_loss`(仅对答案计算损失)是监督微调(SFT)和对齐训练(Alignment)中**非常核心、甚至可以说是必用**的一项技术。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
为了让你彻底明白它的底层逻辑,我们从“普通训练”和“答案专注训练”的对比、PyTorch 的底层实现、以及为什么它对小模型至关重要这三个维度来剖析。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 一、 核心对比:普通 SFT vs Completion-Only SFT
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
在因果语言模型(Causal LM)的日常训练中,模型的任务是**预测下一个 Token**。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
假设一条完整的训练数据拼接后是:
|
||||||
|
> `Task: 1+1等于几?\nAnalysis: 等于2。`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 1. 普通的 SFT 训练(Full Sequence Loss)
|
||||||
|
模型需要对**每一个 Token** 都计算预测损失(Loss),并进行梯度回传:
|
||||||
|
* 模型预测 `Task` 后面的第一个字(“1”) -> **计算 Loss**
|
||||||
|
* 模型预测 “1” 后面的 “+” -> **计算 Loss**
|
||||||
|
* ……
|
||||||
|
* 模型预测 `Analysis: ` 后面的 “等” -> **计算 Loss**
|
||||||
|
* 模型预测 “等” 后面的 “于” -> **计算 Loss**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**弊端**:模型在训练时,不仅要学习怎么回答“等于2”,还要花大量的脑力去学习和记忆“1+1等于几?”这段提示词。但在实际使用时,提示词是用户输入的,模型根本不需要去预测它。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 2. Completion-Only SFT 训练
|
||||||
|
模型依然可以看见完整的 `Task: 1+1等于几?\nAnalysis: 等于2。`(用于提供完整的上下文注意力),但在计算损失时:
|
||||||
|
* 提示词(Prompt)部分:**不计算 Loss,完全忽略**。
|
||||||
|
* 回答(Completion)部分:**正常计算 Loss**。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
模型唯一的优化目标,就是在看到前面的输入后,如何精准地吐出后面的答案。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 二、 底层原理:PyTorch 的 `-100` 魔法
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
在底层代码中,这个机制是通过 PyTorch 交叉熵损失函数(`CrossEntropyLoss`)中的一个特殊参数 **`ignore_index`** 来实现的。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
在 PyTorch 和 Hugging Face Transformers 中,`ignore_index` 的默认值是 **`-100`**。任何标签值被设为 `-100` 的 Token,在计算 Loss 时都会被**完全忽略,梯度不会回传**。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 具体的 Token 与 Label 变化:
|
||||||
|
假设我们要训练一句话,分词后的 `input_ids` 如下。我们在后台为它准备了对应的 `labels`:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| 文本内容 | `Task:` | `大熊猫` | `住哪?` | `\nAnalysis:` | ` Domain:` | ` Mathematics` | ` |` |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| **`input_ids` (输入)** | `1203` | `3042` | `9842` | `4322` | `567` | `8831` | `102` |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
| **`labels` (标签)** | **`-100`** | **`-100`** | **`-100`** | **`-100`** | `567` | `8831` | `102` |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. 在 Forward(前向传播)时,模型能看到完整的 `input_ids`(包含大熊猫、住哪等上下文)。
|
||||||
|
2. 在计算 Loss 时,PyTorch 看到前四个 Label 是 `-100`,就会直接跳过,**只对后三个真正的标签值计算 CrossEntropy**。
|
||||||
|
3. 这样,模型的所有参数权重,都只会为了“在看到前四个 Token 时,如何更准地预测出后三个 Token”而发生改变。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 三、 为什么新版 TRL 的“双列自动检测”如此方便?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
在过去(比如旧版的 `trl` 库中),我们需要使用 `DataCollatorForCompletionOnlyLM`。
|
||||||
|
它的工作原理是:
|
||||||
|
1. 把整段文本拼成一个大 `text`。
|
||||||
|
2. 在分词后的 Token 序列里,拿着一根“放大镜”,去人肉搜索 `\nAnalysis:` 这段字符串对应的 Token ID 边界。
|
||||||
|
3. 把边界之前的所有 Label 强行改成 `-100`。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**缺点**:非常容易因为分词器(Tokenizer)在特殊字符或空格处的切词变化(比如我们遇到的 Mismatch 问题),导致“放大镜”找不到边界,进而导致整条数据都无法计算 Loss,或者报错。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
#### 新版 TRL 的“双列原生检测”:
|
||||||
|
当你在 `dataset` 里保留 `prompt` 和 `completion` 两个独立的列,并在 `SFTConfig` 中开启 `completion_only_loss=True` 时,TRL 采取了更聪明的做法:
|
||||||
|
1. 它先单独对 `prompt` 列进行分词,得到它的 Token 长度(比如是 `L`)。
|
||||||
|
2. 它再对 `prompt + completion` 整体进行分词,得到一整个 Token 序列。
|
||||||
|
3. 它直接将这个完整序列中,前 `L` 个位置的 `labels` 暴力抹成 `-100`。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
这是一种纯粹数学/数组切片上的操作,不再依赖于字符串的模式匹配。不仅速度极快,而且只要做好了空格对齐,就绝对不会出现对齐失败的警告。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### 四、 总结:它对 51M 小模型带来的质变
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
这就是为什么你在微调 51M 模型时,开启这个功能后,指标发生了翻天覆地的变化:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. **参数解放**:51M 模型太小了,如果让它去背诵你的 992 条中文 Prompt(其中有些可能长达几千字),它会因为记忆载荷过大而发生“模式坍塌”。开启后,它只需要背诵极其简短、高度重复的英文路由标签。
|
||||||
|
2. **收敛极快**:因为预测目标变成了极度简单的分类选择(Domain, Code, Math 等),这相当于把一个复杂的**文本生成任务(Generation)**降维成了简单的**选择分类任务(Classification)**。这也是为什么你的 Loss 在第二轮就降到了 `0.1` 附近,准确率直接高达 `97%+`。
|
||||||
|
3. **泛化保留**:因为模型不需要在训练中改变它的“中文语言表征”(因为它不用预测中文),它在微调后,依然完美保留了预训练时学到的常识和逻辑能力,从而在推理时能听懂“大熊猫”和“等差数列”的区别。
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<h1 align="center">Supra-Router-51M · Multi-Task Infrastructure Routing Model</h1>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|

|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
<h2 align="center">About the Model</h2>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
GGUF model [here](https://huggingface.co/SupraLabs/Supra-Router-51M-gguf)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Supra-Router-51M** is an ultra-lightweight, high-speed infrastructure traffic controller optimized for localized edge orchestration. With only **51.7 million parameters**, this micro-LLM acts as a defensive gateway for multi-model ecosystems, accurately determining when user requests can be processed locally by an Edge SLM or when they must be triaged to a cloud-hosted frontier intelligence layer.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The model was built by fine-tuning a pre-trained 51M base on the `SupraLabs/Prompt-Routing-Dataset` (992 rows). Rather than acting as a naive binary classifier, the model uses **Multi-Task Sequence Generation** to map out the underlying properties of a prompt before predicting the final routing token, anchoring its attention heads to robust language and structural logic features.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Multi-Task Decision Sequence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To run inference, wrap your user query inside the structural framing tokens used during training (`Task: [Prompt]\nAnalysis: `). The model will output a deterministic, pipe-separated string containing the full telemetry of the prompt's cognitive requirements:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Expected Output Target Schema:
|
||||||
|
```text
|
||||||
|
Domain: [Semantic Field] | Complexity: [1-5] | Math: [True/False] | Code: [True/False] | Route: [small model/big model] | Justification: [Rule-driven infrastructure reasoning]
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Why this works:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
By forcing a sub-100M parameter model to calculate the semantic domain, structural complexity, and technical flags before it emits the final Route token, the network effectively runs an internal feature-activation map. This multi-task sequence prevents localized weight collapse and guarantees stable routing boundaries.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Training Telemetry & Optimization
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Dataset Source: SupraLabs/Prompt-Routing-Dataset (992 samples)
|
||||||
|
- Training Duration: 5 Epochs
|
||||||
|
- Checkpoint Selection: Peak generalization was reached during Epoch 3 (eval_loss: 0.1342). To eliminate late-stage micro-model memorization and validation drift, the training state was automatically rewound and saved at this numerical peak.
|
||||||
|
- Precision: bfloat16
|
||||||
|
- Hardware Footprint: Optimized sequence processing length of 3840 tokens, ensuring rapid inference execution with negligible CPU/GPU overhead (sub-millisecond generation speeds).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Inference & Gateway Implementation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use this direct script to test or wrap the model inside a live production orchestrator or FastAPI gateway. It enforces greedy decoding (do_sample=False) for maximum decision stability.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```python
|
||||||
|
import torch
|
||||||
|
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
MODEL_ID = "aifeifei798/Supra-Router-51M-zh-cn"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
print("[*] Initializing local infrastructure router...")
|
||||||
|
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID)
|
||||||
|
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
|
||||||
|
MODEL_ID,
|
||||||
|
dtype=torch.bfloat16,
|
||||||
|
device_map="auto"
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
model.eval()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Example prompt showcasing keyword-trap evasion
|
||||||
|
user_prompt = "你好!请问大熊猫主要生活在中国的哪个省份?"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Format to match internal SFT attention alignment
|
||||||
|
formatted_input = f"Task: {user_prompt}\nAnalysis: "
|
||||||
|
inputs = tokenizer(formatted_input, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
with torch.no_grad():
|
||||||
|
outputs = model.generate(
|
||||||
|
**inputs,
|
||||||
|
max_new_tokens=128,
|
||||||
|
do_sample=False,
|
||||||
|
pad_token_id=tokenizer.pad_token_id,
|
||||||
|
eos_token_id=tokenizer.eos_token_id
|
||||||
|
)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
generated_ids = outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[1]:]
|
||||||
|
print(tokenizer.decode(generated_ids, skip_special_tokens=True).strip())
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Proven Benchmarks & Defensive Boundaries
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
During edge validation testing, Supra-Router-51M demonstrated robust resilience against adversarial prompt strings:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Keyword Trap Evasion: Successfully identifies semantic context rather than matching tokens. Prompts containing words like "script" or "calculus" are correctly parsed as creative writing (not programming/math code) and routed locally to the small model when complexity is low.
|
||||||
|
- Complexity-Driven Safety Net: In instances where programming syntax or technical boundaries are ambiguous (e.g., complex regex or architectural database frames), the model naturally scales its evaluation metrics to Complexity: 3, automatically triggering a big model route override.
|
||||||
|
- Deterministic Offloading: Safely captures multi-step logic paths, calculus concepts, and code generation scripts, instantly assigning them to cloud-scale frontier endpoints.
|
||||||
34
config.json
Normal file
34
config.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
|||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"architectures": [
|
||||||
|
"LlamaForCausalLM"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"attention_bias": false,
|
||||||
|
"attention_dropout": 0.0,
|
||||||
|
"bos_token_id": 0,
|
||||||
|
"dtype": "bfloat16",
|
||||||
|
"eos_token_id": 2,
|
||||||
|
"head_dim": 64,
|
||||||
|
"hidden_act": "silu",
|
||||||
|
"hidden_size": 512,
|
||||||
|
"initializer_range": 0.02,
|
||||||
|
"intermediate_size": 1408,
|
||||||
|
"max_position_embeddings": 5120,
|
||||||
|
"mlp_bias": false,
|
||||||
|
"model_type": "llama",
|
||||||
|
"num_attention_heads": 8,
|
||||||
|
"num_hidden_layers": 12,
|
||||||
|
"num_key_value_heads": 4,
|
||||||
|
"pad_token_id": 1,
|
||||||
|
"pretraining_tp": 1,
|
||||||
|
"rms_norm_eps": 1e-06,
|
||||||
|
"rope_parameters": {
|
||||||
|
"factor": 1.0,
|
||||||
|
"rope_theta": 10000.0,
|
||||||
|
"rope_type": "linear",
|
||||||
|
"type": "linear"
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
"tie_word_embeddings": true,
|
||||||
|
"transformers_version": "5.14.0.dev0",
|
||||||
|
"use_cache": false,
|
||||||
|
"vocab_size": 32000
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
9
generation_config.json
Normal file
9
generation_config.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"_from_model_config": true,
|
||||||
|
"bos_token_id": 0,
|
||||||
|
"eos_token_id": [
|
||||||
|
2
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"pad_token_id": 1,
|
||||||
|
"transformers_version": "5.14.0.dev0"
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
3
model.safetensors
Normal file
3
model.safetensors
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|||||||
|
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
||||||
|
oid sha256:a88edff4347cb0d3e0d2ae9d2b9597c932da720746e93292527107bb766bc299
|
||||||
|
size 103584616
|
||||||
159032
tokenizer.json
Normal file
159032
tokenizer.json
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
12
tokenizer_config.json
Normal file
12
tokenizer_config.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
|||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"backend": "tokenizers",
|
||||||
|
"bos_token": "<s>",
|
||||||
|
"clean_up_tokenization_spaces": false,
|
||||||
|
"eos_token": "</s>",
|
||||||
|
"is_local": true,
|
||||||
|
"local_files_only": false,
|
||||||
|
"model_max_length": 5120,
|
||||||
|
"pad_token": "<pad>",
|
||||||
|
"tokenizer_class": "TokenizersBackend",
|
||||||
|
"unk_token": "<unk>"
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
3
training_args.bin
Normal file
3
training_args.bin
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
|||||||
|
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
||||||
|
oid sha256:80ab0b34bfcef9248a74c51ab6066eec496c7c48826837d94aa74d77a7419ad0
|
||||||
|
size 5713
|
||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user