Compare commits
10 Commits
5c20235eb1
...
3c3450065c
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3c3450065c | ||
|
|
7531371ce5 | ||
|
|
0473c52a9c | ||
|
|
2f89e6b8f5 | ||
|
|
6a5d6095ba | ||
|
|
4160a49c1e | ||
|
|
68a5465309 | ||
|
|
59a5b46273 | ||
|
|
2dc14212b6 | ||
|
|
00f8dd3dc9 |
80
README.md
80
README.md
@@ -1,3 +1,77 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
license: apache-2.0
|
||||
---
|
||||
---
|
||||
license: apache-2.0
|
||||
datasets:
|
||||
- PKU-ONELab/NLG-Eval
|
||||
language:
|
||||
- en
|
||||
base_model:
|
||||
- meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Themis
|
||||
|
||||
Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretability
|
||||
|
||||
Paper: https://aclanthology.org/2024.emnlp-main.891
|
||||
|
||||
Github: https://github.com/PKU-ONELab/Themis
|
||||
|
||||
## Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
We propose **Themis**, an 8B-parameter large language model (LLM) specifically designed and trained for NLG evaluation with more comprehensive capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
Our Themis can evaluate various NLG tasks, including uncommon ones like question-answering evaluation (**Versatility**), in a reference-free manner (**Independence**). Moreover, it allows for specific and customized evaluation aspects and criteria, including overall quality and more fine-grained aspects (**Flexibility**), and its evaluation contains corresponding analysis and explanation together with the rating (**Interpretability**).
|
||||
|
||||
We believe that an ideal evaluator should be convenient to use and possess these characteristics. The comparison between related methods and Themis is shown in the table below.
|
||||
|
||||
| Method | Versatility | Independence | Flexibility | Interpretability | Open-source |
|
||||
| :---------------: | :---------: | :----------: | :---------: | :--------------: | :---------: |
|
||||
| UniEval | ❌ | ❌ | ✔️ | ❌ | ✔️ |
|
||||
| G-Eval | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ | ❌ |
|
||||
| X-Eval | ✔️ | ❌ | ✔️ | ❌ | ❌ |
|
||||
| Prometheus | ✔️ | ❌ | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ |
|
||||
| Auto-J | ✔️ | ✔️ | ❌ | ✔️ | ✔️ |
|
||||
| InstructScore | ✔️ | ❌ | ❌ | ✔️ | ✔️ |
|
||||
| TIGERScore | ✔️ | ✔️ | ❌ | ✔️ | ✔️ |
|
||||
| **Themis (Ours)** | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ | ✔️ |
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance
|
||||
|
||||
We implement experiments on several common NLG evaluation tasks and datasets to compare our Themis with other methods, including SummEval for summarization, Topical-Chat for dialogue response generation, SFRES&SFHOT for data-to-text, QAGS for factuality, MANS for story generation, and WMT23 zh-en for machine translation. Experimental results show that our Themis achieves better overall evaluation performance over other evaluation models, including GPT-4.
|
||||
|
||||
| Method | SummEval | Topical-Chat | SFHOT& SFRES | QAGS | MANS | WMT23 | Average Spearman |
|
||||
| -------------------- | :-------: | :----------: | :---------: | :-------: | :-------: | :-------: | :------------: |
|
||||
| BLEU | 0.075 | 0.388 | 0.024 | - | 0.032 | 0.021 | - |
|
||||
| ROUGE | 0.152 | 0.412 | 0.101 | - | -0.002 | 0.151 | - |
|
||||
| BARTScore | 0.329 | 0.086 | 0.208 | 0.425 | 0.350 | 0.118 | 0.253 |
|
||||
| BERTScore | 0.231 | 0.394 | 0.139 | - | 0.285 | 0.219 | - |
|
||||
| BLEURT | 0.152 | 0.388 | 0.244 | - | 0.138 | 0.263 | - |
|
||||
| CometKiwi | 0.228 | 0.340 | 0.251 | 0.094 | 0.251 | 0.343 | 0.251 |
|
||||
| UniEval | 0.474 | 0.577 | 0.282 | - | - | - | - |
|
||||
| G-Eval (GPT-3.5) | 0.409 | 0.585 | - | 0.461 | - | - | - |
|
||||
| G-Eval (GPT-4) | 0.523 | 0.588 | - | 0.611 | - | - | - |
|
||||
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | 0.416 | 0.578 | 0.306 | 0.431 | 0.328 | 0.347 | 0.401 |
|
||||
| GPT-4 Turbo | 0.511 | **0.746** | 0.320 | 0.637 | 0.473 | **0.437** | 0.521 |
|
||||
| X-Eval | 0.480 | 0.605 | 0.303 | 0.578 | - | - | - |
|
||||
| Prometheus-13B | 0.163 | 0.434 | 0.173 | - | 0.007 | 0.129 | - |
|
||||
| Auto-J-13B | 0.198 | 0.425 | 0.141 | 0.226 | 0.380 | 0.104 | 0.246 |
|
||||
| TIGERScore-13B | 0.384 | 0.346 | 0.200 | 0.504 | 0.231 | 0.248 | 0.319 |
|
||||
| InstructScore-7B | 0.258 | 0.241 | 0.247 | - | 0.298 | 0.219 | - |
|
||||
| **Themis-8B (ours)** | **0.553** | 0.725 | **0.333** | **0.684** | **0.551** | 0.405 | **0.542** |
|
||||
|
||||
We further conduct more in-depth analyses, including generalization tests on unseen tasks like the instruction-following evaluation as well as aspect-targeted perturbation tests, and our Themis also exhibits superior evaluation performance. For more experimental results and details, please refer to our paper.
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements and Usage
|
||||
|
||||
Please refer to our [github repo](https://github.com/PKU-ONELab/Themis) for more details.
|
||||
|
||||
## Citation
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
@inproceedings{hu2024themis,
|
||||
title={Themis: A Reference-free NLG Evaluation Language Model with Flexibility and Interpretability},
|
||||
author={Hu, Xinyu and Lin, Li and Gao, Mingqi and Yin, Xunjian and Wan, Xiaojun},
|
||||
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},
|
||||
pages={15924--15951},
|
||||
year={2024}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"_name_or_path": "./models/llama3-8b_sft_full_1e-5_bs8000_3_trainv59_a/checkpoint-1596",
|
||||
"architectures": [
|
||||
"LlamaForCausalLM"
|
||||
],
|
||||
@@ -11,7 +10,7 @@
|
||||
"hidden_size": 4096,
|
||||
"initializer_range": 0.02,
|
||||
"intermediate_size": 14336,
|
||||
"max_position_embeddings": 2048,
|
||||
"max_position_embeddings": 8192,
|
||||
"model_type": "llama",
|
||||
"num_attention_heads": 32,
|
||||
"num_hidden_layers": 32,
|
||||
|
||||
3
model-00002-of-00004.safetensors
Normal file
3
model-00002-of-00004.safetensors
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
|
||||
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
||||
oid sha256:32ce58af5dfc4448d39ee3ce21fee5c85170d5d35e96c0c248d12bd472061c80
|
||||
size 4999802720
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user