--- license: apache-2.0 base_model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct library_name: transformers pipeline_tag: text-generation language: - en tags: - clinical-trials - healthcare - biomedical - information-extraction - qlora - peft - trl - grpo --- # ClinTrial-LM — Qwen2.5-7B fine-tuned for clinical-trial understanding A **QLoRA**-fine-tuned [Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct](https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct) specialised for clinical-trial tasks, trained on ~26k instruction examples derived from the [ClinicalTrials.gov](https://clinicaltrials.gov) registry. 📦 **Code, full pipeline & write-up:** https://github.com/omkar-droid/clintrial-lm > ⚕️ **Research/education only. Not medical advice.** Do not use for clinical decision-making. ## What it does | Task | Description | |---|---| | **Eligibility extraction** | Free-text inclusion/exclusion criteria → structured JSON | | **Plain-language summary** | Trial description → patient-friendly summary | | **Condition Q&A** | "What conditions does this trial study?" | | **Phase classification** | Identify the trial phase | ## Results Evaluated on a **held-out test set split by trial ID** (no trial appears in both train and test), 500 sampled examples. | Task | Metric | Base Qwen2.5-7B | **This model (SFT)** | |---|---|---|---| | Eligibility extraction | criterion F1 | 0.840 | **0.968** | | Eligibility output | **JSON validity** | 0.986 | **1.000** | | Phase classification | exact match | 0.000 | **0.794** | | Condition Q&A | token F1 | 0.298 | **0.742** | | Plain-language summary | ROUGE-L | 0.195 | **0.290** | Eligibility extraction reaches **precision 0.962 / recall 0.978** with **100% schema-valid JSON**. The base model scores 0.000 on phase classification not because it lacks the knowledge, but because it won't answer in the required format — fine-tuning buys **format discipline and faithfulness**. ## Usage ```python import torch from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer MODEL_ID = "OmkarShewale/clintrial-qwen2.5-7b-sft" tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID) model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID, dtype=torch.bfloat16, device_map="auto") SYSTEM = ( "You are a clinical research assistant. You help patients and clinicians understand " "clinical trials. Answer only from the information provided, be precise, and never " "invent eligibility criteria, conditions, or outcomes." ) criteria = """Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adults aged 18 years or older with confirmed type 2 diabetes 2. HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.5% at screening Exclusion Criteria: 1. History of severe hypoglycaemia within the last 6 months 2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding """ messages = [ {"role": "system", "content": SYSTEM}, {"role": "user", "content": 'Extract the eligibility criteria from the trial text below into JSON with two lists, ' '"inclusion" and "exclusion". Copy each criterion verbatim; do not add any.\n\n' f"Trial eligibility text:\n{criteria}"}, ] enc = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, add_generation_prompt=True, return_tensors="pt", return_dict=True).to(model.device) out = model.generate(**enc, max_new_tokens=1024, do_sample=False) print(tokenizer.decode(out[0, enc["input_ids"].shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True)) ``` **Note:** eligibility answers can be long (up to ~1.7k tokens). Use `max_new_tokens >= 1024` or the JSON will be truncated and fail to parse. ## Training | | | |---|---| | Base model | Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct | | Method | QLoRA — 4-bit NF4 + LoRA (r=16, α=32, dropout 0.05) | | Target modules | q/k/v/o_proj, gate/up/down_proj | | Trainable params | ~0.5% of total | | Precision | bf16 compute, gradient checkpointing | | Effective batch | 32 (8 × 4 grad-accum) | | LR / schedule | 2e-4, cosine, 3% warmup | | Hardware | 1× NVIDIA H100 NVL (95 GB), ~19 GB used | | Framework | HuggingFace TRL + PEFT + Transformers | **Best-checkpoint selection matters here:** eval loss bottomed around step 500 and then *rose* while train loss kept falling (overfitting). `load_best_model_at_end` on `eval_loss` selected the step-500 checkpoint — this model. Training for 3 epochs was more than necessary. A **GRPO / RLVR** variant (RL against a programmatic reward: JSON validity + criterion F1) was also trained; it matched this SFT model but did not beat it, because SFT had already saturated the reward. Details in the [repo](https://github.com/omkar-droid/clintrial-lm). ## Data Built from 8,000 real ClinicalTrials.gov studies. Targets come from the registry's **own structured fields** (not a teacher LLM), so labels are auditable. Splits are partitioned **by trial**, not by example, to prevent leakage. ## Limitations - **Not medical advice.** Outputs may be wrong; a human expert must review anything clinical. - Trained on English registry text only; performance on other formats/languages is unknown. - Summary quality (ROUGE-L 0.29) is the weakest task. - Only 8k of ~500k available trials were used — more data would likely improve generalisation. ## License Apache-2.0, inherited from Qwen2.5. Source registry data is public-domain U.S. government work.