初始化项目,由ModelHub XC社区提供模型
Model: Heralax/philosophy-mistral Source: Original Platform
This commit is contained in:
68
README.md
Normal file
68
README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
library_name: transformers
|
||||
license: apache-2.0
|
||||
base_model: Heralax/philosophy-llm-mistral-pretrain
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- generated_from_trainer
|
||||
model-index:
|
||||
- name: philosophy-hardcore-pretraining
|
||||
results: []
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Philosophy LLM
|
||||
|
||||
I would've trained this on Phi so I could've called it Phi-losophy if I had thought of that joke before kicking off the run. Oh well.
|
||||
It's trained on Mistral instead. That's a Mist opportunity right there.
|
||||
|
||||
This is a narrow domain-expert LLM trained on the top 5 books on Gutenberg:
|
||||
|
||||
- The Problems of Philosophy (Bertrand Russell)
|
||||
- Beyond Good and Evil (Nietzsche)
|
||||
- Thus Spake Zarathustra: A Book for All and None (Nietzsche)
|
||||
- The Prince (Machiavelli)
|
||||
- Second Treatise of Government
|
||||
|
||||
It's meant to be an interesting novelty, showing off training on a specific domain. It has some quirks. Namely:
|
||||
|
||||
1. It seems to have memorized the training data very well. Ask a question that exists in the training data, with temp 0, and it will usually give you back the exact response word-for-word. This means that, on the subjects covered by its data, it will be very knowledgeable.
|
||||
2. I forgot to include any generalist instruct data, so it's... not stupid, at least not particularly stupid by 7b standards, but it is very much limited to QA.
|
||||
3. It's much less fluffy and wasteful with its responses than previous Augmentoolkit domain expert models, due to using a new dataset setting. This tends to make it respond with less detail, but it also may remember stuff better and get to the point easier.
|
||||
|
||||
Some example chats (blame LM studio for not hiding the stop token):
|
||||
|
||||
Asking stuff from the training data:
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Asking a question directly from the training data and one I came up with on the spot.
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Some things that are kinda funny but also show off the drawback of not using any generalist data:
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## Training procedure
|
||||
|
||||
### Training hyperparameters
|
||||
|
||||
The following hyperparameters were used during training:
|
||||
- learning_rate: 2e-05
|
||||
- train_batch_size: 2
|
||||
- eval_batch_size: 1
|
||||
- seed: 42
|
||||
- distributed_type: multi-GPU
|
||||
- num_devices: 6
|
||||
- gradient_accumulation_steps: 6
|
||||
- total_train_batch_size: 72
|
||||
- total_eval_batch_size: 6
|
||||
- optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08
|
||||
- lr_scheduler_type: cosine
|
||||
- lr_scheduler_warmup_steps: 136
|
||||
- num_epochs: 6
|
||||
|
||||
### Framework versions
|
||||
|
||||
- Transformers 4.45.0.dev0
|
||||
- Pytorch 2.3.1+cu121
|
||||
- Datasets 2.21.0
|
||||
- Tokenizers 0.19.1
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user