初始化项目,由ModelHub XC社区提供模型

Model: EphAsad/Atem-SageMaths-1.5B
Source: Original Platform
This commit is contained in:
ModelHub XC
2026-07-19 01:19:10 +08:00
commit 4e86890eda
11 changed files with 733 additions and 0 deletions

344
README.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
---
base_model: EphAsad/Atem-Wisdom-1.5B
language:
- en
license: apache-2.0
tags:
- qwen2
- unsloth
- lora
- llama.cpp
- reasoning
- chain-of-thought
- thinking
- mathematics
- math
- distillation
- conversational
- text-generation-inference
datasets:
- HuggingFaceH4/MATH-500
- EleutherAI/hendrycks_math
- qwedsacf/competition_math
pipeline_tag: text-generation
---
![Atem Logo](https://huggingface.co/EphAsad/Atem-v1-1.5B/resolve/main/Logo.png)
# Atem-SageMaths
*Ancient logic. Modern intelligence. Applied to mathematics.*
A 1.5B mathematics model trained on competition-grade problems — covering algebra, geometry, number theory, combinatorics, and more.
![Base Model](https://img.shields.io/badge/Base-Atem--Wisdom--1.5B-blue)
![Stage](https://img.shields.io/badge/Stage-Maths%20Specialisation-purple)
![Parameters](https://img.shields.io/badge/Parameters-1.5B-orange)
![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-green)
---
## Overview
Atem-SageMaths is a mathematics-specialised variant of [Atem-Wisdom-1.5B](https://huggingface.co/EphAsad/Atem-Wisdom-1.5B), fine-tuned on a curated corpus of competition and curriculum mathematics problems drawn from three complementary sources. It inherits Atem-Wisdom's reasoning capability and applies it to mathematical problem solving — working through problems step by step before arriving at a final answer.
The training corpus spans the full difficulty range from pre-algebra through competition-level mathematics, with structured solution traces from MATH-500 providing the think-then-answer format on harder problems.
**When to choose Atem-SageMaths over Atem-Wisdom:**
- Mathematical problem solving across a broad difficulty range
- Competition mathematics — algebra, geometry, number theory, combinatorics, probability
- Situations where step-by-step mathematical working is required
- Curriculum mathematics tasks at pre-algebra through precalculus level
**When to choose Atem-Wisdom instead:**
- General reasoning, analytical, and logic tasks outside mathematics
- Mixed-domain workloads where maths is one of many task types
- Coding and algorithm tasks
---
## The Atem Series
| Model | Stage | Capability | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Atem v1](https://huggingface.co/EphAsad/Atem-v1-1.5B) | Stage 1 — SFT | Fast, direct reasoning | ✅ |
| [Atem-Wisdom](https://huggingface.co/EphAsad/Atem-Wisdom-1.5B) | Stage 2 — CoT | Explicit thinking traces | ✅ |
| [Atem-SageCoder](https://huggingface.co/EphAsad/Atem-SageCoder-1.5B) | Specialisation — Code | Think-then-code on algorithms | ✅ |
| **Atem-SageMaths** | Specialisation — Maths | Structured mathematical problem solving | ✅ |
| Atem-Pharaoh *(planned)* | Stage 3 — DPO/IPO | Preference-aligned reasoning | 🔄 |
Atem-SageMaths is a domain-specialised branch off Atem-Wisdom, parallel to Atem-SageCoder. Both share the same base and training framework; only the dataset domain differs.
---
## Model Details
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| **Base model** | EphAsad/Atem-Wisdom-1.5B |
| **Root architecture** | Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct |
| **Training method** | LoRA SFT — Mathematics Specialisation |
| **LoRA config** | r=32, alpha=64, dropout=0.05 |
| **Parameters** | ~1.54B |
| **Training records** | 16,940 (after filtering) |
| **Think / no-think split** | ~3% / ~97% |
| **Epochs** | 2 |
| **Total steps** | 266 |
| **Final train loss** | 0.5602 |
| **Final val loss** | 0.6044 |
| **Hardware** | NVIDIA A100-SXM4 80GB |
| **Max sequence length** | 8,192 tokens |
| **Precision** | bfloat16 |
| **License** | Apache 2.0 |
---
## Output Format
Atem-SageMaths produces responses in one of two formats:
**With reasoning trace (MATH-500 derived examples):**
```
<think>
[Step-by-step mathematical working — problem analysis, intermediate
calculations, verification of results]
</think>
[Final answer]
```
**Direct answer (majority of responses):**
```
[Structured solution with working shown inline]
```
The think-then-answer format activates on harder problems where the training data included explicit reasoning traces. The majority of training data (97%) used direct solution format without a separate think block, reflecting the natural composition of the training corpus.
---
## Training Data
Atem-SageMaths was trained on 16,940 examples assembled from three sources after token length filtering. camel-ai/math was initially included but removed due to streaming instability during data loading.
| Dataset | Records | CoT | Domain |
|---|---|---|---|
| HuggingFaceH4/MATH-500 | 500 | ✅ solution→think, answer→final | Competition maths, full curriculum |
| EleutherAI/hendrycks_math | ~10,500 (1,500 × 7 subsets) | ❌ | Algebra, geometry, number theory, counting & probability, intermediate algebra, prealgebra, precalculus |
| qwedsacf/competition_math | 10,000 | ❌ | Competition mathematics |
**MATH-500 handling:** The `solution` field contains full worked solutions and was used as the CoT trace (placed between `<think>` tags). The `answer` field (boxed final answer) was used as the response. This is the only source of think-trace training examples.
**hendrycks_math subsets loaded:** algebra, counting_and_probability, geometry, intermediate_algebra, number_theory, prealgebra, precalculus — 1,500 records from the train split of each.
**Token length filter:** Examples exceeding 8,192 tokens after chat template application were removed rather than truncated. This is the primary source of attrition from the ~31,000 raw records loaded to 16,940 retained.
**Loss curve:**
| Step | Train Loss | Val Loss |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | 0.6201 | 0.6310 |
| 200 | 0.5362 | 0.6077 |
| 266 (final) | **0.5602** | **0.6044** |
Loss values are substantially lower than Atem-SageCoder (0.604 vs 0.859), consistent with mathematics Q&A being more formulaic and predictable than code+CoT reasoning traces. Train/val gap of ~0.04 throughout — no overfitting signal. Sharp improvement from steps 100→200 followed by stabilisation.
---
## Training Configuration
```python
# Key hyperparameters
lora_r = 32
lora_alpha = 64
lora_dropout = 0.05
max_seq_length = 8192
learning_rate = 1e-4
lr_scheduler = 'cosine'
warmup_ratio = 0.05
batch_size = 8 # auto-scaled by Unsloth from config 4;
# shorter math examples left VRAM headroom
grad_accumulation = 16 # effective batch size: 128
num_epochs = 2
dtype = bfloat16
load_in_4bit = True
nothink_ratio = 0.97 # reflects natural dataset composition
```
Training used Unsloth (`unsloth==2026.5.5`, `unsloth_zoo==2026.5.5`) with `train_on_responses_only` masking. Loss was computed exclusively on assistant response tokens. Pre-training validation confirmed identity, think tag format, and mask correctness before training was confirmed.
---
## Usage
### Transformers
```python
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM, AutoTokenizer
import torch
model_name = "EphAsad/Atem-SageMaths-1.5B"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
model_name,
torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
device_map="auto"
)
messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "Find all integer solutions to x² - 7x + 12 = 0."
}
]
inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages,
tokenize=True,
add_generation_prompt=True,
return_tensors="pt"
).to(model.device)
with torch.no_grad():
output = model.generate(
input_ids=inputs,
max_new_tokens=1024,
temperature=0.7,
top_p=0.9,
repetition_penalty=1.1,
do_sample=True,
)
print(tokenizer.decode(output[0][inputs.shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
```
### Unsloth (faster inference)
```python
from unsloth import FastLanguageModel
import torch
model, tokenizer = FastLanguageModel.from_pretrained(
model_name="EphAsad/Atem-SageMaths-1.5B",
max_seq_length=8192,
dtype=torch.bfloat16,
load_in_4bit=True,
)
FastLanguageModel.for_inference(model)
messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": "In how many ways can 8 people be seated around a circular table?"
}
]
inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
messages,
tokenize=True,
add_generation_prompt=True,
return_tensors="pt"
).to("cuda")
with torch.no_grad():
output = model.generate(
input_ids=inputs,
max_new_tokens=1024,
temperature=0.7,
top_p=0.9,
do_sample=True,
)
print(tokenizer.decode(output[0][inputs.shape[1]:], skip_special_tokens=True))
```
### Ollama
```bash
# Recommended — best speed/quality balance
ollama run hf.co/EphAsad/Atem-SageMaths-1.5B:Q4_K_M
# Higher quality
ollama run hf.co/EphAsad/Atem-SageMaths-1.5B:Q5_K_M
# Near-lossless
ollama run hf.co/EphAsad/Atem-SageMaths-1.5B:Q8_0
```
### llama.cpp
```bash
llama-server -hf EphAsad/Atem-SageMaths-1.5B:Q4_K_M
```
### System Prompt
Atem-SageMaths's identity and mathematical focus are baked into the chat template. To override manually:
```
You are Atem-SageMaths, a precise mathematical reasoning assistant built
on the Atem foundation. You approach problems methodically — working through
each step carefully, verifying intermediate results, and arriving at
well-supported solutions. Your answers are rigorous, clearly structured,
and mathematically correct.
```
### Available Files
| File | Size | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `model.safetensors` | ~3.1 GB | Full bfloat16 merged weights |
| `Atem-SageMaths-1.5B.Q4_K_M.gguf` | ~986 MB | 4-bit quantised — recommended |
| `Atem-SageMaths-1.5B.Q5_K_M.gguf` | ~1.1 GB | 5-bit quantised |
| `Atem-SageMaths-1.5B.Q8_0.gguf` | ~1.6 GB | 8-bit quantised — near-lossless |
---
## Known Limitations
**Thin CoT coverage.** Only MATH-500 (500 records, ~3% of training data) contributes explicit think traces. The model's think-then-answer behaviour is therefore limited to problems structurally similar to MATH-500 content. On novel problem types, it defaults to the direct solution format.
**Arithmetic precision.** Multi-step numerical calculations remain a known weakness across the Atem series. Intermediate arithmetic slips can occur on problems requiring many sequential operations. Final answers to precision-critical calculations should be independently verified.
**Competition scope.** Training data is heavily weighted toward competition-style problems with clean closed-form answers. Open-ended applied mathematics, calculus, linear algebra, and statistics are not represented in the training corpus.
---
## Roadmap
| Stage | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 — SFT | ✅ Complete | Atem v1 — direct reasoning foundation |
| Stage 2 — CoT SFT | ✅ Complete | Atem-Wisdom — thinking traces |
| Specialisation — Code | ✅ Complete | Atem-SageCoder |
| Specialisation — Maths | ✅ Complete | **Atem-SageMaths — this model** |
| Stage 3 — DPO/IPO | 🔄 Planned | Atem-Pharaoh — preference-aligned reasoning |
---
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{atem_sagemaths_2026,
author = {Asad, Zain},
title = {Atem-SageMaths: A 1.5B Mathematics Model
via Competition Problem Distillation},
year = {2026},
publisher = {HuggingFace},
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/EphAsad/Atem-SageMaths-1.5B}},
}
```
---
## License
Released under the [Apache 2.0 License](https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0), consistent with the base model chain (Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct → Atem v1 → Atem-Wisdom → Atem-SageMaths).
---
Built independently by [EphAsad](https://huggingface.co/EphAsad)