87ebaef4e4
### What this PR does / why we need it? Based on the design of dual-batch overlap proposed by Deepseek team and also the implementation of fused moe in VLLM project, we implement the multi-stream(also known as dual-batch) overlap for deepseek+mla on Ascend NPU. We split the input batch of model into two microbatches and then overlap the comp/comm ops in attention and moe layers using two streams to improve the performance. Our approach can be easily extended when adding dispatch/combine communications for moe layer. Compared with the previously proposed [draft](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/842), we use one stream for computation ops and the other for communication ops, separately. In out opinions, it is beneficial for arranging the order of executing different ops and thus avoiding the contention of computation/communication resources. ref: [overlap for llama](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/15787/files) ref: [dbo in sglang](https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang/pull/4068/files#diff-b4937569fc71f6ad215181b633b2f89c7183a2b4ac39e41fc22635599a9be7de) ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? Adding an env variable "VLLM_ENABLE_DBO". Users can enable dbo by setting "VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_DBO=1" See /examples/offline_dualbatch_overlap_npu.py for more info. ### How was this patch tested? This patch can be tested with vllm-0.9.0 using its online service with benchmark tests. We have decoupled the func of dbo from vllm and it should be able to run without any modification to the code of vllm(some modifications is better to implement in vllm though). Any advice/discussion is welcome. ### Performance Benchmark We have ran the benchmark_serving script of vllm to test the performance after using dual-batch overlap. `python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server \ --model=DeepSeek-R1-W8A8 \ --trust-remote-code \ --distributed-executor-backend=mp \ -tp=16 \ --port 8006 \ --max-num-seqs 390 \ --max-model-len 32768 \ --max-num-batched-tokens 65536 \ --block-size 128 \ --compilation_config 0 \ --gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 \ --disable-log-requests \ --additional-config '{"expert_tensor_parallel_size":1,"enable_inter_dp_scheduling":true,"init_torchair_graph_batch_sizes":true,"trace_recompiles":true,"ascend_scheduler_config":{},"enable_graph_mode":false}'` and run benchmark with the parameters of : `--dataset-name random --random-input-len 4096 --random-output-len 1 --num-prompts 200 --max-concurrency 8 --request-rate 5 --metric-percentiles 90` 1. test with the version using allgather+allreduce in Ascend 910B (tp16 ep16 + deepseek r1 w8a8) 2. test with the version using alltoall: prefill qps: 0.90 -> 1.01 Mean TTFT：8226->7432ms The overlap approach when using alltoall communication can be further optimized by overlapping micro-batch1's moe comp with micro-batch2's dispatch a2a comm --------- Signed-off-by: zhuohuan <zxdu1997@gmail.com>
68 lines
1.8 KiB
Python
68 lines
1.8 KiB
Python
from contextlib import contextmanager
|
|
from typing import Any
|
|
|
|
_ms_comm_context: Any = None
|
|
_cur_micro_batch_num: int = -1
|
|
_ms_layer_index_context: int = -1
|
|
_ms_metadata_context: Any = None
|
|
_ms_attn_metadata_context: Any = None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def set_multistream_layer_context(start_layer: int, ms_metadata: Any,
|
|
attn_metadata: Any):
|
|
"""
|
|
set multistream layer context before transformer layers
|
|
"""
|
|
global _ms_layer_index_context, _ms_metadata_context, _ms_attn_metadata_context
|
|
_ms_layer_index_context = start_layer
|
|
_ms_metadata_context = ms_metadata
|
|
_ms_attn_metadata_context = attn_metadata
|
|
|
|
|
|
def reset_multistream_layer_context():
|
|
"""
|
|
reset multistream layer context
|
|
"""
|
|
global _ms_layer_index_context, _ms_metadata_context, _ms_attn_metadata_context
|
|
_ms_layer_index_context = -1
|
|
_ms_metadata_context = None
|
|
_ms_attn_metadata_context = None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_multistream_layer_context():
|
|
"""
|
|
get multistream layer context
|
|
"""
|
|
return _ms_layer_index_context, _ms_metadata_context, _ms_attn_metadata_context
|
|
|
|
|
|
def advance_step_multistream_layer_context():
|
|
"""
|
|
advance multistream layer index context
|
|
"""
|
|
global _ms_layer_index_context
|
|
_ms_layer_index_context += 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_multistream_comm_context() -> Any:
|
|
"""Get the current comm forward context."""
|
|
return _ms_comm_context
|
|
|
|
|
|
def get_multistream_microbatch_context() -> int:
|
|
return _cur_micro_batch_num
|
|
|
|
|
|
@contextmanager
|
|
def set_multistream_context(context: Any, micro_batch_num: int):
|
|
"""A context manager that stores the current comm forward context,
|
|
can be attention metadata, etc."""
|
|
global _ms_comm_context, _cur_micro_batch_num
|
|
_ms_comm_context = context
|
|
_cur_micro_batch_num = micro_batch_num
|
|
try:
|
|
yield
|
|
finally:
|
|
_ms_comm_context = None
|
|
_cur_micro_batch_num = -1
|