We'll release 0.13.0 soon. The main branch is freeze. Let's revert the
newest change and redo it once 0.13.0 is released
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
81786c8774
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since the _npu_ring_mla operator deteriorates in long-sequencescenarios,
the long sequence is split into shorter sequences for input to improve
performance.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: pichangping <1337510399@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to add acceptance test for eagle/eagle3 via llama/qwen. We
obtained golden baselines by running several times (based on healthy
main), which is feasible and convincing.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Qwen3-235B-A22B belongs to the TopN model, but there is currently a lack
of care for the test cases of the wen3-235B-A22B model on Atlas A2, and
most of the machines currently owned by users in the community are A2.
When users encounter problems, we currently have no way of knowing
whether the model runs normally on the corresponding version of the
code, so we added it. In addition, we currently see TopN models such as:
qwen-dense, qwen3-30b-a3b, Qwen3-Next, Qwen2.5-Omni, but Qwen3-235B-A22B
is missing.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
Test with multi-node, result as following:
1. Accuracy test (Time for executing this test case: 25 minutes)
test running successfully, accuracy as following:
```
dataset version metric mode vllm-api-general-chat
--------- --------- -------- ------ -----------------------
gsm8k 7cd45e accuracy gen 95.68
```
2. Perf test (Time for executing this test case: 1h15 minutes)
test running successfully, throughput as following(This is the atlas A3,
for A2 the result about A3/1.3):
```
╒══════════════════════════╤═════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤════════════════╤══════╕
│ Performance Parameters │ Stage │ Average │ Min │ Max │ Median │ P75 │ P90 │ P99 │ N │
╞══════════════════════════╪═════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪════════════════╪══════╡
│ E2EL │ total │ 384086.3958 ms │ 214767.0486 ms │ 528014.771 ms │ 387621.5746 ms │ 388776.7492 ms │ 390164.3559 ms │ 488105.8512 ms │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ TTFT │ total │ 159409.9868 ms │ 1849.4588 ms │ 302439.6965 ms │ 162183.7007 ms │ 162965.477 ms │ 164274.1936 ms │ 262578.6041 ms │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ TPOT │ total │ 149.8842 ms │ 130.2175 ms │ 151.2625 ms │ 150.473 ms │ 150.6978 ms │ 150.9102 ms │ 151.2131 ms │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ ITL │ total │ 149.6789 ms │ 0.0099 ms │ 283.0242 ms │ 150.3276 ms │ 156.8649 ms │ 168.1372 ms │ 199.378 ms │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ InputTokens │ total │ 3654.3079 │ 3108.0 │ 4280.0 │ 3629.0 │ 3728.0 │ 3842.1 │ 4079.0 │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ OutputTokens │ total │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 1500.0 │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼────────────────┼──────┤
│ OutputTokenThroughput │ total │ 3.935 token/s │ 2.8408 token/s │ 6.9843 token/s │ 3.8698 token/s │ 3.8799 token/s │ 3.9916 token/s │ 6.2137 token/s │ 2800 │
╘══════════════════════════╧═════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧════════════════╧══════╛
╒══════════════════════════╤═════════╤═══════════════════╕
│ Common Metric │ Stage │ Value │
╞══════════════════════════╪═════════╪═══════════════════╡
│ Benchmark Duration │ total │ 4391524.3389 ms │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Total Requests │ total │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Failed Requests │ total │ 0 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Success Requests │ total │ 2800 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Concurrency │ total │ 244.8903 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Max Concurrency │ total │ 256 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Request Throughput │ total │ 0.6376 req/s │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Total Input Tokens │ total │ 10232062 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Prefill Token Throughput │ total │ 22.924 token/s │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Total generated tokens │ total │ 4200000 │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Input Token Throughput │ total │ 2329.9568 token/s │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Output Token Throughput │ total │ 956.3877 token/s │
├──────────────────────────┼─────────┼───────────────────┤
│ Total Token Throughput │ total │ 3286.3445 token/s │
╘══════════════════════════╧═════════╧═══════════════════╛
```
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, MHA models (eg: minicpm-2b, Baichuan-7b) will encounter
errors when running in piecewise graph mode, with error messages similar
to:
```
(E89999): When layout is TND and PA not enabled, keyT(8) and valueT(8) must be equal to the last element of actualSeqenceLengthKV(5)[FUNC:CheckInputShapeWhenLayoutIsTND][FILE:prompt_flash_attention_tiling.cpp][LINE:3618]
```
The error occurs because the qkv in the Prefill stage is also padded,
causing the shape to be inconsistent with actual_seq_lengths.
Add unpadding logic for kv.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds the method for sending chat and non-chat request, we need
it to test much folloing cases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
by running the test
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: jiangyunfan1 <jiangyunfan1@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
#4443 introduces a precision issue in scenarios where MTP >= 3 + deepseek v3.1, and this pr reverts it
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
Signed-off-by: GDzhu01 <809721801@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add cudagraph_capture_sizes for E2E CI test.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
1. refresh additional config doc
2. move kv config logic to platform.
3. improve `dump_config` init logic and rename it to `dump_config_path`
this change is user impacted. dump_config is changed from dict to
string.
4. correct `enable_async_exponential` type
5. remove useless `chunked_prefill_for_mla`
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Fix vllm break in the pr:
1.[Drop v0.14 deprecations
]https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/31285
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: ZT-AIA <1028681969@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, our multi-node logs only show the master node's logs (via the
Kubernetes API), which is insufficient for effective problem
localization if other nodes experience issues. Therefore, this pull
request adds the ability to upload logs for other nodes.
Next plan: Output structured directory logs, including logs from each
node and the polog.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Currently, the vllm pr: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/24252
is causing operator fusion to fail, which can be mitigated by patching
the backend. Once the problem is completely resolved, I will submit a
new pull request to remove the patch.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
---------
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
Description:
This PR updates the implementation of the Triton operator for deployment
on NPU devices, focusing on optimizing grid size and memory handling
based on NPU limitations.
Design Plan:
Grid Calculation: The grid size is now dynamically calculated by batch
and dim to ensure that the number of programs executed does not exceed
the NPU's vector core capacity. This ensures optimal parallelism without
overloading the hardware.
Data Block Handling: Due to the limited on-chip memory (UB) on Ascend
NPUs, this implementation splits large data into smaller chunks of 32k
or less per block. The kernel performs a for-loop to process the data in
these smaller chunks, minimizing memory usage and avoiding potential
overflows.
Changes Compared to GPU Implementation:
Grid and Block Sizing:
For GPU, the grid and block size were determined based on available
thread counts and memory size. In contrast, the NPU version dynamically
adjusts these parameters using B_TILE and BLOCK_N to optimize for NPU’s
architecture.
Memory Chunking:
The original GPU implementation did not require chunking due to the
higher available memory and processing capacity. For the NPU, data is
divided into smaller chunks (32k or smaller) to comply with memory
constraints on the device. The kernel has been modified to handle this
chunking mechanism inside a loop.
Optimized Thread Usage:
The NPU implementation takes into account the hardware-specific thread
limit (24 threads per vector core), ensuring that the number of active
programs is aligned with the NPU's vector core count, avoiding
over-subscription that would lead to serial processing.
This PR ensures that the operator functions efficiently on Ascend NPU,
considering hardware limitations while maintaining the same
functionality and input parameters as the GPU implementation.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
Signed-off-by: maoxx241 <maomaoyu870@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix xlite decode-only e2e test, xlite decode-only mode utilizes
aclgraph's prefill and will be affected by aclgraph, so shortened test
length.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
Signed-off-by: changdawei1 <changdawei3@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: changdawei1 <changdawei3@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fixed the error in the CI process for
vllm-ascend/tests/e2e/nightly/ops/triton/test_rejection_sampler.py
Error: test_rejection_sampler_block_verify_triton_kernel: duplicate
parametrization of 'vocab_size'.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
Signed-off-by: chenaoxuan <cax1165@163.com>
`VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_DENSE_OPTIMIZE` is only used together with
`VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_PREFETCH_MLP` which is useless totally. This PR
remove it.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When matmul_and_reduce is enabled, the prefix attribute is required.
However, in some models, the prefix is not passed correctly, causing
errors when starting the service.
The issue of incorrect prefix passing will be fixed in vLLM in the
future.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The variable `self.num_pcp_pads` was incorrectly truncated during
assignment, causing errors in certain scenarios such as PD
disaggregated. This issue has now been resolved.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
Co-author by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: daishixun <dsxsteven@sina.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add xlite e2e test
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
Signed-off-by: DaweiChang <405739598@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. MagicMTP (paper: "Block Verification Accelerates Speculative
Decoding") was introduced to consider the influence among multiple draft
tokens, improving the acceptance rate without compromising accuracy.
2. The rejection sampling logic in rejection_sampler.py was restructured
using Triton-Ascend, enabling it to operate under high concurrency, thus
resolving CPU and NPU operator bottlenecks and enhancing throughput.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
MagicMTP will automatically take effect when the parameter
"num_speculative_tokens" >= 3.
- vLLM version: v0.11.2
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.2
Signed-off-by: chenaoxuan <cax1165@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request introduces an L2 normalization kernel implemented in
Triton, specifically optimized for Ascend NPUs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this PR does not introduce any user-facing changes.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bc0a5a0c08
---------
Signed-off-by: Ascendyh <hw7osiris@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Revert [KV-Sharing] Support KV-Sharing feature in CLA models (#4138) as
it causes deepseek v3.2 hang error
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
`VLLM_ENABLE_FUSED_EXPERTS_ALLGATHER_EP` is not used anywhere, let's
remove it.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Use optimized apply_top_k_top_p for NPU platfrom in rejection
sampler; (avoid scatter elements which can reduce ~26ms TPOT with bs=24
per DP)
2. <del>Avoid D2H Synchronization before calling npu_top_k_top_p
introduced by parameter validation which improves inference speed with
`async_scheduling` enabled;</del> In order to elminate the D2H
synchronization introduced by parameter validation before calling
`npu_top_k_top_p`, we directly drop this fused operator since the
performance improvement is not significant compared to async_scheduling
and may bring potential accuracy problem.
3. Refactor the implementation of AscendTopKTopPSampler to align that of
vLLM.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
E2E serving test with combinations of `k=500` and `p=0.95` with
async_scheduling in single node and wide-EP scenarios.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: realliujiaxu <realliujiaxu@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[E2E] Optimize e2e test.
- Remove the test_basic_camem testcase.
- Change Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct-W8A8 to Qwen3-0.6B-W8A8
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Some E2E testcases are not in our CI workflow, this PR add them back.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
RFC: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4629
Reason：
The functions related to Cp differ significantly from those of normal
MLA-Attention, but the coupling is quite severe.
Steps：
1)Extract common code AscendMLAMetadataBuilder.build to 4 functions:
build_prefill_metadata, build_decode_metadata,build_cp_metadata,
build_chunked_metadata
todo：
1)refactor function _compute_prefill_context;
2)refactor function _mla_preprocess,_mla_decode_preprocess
3）Extract public data and processing functions from the attention_cp.py
and mla_cp.py files to the common_cp file.
vLLM version: 0.13.0rc3
vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
- vLLM version: 0.13.0rc3
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: wujinyuan1 <wjy9595@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wujinyuan1 <wujinyuan1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wujinyuan1 <wjy9595@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Fix vllm break:
1. [Enable cuda graph for deepepHT, 5.3% throughput improvement, 4.4%
TTFT improvement] (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/29558)
Fix Solution: Add the now-necessary `all2all_backend` parameter. The
impact of this parameter on the original `set_splitting_ops_for_v1`
implementation is only that graph mode is disabled in `vllm` if
`deepep_high_throughput` is enabled; it has no effect on the
`vllm-ascend` logic.
2.[Migrate legacy ViT MultiHeadAttention to new MMEncoderAttention
interface ] (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/30684)
Fix Solution: The reason why the GPU does not need to convert qkv to 3D
is that the GPU's flash_attention operator is compatible with 3D and 4D
(b s h d and s b ( h d)), but the NPU's flash_attention_unpad operator
only supports 3D (s b ( h d)). Therefore, we need to introduce the
reshape_qkv_to_3d operation.
4.Skip Tencent-Hunyuan/HunyuanOCR test case, as it has following issue
in upgrade vllm code:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5297
### How was this patch tested?
Co-authored-by: zxwang <1476209578@qq.com>
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: zxwang <1476209578@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: zxwang <1476209578@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Move all_reduce logic to AscendFusedMoE.forward, reuse vLLM's logic.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: weichen <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
efect e2e ci test：
1. tests/e2e/singlecard/pooling/test_embedding.py: remove the eager
parameter and rename test case
2. tests/e2e/singlecard/pooling/test_scoring.py: Rename test cases
3. tests/e2e/singlecard/pooling/test_classification.py: Rename test case
4. tests/e2e/singlecard/test_quantization.py: remove the eager parameter
and chage model to vllm-ascend/Qwen2.5-0.6B-W8A8 and Rename test case
5. tests/e2e/multicard/test_shared_expert_dp.py: Rename test cases
6. tests/e2e/singlecard/test_sampler.py: Rename test cases
7. tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_accuracy.py: Rename test cases
8. tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py: Rename
test cases and remove the eager parameter
9. tests/e2e/multicard/long_sequence/test_accuracy.py: Rename test cases
and remove the eager parameter
10. tests/e2e/multicard/long_sequence/test_basic.py: Rename test cases
and remove the eager parameter
11.tests/e2e/multicard/test_expert_parallel.py:remove the eager
parameter
12.tests/e2e/multicard/test_full_graph_mode.py:remove the eager
parameter
13.tests/e2e/multicard/test_ilama_lora_tp2.py:remove the eager parameter
14.tests/e2e/singlecard/spec_decode_v1/test_v1_mtp_correctness.py:remove
the eager parameter
15.tests/e2e/singlecard/spec_decode_v1/test_v1_spec_decode.py:remove the
eager parameter
16.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_accuracy.py:remove the eager
parameter
17.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_camem.py:remove the eager parameter
18.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_ilama_lora.py:remove the eager parameter
19.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_multistream_overlap_shared_expert.py:remove
the eager parameter
20.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_vlm.py:remove the eager parameter
21.tests/e2e/singlecard/test_xli:remove the eager parameter
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Using `spawn` in continuous testing scenarios
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Standardize test case naming in `vllm-ascend/tests/e2e/multicard/` to
follow the `<model>_<feature>_<distributed>` convention.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: root <root@LAPTOP-VQKDDVMG.localdomain>
Co-authored-by: root <root@LAPTOP-VQKDDVMG.localdomain>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add dynamic EPLB CI for qwen3-moe-30B-W8A8
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support KV-Sharing feature in CLA (cross layer attention) models, which
sharing kv cache in some layers.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch add handling of `XDRotaryEmbedding` in modelrunner to support
for `hunyuan-vl`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with added/exist tests
Closes: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4992
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove unnecessary attributes from set_ascend_forward_context
1.prefetch_stream
2.weight_prefetch_method
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In code files such as`mooncake_connector.py`,
`vllm_config.model_config.hf_config` is used to get the LLM configs.
This approach works for LLMs, but not for multi-modal models. For
multi-modal models, `vllm_config.model_config.hf_text_config` must be
used instead to get the LLM configs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR updates the mm param --mm-processor-cache-gb, we need it to run
the case
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
by running the test
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: jiangyunfan1 <jiangyunfan1@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, `torch_npu.npu_grouped_matmul_swiglu_quant` can only support
weight nz, so we need to trans w13_weight, w2_weight to nz forcely.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR deletes `cudagraph_batch_sizes` in `MtpProposer` and reuses the
one in `NPUModelRunner`.
During our deployment of DeepSeek-V3.2 with MTP across machines 2P2D and
conducting AISBench stress testing, an error occurred (see below). After
investigation, we found that
`compilation_config.cudagraph_capture_sizes` is modified by
`adjust_cudagraph_sizes_for_spec_decode` in `NPUModelRunner`. This
modification only updates `cudagraph_batch_sizes` in `NPUModelRunner`
but is not synchronized to `MtpProposer`. After discussion (CC @yiz-liu)
, we believe it is unnecessary to maintain `cudagraph_batch_sizes` in
`MtpProposer`; it should directly use the variable from
`NPUModelRunner`.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add a control to enable the exponential distribution operator
overlapping with model executing (default is OFF due to this feature
might not perform well on MOE models, i.e. For Qwen3-30B).
Enable async exponential overlapping will provides performance
improvement.
Also, overlapping the exponential operator with module execution can
cover the performance drop introduced by AICPU-version's exponential
operator.
**UPDATE**: (12/12)
Now our overlap will use the same stream that introduced in this pr:
#4908 .
We move the `do_async_exponential` from `model_runner_v1.py` to
`sampler.py`.
Now we are using `additional_config` to enable async exponential:
Add `"enable_async_exponential": 1` in `addition_config`.
Now we **ONLY** support default exponential/AI-CPU exponential, the old
`"enable_async_exponential": 2` option has been aborted to keep
consistency.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
**YES**, added a new `additional_config` : `"enable_async_exponential":
1`.
When `enable_async_exponential` is set to 1, we enable the async
exponential and overlap with model runner.
When `enable_async_exponential` is set to 0 (default is 0), we disable
the async exponential, but exponential will still running on a different
stream using stream introduced in #4908.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: YuhanBai <yuhan.bai0830@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: YuhanBai yuhan.bai0830@gmail.com
