### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Move ops/comm_utils to ops/moe/comm_utils
2. Move distributed/tensor_parallel/gather_from_sequence_parallel_region
to ops/moe/comm_utils
3. Delete distributed/tensor_parallel
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
a1213fae5f
---------
Signed-off-by: wuweiqiang24 <1005334931@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wuweiqiang24 <wuweiqiang11@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR prefetchs the weight of mlp layers in Qwen Dense Models to
optimize the performance in Decode phase mainly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
a1213fae5f
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Shuming19 <313093131@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[Feat]support dynamic quantization in allgather
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
5931b7e5d9
Signed-off-by: withHades <244036962@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: WithHades <244036962@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, when executing to the Linear layer of the model in
vLLM-Ascend, the weights input format is ND in unquantized case and
skipped ascend case, which is slower than FRACTAL_NZ.
This PR supplements the execution logic for Linear layer. When
VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_MLP_OPTIMIZE=1 and CANN version is 8.3, the weights
of the Linear layer will be converted to FRACTAL_NZ, in both unquantized
case and skipped ascend case.
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
267c80d31f
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In reinforcement learning scenarios, weight updates are required, but
the current inference applies a transpose operation to the weights,
altering their shape. This causes a shape mismatch with the training
weights, triggering an error during weight updates.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
6fb2788163
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Optimize rope by caching sin and cos at the first layer in Qwen Models.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
562663a044
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: ZYang6263 <zy626375@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: ZYang6263 <51255902183@stu.ecnu.edu.cn>
Co-authored-by: ZYang6263 <zy626375@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Flashcomm_v1 optim in Qwen Dense Models.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
5e537f45b4
Co-authored-by: 1024daniel <xxltju324@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The current implementation will result in duplicate generation of
`sin_cos_cache` in rope when `kv_seqlen` > 4k, because the
initialization length of the `sin_cos_cache` is only 4k.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
After this PR merged, sin_cos_cache will not increase in forward func,
so `test_native_rope_deepseek_forward_cache_handling` is not necessary.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
60f0843ef8
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Move prepare/finalize operation from moe_comm_method to
/ops/moe/fused_moe_prepare_and_finalize
2. Adapt to token_dispatcher in moe_comm_method
3. Move
moe_comm_method/experts_selector/token_dispatcher/fused_moe_prepare_and_finalize
to /ops/moe
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
f4962a6d55
Signed-off-by: weichen <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <12153182+weijinqian0@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces Oproj matrix tensor model parallel to achieve
decreasing of memory consumption. It only support graph mode in pure DP
scenario.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
oproj_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT increasing, saved 5.8
GB NPU memory per RANK. We got best performance when
oproj_tensor_parallel_size=4 without TPOT increasing.
performance data:
<img width="1442" height="442" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83270fc5-868a-4387-b0a9-fac29b4a376d"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| oproj_tensor_parallel_size | Split the o_proj matrix along the row
dimension (head num * head dim) into oproj_tensor_parallel_size pieces.
| No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, head num * head dim must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"oproj_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
eddaafc1c7
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zzh <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Delete redundant codes related to communication
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
not involve
### How was this patch tested?
not involve
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
6c7af8110a
---------
Signed-off-by: 刘哲续 <liuzhexu1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: 刘哲续 <liuzhexu1@huawei.com>
Clean up useless code which is only used for torchair in rotary_embedding
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
a344a5aa0a
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
After moved torchair related rope ops into torchair_ops, split the
torchair from the origin rope ops to make the code clean.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
vLLM version: main
vLLM main:
ab9f2cfd19
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
81eea3d348
Signed-off-by: hust17yixuan <303660421@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
There are a lot of redundant codes related to moe here, and the
structure is not very clear.
We did the following things：
we have placed the relatively independent code related to apply_mlp into
a separate file;
removed the environment variables of alltoall_buffer and alltoall_seq.
Remove the code related to alltoall_buffer and alltoall_seq, and retain
the sole TokenDispatcher inheritance class.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
e2e&ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
4071c76cf3
---------
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <12153182+weijinqian0@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In a mixed-precision scenario, quant_config is not None, but MoE needs
to perform unquantized computation; however, quantized computation is
currently being used. Therefore, we put the with_quant logic into
forward, avoid misjudging in mix-precision scenarios.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
98ac0cb32d
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces LMhead tensor model parallel to achieve decreasing of
memory consumption, and TPOT performance improvement. It support both
eager mode and graph mode.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
lmhead_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT optimization, saved
1.48 GB NPU memory per RANK.
performance data:
<img width="1444" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c5ef0d3-a7c7-46fd-9797-4de728eb0cb0"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| lmhead_tensor_parallel_size | Split the lm_head matrix along the
column dimension (vocab_size) into lmhead_tensor_parallel_size pieces |
No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, vocab_size must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"lmhead_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
de533ab2a1
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zhangzihang <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Register VocabParallelEmbedding instead of overwrite forward
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
644d57d531
---------
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
convert the format of gmm to nz
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
not involved
### How was this patch tested?
ut: test_fused_ops.py and e2e: test_fused_moe.py
**performance**:
(qwen3 30B, 2k->20k)
base:
Total Token throughput (tok/s): 719.93
gmm nz:
Total Token throughput (tok/s): 728.52
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
bfc1edc9f5
Signed-off-by: huangxialu <huangxialu1@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Integrate the arange operator to reduce the time spent and improve
performance
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
56dcf4e7e9
---------
Signed-off-by: s30076806 <songjiayang2@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Register RotaryEmbedding instead of overwrite forward
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
808d2e9aa0
---------
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor all2all-related fused_experts (both quantized/unquantized) into
TokenDispatcherWithAll2AllV, including dispatch & combine calculation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
E2E & UT
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
65197a5fb3
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
For dense models, by not applying tensor parallelism (TP) to the
attention module and applying TP to the MLP module, the allreduce
operations in the attention module can be eliminated, thereby reducing
computational overhead. However, this approach increases memory usage,
so the environment variable VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_MLP_OPTIMZE is used to
control this optimization.
- vLLM main:
b17109beea
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix some ci issue and refactor modelrunner
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
4d9c61993a
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Use function CustomOp.register_oot to achieve the customop registery
```
from vllm.model_executor.custom_op import CustomOp
CustomOp.register_oot(_decorated_op_cls=AscendRMSNorm, name="RMSNorm")
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
afa5b7ca0b
---------
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
this pr refactor select_experts of moe module
i merge implementations of quantitative and non-quantitative method in a
new class
use such as vllm like ExpertsSelector.select_experts
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
test in qwen3-moe and all ut.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
e18859298d
Signed-off-by: yangcheng <yangcheng104@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: yangcheng (AJ) <y00806874@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix AscendFusedMoE init error. Use `super().__init__()` instead of
`super(FusedMoE, self).__init__()` to ensure the member variables in
base class could be called by the children class
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
766bc8162c
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
torch_npu.npu_grouped_matmul:
https://www.hiascend.com/document/detail/zh/Pytorch/710/apiref/torchnpuCustomsapi/context/torch_npu-npu_grouped_matmul.md
According to the document, when `split_item` is 2 or 3,
`torch_npu.npu_grouped_matmul` will return a list which has one element.
Therefore, the `torch.cat` after `torch_npu.npu_grouped_matmul` is
unnecessary.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
not involved
### How was this patch tested?
ut and e2e covered: `tests/ut/ops/test_fused_ops.py`,
`tests/e2e/singlecard/ops/test_fused_moe.py`
**performance**:
(qwen3 30B, 2k->20k)
base:
Total Token throughput (tok/s): 667.76
remove cat:
Total Token throughput (tok/s): 680.82
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
fa00c5d75b
Signed-off-by: huangxialu <huangxialu1@huawei.com>
we recently added disaggregated_prefill and ascend_forward_context
feature by
ba3dfbd59e
and
df0ec55162.
This PR fix some nit introduced by them to make the code clear.
1. drop `current_platform` usage. It'll lead unknown circular import
error in some case
2. update `set_ascend_forward_context` function to make the logic clear.
for example, remove V0 support in this function.
3. Remove useless `self.local_rank_across_dp` in worker
4. Remove `soc_info.py` to use `get_ascend_soc_version` instead.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
02f82fe438
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
test vllm_ascend/ops/vocab_parallel_embedding.py contains vocab parallel
embedding forward
CI passed with new added test.
vLLM version: v0.10.0
vLLM main:
2cc571199b
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
05cbbe20c5
Signed-off-by: chengyuan <chengyuan27@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chengyuan <chengyuan27@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
A refactoring of forward_context and model_runner_v1, add some context
which is necessary in model inference into forward_context, and refactor
dummy_run logic, make it more reasonable.
Some details for this PR:
Add `ascend_forward_context`;
Update mc2_v2 op, and support `active_mask` param;
Update scripts in examples dir;
refactor `dummy_run` logic;
Add soc_version for A2 and A3;
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No change at user-facing.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
57c22e57f9
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
What this PR does / why we need it?
Add uts for deepseek_v2
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
f3137cdd81
---------
Signed-off-by: 张帮政 <zhangbangzheng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Use base test to avoid patch everwhere.
Followup here: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1566
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
ut ci passed
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8d0a01a5f2
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We'll refator `CustomOp` in vllm-ascend from this pr on.
Use function `CustomOp.register_oot` to achieve the customop registery,
taking `AscendQuickGELU` as an example:
```python
from vllm_ascend.ops.activation import AscendQuickGELU
CustomOp.register_oot(_decorated_op_cls=AscendQuickGELU, name="QuickGELU")
```
This is a quick adapt for `CustomOp.register_oot` mechanism from vllm
0.9.2. For further step, we can remove inherit from `QuickGELU` can
write our own `QuickGELU` at all.
Part of https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1647
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8dfb45ca33
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Use Base test and cleanup all manaul patch code
- Cleanup EPLB config to avoid tmp test file
- Use BaseTest with global cache
- Add license
- Add a doc to setup unit test in local env
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR supports torchair graph mode with non-mla backend on both 800IA2
and 300I Duo platforms. The main change is to add
`attention_v1_torchair.py` to support specific attention related
operations that are required by torchair.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Before this PR, vLLM-Ascend only allows deepseek to use torchair. Now we
can also use it with pangu. Besides, we add a support model list to
control which type of models that can use torchair.
### How was this patch tested?
We have test it with PanguProMoE on both 800IA2 and 300I Duo platforms,
and model generates answer normally.
---------
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
1.add static EPLB unit test
2.fix bug: Tensor cannot be directly judged by if statements
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Run the unit test.
---------
Signed-off-by: songshanhu07 <1763685535@qq.com>
