<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR is used for resolved [issue
1147](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1147)
1. Move fused_moe code into one file `fused_moe.py`.
2. Integrate branch conditions into function `get_fused_moe_state`.
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
1. This PR has removed the env `VLLM_ENABLE_MC2`, because I think this
env is useless, we can make judgments based on the current scenario
without this env, it will only increase complexity.
2. This PR has removed the env `USING_LCCL_COM`, because this env has
already expired.
3. `additional_config.expert_tensor_parallel_size` has already expired,
and now we also use parameter `enable_expert_parallel`, consistent with
the vLLM.
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
W_UV/W_UK_T cannot be converted to nz, because this position will be
fused into transposebatchmatmul, which does not support nz. The weights
are actually converted back to nd in each run.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Use #1098 as the baseline, p90 TPOT 90.79ms->88.58ms, improve TPOP 2ms
### How was this patch tested?
use #1101
---------
Signed-off-by: ttanzhiqiang <389825161@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Move all vector operations to a secondary stream, with the expected
overlaping being:
```
| q_rmsnorm | | kv_norm_rope_cache | | q_rope |
| matmul W_DQ | matmul W_DKV | index | index | matmul W_UQ | split | matmul W_KV_T |
```
Currently, the `IndexByTensor` operators introduced by computation of
`cos` and `sin` can't be offloaded to the secondary stream due to a
known bug of graph fusion optimization pass. So we instead keep it in
the main stream, only requires it be computed before `matmul W_UQ` to
avoid hindering later overlapping. The problem may be solved by later
optimization (#993), which hoists the computation of `cos` and `sin` up
to the first layer.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Controlled by `torchair_graph_config.enable_multistream_mla`, defaulted
to False.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on 1x16 910 node, with tailored 2 layer DSKv2.
Signed-off-by: sdmyzlp <lrwei2@petalmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Improve assertion on Graph mode with MLA.
When running deepseek with graph mode, the fused MLA op only support
`numHeads / numKvHeads ∈ {32, 64, 128}`, thus we improve the assertion
info here to avoid users confused with this.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Adjusting tp size is required when running deepseek-v3/r1 with graph
mode. deepseek-v2-lite is not supported in graph mode.
### How was this patch tested?
Test locally as the CI machine could not run V3 due to the HBM limits.
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The former PR https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/736
select the valid token inside the `input_ids` and `position_ids` breaks
the necessary padding required by torchair. In this PR, we pending the
pad logic after the multimodal part.
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Based on the design of dual-batch overlap proposed by Deepseek team and
also the implementation of fused moe in VLLM project, we implement the
multi-stream(also known as dual-batch) overlap for deepseek+mla on
Ascend NPU. We split the input batch of model into two microbatches and
then overlap the comp/comm ops in attention and moe layers using two
streams to improve the performance. Our approach can be easily extended
when adding dispatch/combine communications for moe layer.
Compared with the previously proposed
[draft](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/842), we use
one stream for computation ops and the other for communication ops,
separately. In out opinions, it is beneficial for arranging the order of
executing different ops and thus avoiding the contention of
computation/communication resources.
ref: [overlap for
llama](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/15787/files)
ref: [dbo in
sglang](https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang/pull/4068/files#diff-b4937569fc71f6ad215181b633b2f89c7183a2b4ac39e41fc22635599a9be7de)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Adding an env variable "VLLM_ENABLE_DBO". Users can enable dbo by
setting "VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_DBO=1"
See /examples/offline_dualbatch_overlap_npu.py for more info.
### How was this patch tested?
This patch can be tested with vllm-0.9.0 using its online service with
benchmark tests. We have decoupled the func of dbo from vllm and it
should be able to run without any modification to the code of vllm(some
modifications is better to implement in vllm though).
Any advice/discussion is welcome.
### Performance Benchmark
We have ran the benchmark_serving script of vllm to test the performance
after using dual-batch overlap.
`python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server \
--model=DeepSeek-R1-W8A8 \
--trust-remote-code \
--distributed-executor-backend=mp \
-tp=16 \
--port 8006 \
--max-num-seqs 390 \
--max-model-len 32768 \
--max-num-batched-tokens 65536 \
--block-size 128 \
--compilation_config 0 \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 \
--disable-log-requests \
--additional-config
'{"expert_tensor_parallel_size":1,"enable_inter_dp_scheduling":true,"init_torchair_graph_batch_sizes":true,"trace_recompiles":true,"ascend_scheduler_config":{},"enable_graph_mode":false}'`
and run benchmark with the parameters of :
`--dataset-name random --random-input-len 4096 --random-output-len 1
--num-prompts 200 --max-concurrency 8 --request-rate 5
--metric-percentiles 90`
1. test with the version using allgather+allreduce in Ascend 910B (tp16
ep16 + deepseek r1 w8a8)
2. test with the version using alltoall:
prefill qps: 0.90 -> 1.01
Mean TTFT：8226->7432ms
The overlap approach when using alltoall communication can be further
optimized by overlapping micro-batch1's moe comp with micro-batch2's
dispatch a2a comm
---------
Signed-off-by: zhuohuan <zxdu1997@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add `with_prefill_across_dp` to AscendMetadata to fix dp
This pr fixes the bug introduced by #1012, which add an arg
`with_prefill_across_dp` when dp_size > 1.
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
More and more config options are added to additional_config. This PR
provide a new AscendConfig to manage these config options by an easier
way to make code cleaner and readable.
This PR also added the `additional_config` doc for users.
Added the test_ascend_config.py to make sure the new AscendConfig works
as expect.
TODO: Add e2e test with torchair and deepseek once the CI resource is
available.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Solve the bug that the graph mode is the same as p and d, and some other
bugs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Wouldn't be
### How was this patch tested?
Follow the end-to-end test
Signed-off-by: ningbenzhe1 <ningbenzhe@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix deepseek with v1, this error is introdeced by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/945. and this pr fix
the block table of mla
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new addedtest.
Signed-off-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
Make spec decode support for V1 Engine
- Currently, Ascend does not support the triton kernel. PyTorch is used
to rewrite the `rejection_sampler.py` triton kernel. However, PyTorch is
not as good as Triton. Therefore, ascend c is used to implement the
function in the future.
- Currently, spec decode supports only the ngram algorithm. The eagle
algorithm needs to be further adapted.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
Not change user facing.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
test by `tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_v1_spec_decode.py` and
`tests/sample/test_rejection_sampler.py`, test base function of
rejection sampler and e2e function of spec decode.
Signed-off-by: ponix-j <657511300@qq.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, the implementation for MLA V1 pads q, k, v to `head_dim` 256
to conform to early MLA kernel. But the new MLA kernel supports
`head_dim` that can't be devided by 128. Therefore we can remove those
unnecessary paddings to boost the performance
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update attention nz and mla nz modules to improve TPOP 6ms performance
Convert W_UV and W_UK_T to NPU format in mla_v1.py
Convert layer.weight to NPU format in w8a8.py
Signed-off-by: ttanzhiqiang <389825161@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- According to https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/807,
we pull request for customer ascendc kernel of multi-step.
- also a bug we found in multi_step_runner.py is fixed when we use
multi-step on V0 Engine.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no user-facing change
### How was this patch tested?
we add Unit Test file and offline inference file to test the custom
ascendc kernel. See test/ops/test_multi_step.py and
examples/offline_multi_step.py
---------
Signed-off-by: wan_danfeng <wonderful199082@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
this PR fix CI failure broken by vllm.
1. add moe_config for fused_moe
2. adjust the change for kv cache group from vllm. currently vllm-ascend
doesn't support this feature. this is just a quick fix for backward
compatibility
fix: #872
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
moe support for llama4 and mllama4 in vllm-ascend
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
start sever:
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model
/data/nfs/benchmark/tokenizer/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct \
--max-num-seqs=256 \
--max-model-len=8192 \
--tensor-parallel-size=8 \
--block-size=128 \
--dtype bfloat16 \
--host=0.0.0.0 \
--port=8000 \
--gpu-memory-utilization=0.9 \
--trust-remote-code
client:
python online_server.py --model-path
/data/nfs/benchmark/tokenizer/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
--image-path /data/nfs/w60040464/cherry_blossom.jpg --docker-ip
7.242.108.253 --served-port 8000 --text "what is the content of this
image?"
result:
{'id': 'chatcmpl-2b709a5d2e1a4017991ec4ba8248686a', 'object':
'chat.completion', 'created': 1747056823, 'model':
'/data/nfs/benchmark/tokenizer/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct',
'choices': [{'index': 0, 'message': {'role': 'assistant',
'reasoning_content': None, 'content': 'The image depicts a tower, likely
Tokyo Skytree, framed by branches of a cherry blossom tree. The tower is
white and has a distinctive shape, with a large sphere at the top and a
long, thin spire extending from it. The branches of the cherry blossom
tree are in the foreground, with pink flowers blooming on them. The
background is a clear blue sky.\n\n**Key Features:**\n\n* **Tower:**
White, spherical shape at the top, long thin spire\n', 'tool_calls':
[]}, 'logprobs': None, 'finish_reason': 'length', 'stop_reason': None}],
'usage': {'prompt_tokens': 2340, 'total_tokens': 2440,
'completion_tokens': 100, 'prompt_tokens_details': None},
'prompt_logprobs': None}
Signed-off-by: chenxu <chenxu68@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chenxu <chenxu68@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: evian <eviantai@u.nus.edu>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add padding for ACL Graph and refactor graph batch size adjustments to
utils.py
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support the features of prefix cache and chunked prefill in v0/v1.
---------
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix function name typo, make `mask_fill_` to `masked_fill_`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com>
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
1. Improve inference speed and usability for deepsek models with NPU
graph mode.
2. Modify some codes to adapt to CANN 8.1.RC1.beta1.
3. Add a switch for NPU graph mode and its cache.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
This PR provides an experimental configuration to enable NPU graph mode
for Deepseek models. User can set
additional_config={'enable_graph_mode': True} to try this feature. Note
that this feature currently only supports for V0 engine.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
This patch was tested with the newest torch_npu 2.5.1
(https://pypi.org/project/torch-npu/#files) and CANN 8.1.RC1.beta1
toolkit&nnal&kernels
(https://www.hiascend.com/developer/download/community/result?module=cann)
released in 25/30 April.
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Deepseek v3 now adopt vanilla chunked prefill on MLA part which is
ineffcient for computing but necessary for chunked prefill. Since PR
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/543 bring v0 scheduler
into vllm-ascend, we can now adopt torch_npu._npu_flash_attention inside
the mla backend for more performance boost. Also there are some
redundant computation inside the rope, which is also removed. This PR
should bring some performance gain for deepseek eager mode inference.
---------
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
Replace torch function with reshape_and_cache fused op for better
performance. The `reshape_and_cache` function wasn't working because it
expected torch.int32 tensor, but a torch.int64 tensor was provided.
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
`reshape_and_cache_siso` seems have some funcitonality issues, use torch
op combination replace this custom op by default.
---------
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Eliminated duplicate `block_table` tensor initialization and cleaned up
unused code segments. This resolves an issue where the second creation
was overwriting the first, potentially leading to unexpected behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
This PR supports the access of vllm-acend to the piecewise_graph feature
provided by the v1 engine.
1. register unifiled_ascend_attention_with_output for piecewise_graph to
split graph.
2. support NPUGraph to accelerate kernel launch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
support npugraph to default， Users can disenable the npugraph feature by
configuring enforce_eager.
This has corresponding requirements for the versions of torch_npu and
CANN, and they need to support graph capture.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
it turn to default
---------
Signed-off-by: Bug Hunter Yan <yanpq@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. support deepseek with w8a8 quant;
2. support deepseek with mix-parallel(multi-DP, EP+TP);
3. support deepseek with graphmode.
---------
Signed-off-by: wen-jie666 <wenjie39@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liuyizhou5@h-partners.com>
Signed-off-by: libaokui <libaokui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wen-jie666 <wenjie39@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The pr will fix some bug about spec decode / MTP
The pr add a mtp e2e UT `test_mtp_correctness.py`
**vllm_ascend/attention/attention.py**
1. add support `self.attn_mask_cache` only has 1 element to cover scene
in which both spec docode and chunked prefill are enabled.
**vllm_ascend/distributed/parallel_state.py**
1. remove 2 assert because spec decode worker would use init_worker
twice
**vllm_ascend/models/deepseek_mtp.py**
1. remove unused params;
2. add support w8a8 in `CustomDeepSeekMTP`
**vllm_ascend/quantization/quant_config.py**
1. use `AscendUnquantizedFusedMoEMethod` instead of
`UnquantizedFusedMoEMethod`
**other**
1. replace `from vllm.logger import init_logger` to `from vllm.logger
import logger` all of the vllm-ascend project
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Signed-off-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
1. Add `vllm_version_is` function to check vllm version.
2. `ensure_kv_transfer_initialized` and `get_kv_transfer_group ` have
been moved to other place in vllm main branch via
3408e47159
, this patch fix the import error.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Backport: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/252
This support speculative decoding in Ascend, including speculating with
a draft model、by matching n-grams in the prompt、using MLP speculators
and using EAGLE based draft models.
Backport: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/423
spec decode MultiStepWorker support TP1DraftModelRunner fully, support
run the draft_model_runner with multi-step prepare on the NPU directly
and support draft_model_runner use MLA.
1. before this pr, `MultiStepWorker` would not step into the branch
using NPU prepare, but only into the branch using CPU prepare (`line 52`
of `vllm_ascend/patch/patch_multi_step_worker.py`). Although this has
`no effect` on the `correct operation` of speculative decoding and the
performance of the two branches is basically the same as of the current
version, I support entering this branch in this PR. In general, there
are two main changes in `patch_multi_step_worker.py`: first, the
`is_cuda_like()` check is removed and the `TP1DraftModelRunner`
rewritten in vllm_ascend is used; second, the
`supports_gpu_multi_step()` function is made to return true on NPU
devices when outer Multi_step_worker could work correct.
3. before this pr, `TP1DraftModelRunner` only supports Attention on NPU,
but not MLA. The relevant adaptation is in
`vllm_ascend/worker/draft_model_runner.py`. Although I don’t know why
the `input_positions` of `model_input.attn_metadata` in vllm-ascend
needs to be added in `execute_model`, it is done in `model_runner.py`,
so I also made corresponding changes. Otherwise, when atten_backend is
MLA, it will prompt that input_positions cannot be found.
4. I commented out two lines in `draft_model_runner.py` in `line118` to
support the scenario of K>1.
```
# lora_mapping=model_input.lora_mapping,
# lora_requests=model_input.lora_requests,
```
I added comments. In the future, when vllm-ascend supports lora feature,
the changes here can be restored.
TODO：
- [ ] revert the patch when the related issues are addressed in vllm
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
- e2e test for medusa proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_medusa_correctness.py
- e2e test for mlp proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_mlp_correctness.py
- e2e test for n-gram proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_ngram_correctness.py
Tests for patched files:
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_dynamic_spec_decode.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_multi_step_worker.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_ngram_worker.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_spec_decode_worker.py
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
This PR adds AscendScheduler to vllm v1 engine.
This scheduler currently supports v0-style prefill-first scheduling
strategy.
In the future more schedule methods will be supported by this scheduler.
---------
Signed-off-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
1. remove useluss code in attention.py
2. multistep now using StatefulModelInputForNPU and do not use
StatefulModelInput
Signed-off-by: new-TonyWang <wangtonyyu222@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add support for V1 Engine.
Please note that this is just the initial version, and there may be some
places need to be fixed or optimized in the future, feel free to leave
some comments to us.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
To use V1 Engine on NPU device, you need to set the env variable shown
below:
```bash
export VLLM_USE_V1=1
export VLLM_WORKER_MULTIPROC_METHOD=spawn
```
If you are using vllm for offline inferencing, you must add a `__main__`
guard like:
```bash
if __name__ == '__main__':
llm = vllm.LLM(...)
```
Find more details
[here](https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/getting_started/troubleshooting.html#python-multiprocessing).
### How was this patch tested?
I have tested the online serving with `Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct` using this
command:
```bash
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --max_model_len 26240
```
Query the model with input prompts:
```bash
curl http://localhost:8000/v1/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct",
"prompt": "The future of AI is",
"max_tokens": 7,
"temperature": 0
}'
```
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: didongli182 <didongli@huawei.com>
