### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add ut for torchair graph mode on DeepSeekV3
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Move all vector operations to a secondary stream, with the expected
overlaping being:
```
| q_rmsnorm | | kv_norm_rope_cache | | q_rope |
| matmul W_DQ | matmul W_DKV | index | index | matmul W_UQ | split | matmul W_KV_T |
```
Currently, the `IndexByTensor` operators introduced by computation of
`cos` and `sin` can't be offloaded to the secondary stream due to a
known bug of graph fusion optimization pass. So we instead keep it in
the main stream, only requires it be computed before `matmul W_UQ` to
avoid hindering later overlapping. The problem may be solved by later
optimization (#993), which hoists the computation of `cos` and `sin` up
to the first layer.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Controlled by `torchair_graph_config.enable_multistream_mla`, defaulted
to False.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on 1x16 910 node, with tailored 2 layer DSKv2.
Signed-off-by: sdmyzlp <lrwei2@petalmail.com>
Contains on #1111 for completeness.
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Implement multi-stream parallelism for MoE layers with shared experts,
where computation of shared experts will be overlapped with expert token
dispatch and combine. Also, when multi-stream is enabled, weights of
shared experts will be force to replicate across all cards, regardless
of any tensor parallelism configurations, to avoid AllReduce operations.
With the expected overlaping being:
```
| shared gate_up | shared act | | shared down |
| dispatch | routed gate_up, act, down | combine |
```
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on 1x16 910 node, with tailored 2 layer DSKv2.
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
---------
Signed-off-by: sdmyzlp <lrwei2@petalmail.com>
1. Add `__init__.py` for vllm_ascend/compilation to make sure it's a
python module
2. Fix model runner bug to keep the same with vllm
3. Add release note for 0.9.0rc2
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
1. Update 0.9.0rc1 release date
2. Update feature and model support list
3. Add DP known issue to release note
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add EPLB expert map import capabilities
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
When importing the EPLB expert map you need import expert map file by
vllm args additional_config
### How was this patch tested?
1.You need to collect expert hotness and generate an expert placement
file based on the hotness and the EPLB algorithm, or you can directly
use an existing expert placement table.
2.When launching vLLM, enable EC2 and pass the configuration via the
command-line argument:
--additional-config '{"expert_map_path": "/xxx/xxx/xx.json"}
Co-authored-by: songshanhu07 <1763685535@qq.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: songshanhu07 <1763685535@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuxiao-Xu <664988918@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: songshanhu07 <1763685535@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Xu Yuxiao <xuyuxiao2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
View optimization in torchair (defaulted to on for Transpose with any of
its axis being 1) prevents the weight Transpose to be fused with later
GroupedMatmul, which decrease the performance of MoE layer when expert
parallelism equals the total number of experts (e.g. EP256 for DSKv3).
Add an option to solve this problem by disabling the optimization.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Controlled by
`additional_config.torchair_graph_config.enable_view_optimize`,
defaulted to `True`.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested on 1x16 910 node, with tailored 2 layer DSKv2.
Signed-off-by: sdmyzlp <lrwei2@petalmail.com>
Fix the ascend config check logic:
1. refactor check_ascend_config to make it clear:
1. torchair graph should not work with enforce_eager=True
2. aclgraph should not work with torchair graph
3. add refresh config for rlhf case
4. fix a typo in model runner
5. change expert_tensor_parallel_size default to 0 to keep the same as
before
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
More and more config options are added to additional_config. This PR
provide a new AscendConfig to manage these config options by an easier
way to make code cleaner and readable.
This PR also added the `additional_config` doc for users.
Added the test_ascend_config.py to make sure the new AscendConfig works
as expect.
TODO: Add e2e test with torchair and deepseek once the CI resource is
available.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update feature support for lora
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
preview
Signed-off-by: paulyu <paulyu0307@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: paulyu <paulyu0307@gmail.com>
1. Fix format check error to make format.sh work
2. Add codespell check CI
3. Add the missing required package for vllm-ascend.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add 0.8.5rc1 release note and bump vllm version to v0.8.5.post1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update installation and tutorial doc
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
preview
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
1. remove Chinese doc. The content is out of data and we don't have
enough time to maintain it.
2. Update feature support matrix. Refresh the content and add V1 status.
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update v0.8.4 release note:
- Add contents for structured output feature.
- Remove redundant `(` in spec decoding.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
Preview
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR enable custom ops build by default.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users now install vllm-ascend from source will trigger custom ops
build step.
### How was this patch tested?
By image build and e2e CI
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
1. remove useluss code in attention.py
2. multistep now using StatefulModelInputForNPU and do not use
StatefulModelInput
Signed-off-by: new-TonyWang <wangtonyyu222@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add support for V1 Engine.
Please note that this is just the initial version, and there may be some
places need to be fixed or optimized in the future, feel free to leave
some comments to us.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
To use V1 Engine on NPU device, you need to set the env variable shown
below:
```bash
export VLLM_USE_V1=1
export VLLM_WORKER_MULTIPROC_METHOD=spawn
```
If you are using vllm for offline inferencing, you must add a `__main__`
guard like:
```bash
if __name__ == '__main__':
llm = vllm.LLM(...)
```
Find more details
[here](https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/getting_started/troubleshooting.html#python-multiprocessing).
### How was this patch tested?
I have tested the online serving with `Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct` using this
command:
```bash
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct --max_model_len 26240
```
Query the model with input prompts:
```bash
curl http://localhost:8000/v1/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct",
"prompt": "The future of AI is",
"max_tokens": 7,
"temperature": 0
}'
```
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: didongli182 <didongli@huawei.com>
This PR added pooling support for vllm-ascend
Tested with `bge-base-en-v1.5` by encode:
```
from vllm import LLM
# Sample prompts.
prompts = [
"Hello, my name is",
"The president of the United States is",
"The capital of France is",
"The future of AI is",
]
# Create an LLM.
model = LLM(model="./bge-base-en-v1.5", enforce_eager=True)
# Generate embedding. The output is a list of EmbeddingRequestOutputs.
outputs = model.encode(prompts)
# Print the outputs.
for output in outputs:
print(output.outputs.embedding) # list of 4096 floats
```
Tested by embedding:
```
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
llm = LLM(model="./bge-base-en-v1.5", task="embed")
(output,) = llm.embed("Hello, my name is")
embeds = output.outputs.embedding
print(f"Embeddings: {embeds!r} (size={len(embeds)})")
```
Related: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/200
## Known issue
The accuracy is not correct since this feature rely on `enc-dec`
support. It'll be done in the following PR by @MengqingCao
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update Feature Support doc.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no.
### How was this patch tested?
no.
---------
Signed-off-by: Shanshan Shen <467638484@qq.com>
