### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add qwen-vl model and sampling feature UT for 310I series
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
e0f63e4a35
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
cherry-pick #1675 to main
This PR adds validation checking to torchair_graph_config for better
reliability.
Co-authored-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
2836dd73f1
Signed-off-by: 22dimensions <waitingwind@foxmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
cherry-pick #1501 from 0.9.1-dev to main
Currently, Ray is not compatible with ACL Graph, so we need to fall back
to eager mode when using the Ray backend.
co-authored: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
2836dd73f1
Signed-off-by: 22dimensions <waitingwind@foxmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR enabled pytest and yaml style accuracy test, users now can
enable accuracy test by running:
```bash
cd ~/vllm-ascend
pytest -sv ./tests/e2e/singlecard/models/test_lm_eval_correctness.py \
--config ./tests/e2e/singlecard/models/configs/Qwen3-8B-Base.yaml \
--report_output ./benchmarks/accuracy/Qwen3-8B-Base.md
pytest -sv ./tests/e2e/singlecard/models/test_lm_eval_correctness.py \
--config-list-file ./tests/e2e/singlecard/models/configs/accuracy.txt
```
Closes: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1970
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
2836dd73f1
---------
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add ut for qwen2_5_vl
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
not involved
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
2836dd73f1
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pr add e2e testcase to make sure initialize LLM by
external_launcher method is ok.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
not involved
### How was this patch tested?
not involved
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
2836dd73f1
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
This PR fixes the bug `local variable 'decode_hs_or_q_c' referenced
before assignment` when running chunked-prefill with torchair. We should
calculate `decode_hs_or_q_c` whether or not torchair graphics mode is
enabled.
backport of #1378
fix https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1369
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
0e36abf993
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
What this PR does / why we need it?
test device allocator/camem and mutistream/layers contains resource
allocation and stream ops
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
N/A
How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
2836dd73f1
Signed-off-by: 1024daniel <xxltju324@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add ut for decorator.py/deepseek_mtp.py
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new tests
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
055bd3978e
---------
Signed-off-by: CaranLic <740821011@qq.com>
bugfix cherry-pick from v0.9.1-dev
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/2007
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Minimum reproducing code：
```python
# test.py
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
prompts = [
"Hello, my name is",
"The future of AI is",
]
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95)
llm = LLM(model="Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct", max_model_len=26240)
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
prompt = output.prompt
generated_text = output.outputs[0].text
print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}")
```
```bash
export USE_OPTIMIZED_MODEL=0
python test.py
```
exception as follow:
```
[rank0]: File "/home/xxx/vllm_ascend/models/qwen2_5_vl_without_padding.py", line 84, in forward
[rank0]: q = torch_npu.npu_rotary_mul(q, cos, sin)
[rank0]: File "/home/anaconda3/envs/xxx/lib/python3.10/site-packages/torch/_ops.py", line 1116, in __call__
[rank0]: return self._op(*args, **(kwargs or {}))
[rank0]: RuntimeError: Expected all tensors to be on the same device, but found at least two devices, npu:0 and cpu! (when checking argument for argument r1 in method wrapper__npu_rotary_mul)
```
In `AscendQwen2_5_VisionAttention_Without_Padding`,
`torch_npu.npu_rotary_mul(q, cos, sin)`， `cos`/`sin` on cpu, but `q` on
npu, so there will be an error.
`qwen2_5_vl_without_padding.py` need this bugfix, because
`AscendQwen2_5_VisionTransformer_Without_Padding.rot_pos_emb` in
wen2_5_vl_without_padding.py is from vllm and `inv_freq` will create on
cpu.
40d86ee412/vllm/model_executor/models/qwen2_5_vl.py (L482)
```python
inv_freq = 1.0 / (theta**(torch.arange(0, dim, 2, dtype=torch.float, device='cpu') / dim))
```
`qwen2_5_vl.py` do not need, because
`AscendQwen2_5_VisionRotaryEmbedding` in qwen2_5_vl.py rewrite
`AscendQwen2_5_VisionRotaryEmbedding` and `inv_freq` will create on
device.
```python
inv_freq = 1.0 / (theta**(torch.arange(0, dim, 2, dtype=torch.float) / dim))
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
18cc33dd60
Signed-off-by: pjgao <gaopengju3@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: pjgao <gaopengju3@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add ut for qwen2_vl.py
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
not involved
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
555e7225bc
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adding `W4A8_DYNAMIC` quantization support for linear.
Dense models like Qwen3 can infer with `W4A8_DYNAMIC` quantization.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
Adding ut case in `tests/ut/quantization/test_w4a8_dynamic.py`
Adding e2e case in
`tests/e2e/multicard/test_offline_inference_distributed.py::test_models_distributed_Qwen3_W4A8DYNAMIC`
to test qwen3 w4a8_dynamic quantized model
Note the w4a8_dynamic quantized model is quantized by `msit/msmodelslim`
of commit `d0abb0a47e1f1a473b866ad41b737fbc28fb1409`
1. Generate `W4A8_DYNAMIC` quantization weights using `msmodelslim`
```shell
git clone https://gitee.com/ascend/msit.git
cd msit/msmodelslim
git checkout d0abb0a47e1f1a473b866ad41b737fbc28fb1409
bash install.sh
```
2. Serve model using `vllm`
```shell
VLLM_USE_V1=1 python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server \
--model vllm-ascend/Qwen3-8B-W4A8 \
--port 8000 \
--quantization ascend \
--tensor_parallel_size 2 \
--enforce-eager
```
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
4cd7fe6cea
---------
Signed-off-by: ZhouXiang <zhouxiang100@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
test vllm_ascend/ops/vocab_parallel_embedding.py contains vocab parallel
embedding forward
CI passed with new added test.
vLLM version: v0.10.0
vLLM main:
2cc571199b
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
05cbbe20c5
Signed-off-by: chengyuan <chengyuan27@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chengyuan <chengyuan27@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix test on pyhccl to 2 cards
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
0d0cc9e150
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Refactor Sampler implementation from patch way to inherit from vLLM
Sampler interface.
Next step: Make the op `TopKTopPSampler` in vLLM support custom ops
register mechanism
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
61a6905ab0
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Fixed the issue that pyhccl e2e cannot run continuously with other
tests.
2.Cleaned up the resources occupied by the dynamic_npugraph_batchsize
e2e test.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
This is a e2e test
e2e multi-cards tests local running successfully.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
0df4d9b06b
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add two custom kernels(bgmv_shrink and bgmv expand) to solve the
performance of LoRA
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no user-facing change
### How was this patch tested?
we add Unit Test file to test the custom ascendc kernel. See
vllm-ascend/tests/e2e/singlecard/ops/test_bgmv_expand.py and
vllm-ascend/tests/e2e/singlecard/ops/test_bgmv_expand.py
Based on the actual test of the QWen2.5 7B model using vllm-ascend
version v0.9.2.rc1, the TTFT, TPOT and throughput have increased by
about 70%.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
40d86ee412
---------
Signed-off-by: taoxudonghaha <justsheldon@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently our workflow run time takes about 3 hours in total, which
seriously affects the developer experience, so it is urgent to have a
optimization, after this pr, It is expected that the running time of the
full CI can be shortened to 1h40min.
- Enable linux-aarch64-a2 (64GB) to replace linux-arm64-npu (32GB)
- Change TP4 ---> TP2 * 2 max-parallel
- Move DeepSeek-V2-Lite-W8A8 to single card test
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
a2480251ec
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Pin transformers to fix v0.9.1 doctest
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
doctest passed
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
c657369841
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add ut for qwen3_moe.py
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
18cc33dd60
Signed-off-by: huangxialu <huangxialu1@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add ut for files in folder /attention
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
139a7f07bd
---------
Signed-off-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
it'll execute allreduce and malmul seperately in vllm RowParallelLinear
forward funcion, this function use torch_npu.npu_mm_all_reduce_base to
execute allreduce and matmul in a fused kernel way. this will gain a 20%
performance
promotion in eager mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
this PR introduce a new env `VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_MATMUL_ALLREDUCE` to
control whether enable the feature or not.
### How was this patch tested?
the patch is tested by adding a new test file `test_patch_linear.py` to
guard the ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
A refactoring of forward_context and model_runner_v1, add some context
which is necessary in model inference into forward_context, and refactor
dummy_run logic, make it more reasonable.
Some details for this PR:
Add `ascend_forward_context`;
Update mc2_v2 op, and support `active_mask` param;
Update scripts in examples dir;
refactor `dummy_run` logic;
Add soc_version for A2 and A3;
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No change at user-facing.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
57c22e57f9
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix num_hidden_layers when Qwen2-Audio 7B and #1760 ：
```
INFO 07-15 04:38:53 [platform.py:174] PIECEWISE compilation enabled on NPU. use_inductor not supported - using only ACL Graph mode
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/workspace/test1.py", line 58, in <module>
main(audio_count)
File "/workspace/test1.py", line 38, in main
llm = LLM(model="Qwen/Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct",
File "/vllm-workspace/vllm/vllm/entrypoints/llm.py", line 271, in __init__
self.llm_engine = LLMEngine.from_engine_args(
File "/vllm-workspace/vllm/vllm/engine/llm_engine.py", line 494, in from_engine_args
vllm_config = engine_args.create_engine_config(usage_context)
File "/vllm-workspace/vllm/vllm/engine/arg_utils.py", line 1286, in create_engine_config
config = VllmConfig(
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/pydantic/_internal/_dataclasses.py", line 123, in __init__
s.__pydantic_validator__.validate_python(ArgsKwargs(args, kwargs), self_instance=s)
File "/vllm-workspace/vllm/vllm/config.py", line 4624, in __post_init__
current_platform.check_and_update_config(self)
File "/vllm-workspace/vllm-ascend/vllm_ascend/platform.py", line 180, in check_and_update_config
update_aclgraph_sizes(vllm_config)
File "/vllm-workspace/vllm-ascend/vllm_ascend/utils.py", line 307, in update_aclgraph_sizes
num_hidden_layers = vllm_config.model_config.hf_config.num_hidden_layers
File "/usr/local/python3.10.17/lib/python3.10/site-packages/transformers/configuration_utils.py", line 211, in __getattribute__
return super().__getattribute__(key)
AttributeError: 'Qwen2AudioConfig' object has no attribute 'num_hidden_layers'
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Closes: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1780https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1760https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1276https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/359
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Upgrade to v0.10.0
- Drop v0.9.2 version compatibility
- Add patch for
`vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_common/patch_sampler_gather_logprobs.py`
as workaround of
f3a683b7c9
for v0.10.0 and also add e2e test `test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- Pin transformers<4.54.0 as workaround of
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/2034
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Test locally:
`VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE=true pytest -sv
tests/e2e/singlecard/test_offline_inference.py::test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- CI passed
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
this pr is to add ut for qwen2_5_vl_without_padding.py
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
this is only a ut test
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
9c8b2c2a8a
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add uts for files in folder /core
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
5a19a6c670
---------
Signed-off-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add some uts for files in folder /multistream
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
b77c7d327f
Signed-off-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add some ut for files in folder /distributed
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
107111a859
Signed-off-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: lwq <liwenquan5@huawei.com>
What this PR does / why we need it?
Add uts for deepseek_v2
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
f3137cdd81
---------
Signed-off-by: 张帮政 <zhangbangzheng@huawei.com>
Before do attention module refactor, we can do some code cleanup to make
the next step easier.
What this PR does:
1. remove uesless `common_prefix_len` for attention builder
2. remove uesless `is_only_prefill` and `num_input_tokens` in attention
metadata.
3. remove `CommonAttentionMetadata` and ues `query_start_loc` instead,
`CommonAttentionMetadata` is over designed and uesless
4. update the attention backend input parameters to keep the same as
vLLM.
5. Rename attention name to the same style with `ASCEND` prefix
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
107111a859
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Change AI Vector core number getting function to glibc ABI free
function. After this PR merged in, there should been no glibc ABI
problems for bump torch version to 2.7.1.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
f59ec35b7f
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add UT for patches in vLLM Ascend
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Irrelevant
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
107111a859
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support pipeline parallel with ray backend in V1Engine.
Fixes#1751
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Users could specify ray as distributed backend when inferencing with pp
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
32142b3c62
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Optimizes the performance of the Qwen3 quantization model by registering
a custom model and adding the AddRmsNormQuant operation. Subsequent PRs
will focus on performance optimizations based on this custom model.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8d0a01a5f2
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
What this PR does / why we need it?
According to issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1298 , this pull
request adds unit test code for schedule_config.py.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8d0a01a5f2
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Use base test to avoid patch everwhere.
Followup here: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1566
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
ut ci passed
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8d0a01a5f2
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
There is a lot torchair specified logic in common code. It results hard
code maintenance. We will create a new torchair module to launch
torchair related logic there. I plan to add 4 PR.
1. Refactor worker
2. Refactor utils (this PR)
- simple change that move all torchair related util function to torchair
module
3. Refactor model_runner
4. Refactor attention
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8188196a1c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
There is a lot torchair specified logic in common code. It results hard
code maintenance. We will create a new torchair module to launch
torchair related logic there. I plan to add 4 PR.
1. Refactor worker (this PR)
- create torchair module and move torchair related code in worker to the
new module
3. Refactor utils
4. Refactor model_runner
5. Refactor attention
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8188196a1c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove ETP/EP maintained in branch main. We drop this as there is no
relevant scenarios to use ETP now, and we may subsequently advocate
implementing expert tensor parallelism in vLLM to support scenarios
where the expert is needed to be sliced
This is a part of #1422 backport.
Fixes https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1396https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1154
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
We'll not maintain etp/ep in vllm-ascend anymore, and use the tp/ep in
vllm instead.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added and existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
fe8a2c544a
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
vLLM commit
752c6ade2e
removed `blocksparse_params` for attention backend. This PR does the
same change to make CI happy.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
9499e26e2a
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix e2e data parallel test: add resource release code and give more time
to engine to pause their processing loops before exiting.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
5895afd780
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
maybe fixes
[#1728](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1728#issuecomment-3065083433)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Test Qwen3-32B tp=4 with:
```bash
vllm serve --port 1234 Qwen/Qwen3-32B \
--served-model-name Qwen3-32B \
--tensor-parallel-size 4 \
--swap-space 16 \
--max-model-len 6000 \
--load-format dummy \
--disable-log-stats \
--disable-log-requests \
```
Request batch_size=128 input/output token=1024
**In 0.9.2rc1**
```text
=====================================================
Total TPS with prefill(tokens/s) : 785.1395
Total TPS without prefill : 846.6809
Mean TPS with prefill : 6.1339
Mean TPS without prefill : 6.6147
=====================================================
Mean TTFT(ms) : 10307.8123
Max TTFT(ms) : 21423.0733
Min TTFT(ms) : 362.3602
=====================================================
Mean TPOT(ms) : 151.3051
Max TPOT(ms) : 159.4649
Min TPOT(ms) : 140.899
=====================================================
Total Time(s) : 175.6032
Request Throughput(requests/s) : 0.7289
=====================================================
```
**Apply this PR**
```text
=====================================================
Total TPS with prefill(tokens/s) : 811.0014
Total TPS without prefill : 876.4423
Mean TPS with prefill : 6.3359
Mean TPS without prefill : 6.8472
=====================================================
Mean TTFT(ms) : 10263.8382
Max TTFT(ms) : 21151.2547
Min TTFT(ms) : 375.9136
=====================================================
Mean TPOT(ms) : 146.1686
Max TPOT(ms) : 154.0957
Min TPOT(ms) : 136.8879
=====================================================
Total Time(s) : 169.8579
Request Throughput(requests/s) : 0.7536
=====================================================
```
The TPOT performance gap between these two sets of data is about 3%.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8dfb45ca33
Signed-off-by: lianyibo <lianyibo1@kunlunit.com>
