1. remove some useless test func and file
2. fix format.sh problem
3. enable full test for singlecard and multicard
4. move long term test to long_term folder. For this kind of test, it
only runs by labeled and daily test. Include: spec decode、accuracy test
## After refactor:
There are 4 test modules
- `singlecard`: contains the test running on one NPU. It'll be run for
each PR and daily test.
- `multicard`: contains the test running on multi NPUs. It'll be run for
each PR and daily test.
- `long_term`: contains the test that cost much time(Now include `spec
decode` and `accuracy` test). It'll be run for the PR with
`long-term-test` labeled and daily test.
- `e2e`: contains the test for doc and pd feature. It'll be run for the
PR with `pd-test` labeled and daily test.
## Todo:
1. some test are skipped, they should be fixed and reenabled in the
future.
2. pyhccl test for multicard doesn't work at all. It should be enabled
as well.
3. ensure long-term-test pass by daily test.
### Know issue
Now, `ready` labels is required to start pd test or long term test. And
when `long-term-test` or `pd-test` is labeled after another one, the old
labeled test will be re-run again. So the labeled test should be ran in
the following step:
1. decide which test need run, then label it. `long-term-test` or
`pd-test` or both.
2. add `ready-for-test` label, then the test will be ran.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
Fix output tensor shape in vanilla_chunked_prefill function.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
None.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Run offline inference on DeepSeek models.
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Backport: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/252
This support speculative decoding in Ascend, including speculating with
a draft model、by matching n-grams in the prompt、using MLP speculators
and using EAGLE based draft models.
Backport: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/423
spec decode MultiStepWorker support TP1DraftModelRunner fully, support
run the draft_model_runner with multi-step prepare on the NPU directly
and support draft_model_runner use MLA.
1. before this pr, `MultiStepWorker` would not step into the branch
using NPU prepare, but only into the branch using CPU prepare (`line 52`
of `vllm_ascend/patch/patch_multi_step_worker.py`). Although this has
`no effect` on the `correct operation` of speculative decoding and the
performance of the two branches is basically the same as of the current
version, I support entering this branch in this PR. In general, there
are two main changes in `patch_multi_step_worker.py`: first, the
`is_cuda_like()` check is removed and the `TP1DraftModelRunner`
rewritten in vllm_ascend is used; second, the
`supports_gpu_multi_step()` function is made to return true on NPU
devices when outer Multi_step_worker could work correct.
3. before this pr, `TP1DraftModelRunner` only supports Attention on NPU,
but not MLA. The relevant adaptation is in
`vllm_ascend/worker/draft_model_runner.py`. Although I don’t know why
the `input_positions` of `model_input.attn_metadata` in vllm-ascend
needs to be added in `execute_model`, it is done in `model_runner.py`,
so I also made corresponding changes. Otherwise, when atten_backend is
MLA, it will prompt that input_positions cannot be found.
4. I commented out two lines in `draft_model_runner.py` in `line118` to
support the scenario of K>1.
```
# lora_mapping=model_input.lora_mapping,
# lora_requests=model_input.lora_requests,
```
I added comments. In the future, when vllm-ascend supports lora feature,
the changes here can be restored.
TODO：
- [ ] revert the patch when the related issues are addressed in vllm
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
- e2e test for medusa proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_medusa_correctness.py
- e2e test for mlp proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_mlp_correctness.py
- e2e test for n-gram proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_ngram_correctness.py
Tests for patched files:
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_dynamic_spec_decode.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_multi_step_worker.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_ngram_worker.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_spec_decode_worker.py
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
