### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Upgrade to v0.10.0
- Drop v0.9.2 version compatibility
- Add patch for
`vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_common/patch_sampler_gather_logprobs.py`
as workaround of
f3a683b7c9
for v0.10.0 and also add e2e test `test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- Pin transformers<4.54.0 as workaround of
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/2034
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Test locally:
`VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE=true pytest -sv
tests/e2e/singlecard/test_offline_inference.py::test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- CI passed
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
1. vLLM commit
45badd05d0
changed the pooling check logic which broken vLLM Ascend.
2. vLLM commit
3e04107d97
requires higher version of transformers. The transformers version bug
has been fixed by
e936e401de.
We can safe to remove the version limit now.
3. vLLM commit
217937221b
added a new input `enable_eplb` for FusedMoe Ops
This PR fix the broken CI.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
6a971ed692
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
vllm has released 0.9.2. This PR drop 0.9.1 support.
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
b942c094e3
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
mla attention still using the gpu_input_batch's attr:`swap_states`, which will lead to
an error `AttributeError: 'InputBatch' object has no attribute 'swap_states'`
This PR fixed the mla input patch error
### How was this patch tested?
will be tested by #1136
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Change as little existing code as possible to add v1 pooling task's
support, notice that i move down the `vllm.v1.worker.gpu_input_batch` to
vllm-ascend, Considering the frequent changes in upstream interfaces, in
order to decouple, so i move it here
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test, and I have a simple test was
first conducted locally which is adapted from
https://www.modelscope.cn/models/Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B, just like
bellow：
```python
import os
import torch
from vllm import LLM
os.environ["VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE"]="True"
def get_detailed_instruct(task_description: str, query: str) -> str:
return f'Instruct: {task_description}\nQuery:{query}'
# Each query must come with a one-sentence instruction that describes the task
task = 'Given a web search query, retrieve relevant passages that answer the query'
queries = [
get_detailed_instruct(task, 'What is the capital of China?'),
get_detailed_instruct(task, 'Explain gravity')
]
# No need to add instruction for retrieval documents
documents = [
"The capital of China is Beijing.",
"Gravity is a force that attracts two bodies towards each other. It gives weight to physical objects and is responsible for the movement of planets around the sun."
]
input_texts = queries + documents
model = LLM(model="Qwen/Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B", task="embed")
outputs = model.embed(input_texts)
embeddings = torch.tensor([o.outputs.embedding for o in outputs])
scores = (embeddings[:2] @ embeddings[2:].T)
print(scores.tolist())
# [[0.7620252966880798, 0.14078938961029053], [0.1358368694782257, 0.6013815999031067]]
```
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wangli <858794774@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wangli <858794774@qq.com>
