Commit Graph

640 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
realliujiaxu
5def28dcd3 [Feat]support sequence parallelism by pass for VL models (#5632) 2026-02-27 08:27:41 +08:00
pu-zhe
e76b69b9ef [BugFix] [310p] Fix attention accuracy issue (#6803)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request resolves an attention accuracy issue by enhancing the
AttentionMaskBuilder310 to correctly handle the maximum model length.
The change ensures that the attention mask generation process is
properly parameterized by the model's configuration, rather than relying
on a fixed internal value. This leads to more accurate attention mask
creation, which is crucial for the correct functioning of the attention
mechanism.
Update fused_moe to main branch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Qwen3 dense mode & moe model e2e test
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1

---------

Signed-off-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
2026-02-26 14:30:39 +08:00
Cao Yi
3953dcf784 [Feature][Quant] Auto-detect quantization format from model files (#6645)
## Summary

- Add automatic quantization format detection, eliminating the need to
manually specify `--quantization` when serving quantized models.
- The detection inspects only lightweight JSON files
(`quant_model_description.json` and `config.json`) at engine
initialization time, with no `.safetensors` reads.
- User-explicit `--quantization` flags are always respected;
auto-detection only applies when the flag is omitted.

## Details

**Detection priority:**
1. `quant_model_description.json` exists → `quantization="ascend"`
(ModelSlim)
2. `config.json` contains `"quant_method": "compressed-tensors"` →
`quantization="compressed-tensors"` (LLM-Compressor)
3. Neither → default float behavior

**Technical approach:**
Hooked into `NPUPlatform.check_and_update_config()` to run detection
after `VllmConfig.__post_init__`. Since `quant_config` is already `None`
at that point, we explicitly recreate it via
`VllmConfig._get_quantization_config()` to trigger the full quantization
initialization pipeline.

## Files Changed

| File | Description |
|------|-------------|
| `vllm_ascend/quantization/utils.py` | Added
`detect_quantization_method()` and `maybe_auto_detect_quantization()` |
| `vllm_ascend/platform.py` | Integrated auto-detection in
`check_and_update_config()` |
| `vllm_ascend/quantization/modelslim_config.py` | Improved error
handling for weight loading |
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd

---------

Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
2026-02-26 10:59:25 +08:00
starmountain1997
bc1622338c [CI] Add long and short prompt tests for DeepSeek-V3.2 (#6536)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

This version has no divisibility constraint between tp and mtp+1.
However, cudagraph_capture_sizes must be a common multiple of tp and
mtp+1, with a maximum of tp * (mtp+1). Therefore, we fixed
cudagraph_capture_sizes.

We added a long-sequence test (64k input, 3k output) for the two-node
mixed deployment scenario. Due to the excessive time required for
performance benchmarking, we are only verifying functionality. The
single-node scenario is skipped because VRAM limitations prevent
launching the model with a max-model-len of 68,000.

and we also add aime2025 test for dual-node deepseek 3.2 nightly test.

### How was this patch tested?

test at nightly environment.

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

Signed-off-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
2026-02-26 10:58:50 +08:00
Dijurido
169e434f78 [CI] Fix EAGLE CI problems (#6702)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
New FIA operator requires queryT equal to the last element of
actualSequenceLengthQ.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.

### How was this patch tested?
Passed existing test (test_mtp_eagle_correctness.py).

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea

---------

Signed-off-by: Wangbingjie <wangbj1207@126.com>
Signed-off-by: Wangbingjie <w30061490@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Wangbingjie <w30061490@china.huawei.com>
2026-02-26 10:26:01 +08:00
Li-Yongwen
2870f7c8ad [Feat] Support routing replay (#6696)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

[Feat] Support routing replay
same as https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/6666
resubmit  because of DOC failure

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea

---------

Signed-off-by: liyongwen <1310439159@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Li-Yongwen <63399187+Li-Yongwen@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
2026-02-26 10:22:47 +08:00
bowenli
e3927cc8f5 [Bugfix] fix bug for mtp (#6514)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix(mtp): resolve MTP core bugs and enhance eager mode test cases
1. Resolved critical issues in eager mode MTP core execution logic;
2. Fixed functional bugs in the _update_states_after_model_execute
function;
3. Updated and released test_mtp_qwen3_next.py to validate eager mode
acceptance rate.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

Signed-off-by: Bowen-Leee <caoshankuangren@gmail.com>
2026-02-25 17:50:57 +08:00
Li Wang
ac9a7d1301 [Nightly] Increase VLLM_ENGINE_READY_TIMEOUT_S to avoid nightly failure (#6778)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
After some observation, I found some cases failed for timeout, just like
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/22280996034/job/64487867977#step:9:921
and
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/22315540111/job/64574590762#step:9:1809,
this may caused by the excessively long model loading time (currently we
are still loading weights from network storage), it is necessary to
adjust the timeout seconds 600s -> 1800s
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
2026-02-25 10:14:51 +08:00
weiguihua2
db51a1b9b6 [Feat]ds3.2 support pcp (#6733)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The ds3.2 model adaptation supports the PCP feature.

The solution is as follows: When saving the KV cache, first perform an
allgather operation on the KVs, and then each node saves its own copy.
When the attention or indexer performs calculations, they all gather the
KV cache and then perform the calculations.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
02/12 23:05:10 - AISBench - INFO - Running 1-th replica of evaluation
02/12 23:05:10 - AISBench - INFO - Task [vllm-api-general-chat/gsm8k]:
{'accuracy': 96.35416666666667, 'type': 'GEN'}
02/12 23:05:10 - AISBench - INFO - time elapsed: 2.87s
02/12 23:05:12 - AISBench - INFO - Evaluation tasks completed.
02/12 23:05:12 - AISBench - INFO - Summarizing evaluation results...
dataset       version    metric    mode      vllm-api-general-chat
gsm8kdataset  -          accuracy  gen                       96.35


- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea

---------

Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
2026-02-25 09:46:57 +08:00
SILONG ZENG
62ea664aa7 [Lint]Style: Convert test/ to ruff format(Batch #5) (#6747)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
| File Path |
| :--- |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/compile/backend.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/compile/test_graphex_norm_quant_fusion.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/compile/test_graphex_qknorm_rope_fusion.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/compile/test_norm_quant_fusion.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/model_runner_v2/test_basic.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_accuracy.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_batch_invariant.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_aclgraph_mem.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_async_scheduling.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_auto_fit_max_mode_len.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_batch_invariant.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_camem.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_completion_with_prompt_embeds.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_cpu_offloading.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_guided_decoding.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_ilama_lora.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_llama32_lora.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_models.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_multistream_overlap_shared_expert.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_quantization.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_qwen3_multi_loras.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_sampler.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_vlm.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/test_xlite.py` |
| `tests/e2e/singlecard/utils.py` |

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea

---------

Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
2026-02-24 15:50:00 +08:00
SILONG ZENG
e2237819a9 [CI]Fixed the spell check function in typos.toml (#6753)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The incorrect regular expression syntax `.*[UE4M3|ue4m3].*` actually
ignores all words containing any of the following characters: `u, e, 4,
m, 3, |`

```yaml
extend-ignore-identifiers-re = [".*Unc.*", ".*_thw",
    ".*UE8M0.*", ".*[UE4M3|ue4m3].*", ".*eles.*", ".*fo.*", ".*ba.*",
    ".*ot.*", ".*[Tt]h[rR].*"]
```
===fix===>
```yaml
extend-ignore-identifiers-re = [".*Unc.*", ".*_thw",
    ".*UE8M0.*", ".*(UE4M3|ue4m3]).*", ".*eles.*", ".*fo.*", ".*ba.*",
    ".*ot.*", ".*[Tt]h[rR].*"]
```

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea

Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
2026-02-14 11:57:26 +08:00
JIACHENG XU
64aea60f2e [EPLB][Nightly] Refactor UT (#6543)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The basic configs are extracted and reused for eplb UT. This is done so
that if the basic configs are changed later, eplb UT does not need to be
modified repeatedly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

Signed-off-by: bigsir007 <xujiacheng12@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: bigsir007 <xujiacheng12@huawei.com>
2026-02-14 10:56:29 +08:00
Icey
7164990904 [Graph][Fusion] Integrating inductor pass and npugraph ex pass (#6354)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Integrating inductor pass and npugraph ex pass, see RFC:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/6347

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A

### How was this patch tested?
all tests passed.

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

---------

Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
2026-02-13 15:34:55 +08:00
jiahao.quan
7221045777 [Attention] add gpt-oss support (#5901)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Please refer to the following link for the historical conversation
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/4467. We have made
updates in light of the comments from the prior PR review. Given the
refactoring of the attention_v1 component, we have carried out necessary
adjustments to fit the newly revised code.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

1. Modified the code in the Attention section to adapt to the SWA and
Sink features required by gpt-oss.
2. Modified the code in the MoE section to add support for bias and
swigluoai.

### How was this patch tested?
Please refer to the
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/4467 for performance
tests, on the basis of which the accuracy tests from AIME2024 have been
newly added.

![img_v3_02tu_501e88e3-2217-4565-8edf-b9acf4f43f2g](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/024f8283-18ab-4d4d-ab12-27917b5d7d06)


- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df

---------

Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: mikequan0425 <mikequan0425@foxmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: jiangyunfan1 <jiangyunfan1@h-partners.com>
Signed-off-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: luomin2005 <luomin2005@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: leon_tao <taoyao2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: nurxat <738457498@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Co-authored-by: mikequan <199741451@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: LI SHENGYONG <49200266+shenchuxiaofugui@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jiangyunfan1 <jiangyunfan1@h-partners.com>
Co-authored-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: luomin2005 <luomin2005@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <56102866+liziyu179@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: whx <56632993+whx-sjtu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Cao Yi <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: SILONG ZENG <2609716663@qq.com>
2026-02-12 10:55:34 +08:00
lih827
f71812011d [Feature] DispatchGmmCombineDecode support bf16/float16 gmm1/gmm2 weight and support gmm weight with ND format (#6393)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. support ND format gmm weight input.
Before this pr, gmm1_weight and gmm2_weight could only be passed as
input to the DispatchGmmCombineDecode operator in NZ data format. After
the modification, they are allowed to be passed in ND data format.
2. support bf16/float16 gmm weight
The current PR modification enables the DispatchGmmCombineDecode
operator to support non-W8A8 scenarios, allowing gmm1_weight and
gmm2_weight to be passed as float16/bfloat16 which is correspond with
input token data type.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

Signed-off-by: lih827 <383084552@qq.com>
2026-02-12 10:37:41 +08:00
ZYang6263
56269eae0e [BugFix] Fix AddRMSNormQuant not taking effect (#6620)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the issue where, in graph mode, the fused `AddRMSNormQuant` operator
does not take effect when there is no bias.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd

---------

Signed-off-by: ZYang6263 <zy626375@gmail.com>
2026-02-12 09:26:05 +08:00
iiiklw
a0315f6697 [npugraph_ex]enable npugraph_ex by default (#6664)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

This pull request enables the `npugraph_ex` backend by default to
improve performance on Ascend NPUs, as proposed in the
[RFC](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/6214).


### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

Yes. `npugraph_ex` is now enabled by default. Users can disable it by
setting `enable: false` in the `npugraph_ex_config` section of the
`additional_config`.

### How was this patch tested?

CI passed. The changes are covered by existing and new E2E tests
(`test_aclgraph_accuracy.py`) and unit tests (`test_ascend_config.py`)
that have been updated to reflect the new default behavior. The tests
verify correctness and consistency with `npugraph_ex` enabled and
disabled, as well as with the new static kernel option.

Signed-off-by: huyuanquan1 <huyuanquan1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: huyuanquan1 <huyuanquan1@huawei.com>
2026-02-12 08:44:06 +08:00
Angazenn
c0c2eb614e [Main][Ops] Make triton rope support index_selecting from cos_sin_cache (#5450)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

This PR extends original `rope_triton_forward` and
`split_qkv_rmsnorm_rope` to support `cos_sin_cache` && `positions` as
inputs. This fully aligns to vLLM RoPE api interface. Compared with
earlier implementation for RoPE, the benefits are:

1. avoiding pre-computation of `cos` `sin` before model execution, which
helps to remove redundant codes.
2. allowing eagle3 draft model to have different rope parameters with
main model (see #6612 ). This help to recover accept rate && accuracy in
that case.

In addition, this kernel change only introduces very small performance
degradation. Those `index_select` or `chunk` operations are now changed
into simple memory access in triton kernel (For example,
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/5450/changes#diff-a4c2d3071530df193b98f9bf38553874bc4d47571336711f116c26d019cfbb6aR77-R81).

**Highlights**

- **RoPE Cache Unification**: Replaced separate _sin and _cos global
tensors with a unified cos_sin_cache and explicit positions tensor for
Rotary Positional Embeddings (RoPE), streamlining data handling.
- **Triton Kernel Integration**: Updated Triton kernels
(split_qkv_rmsnorm_rope_kernel, _triton_rope) to directly consume the
cos_sin_cache and positions for more efficient and integrated RoPE
calculations.
- **Custom Operation Registration**: Registered `rope_forward_oot` as a
new custom operation, allowing its use in fused compilation passes and
providing a dedicated entry point for the new RoPE implementation.
- **Refactored RoPE Forward Pass**: Modified the rope_forward_oot
function to accept the new cos_sin_cache and positions arguments,
enabling a more flexible and integrated RoPE application within the
system.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803

Additional test on Qwen3-235b accuracy:

| Aime2024 | GSM8K | Livecodebench |
| -------- | -------- | -------- |
| 83.33 | 96.26 | 70.23 |

---------

Signed-off-by: Angazenn <supperccell@163.com>
2026-02-11 21:20:53 +08:00
SILONG ZENG
6bc44bf49b [CI]fix nightly multi node test error for wait for pod ready (#6675)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fixes the issue where nightly multi-node tests hang during the "wait for
pod ready" stage due to strict shell mode.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
13397841ab

Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
2026-02-11 18:11:00 +08:00
whx
bb73478c00 [Test][BugFix] Fix torch.rand usage in triton penalty test (#6680)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes a `TypeError` in
`tests/e2e/nightly/single_node/ops/singlecard_ops/triton/test_penality.py`
that was causing nightly test failures. The `torch.rand()` function was
being called with the `device` string as a positional argument, which is
incorrect. This has been corrected to use the `device` keyword argument.

Fixes #

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this change only affects a test file.

### How was this patch tested?
CI is expected to pass with this fix.

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
13397841ab

Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
2026-02-11 16:31:49 +08:00
pu-zhe
02886e2641 [Feat] 310p support MoE W8A8 quantizaition (#6641)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces support for W8A8 dynamic quantization for
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models on Ascend 310P devices. This is achieved
by:
- Implementing a new quantization scheme
`AscendW8A8DynamicFusedMoEMethod310`.
- Adding a unified MLP implementation (`unified_apply_mlp`) for 310P
that handles both quantized and unquantized paths.
- Refactoring the MoE and quantization configuration logic to correctly
route to the new 310P-specific implementations.
- Adding new e2e and unit tests to verify the functionality of MoE W8A8
quantization.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
- Added a new e2e test `test_qwen3_moe_tp2_w8a8` to test MoE W8A8
quantization in a multi-card setup.
- Added several new unit tests for the 310P-specific MoE components,
including `experts_selector`, `fused_moe`, `moe_comm_method`, `moe_mlp`,
and the new `w8a8_dynamic` quantization method.

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd

---------

Signed-off-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
2026-02-10 17:17:44 +08:00
jiangyunfan1
1eb07986bf [TEST]add a qwen3-30b acc case with mooncake mempool (#6244)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds a case of qwen3-30b w8a8 with mooncake mempool, we need to
test it regual
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
by running the test
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
d68209402d

Signed-off-by: jiangyunfan1 <jiangyunfan1@h-partners.com>
2026-02-10 16:26:55 +08:00
wangxiyuan
2a826b5fad [Misc] upgrade to vllm main (#6646)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR upgrades the core vLLM dependency to a newer version from the
main branch (`13397841ab469cecf1ed425c3f52a9ffc38139b5`). This is
necessary to keep our project up-to-date with the latest features and
fixes from upstream vLLM.

1.
ac32e66cf9
pass file is moved.

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd

---------

Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
2026-02-10 14:08:59 +08:00
yupeng
8d44ddacb0 [Test][LoRA] Add e2e test for base model inference (#6624)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

This PR adds an end-to-end test case to verify the correctness of base
model inference when LoRA is enabled. This is to ensure that after a
LoRA base model request issue was fixed, the functionality remains
correct and does not regress. The new test case calls `do_sample` with
`lora_id=0` to target the base model and asserts the output against
expected SQL queries.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

CI passed with the new test case. The test can be run with:
```bash
pytest -sv tests/e2e/singlecard/test_llama32_lora.py

Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
2026-02-09 21:06:49 +08:00
Qiu
cb7c419bc0 [Feat](sfa,dcp) support dcp for sfa (#6563)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds DCP support to the SFA backend.

Please note that due to operator constraints, the current implementation
has to all-gather the entire KV cache and modify the block table to
satisfy the operator input requirements. This results in significantly
increased communication overhead and peak memory usage. Therefore, this
is only a temporary workaround and will be refactored once the operator
provides proper support.

Additionally, because of the above limitations,
`cp_kv_cache_interleave_size` is currently required to be equal to
`block_size`. This restriction will also be removed after the refactor.

#### Test
accuracy test using DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp-W8A8 with dp2tp8dcp8

| dataset | version | metric | mode | vllm-api-general-stream |
|----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | -----|
| gsm8kdataset | - | accuracy | gen | 96.35 |

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

---------

Signed-off-by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
2026-02-09 18:52:25 +08:00
lhp-deep
d060c797ed [fix bug] fix tensor mismatch bug in sigmoid operate test case (#6619)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes a bug in the `test_triton_fusion_ops` test case. The test
compares a fused kernel (`fused_sigmoid_gating_delta_rule_update`) with
a split implementation. Both paths use a recurrent state tensor.

The bug was that the state tensor was being modified in-place by the
fused kernel call, and this modified tensor was then reused for the
split implementation path. This led to an incorrect comparison and test
failure.

This fix ensures that each path starts with an identical, clean initial
state by creating separate tensors. It also changes the state
initialization from `torch.randn` to `torch.ones` to make the test
deterministic.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this change only affects a test case and has no user-facing impact.
### How was this patch tested?
The fix is applied directly to the test case. The CI passing for
`test_fused_sigmoid_gating_delta_rule.py` will confirm that the fix is
working as expected.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd

Signed-off-by: lhp-deep <liuhaopeng1@huawei.com>
2026-02-09 16:43:27 +08:00
pu-zhe
1cc225711d [Refactor]310p_e2e test case update (#6539)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pull request significantly enhances the test suite by adding new
end-to-end test cases for Qwen3 models on the 310P hardware platform.
The primary goal is to ensure the stability and correctness of these
models under diverse operational conditions, including various
parallelism strategies, data types, and quantization methods.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
E2E test
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

---------

Signed-off-by: pu-zhe <zpuaa@outlook.com>
2026-02-07 09:28:37 +08:00
wangxiyuan
6c49f95da2 [Ops][Refactor] Remove custom rotary_embedding operator (#6523)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR removes the custom `rotary_embedding` operator and its
associated C++ kernel implementation, PyTorch bindings, and tests.

The codebase now falls back to using the native
`torch_npu._npu_rotary_embedding` implementation. This change simplifies
the codebase by removing custom, platform-specific kernel code and
relying on the standard NPU library implementation, which is presumably
more optimized and easier to maintain.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is an internal refactoring and does not introduce any
user-facing changes.

### How was this patch tested?
The tests for the custom `rotary_embedding` operator have been removed
along with the operator itself. The correctness of the fallback to the
native `torch_npu` implementation is verified by existing CI tests for
attention layers and models that use rotary embeddings.

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
2026-02-07 09:24:05 +08:00
wangyu
c63b7a1188 [Test] Add initial multi modal cases of Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct for disaggregated encoder (#5301)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds disaggregated encoder  tests for Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct 
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
by running the test
by running ci

- vLLM version: release/v0.12.0

---------

Signed-off-by: wangyu31577 <wangyu31577@hundsun.com>
Signed-off-by: wangyu <53896905+yenuo26@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wangyu31577 <wangyu31577@hundsun.com>
2026-02-06 17:30:17 +08:00
Li Wang
d018aeb5fa [Image] Bump mooncake version to v0.3.8.post1 (#6428)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch bump the mooncake version to the latest
[release](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/releases/tag/v0.3.8.post1)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?
test is locally
>>> from mooncake.engine import TransferEngine
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

---------

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
2026-02-06 10:54:03 +08:00
zhangxinyuehfad
81f3c09d6d [CI] Change A2 runner (#6557)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

This PR updates the CI runner from `linux-aarch64-a2-*` to
`linux-aarch64-a2b3-*` in various test configuration files. This change
is necessary to adapt to updates in the CI infrastructure.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No.

### How was this patch tested?

The changes are configuration updates for CI tests. The correctness will
be verified by the CI pipeline.

Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
2026-02-05 23:43:57 +08:00
meihanc
922e5c163b [main2main] upgrade vllm main 0202 (#6560)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Fix `TypeError: FusedMoEParallelConfig.__init__() missing 1 required
positional argument: 'is_sequence_parallel'` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32567
2. Fix ` TypeError: '>' not supported between instances of 'MagicMock'
and 'int'` due to https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/33035
3. Fix `TypeError: Can't instantiate abstract class AscendMLAImpl with
abstract methods forward_mha, forward_mqa` and AttributeError: 'bool'
object has no attribute 'process_weights_after_loading' due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/33284
4. Fix `'AscendSharedFusedMoE' object has no attribute
'_routed_input_transform'`due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32790
5. Fix `NPUModelRunner._dummy_run() got an unexpected keyword argument
'num_active_loras'` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32005
6. Fix the problem caused by` 'tuple' object has no attribute 'job_id'`
due to https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27492
7. Fix the problem that all_moe_layers is not equal to vllm.moe_forward,
vllm.moe_forward_shared due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/33184
8. Add patch to fix the problem "got multiple values for keyword
argument 'add_special_tokens'" due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32863
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

---------

Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
2026-02-05 19:31:17 +08:00
ChenCangtao
2c1608265b [CI][npugraph_ex]Fix npugraph ex e2e test (#6553)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When running the Qwen3-0.6B model using the npugraph_ex backend, the
last few characters of the generated results changed. We have modified
the relevant test cases to ensure the CI runs smoothly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

---------

Signed-off-by: chencangtao <chencangtao@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: chencangtao <chencangtao@huawei.com>
2026-02-05 14:03:10 +08:00
Yizhou
2ee4f23f28 [ModelRunner][Fix] Pads query_start_loc to satisfy FIA/TND constraint (#6475)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR reverts "[ModelRunner] Revert [Fix] Pads query_start_loc to
satisfy FIA/TND constraint #6459 (commit
5b0a6bcfe9)" and fixes a check in
`model_runner_v1`.

**A key change is that we remove the strict assertion in the latest
commit, as it turns out MLA + PIECEWISE will slice during computing,
leaving our assertion uncalled for and will only cause false alarm.**

This handles both uniform and mixed batches (by inserting a dummy
request for mixed batches), consolidates ad-hoc padding into a single
helper, copies the updated buffer to the device, which prevents kernel
mismatches or failures and ensure correct shapes for FIA/TND execution
in full graph modes.

We currently place this helper in `execute_model`. My original design
was to include it in `_prepare_inputs`, but that doesn’t work because it
must run after padding. While I’d prefer to minimize the impact and
reuse as much of the base class as possible in the future, it doesn’t
seem achievable at the moment.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.

### How was this patch tested?
Test cases added.

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

---------

Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
2026-02-04 21:11:08 +08:00
starmountain1997
bfcc372f75 [CI] Add long and short prompt tests for DeepSeek-V3.2 (#6499)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

This PR enhances the test_deepseek3_2_w8a8_pruning_mtp_tp2_ep E2E test
by adding both short and long prompt test cases:
- Short test: Validates basic functionality with minimal input ("Hello
")
- Long test: Validates the model can handle prompts near its maximum
context length (~163K tokens, approaching the max_position_embeddings
limit of 163,840)
Additionally, explicitly sets max_model_len=163840 to ensure the test
properly exercises the model's full context window capability.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No. This change only affects internal E2E testing infrastructure.  

### How was this patch tested?

The modified test case will be executed as part of the E2E test suite
and has been validated
[here](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21620195055/job/62308026205?pr=6499).



- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

Signed-off-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
2026-02-04 09:10:50 +08:00
Nengjun Ma
78fad4e348 [Refactor] MLP weight prefetch to consistency with MoE Model's prefetching in terms of code and usage (#6442)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor MLP weight prefetch to consistency with MoE Model's prefetching
in terms of code and usage.
Environments VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_PREFETCH_MLP,
VLLM_ASCEND_MLP_DOWN_PREFETCH_SIZE and
VLLM_ASCEND_MLP_GATE_UP_PREFETCH_SIZE is removed, usage as following:

--additional-config '{"weight_prefetch_config": { "enabled": true,
"prefetch_ratio": {"mlp": { "gate_up": 1.0, "down": 1.0} }}}'

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

---------

Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
2026-02-04 09:08:18 +08:00
whx
4d6444d5fd [Nightly][BugFix] Remove kv_cache nz test case for test_mla_preprocess_nq.py (#6505)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove kv_cache nz test case for test_mla_preprocess_nq.py. This case is
added by https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/3072 but has
not been tested on bf16 scenario. Results show that this is not
currently supported.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.


- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
2026-02-03 18:26:51 +08:00
Feng Liu
03a18ad6fd [E2E] add E2E for Prefix Caching cp & Chunked Prefill cp (#5149)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add E2E for Prefix Caching cp & Chunked Prefill cp 
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c

---------

Signed-off-by: F.Liu <liufeng248@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Liu <46866849+ader47@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: F.Liu <liufeng248@huawei.com>
2026-02-03 15:04:14 +08:00
LeeWenquan
b1de6cbb31 [Bugfix][CI]Add qwen3Next MTP+Full Decode (#6047)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix a bug in the repo and add a test case for MTP + Full Decode Only +
Qwen3Next.
The _build_dummy_attn_metadata function in NPUModelRunner seems losed a
query_star_loc.copy_to_gpu operation, which will lead to difference
between query_start_loc and query_start_loc_cpu, and they are required
to be same in MTP + Full Decode Only + Qwen3Next case.

Before this pr:
`self.query_start_loc = [0, 0, 0, 0, ... , 0]
self.query_start_loc_cpu = [0, 2, 4, 6, ... ,128]`

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d

---------

Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
2026-02-03 14:26:21 +08:00
Shaoxu Cheng
39e77fb9e4 [Feat.]: support 310p w8a8 (#6454)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Introduced 310P W8A8 Quantization Support: New modules and methods have
been added to enable W8A8 static quantization specifically for the
Ascend 310P platform.
Platform-Specific Quantization Configuration Loading: The system now
dynamically loads the appropriate quantization configurations
(AscendCompressedTensorsConfig, AscendModelSlimConfig) based on whether
the current hardware is an Ascend 310P device.
Implemented AscendW8A8LinearMethod310P: A dedicated linear quantization
method for 310P is provided, handling the specifics of weight and
activation quantization, including input parameter broadcasting and
weight data manipulation.
Extended AscendModelSlimConfig for 310P: A specialized configuration
class for 310P integrates the new W8A8 linear method for both standard
linear layers and vocabulary parallel embeddings, ensuring proper
quantization application.

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

---------

Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxu Cheng <2906339855@qq.com>
2026-02-03 14:13:06 +08:00
lidenghui1110
79803932e2 [Kernel] Add AscendC fused op transpose_kv_cache_by_block to speed up GQA transfer (#6366)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
As #2947 describe, we need to transpose kv cache layout after GQA kv
transfer when prefill and decode tensor parallel size are heterogeneous,
in the previous implementation, we use `npu_paged_cache_load ` +
`tranpose` + `_npu_reshape_and_cache` to do this work.

But obviously, it is not an efficient plan, the ops above need to be
called for each layer, which introduces 3 * layer_num kernel launch, and
6 * layer_num data movement between L1 Cache and HBM for one request on
decode node. Usually, decode node uses graph mode, so these op kernels
will be called between decode forward launched by an async thread in
mooncacke connector, this kernels maybe last for several decode forward
and TTFT will increase by 3~4 decode forward time.

In this PR, we implement an AscendC fused op
`transpose_kv_cache_by_block` to do this with only once kernel launch
and move data between L1 Cache and HBM only once.

After using this fused op, the time cost in transpose kv cacke layout
can be decreased to 0.24ms from 7ms in UT on 910C, and in PD
disaggregation scenario, TTFT can decrease about 90 ~ 110 ms in
qwen3-235B.

| request_num | original | fused_op|
|:----------------------:|:---------------:|:-------------------:|
|           1            |      643 ms      |        578 ms        |
|          128           |     1480 ms      |       1368 ms        |

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Use fused op by default, incase the op has bug in any scenario, provide
fallback choice using env to disable it.

**DISABLE fused op by add following env**
`export VLLM_ASCEND_FUSION_OP_TRANSPOSE_KV_CACHE_BY_BLOCK=0`

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

---------

Signed-off-by: lidenghui <lidenghui1110@gmail.com>
2026-02-03 14:10:01 +08:00
guanguan0308
dffac6db73 [Refactor] Add expert processed token count output for DispatchFFNCombine/DispatchFFNCombineBF16 (#6402)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add New Output for Expert Token Count
An additional output tensor expert_token_nums is added to both operators
to meet the requirement of tracking token distribution among experts:

Tensor Name: expert_token_nums
Dimension: 1D tensor
Shape: (local_expert_num,)
Data Type: int32
Semantics: Represents the number of tokens actually received by each
expert on the current card.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

---------

Signed-off-by: guanguan0308 <1546542263@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: guanguan0308 <162653673+guanguan0308@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-02-03 10:41:06 +08:00
starmountain1997
b6256e8bc9 Revert "[CI] fix DS3.2 single node cudagraph_sizes config (#6241)" (#6497)
# What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR reverts commit 8134146ab6, which
modified the DeepSeek V3.2 (W8A8) single-node nightly test
configuration. as there is no limit between tp_size and MTP.
# Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. This PR only affects CI/CD test configurations and does not
introduce any user-facing changes.
# How was this patch tested?
N/A for a revert PR. The changes restore the previously known working
configuration.
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.15.0

Signed-off-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
2026-02-03 08:42:58 +08:00
meihanc
c08364f761 [Bugfix] Fix intermittent kv_port conflict with AscendDirectTransport (#6455)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

When using Mooncake on Ascend NPU, AscendDirectTransport randomly
allocates ports within range `[20000, 20000 + npu_per_node × 1000)`.
Reference:
[ascend_direct_transport.cpp#L554](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/blob/v0.3.7.post2/mooncake-transfer-engine/src/transport/ascend_transport/ascend_direct_transport/ascend_direct_transport.cpp#L475)

If `kv_port` overlaps with this range, users may encounter intermittent
startup failures:
```bash
zmq.error.ZMQError: Address already in use (addr='tcp://x.x.x.x:30012')
RuntimeError: KV Cache sending/receiving thread failed to start.
```
This pr fix intermittent kv_port conflict with AscendDirectTransport in
`Qwen3-235B-W8A8-EPLB.yaml`, and add Added `kv_port Configuration Guide`
section in `pd_disaggregation_mooncake_multi_node.md`.

test
Results(tests/e2e/nightly/multi_node/config/Qwen3-235B-W8A8-EPLB.yaml):
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21540138907/job/62073265259

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
2026-02-02 17:31:21 +08:00
LHXuuu
45a573cff1 [Quantization][Feature] Support compressed tensors moe w4a8 dynamic weight (#5889)
### What this PR does / why we need it?

While using the LLM Compressor quantization tool from the VLLM community
to generate quantized weights, the VLLM Ascend engine needs to be
adapted to support the compressed tensors quantization format.

1. Support Moe model W4A8 dynamic weight.

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df

---------

Signed-off-by: LHXuuu <scut_xlh@163.com>
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
2026-02-02 16:39:32 +08:00
wangxiyuan
eeedf7c503 [Main2Main][Deps][Misc] Upgrade vLLM to v0.15.0 (#6470)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR upgrades the vLLM dependency from `v0.14.1` to `v0.15.0`. This
involves:
- Updating the `VLLM_TAG` in all `Dockerfile`.
- Updating the vLLM version in `docs/source/conf.py`.
- Removing conditional code paths specific to `v0.14.1` across the
codebase, which simplifies maintenance.
- Fix `TypeError: MMEncoderAttention.__init__() got an unexpected
keyword argument 'multimodal_config'` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/31972.
- Fix `_shared_experts: 'NoneType' object is not callable` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32082 by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/6335.
- Fix `ReshapeAndCacheOperation setup failed!` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25954 by overriding attention
metadata slots.

This upgrade is necessary to keep the project aligned with the latest
features, bug fixes, and API changes in the vLLM project.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this is an internal dependency update and does not introduce any
user-facing changes.

### How was this patch tested?
CI is expected to pass with these changes, ensuring that all existing
tests are successful with the new vLLM version.

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8


co-authored-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
2026-02-02 15:57:55 +08:00
starmountain1997
8134146ab6 [CI] fix DS3.2 single node cudagraph_sizes config (#6241)
# What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes the single-node nightly test for DeepSeek V3.2 (W8A8)
model to ensure CI stability. The changes include:
1. Simplified nightly test matrix (nightly_test_a3.yaml):
- Temporarily reduced to only run deepseek3_2-w8a8 test case for
debugging
- Changed trigger from schedule/workflow_dispatch to support
push/pull_request for faster iteration
2. Updated DeepSeek V3.2 test configuration
(test_deepseek_v3_2_w8a8.py):
- Adjusted cudagraph_capture_sizes from [3, 6, 9, 12] to [8, 16, 24, 32]
for better performance
- Increased max-num-seqs from 4 to 8
- Increased gpu-memory-utilization from 0.92 to 0.98
- Increased num_speculative_tokens from 2 to 3
3. Added PR checkout step (_e2e_nightly_single_node.yaml):
- Added ability to checkout a specific PR (#6241) for testing
# Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No. This PR only affects CI/CD test configurations and does not
introduce any user-facing changes.
# How was this patch tested?
Mock nightly test has passed, see
[here](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21574655952/job/62159656622?pr=6241).

<img width="1053" height="714" alt="a2f2ee359febb13e1f6330b1bd3c116b"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3262ad0f-adec-4c71-871f-d9cf2db06fbc"
/>


- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
d68209402d

---------

Signed-off-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guozr <guozr1997@hotmail.com>
2026-02-02 11:47:32 +08:00
wangxiyuan
b4aafd4293 [Core][Misc] Clean up ProfileExecuteDuration (#6461)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR removes the custom `ProfileExecuteDuration` utility and its
usages across the codebase. This utility was used for profiling
execution duration of different stages in the inference process. It is
replaced by the standard `vllm.v1.utils.record_function_or_nullcontext`,
which integrates with PyTorch's profiler.

This change simplifies the code by removing a custom implementation in
favor of an upstream utility, improving maintainability. Associated
documentation and tests for `ProfileExecuteDuration` are also removed.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
`VLLM_ASCEND_MODEL_EXECUTE_TIME_OBSERVE` env is removed now.

### How was this patch tested?
CI passed. The changes are a cleanup and replacement with a standard
utility. Existing tests cover the functionality. The removed feature had
its own tests which are also removed.

Related RFC: #5304

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
2026-02-01 20:06:01 +08:00
Li Wang
5b0a6bcfe9 [ModelRunner] Revert "[Fix] Pads query_start_loc to satisfy FIA/TND constraint (#6459)
This reverts commit 56f5d3bd49.

### What this PR does / why we need it?
The patch https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/6357 which
break the functionality availability in the spec_decode scenario, let's
revert and make CI happy first
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8

Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
2026-01-31 16:33:34 +08:00
Qiu
638cae824d [bugfix](CP) Fix and unify the PD request discrimination logic. (#5939)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Since the PR (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32118) has
modified the criteria for judging Prefill and Decode requests in vLLM,
PCPManager needs to synchronize with this standard. As PCPManager
involves multiple calculations of PD request counts, this PR attempts to
consolidate the related logic and update the PD request count once per
batch.

### How was this patch tested?
```bash
pytest tests/e2e/multicard/4-cards/long_sequence/test_mtp.py
```

- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
11b6af5280

Signed-off-by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
2026-01-31 10:26:02 +08:00