### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. use action/checkout@v5 instead of v4
2. remove dbo test case because there is issue with it and will be
refactored later
3. make vllm-ascend compatible with vllm v0.10.1.1 and add CI for it
4. fix sampler api changes introduced by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/22387
6. fix qwen3 moe config changes intruoduced by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/20562
7. fix kvcache block changes introduced by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23262
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
0c6e40bbaa
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix some ci issue and refactor modelrunner
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
4d9c61993a
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adopt Mooncake TransferEngine for kv cache register and
pull_blocks style disaggregate prefill implementation.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### Dependencies
1. Cann Dependencies
Using Mooncake TransferEngine with Ascend Transport requires CANN
version 8.2.RC1 or higher.（see detail
Mooncake[#502](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/pull/502)）
2. vllm-ascend
This PR depends on changes introduced by #950 (modifications to
`model_runner_v1`) and #1361 (updates to `schedule`), both of which have
been merged into the `v0.9.1-dev` branch and are expected to land in
`main` shortly.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
1c859a1387
---------
Signed-off-by: leichao.lc <leichao139636@163.com>
Co-authored-by: jianzs <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zzy-ContiLearn <1831242919@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Dreamerleader <2270923832@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: chris668899 <15105191595@126.com>
Co-authored-by: Pz1116 <zpbzpb123123@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. update `CachedRequestState` as `NewRequestData` changed in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/22570
2. drop maintenance of vllm v0.10.0 in the branch main
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
92ff41abea
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pr fix broken CI:
1. Fix the
ee2eb6ecd8
changes, in this commit, they fused the gate and up projections in the
vision MLP, This can improve performance by reducing one matrix
multiplication. so, this pr do the following things:
- Specify that the two linear layers are fused as `mlp.gate_up_proj`
when loading the weights.
- Use a SiluAndMul activation function.
2. Fix
aefeea0fde,
Update ModelRunnerOutput parameters to adapt to its changes
3. Fix
[vllm-commit](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/20815/files#diff-3ffb829a39ab2b3e4706aa28f5e476815f36c3a87b98d6a66514ebedc8f3ffb4R354-R356),
fix qwen moe
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
fed5849d3f
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 816375e0c1071d0696dfab1a1ce35674f9f37aa0)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Suppose that you want to start a prefiller instance with npus `2,3`
only. So you start the instance with `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES=2,3`.
The current programming will start two workers, whose ranks are `0` and
`1` respectedly. And they will pick the first and second ip addresses of
npus in the ranktable instead of the thirdth and forth ones. But
actually they are using card `2,3` and therefore they can not link with
remote instances when they attempt to transfer the KVCache.
Hence, at most 1 prefiller instance and at most 1 decoder instance can
work on a single machine since they always pick the first npu ip address
in the ranktable currently.
This pull request is proposed to fix the problem. This fix pick ips of
only those devices that are in `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES` from the
ranktable.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
If the user use ranktable generated by `gen_ranktable.sh`, they should
not face any change.
### How was this patch tested?
Qwen-0.6B 1P 1D, dp=2, `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES=2,3` for prefiller and
`ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES=4,5` for decoder.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
ad57f23f6a
Signed-off-by: CaveNightingale <cavenightingale@foxmail.com>
