What this PR does / why we need it?
Improve usability，local_buffer_size support for units: GB, MB, KB, B,
For example, "2GB"
{
"local_hostname": "XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX",
"metadata_server": "P2PHANDSHAKE",
"protocol": "ascend",
"device_name": "",
"use_ascend_direct": true,
"master_server_address": "XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:50088",
"global_segment_size": 60000000000,
"local_buffer_size": "2GB"
}
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
local_buffer_size support for units: GB, MB, KB, B
How was this patch tested?
Mooncake configures local_buffer_size as GB, MB, KB, B
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: lty <linxianchong1@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support pp for kv pool
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: baxingpiaochong <771405853@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
check kv extra config & del hccl backend
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
To adapt to the vLLM v0.11.2 image, the method for obtaining PCP size
and DCP size has been modified.
___
- vLLM version: v0.11.2
---------
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.In short, we renamed the existing MooncakeStoreConnector to
AscendStoreConnector and extracted the storage engine interaction logic
into a new Backend class.
Associated RFC：https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4329
2.Fixed the issue where the number of input parameters for the connector
was incorrect, introduced in vllm 0.11.2
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
change MooncakeStoreConnector to AscendStoreConnector
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.2
---------
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
