### What this PR does / why we need it?
Added a check in the may_reinitialize_input_batch method to verify
whether the backend implements the get_supported_block_size method
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no user-facing change
### How was this patch tested?
Only a few lines of code within the methods were modified, and the
format check test has been passed.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: Debuuuuger <huangzr@cmbchina.com>
Signed-off-by: debuger <102402761+huangazazaz@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Debuuuuger <12110718@mail.sustech.edu.cn>
Co-authored-by: Debuuuuger <huangzr@cmbchina.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Replace the RoPE operator implementation.
- Refactor some leftover implementations of 300I DUO in the main branch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
310P support guides updates, as currently has supported in main branch.
---------
Signed-off-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
After removing codepsell a while, we discovered that typo had a problem
correctly recognizing certain misspelled words, so I suggested adding it
back.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
* Refactor the LayerNorm and activation operator classes to decouple the
310P device implementation from the main branch.
* Refactor `mm_encoder_attention` on 310P to use the
`torch_npu._npu_flash_attention_unpad` operator.
* Refactor the QKV inputs in the prefill stage of `attention_v1` on 310P
so they are no longer padded to 16× alignment.
* Refactor `model_runner` on 310P to align the KV-cache initialization
logic with the mainline implementation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
use the e2e tests.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch purpose to optimize the lint check term. The main idea is to
reduce unnecessary installation time.
1. The installation of vllm is not must, only append the path of vllm
src to the `PATHONPATH` is effective
2. This installation of `requirements-dev.txt` is not must, we have a
pre-built image `quay.io/ascend-ci/vllm-ascend:lint` with all the
requirements installed in advance.
**NOTE**: the conditions for triggering image builds are: 1).Daily
scheduled build; 2) Build when requirements are modified; 3) Manual
build. This ensures that the dependencies in our image are up-to-date to
the greatest extent possible.
3. The `mypy` was separated from the `pre-commit` hook for performance
reasons; we found that integrating `mypy` into the `pre-commit` hook
resulted in poor performance.
4. Reduce the CPU core consumption from 16 -> 8
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The end-to-end lint time was optimized from 20min/per PR to 8min/per PR
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add basic 310p support. Only dense models work with eager mode now.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxu Cheng <2906339855@qq.com>
