### What this PR does / why we need it?
Added a check in the may_reinitialize_input_batch method to verify
whether the backend implements the get_supported_block_size method
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no user-facing change
### How was this patch tested?
Only a few lines of code within the methods were modified, and the
format check test has been passed.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: Debuuuuger <huangzr@cmbchina.com>
Signed-off-by: debuger <102402761+huangazazaz@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Debuuuuger <12110718@mail.sustech.edu.cn>
Co-authored-by: Debuuuuger <huangzr@cmbchina.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
* Refactor the LayerNorm and activation operator classes to decouple the
310P device implementation from the main branch.
* Refactor `mm_encoder_attention` on 310P to use the
`torch_npu._npu_flash_attention_unpad` operator.
* Refactor the QKV inputs in the prefill stage of `attention_v1` on 310P
so they are no longer padded to 16× alignment.
* Refactor `model_runner` on 310P to align the KV-cache initialization
logic with the mainline implementation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
use the e2e tests.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: Tflowers-0129 <2906339855@qq.com>
