### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, there are two paths to judge the chip type in code,
`get_ascend_soc_version` use `get_soc_version` api in torch_npu, and
`is_310p` `use _build_info.__soc_version__`, which generate when
install. We need to unify the two paths.
We need to unify these codes based on the following points:
1. We need to ensure consistency in chip type judgment between compiling
and running states;
2. In compiling state, we need chip type to complete op's compilation,
but in running state, we only need device
type(910B/910_93/310P/910_95/etc) to make code branch judgement;
3. In compiling state, torch_npu may not have been installed yet, so we
can't use torch_npu's api.
Based on the above points, we have made the following changes:
1. When user set env `SOC_VERSION`, use it; when not set, query
soc_version by `npu-smi`;
2. generate device_type based on soc_version when compiling, and write
`__device_type__` instead of `__soc_version__` in `_build_info.py`;
3. In running state, use `__device_type__` to judge code branch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
When not set env `SOC_VERSION`, it will not be `ASCEND910B1` by default,
we will query soc_version by `npu-smi`. And env `SOC_VERSION` must be in
the list `soc_to_device` in `setup.py`.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
It's a tiny bugfix in the `gen_ranktable.py` script. The script is an
util to help setup an example case. It is used to prepare a ranktable
before disaggregated prefill deployment.
Elements in `local_device_ids` list should be casted to `int` type
before referred for a MOD math operation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
No.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
c9461e05a4
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor the multi-machine CI use case. The purpose of this PR is to
increase the ease of adding multi-machine CI use cases, allowing
developers to add multi-machine cluster model testing use cases
(including PD separation) by simply adding a new YAML configuration
file.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The PR is for the document of the prefiller&decoder disaggregation
deloyment guide.
The scenario of the guide is:
- Use 3 nodes totally and 2 NPUs on each node
- Qwen3-30B-A3B
- 1P2D
- Expert Parallel
The deployment can be used to verify PD Disggregation / Expert Parallel
features with a slightly less resources.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
No.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
e599e2c65e
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
we recently added disaggregated_prefill and ascend_forward_context
feature by
ba3dfbd59e
and
df0ec55162.
This PR fix some nit introduced by them to make the code clear.
1. drop `current_platform` usage. It'll lead unknown circular import
error in some case
2. update `set_ascend_forward_context` function to make the logic clear.
for example, remove V0 support in this function.
3. Remove useless `self.local_rank_across_dp` in worker
4. Remove `soc_info.py` to use `get_ascend_soc_version` instead.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
02f82fe438
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
