### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor pcp& dcp related code. we use pcp_manager class to Unifiy
Manage pcp & dcp . as we do this , many code can be deleted from
model_runner, and can avoid break pcp & dcp by other developments.
RFC：https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5449
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: zhenwenqi2024 <zhenwenqi_2022@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: zzzzwwjj <34335947+zzzzwwjj@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to refactor eagle-related modules in vllm-ascend.
This is the starting PR of eagle refactoring. Provided with vllm-eagle,
ascend-eagle and ascend-mtp, we first let ascend-mtp inherit from
ascend-eagle and let ascend-eagle inherit from vllm-eagle. As a
initialization, we just delete `__init__` in mtp_proposer and simplify
the corresponding logic in eagle_proposer.
Based on "vllm-eagle <----- ascend-eagle <----- ascend-mtp", our target
is to gradually delete ascend-mtp and enable ascend-eagle to converge to
vllm-eagle. So the main workspace is eagle_proposer. In this way, we
hope that contributors can concurrently refactor eagle.
Incoming changes:
1. delete common methods in vllm-eagle & ascend-eagle & ascend-mtp
2. delete `load_model` in mtp_proposer
3. delete `dummy_run` and `propose` in mtp_proposer
4. ......
RFC: #5467
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We support to use full graph with eagle.
Change list:
1. Distinguish between processing graph_params and draft_graph_params in
attention_v1.
2. Adapt the full-graph mode in eagle_proposer, include:
1). If use full graph, make Fullgraph Wrapper when load model.
2). Build a new meatadata, set running mode in FULL and mark attention
update in dummy_run when in Fullgraph mode.
3). Fixed and fill any attn_metadata, such as
attn_metadata.slot_mapping.
4). Add a descriptor.
5). Set running mode and triggered update metadata.
3. Trans is_mtp_model to is_draft_model, and add the update of
workspace.
NOTE:
When set async_scheduling=True, the draft model will enforce execution
in eager mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou <136800916+yiz-liu@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This is to prepare for the migration to vLLM's `EagleProposer`, it does
not have `name` attribution. Also it's a breakdown of #5100 .
Introduces logic to determine whether eagle3 heads require auxiliary
hidden states based on configuration, ensuring consistent handling
across related components. Prevents incorrect assumptions for eagle3
variants that do not use auxiliary outputs, improving compatibility and
correctness.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
None.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR deletes `cudagraph_batch_sizes` in `MtpProposer` and reuses the
one in `NPUModelRunner`.
During our deployment of DeepSeek-V3.2 with MTP across machines 2P2D and
conducting AISBench stress testing, an error occurred (see below). After
investigation, we found that
`compilation_config.cudagraph_capture_sizes` is modified by
`adjust_cudagraph_sizes_for_spec_decode` in `NPUModelRunner`. This
modification only updates `cudagraph_batch_sizes` in `NPUModelRunner`
but is not synchronized to `MtpProposer`. After discussion (CC @yiz-liu)
, we believe it is unnecessary to maintain `cudagraph_batch_sizes` in
`MtpProposer`; it should directly use the variable from
`NPUModelRunner`.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: QiuChunshuo <qiuchunshuo@huawei.com>
RFC: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4629
Reason:
The metadata data class contains an excessive number of variables. We
will inherit the metadata of the community and simultaneously remove
some variables that are no longer needed at present.
Todo:
1. remove attn_state partly.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to fix failure of `enable_force_load_balance` caused by
missing `in_profile_run` in `dummy_run` of mtp_proposer.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Extracts repeated `attn_metadata[layer_name].decode` access into a
single variable to improve code readability and reduce redundancy.
Uses `getattr` with a default value to safely access the decode
attribute, making the code more defensive against potential attribute
errors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
None.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Synchronize the host query_start_loc with device values to prevent shape
mismatches when not enable async scheduling.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
None.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
delete sekf.in_profile_run in model_runner to make EPLB works as expect
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: zhenwenqi2024 <zhenwenqi_2022@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When enable the async_scheduling, in large scale EP scene, mtp module
goes to eagler mode, which results in the mismatch of
seq_lens_list、block_table. So adapt the judgement before the draft model
forward.
fix#4986
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: hust17yixuan <303660421@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR add `qkv_rmsnorm_rope` operator and introduces a graph fusion
pass for `qknorm_rope` operations. The implementation includes a new
configuration flag, a pattern matching pass using
`torch._inductor.pattern_matcher`, and a custom Triton kernel for the
fused operation.
Co-authored-by: Angazenn
[supperccell@163.com](mailto:supperccell@163.com)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, add new additional_config
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We refactored the eagle_proposer.py to adapt the framework of eagle.py
in vllm-v0.12.0, to support the logit of padded drafter batch and
async-scheduler.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
(1)refactor npu_model_runner for profile_run
(2) move _select_moe_comm_method to ascend_forward_context
(3) delete _init_model_kwargs in npu_model_runner
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Na
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: zhenwenqi2024 <zhenwenqi_2022@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: zhenwenqi2024 <155598497+zhenwenqi2024@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the bug " TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable' " in
vllm_ascend/compilation/acl_graph.py
The reason of that is the attn_metadata is none in the dummy_run of MTP.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: chenmenglong <chenmenglong1@huawei.com>
The `attn_metadata` is not used by any draft proposer, so we can remove
it.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In PR #4188, a small bug was introduced that caused sfa-cp to be unable
to find the global_pp_size parameter during initialization, and this PR
fixed the issue.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Fix a premature `return` in `moe_init_routing_quant_v2.cpp` so the
routing kernel completes correctly instead of exiting early in certain
paths.
- Switch `FusedAlltoAllCommImpl` to use the MC2-based token dispatcher
and prepare/finalize routines, aligning MoE communication with the MC2
algorithm optimized for Ascend devices.
- Add a temporary override in `MtpProposer` to map `FUSED_ALLTOALL` back
to `ALLTOALL` until the MoE communication type selection logic is fully
finalized, avoiding incorrect behavior in dummy-run flows.
- Simplify the MoE communication selection for Ascend 910-93 in
`NPUModelRunner` by removing the EP-size guard on `FUSED_ALLTOALL`,
which fixes failures in multi-node / larger-EP configurations while
keeping MC2 routing under the configured token capacity.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: mojave2 <chenchen145@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Corrects attention metadata size for MTP when both asynchronous
scheduling and full ACL graph mode are enabled. This prevents potential
size mismatches during execution.
Additionally, improves the robustness of calculating token sample
indices by explicitly aligning tensor shapes.
Finally, prevents padding when the number of input tokens exceeds the
maximum ACL graph batch size to avoid out-of-bounds errors.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
Need to add corresponding test case ASAP.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Yizhou <136800916+yiz-liu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
pick from https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/4736 to fix
the merge conflict
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, the all_reduce operation in _sync_metadata_across_dp is
performed with gloo backend which is extremely time-consuming when
DPEngineCores are in different nodes. This operation cannot be ignored
by async scheduling in multi-node-scenarios with speculative decoding
(e.g., EAGLE, mtp).
This pr eliminates the all_reduce operation for D Nodes and change the
input parameter of MoEDispatch & MoeCombine operators to make MC2EP
support different num_tokens across all ranks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Tested with PD disaggregation (2P: DP2TP8EP16 1D: DP8TP4EP32) scenarios
while enabling async scheduling. This pr can remove cross-node
all_reduce with gloo backend and further reduce latency with correct
accuracy.
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
refactor npu_modelrunner， we should be close to gpu_modelrunner
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: zhenwenqi2024 <zhenwenqi_2022@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: zhenwenqi2024 <155598497+zhenwenqi2024@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR clean up useless torchair logic in model runner. The moge doc is
only for torchair, it can be removed as well.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR eliminates the simplicit HD synchronization in sfa backend, and
_build_dummy_attn_metadata and dummy_run in mtp_proposer, significantly
improving dsv3.2 performance in low-latency scenarios.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Performance improvements are observed with E2E performance serving (P:
DP4TP8EP32 D: DP8TP4EP32) with `num_speculative_tokens=3`.
DSV3.2-W8A8-EXP:
TPOT: 41.67ms -> 23.36ms
ITL: 85.93ms -> 55.96ms
DSV3.2-W8A8 (relaesed in December):
TPOT: 18.11ms
ITL: 56.13ms
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The first commit support `FULL_DECODE_ONLY`:
- Update `AscendSFAMetadataBuilder` to use `num_input_tokens` for
slicing slots and positions, ensuring fixed tensor shapes.
- Implement padding logic for `query_start_loc` in `NPUModelRunner` to
support uniform decode in full graph mode, aligning with GPU runner
behavior.
- Adjust MLA cosine cache allocation to occur independently of graph
mode and switch to using device-resident sequence lengths for attention
metadata.
- Remove redundant slicing of hidden states and outputs in
`AscendSFAImpl` and optimize `sin`/`cos` cache updates.
The second commit take MTP into account:
- Update `AscendSFAMetadataBuilder` to use `num_input_tokens` for
slicing slots and positions, ensuring fixed tensor shapes.
- Implement padding logic for `query_start_loc` in `NPUModelRunner` to
support uniform decode in full graph mode, aligning with GPU runner
behavior.
- Adjust MLA cosine cache allocation to occur independently of graph
mode and switch to using device-resident sequence lengths for attention
metadata.
- Remove redundant slicing of hidden states and outputs in
`AscendSFAImpl` and optimize `sin`/`cos` cache updates.
And the rest of them are just bugfix.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
Test cases needed.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
aclgraph is stable and fast now. Let's drop torchair graph mode now.
TODO: some logic to adapt torchair should be cleaned up as well. We'll
do it in the following PR.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR is to fix a smoking test failure. Adjust mtp_proposer and
model_runner_v1 to route MTP decoding through the non‑fused MoE
implementation while keeping the overall inference flow unchanged.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: mojave2 <chenchen145@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In the Deepseek technical report, it is mentioned that the embedding and
lmhead layers of the MTP layer are shared with the main model, but the
current implementation independently loads the complete embedding and
lmhead. In the Deepseek-R1 model, their weight sizes are 129280*7168 in
fp16 format, which is 1.72G.
This PR fixes the MTP layer to use the lmhead and embedding of the main
model, saving 3.45G of GPU memory in the pure DP scenario.
The current process will first create temporary spaces for the embedding
and lmhead in the mtp layer, then I will call torch.equal to determine
if the two matrices are the same. If they are the same, they will be
reused, and the previous tensor will be released.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
there is d2h copy blocking cpu operations in mtp propose method, which
make host bound issue. this pr refactor it and use cpu tensor to
implement it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
vllm main f5d3d93c40417c296c20dc301100e55708a17f3f
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
this pr aims to support async_scheduling for mtp, which refer to vllm pr
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/24799.
and this pr fix some synchronize problem in vllm-ascend.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix mtp and eagle aclgraph bug
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: GDzhu01 <809721801@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support shared expert DP for deepseek_mtp feature.
`shared_expert_dp` requires `SP==True`, with corresponding parameter
restrictions.
Previously, due to the coupling between `shared_expert_dp` and torchair,
and the removal of `deepseek_mtp` in vllm_ascend, shared expert dp of
deepseek_mtp was temporarily removed.
Currently, by performing the `reduce_scatter` on the input of
deepssek_mtp in `mtp_proposer.py`, we ensure that it matches the
dimensions of `input_embedding`, and then perform the `all_gather` on
the output of mtp.
### How was this patch tested?
baseline:
<img width="1184" height="692" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9680d53a-7b1d-481a-accc-b8f3dae2b9e3"
/>
enable shared_expert_dp and multistream_overlap_shared_expert:
<img width="1167" height="687" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2531d06b-dfda-4e24-8628-6f4b0f677ddc"
/>
TPOT: 48ms -> 45.4ms
Average TPS per rank: 117.6 -> 126.1
- vLLM version: v0.11.2
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.2
---------
Signed-off-by: chenmenglong <chenmenglong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zengran <zengran2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: zengran <zengran2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR integrate suffix decoding (https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04975)
from vllm (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25784)
#
Suffix Decoding is a dynamic n-gram matching method that:
1. Uses suffix trees to generate speculative tokens quickly using branch
frequency counts.
2. Can keep a history of prior model responses, which tends to work very
well with repetitive agentic use cases.
3. Can be dynamically updated with newly generated tokens, and FIFO
eviction of older requests.
#
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This feature should be implemented as opt-in and remain seamless for
users who do not require suffix speculative decoding.
For users who wish to enable it, they must first install
arctic-inference:
`pip install arctic-inference
`
After installation, the suffix speculative decoding feature can be
enabled using the following speculative config:
`--speculative_config '{"method": "suffix", "num_speculative_tokens":
5}'
`
### How was this patch tested?
This PR is currently being tested on vLLM
main:83f478bb19
with PR https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25784
In our previous testing, suffix decoding achieved a 13%-30% throughput
improvement over n-gram on the sonnet dataset, tested on vllm-ascend
v0.9.1 with concurrency ranging from 2 to 40.
- vLLM version: v0.11.2
---------
Signed-off-by: fluctlux <38945811+fluctlux@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Previously, the dummy run executed compute_logits only once, regardless
of num_speculative_tokens. This caused execute_model to hang on
compute_logits when lm head tensor parallelism exceeded 1. The fix
ensures compute_logits executes correctly during dummy run, matching
num_speculative_tokens.
I set the `non_blocking` argument to False when moving
`exceeds_max_model_len` to the CPU. From what I understand, using
`non_blocking=True` and immediately accessing the tensor on the CPU can
cause accuracy problems. However, this issue doesn't happen when
transferring data to a device. ref:
https://discuss.pytorch.org/t/should-we-set-non-blocking-to-true/38234/18
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
---------
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
The main purposes of this PR are as follows:
1. Remove the multicast-related code;
Reason:
1. In the scenario like a2 Dual-System Back-to-Back Networking，the
performance is worse than all_gather. Before the modification, in e2e
test, it was 3 tps; after the modification, it is 10 tps.
2. At the same time, we usually enable the SP feature，it is consistent
with the current logic.
3. The advantage of broadcast communication lies in the fact that it
does not suffer from uneven DP load and does not require the prefill ACL
graph to be enabled. But we support prefill Acl graph recently.
So we think there is no need to maintain the multicast as one choice in
moe communication.
Performance benefits are as follows:
When not enable_flashcomm1, TTFT remains relatively stable at around
43000ms, which is approximately 15000ms faster than before the
modification.
When enable_flashcomm1, there is no diffenence, TTFT remains relatively
stable at around 29000ms.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
---------
Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
