`VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_DENSE_OPTIMIZE` is only used together with
`VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_PREFETCH_MLP` which is useless totally. This PR
remove it.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
`VLLM_ENABLE_FUSED_EXPERTS_ALLGATHER_EP` is not used anywhere, let's
remove it.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### Motivation.
**Limitations of the current vLLM v1 scheduling strategy**
vLLM v1 scheduling currently enables chunkedprefill by default, which
processes prefill and decode requests simultaneously in a single
scheduling session. This can impact the overall system throughput and
performance in some scenarios.
Balance scheduling addresses this issue by synchronizing the number of
running queues across all schedulers to delay the scheduling of new
requests, thereby improving the overall system's steady-state decoding
time. This achieves:
✅Adding `balance_gather` to the scheduler synchronizes the number of
requests in the running queues between DPs.
✅Balance scheduling improves the decode steady-state time, thereby
increasing the overall output throughput of the inference system.
### Proposed Change.
**1.Feature Overview**
In the vLLM scheduler, running requests (i.e., requests that are already
undergoing pre-filled computation) have the highest priority, followed
by waiting requests (i.e., requests that have not yet been computed).
As shown in the diagram above, when the entire inference system exits
from a steady state, the scheduler will schedule a batch of new requests
for prefill operations and then synchronize them among the dynamic
programming (DP) models. This can cause some DP models that are entirely
decoded to synchronize with the number of prefilled tokens. Frequent
prefill scheduling by certain DP models can lead to a deterioration in
the overall system output throughput.
Balance scheduling synchronizes the number of running queue requests
across different DPs, and only schedules new requests for prefilling
when at least every scheduler has fewer than max_nun_requst.
**2.Implementation Design**
**3.Experiment Results**
- Fixed-length input scenario: In the performance test scenario with
3.5K fixed-length input and 1.5K fixed-length output, the throughput
performance was improved by approximately **18%** after adding balance
scheduling.
| Method | Model | Input Len | Request Count | Output Len | BatchSize |
Average TTFT | Average TPOT | e2e duration | Input Token Throughput |
Output Token Throughput | Request Throughput
| ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
---- | ---- |
| Baseline | DeepSeekV3.1 | 3500 | 512 | 1500 | 128 | 6600 | 86.85 |
591.9s | 3030.5 | 1297.3 | 0.86 |
| Balance scheduling | DeepSeekV3.1 | 3500 | 512 | 1500 | 128 | 7012 |
70.63 | 501.7s | 3575.7 | 1530.7 | 1.02 |
**4.Demo PR**
[#29721 ](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/29721)
---------
Signed-off-by: GDzhu01 <809721801@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds model-side integration for the previously introduced
experimental AscendC fused operator DispatchGmmCombineDecode, used in
MoE decoding.
The operator implementation itself was added in a prior PR[#4139
](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/4139).
This change only adapts the model execution path to optionally use the
fused operator.
When the environment variable VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_FUSED_MC2=2 is set, the
original MC2 path composed of multiple operators (A8W8 dispatch → GMM →
SwiGLU → GMM → combine) might be replaced by the single fused operator
DispatchGmmCombineDecode.
By default, the existing multi-operator MC2 implementation is preserved.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangqiankun <wangqiankun13@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Now `VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_NZ` will have three options:
0: disable nz;
1: only quant case enable nz;
2: enable nz as long as possible;
And `VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_NZ`=1 by default.
All cases are shown in the table below:
| | W4A4 | W4A8 | W8A8 | fp16/bf16 | fp32 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| trans nz | can't support nz | trans nz by default | trans nz by
default | trans nz when VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_NZ is 2 | can't support nz |
| transpose | only support not transpose case | only support transpose
case | only support transpose case | linear: only support not transpose
case<br>gmm: only support transpose case | same to fp16/bf16 |
Some exceptional cases:
1. MLAPO op need to do some additional processing on the weights,
including trans nz. If use MLAPO op, some weight will be transformed to
nz forcely;
2. MLA/SFA's weight `W_UV` will be used by op
`torch.ops._C_ascend.batch_matmul_transpose`, and this op can't support
nz currently;
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Now fp16/bf16 weight will not trans nz by default.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Renames the MoE comm enum value `MoECommType.FUSED_ALLTOALL` to
`MoECommType.FUSED_MC2` and updates all call sites.
- Updates `select_moe_comm_method` to optionally select `FUSED_MC2` on
Ascend A3 when:
- `enable_expert_parallel=True`
- quantization is `w8a8_dynamic`
- `EP <= 16`
- `dynamic_eplb` is disabled
- `is_mtp_model = False`
- Replaces the old “fused all-to-all” comm implementation with
`FusedMC2CommImpl`, using `TokenDispatcherWithMC2` /
`PrepareAndFinalizeWithMC2` and `dispatch_ffn_combine`.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Chen Chen <0109chenchen@gmail.com>
Similar to #2309 , this PR introduces Embedding tensor model parallel to
achieve decreasing of memory consumption. It support both eager mode and
graph mode.
And this PR refactor module tensor parallel configurations supported in
#2309, #2167, #2120, merge all config into `finegrained_tp_config` in
`additional_config`, including:
`lmhead_tensor_parallel_size`
`oproj_tensor_parallel_size`
`embedding_tensor_parallel_size`
`mlp_tensor_parallel_size`
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: zzhxx <zhangzihang23@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Co-authored-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: chenxiao <Jaychou1620@Gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zzhxx <zhangzihang23@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Co-authored-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_TOPK_TOPP_OPTIMIZATION is enabled by default for long
time. Let's remove it now.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
As support for the mooncake connector is now available, the llmdatadist
connector is no longer being maintained, so the llmdatadist-related
files need to be retired.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, there are two paths to judge the chip type in code,
`get_ascend_soc_version` use `get_soc_version` api in torch_npu, and
`is_310p` `use _build_info.__soc_version__`, which generate when
install. We need to unify the two paths.
We need to unify these codes based on the following points:
1. We need to ensure consistency in chip type judgment between compiling
and running states;
2. In compiling state, we need chip type to complete op's compilation,
but in running state, we only need device
type(910B/910_93/310P/910_95/etc) to make code branch judgement;
3. In compiling state, torch_npu may not have been installed yet, so we
can't use torch_npu's api.
Based on the above points, we have made the following changes:
1. When user set env `SOC_VERSION`, use it; when not set, query
soc_version by `npu-smi`;
2. generate device_type based on soc_version when compiling, and write
`__device_type__` instead of `__soc_version__` in `_build_info.py`;
3. In running state, use `__device_type__` to judge code branch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
When not set env `SOC_VERSION`, it will not be `ASCEND910B1` by default,
we will query soc_version by `npu-smi`. And env `SOC_VERSION` must be in
the list `soc_to_device` in `setup.py`.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
pd proxy support ipv6, mooncake connector check whether the IPv6 address
is used and notify the user.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Supports generalized FlashComm2 optimization, which reduces
communication overhead, decreases RmsNorm computation, and saves one
AllGather step by replacing Allreduce operations in the Attention module
with pre-AlltoAll and post-AllGather operations (used in combination
with FlashComm1). This feature is enabled during the Prefill phase and
is recommended to be used together with FlashComm1, delivering broad
performance improvements, especially in long sequence scenarios with
large tensor parallelism (TP) configurations. Benchmark tests show that
under TP16DP1 configuration, it can improve the prefill performance of
the DeepSeek model by 8% on top of FlashComm1.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhxx <2783294813@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Levi-JQ <yujinqi2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Levi-JQ <yujinqi2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: zzhxx <2783294813@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Corrected the errors in the information
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove codes of dbo.
Currently, vLLM has supported dbo with pr:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23693.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main:
17c540a993
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, when executing to the Linear layer of models in vLLM-Ascend,
the weights format is ND in unquantized case and skipped ascend case.
This PR supplements the execution logic for Linear layer. We use a new
global variable: VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_NZ. When VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_NZ=1 and
CANN version is 8.3, the weights of the Linear layer will be converted
to FRACTAL_NZ, in both unquantized case and skipped ascend case. We also
use VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_NZ to control the existing NZ conversion, such as
w8a8-quantized case.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Add a new global variable VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_NZ. If you want to use NZ
format, you should set VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_NZ=1.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
vllm-ascend support [msMonitor
](https://gitcode.com/Ascend/mstt/tree/master/msmonitor)tool to collect
performance of vllm-ascend
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
1.add env MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON；
2.user cann enable msMonitor tool by setting MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1
before run vllm-ascend model；
3.MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON and VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_DIR cannot both set
### How was this patch tested?
1.run vllm-ascend model while not set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1 or set
MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=0, model will run successfully;
2.run vllm-ascend model while set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1, run msMonitor
tool to collect profile data;
3.run vllm-ascend model while set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1 and
VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_DIR, will raise error
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
f225ea7dd9
Signed-off-by: mei-feiyao <1332490378@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR addresses a critical issue where Node D (Device) failures cause
Node P (Processor) to hang due to inability to release KV cache.
**Trigger Scenarios:**
1. Node D fails mid-inference (e.g., network disconnection)
2. Node D rejects requests at a certain stage (e.g., via API server)
3. Load-test script termination causes Node P or D to abort queued
requests
**Root Cause Analysis:**
1. Currently, Node D sends a "KV cache pull complete, release approved"
message to Node P
2. This message is transmitted via the worker connector. If PD
connection breaks or requests are rejected upstream, Node D cannot send
the message
3. Node P will never release KV cache without receiving this message
**Solution:**
Following VLLM community's approach (NIXL connector timeout mechanism),
we're implementing:
- A timeout mechanism with comprehensive warnings
- Updated README documentation
- Reference: VLLM's optimization PR
[#20139](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/20139)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
None
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
9607d5eb44
---------
Signed-off-by: underfituu <hzhucong@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixed the bug in register_custom_ops without forward_context. We
set try-except to consider this situation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
7920de0a2a
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR prefetchs the weight of mlp layers in Qwen Dense Models to
optimize the performance in Decode phase mainly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
a1213fae5f
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Shuming19 <313093131@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Flashcomm_v1 optim in Qwen Dense Models.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
5e537f45b4
Co-authored-by: 1024daniel <xxltju324@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In vllm version 0.10.1, a new KVOutputAggregator was added to the
executor, moving aggregation to the
executor(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/19555). This caused
mooncake_connector to break. This change aims to fix this bug and also
adds a policy to forcibly release the KV cache when the prefill node
times out.
This PR is currently linked to a PR in vllm
(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23917). The vllm PR aims to
modify the finish and send count confirmation in heterogeneous TP
situations.
The reason for deleting many UTs is that a lot of communication codes
have been deleted, so the UT as a whole will appear more concise.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
fa4311d85f
---------
Signed-off-by: baxingpiaochong <771405853@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The detail has been clarified in that issue :
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/2557
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
easy to test beacause we just need to echo the variable
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
6997a25ac6
---------
Signed-off-by: zzy-ContiLearn <1831242919@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: LCAIZJ <leichao139636@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
There are a lot of redundant codes related to moe here, and the
structure is not very clear.
We did the following things：
we have placed the relatively independent code related to apply_mlp into
a separate file;
removed the environment variables of alltoall_buffer and alltoall_seq.
Remove the code related to alltoall_buffer and alltoall_seq, and retain
the sole TokenDispatcher inheritance class.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
e2e&ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
4071c76cf3
---------
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <12153182+weijinqian0@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
For dense models, by not applying tensor parallelism (TP) to the
attention module and applying TP to the MLP module, the allreduce
operations in the attention module can be eliminated, thereby reducing
computational overhead. However, this approach increases memory usage,
so the environment variable VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_MLP_OPTIMZE is used to
control this optimization.
- vLLM main:
b17109beea
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
1. rename `VLLM_LLMDD_RPC_PORT` to `VLLM_ASCEND_LLMDD_RPC_PORT` to make
the prefix the same in vllm-ascend
2. enable `VLLM_ASCEND_LLMDD_RPC_IP` env for PD feature.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Refactor Sampler implementation from patch way to inherit from vLLM
Sampler interface.
Next step: Make the op `TopKTopPSampler` in vLLM support custom ops
register mechanism
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
61a6905ab0
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
it'll execute allreduce and malmul seperately in vllm RowParallelLinear
forward funcion, this function use torch_npu.npu_mm_all_reduce_base to
execute allreduce and matmul in a fused kernel way. this will gain a 20%
performance
promotion in eager mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
this PR introduce a new env `VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_MATMUL_ALLREDUCE` to
control whether enable the feature or not.
### How was this patch tested?
the patch is tested by adding a new test file `test_patch_linear.py` to
guard the ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Performance optimization for apply_top_k_top_p
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Use VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_TOPK_TOPP_OPTIMIZATION to enable this feature
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
6a9e6b2abf
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The optimization solution for non-deepseek select_experts is to replace
gating_topk_softmax with softmax+topk+to, which is optimized from 37us
to 14us on bf16/fp16 of qwen3-235b
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
1a4f35e2ea
---------
Signed-off-by: ttanzhiqiang <389825161@qq.com>
vllm has released 0.9.2. This PR drop 0.9.1 support.
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
b942c094e3
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1、Sometimes loading torchair cache will fail because of the floating of
npu memory, so this pr add a new cache to save the old kv cache bytes to
avoid the possible crash while loading the torchair graph cache.
2、When caching is enabled and does not exist, the first compilation
introduces the overhead of Dynamo Gurad. So in this case, we will
compile them directly twice to skip them (This will bring 3-4 ms of tpot
optimization)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Add a new env `VLLM_ASCEND_KV_CACHE_MEGABYTES_FLOATING_TOLERANCE` to
control kv cache floating tolerance
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
1fd471e957
Signed-off-by: boying <897013703@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
support fused_moe_allgather_ep
### How was this patch tested?
It was tested by UT.
Signed-off-by: lyj-jjj <liuyingjun5@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Enable `ACL_OP_INIT_MODE=1` directly only when using V0 spec decode.
Find more details at **mengwei805**'s comment in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1123.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The user will not be aware of `VLLM_ASCEND_ACL_OP_INIT_MODE`
(`ACL_OP_INIT_MODE`).
### How was this patch tested?
Test scripts:
```python
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
prompts = [
"The future of AI is",
]
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.8, top_p=0.95)
llm = LLM(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct",
tensor_parallel_size=1,
speculative_config={
"method": "ngram",
"num_speculative_tokens": 5,
"prompt_lookup_max": 4,
},
)
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
prompt = output.prompt
generated_text = output.outputs[0].text
print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}")
```
Results:
```
Adding requests: 100%|██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 1/1 [00:00<00:00, 76.70it/s]
Processed prompts: 100%|███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████| 1/1 [00:00<00:00, 1.33it/s, est. speed input: 6.64 toks/s, output: 21.26 toks/s]
Prompt: 'The future of AI is', Generated text: ' bright\n\n04/15/2020\n\nBy: James'
```
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR is used for resolved [issue
1147](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1147)
1. Move fused_moe code into one file `fused_moe.py`.
2. Integrate branch conditions into function `get_fused_moe_state`.
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
1. This PR has removed the env `VLLM_ENABLE_MC2`, because I think this
env is useless, we can make judgments based on the current scenario
without this env, it will only increase complexity.
2. This PR has removed the env `USING_LCCL_COM`, because this env has
already expired.
3. `additional_config.expert_tensor_parallel_size` has already expired,
and now we also use parameter `enable_expert_parallel`, consistent with
the vLLM.
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Set `ACL_OP_INIT_MODE` env var default to `0`, since vllm-ascend may
have problems in some scenarios when setting it to `1`.
Plus, the guide https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/734
has also been updated.
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
Add unpadded Qwen2.5-VL for verl scenario.
When using vllm-ascend for verl scenario, set `USE_OPTIMIZED_QWEN2_5_VL`
(default `1`) to `0` to use unpadded Qwen2.5-VL to avoid errors.
This is cherry-picked from 0.7.3-dev
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Shanshan Shen <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix typo of VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_TOPK_OPTIMIZE
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
