<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
disable NZ for float weight case. This is only a quick fix for dev
branch.
For main branch, we'll consider more case to make it more common.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
qwen2.5 32B
<img width="441" height="221" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7ae18ffd-1ce2-43d9-9960-be45250ad0da"
/>
---------
Signed-off-by: 刘哲续 <liuzhexu1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: 刘哲续 <liuzhexu1@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Fixes Qwen3-Next enable nz accuracy problem
---------
Signed-off-by: wxsIcey <1790571317@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
fix sleepmode level2 e2e test
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
no
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
use e2e tests
Signed-off-by: wangx700 <wangxin700@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, in the piecewise of aclgraph, the model will be in eagle mode
in attention, which will cause abnormal allreduce latency of O matrix.
The reason is that cpu resources will be preempted in eagle mode. So I
hope to temporarily add cpu binding to vllm-ascend.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: GDzhu1 <809721801@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The `force_attention` parameter is designed for flash infer kernel
warmup, we don't actually need it on Ascend device (at least for
now).And it tends to make things more complicated. So we replace the
`force_attention` parameter with `aclgraph_runtime_mode` in the
attention metadata creation logic.
This change makes the control flow more explicit by directly using the
graph runtime mode to determine how to build attention metadata, rather
than relying on an intermediate boolean flag. This simplification
removes redundant logic and clarifies the conditions for building
attention metadata for full decode graph mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
DP + `FULL_DECODE_ONLY` + online serving.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Make the Full Graph mode can run with MTP.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adapt deepseek-v3.2 to vllm 0.11.0, removing the useless patch.
The final goal is to remove all the patches and align the code arch to
vllm, thus we need to do the following work in next prs.
TODO:
- [x] remove patch on attention spec
- [ ] refactor the kvcache creation logic
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
1. CI passed with existing test.
2. Test pass with deepseek-v3.2-exp
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When running DP in a non-equilibrium scenario, which means there is some
dp groups executing `dummy_run`, we need to make sure it running the
same mode as other dp, thus improving then performance in dp scenario
### How was this patch tested?
Tested by adding log in `_dummy_run`
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/releases/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Upgrade vLLM to newest commit
- Fix the aclgraph doesn't work problem, caused by
24fab45d96
- Fix PoolerOutput import error, caused by
755ed7b05b
- Fix the aclgraph weight load error to keep the same with torchair fix.
4492e3a554
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
All test should pass
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
52d0cb8458
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
vllm-ascend support [msMonitor
](https://gitcode.com/Ascend/mstt/tree/master/msmonitor)tool to collect
performance of vllm-ascend
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
1.add env MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON；
2.user cann enable msMonitor tool by setting MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1
before run vllm-ascend model；
3.MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON and VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_DIR cannot both set
### How was this patch tested?
1.run vllm-ascend model while not set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1 or set
MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=0, model will run successfully;
2.run vllm-ascend model while set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1, run msMonitor
tool to collect profile data;
3.run vllm-ascend model while set MSMONITOR_USE_DAEMON=1 and
VLLM_TORCH_PROFILER_DIR, will raise error
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
f225ea7dd9
Signed-off-by: mei-feiyao <1332490378@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
based on the https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23770,
fix Async scheduling and PP compatibility with DP, also fixes issue with
finished requests not being processed in async scheduling and PP cases,
and possible worker race conditions.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
544fe76b95
---------
Signed-off-by: jesse <szxfml@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
For sleep mode level 2, we discarded model both weights and kv_cache,
but the problems is: When we discard weights, we also discard some
tensors representing the model state which we called
`model.named_buffers()`, such as: `running_mean / running_var` in
BatchNorm、rope cos-sin cache ... when we update weights, but forgot to
update buffers as well, this will lead to some unknown issue
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
5963b98b46
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### Motivation
Currently dynamically experts balancing would stop-the-world.
Asynchronously expert load balancing would be better without flowing
problems:
Host-bound latency:
There are many cpu operations during EPLB such as
eplb-algorithm、creating p2p ops、and log2phy expert converting would
spend long cpu time, as ~1s.
Communication latency: The transfer time would cost much in the
situation without nvlink. As the weight of an expert maybe transfer to
multiple new positions, thus N times send/recv for one expert, with
result long latency. We had tested that batch_isend_irecv cost more
100ms for 16 experts weight transmission in A2 server of ascend.
SwiftBalancer would not stop-the-world anymore, in out test on NPU 1~2ms
cost for each layer while benefit 5ms-8ms decode latency with ep_size =
64.
The following updates have been made:
1、expert distribution recording with lower cost.
2、async cpu computing for eplb algo and other python operator.
3、new eplb algo with less expert rebalancing while almost the same
effect.
### Proposed Change
We will gradually migrate the EPLB logic to the VLLM community and
implement a generalized design. Relevant RFC:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/22246
The overall workflow involves:
<img width="801" height="302"
alt="474430541-23b06f58-23bc-44a3-a1be-00f268aeb15c"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1d73a459-1b23-4b0a-812a-bf0a75debfed"
/>
1. Record experts distribution during forward. We using expert_token_num
after disptach instead of topk_ids, thus we got much smaller tensor
shape to reduce cost of hbm recording and add-operator.
2. Do all-gather for experts distribution. Using all-gather instead of
all-reduce as less traffic volume.
3. Wake up eplb worker process with experts distribution when
num_iterations comes. Run eplb algorithm in eplb worker.
4. Generate p2p send/recv ops and other operator such as log2phy would
cost long cpu time.
5. Lanch ibatch_send_recv in async_stream before forward.
6. After forward, wait for the ibatch_send_recv finish, then do uapte
expert map and expert weights.
### Co-author
Co-authored-by: raindaywhu raindaywhu@raindaywhu@ 163.con
Co-authored-by: njuyuan yuanjl19@smail.nju.edu.cn
Co-authored-by: qmkakaxi wjh1594260677@qq.com
Co-authored-by: Skywalker-EP 173723846@qq.com
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
567939953b
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <z00858301@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <z00858301@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
modelslim will generate self.bias for rms norm in quantization, since
RMSNorm in vllm has no this parameter, so its nesscesary
to create a AscendQuantRmsNorm.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
tested by deepseek-v3.1-w8a8
<img width="2496" height="592" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/004c6e76-3d7a-4a1f-b59f-a14304012663"
/>
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
d6249d0699
Signed-off-by: 22dimensions <waitingwind@foxmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR prefetchs the weight of mlp layers in Qwen Dense Models to
optimize the performance in Decode phase mainly.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
a1213fae5f
Signed-off-by: rjg-lyh <1318825571@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Shuming19 <313093131@qq.com>
This PR is based on top of
[#23569](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23569) and
[#24219](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/24219).
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR allows the model runner to function asynchronously when using
async scheduling. This allows full overlap of the cpu operations
(including prepare_inputs) and the model forward pass. This diff is
functional and does not support speculative decoding, PP, or guided
decoding.
Expected speedup is 5-10% over the current async scheduling.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
server
```
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=Qwen3-32B\
--trust-remote-code --enforce-eager \
--distributed-executor-backend=mp \
-tp=4 \
--port 8006 \
--max-model-len 32000 \
--block-size 128 \
--gpu-memory-utilization 0.99
```
client
```
python $TEST_PY --backend vllm --trust-remote-code --model Qwen3-32B \
--dataset-name random --random-input-len 2048 --random-output-len 2048 \
--ignore-eos\
--num-prompts 48 --max-concurrency 48 --request-rate inf --temperature 0 \
--metric-percentiles 90 --base-url http://localhost:8006 --save-result \
--result-dir $PROFILER_DIR
```
benchmark test based on Qwen3-32B TPOT result:
||forward async| scheduler async |sync|
|-|-|-|-|
|avg|41.73|41.86|44.20|
|improve0|0.3%|0|0|
|improve1|5.58%|0|0|
benchmark test based on Qwen2___5-VL-7B-Instruct TPOT result:
||forward async|sync|
|-|-|-|
|avg|23.22|29.16|
|improve|20.3%|0|
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
e93f4cc9e3
Signed-off-by: jiangpeng36 <jiangpeng36@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
Co-authored-by: jiangpeng36 <jiangpeng36@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adjust the position of warm_up_atb.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
not involved
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
b23fb78623
Signed-off-by: huangxialu <huangxialu1@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove compatibility maintenance for vllm v0.10.1 and v0.10.1.1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
branch main of vllm-ascend will not be compatible with vllm v0.10.1 and
v0.10.1.1
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
6fb2788163
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch also supports v0.10.1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- CI passed
- test 0.10.1: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/2583
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
321938e9ac
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix mtp mode ut
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Nothing
### How was this patch tested?
This can be tested in the same way as a unit test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
53415653ff
Signed-off-by: 赵江江 <zhaojiangjiang1@h-partners.com>
Co-authored-by: 赵江江 <zhaojiangjiang1@h-partners.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix some ci issue and refactor modelrunner
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
4d9c61993a
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Our current code register the custom ops inside the platform
intialization phase. however, when a new process started by creating a
worker, the former patch will lose it effect on the custom ops and lead
to fallback to the native pass wrote in vllm. This PR move the patch
code to the worker to make sure the custom op patch worker as our
expected.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
8ea0c2753a
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. update `CachedRequestState` as `NewRequestData` changed in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/22570
2. drop maintenance of vllm v0.10.0 in the branch main
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
92ff41abea
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove redundant imported `envs`, using `envs_ascend` instead.
```python
import vllm.envs as envs_vllm
import vllm_ascend.envs as envs_ascend
```
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
71683ca6f6
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
There is lot of torchair code in model runner leading the code hard for
maintenance. We'll create new torchair_model_runner to split torchair
related logic. Following the workflow #2203, this is the first PR.
What this PR does:
create the new torchair model runner, more function will be added later
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
586f286789
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
we recently added disaggregated_prefill and ascend_forward_context
feature by
ba3dfbd59e
and
df0ec55162.
This PR fix some nit introduced by them to make the code clear.
1. drop `current_platform` usage. It'll lead unknown circular import
error in some case
2. update `set_ascend_forward_context` function to make the logic clear.
for example, remove V0 support in this function.
3. Remove useless `self.local_rank_across_dp` in worker
4. Remove `soc_info.py` to use `get_ascend_soc_version` instead.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
02f82fe438
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pr fix broken CI:
1. Fix the
ee2eb6ecd8
changes, in this commit, they fused the gate and up projections in the
vision MLP, This can improve performance by reducing one matrix
multiplication. so, this pr do the following things:
- Specify that the two linear layers are fused as `mlp.gate_up_proj`
when loading the weights.
- Use a SiluAndMul activation function.
2. Fix
aefeea0fde,
Update ModelRunnerOutput parameters to adapt to its changes
3. Fix
[vllm-commit](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/20815/files#diff-3ffb829a39ab2b3e4706aa28f5e476815f36c3a87b98d6a66514ebedc8f3ffb4R354-R356),
fix qwen moe
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
fed5849d3f
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We notice that vllm's main branch merged the PR
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/21072 and
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/21473 to support ray backend
and fix some rebase bug from previous change. Those changes makes the
disaggregate pd in vllm ascend breaks in some scenario.
In this PR, we adopt those changes to make sure the
`llmdatddist_c_mgr_connector` works fine on the newest vllm main branch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No user face change.
### How was this patch tested?
relevant ut will be added to make sure the functionality of those
changes.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
ad57f23f6a
---------
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
A refactoring of forward_context and model_runner_v1, add some context
which is necessary in model inference into forward_context, and refactor
dummy_run logic, make it more reasonable.
Some details for this PR:
Add `ascend_forward_context`;
Update mc2_v2 op, and support `active_mask` param;
Update scripts in examples dir;
refactor `dummy_run` logic;
Add soc_version for A2 and A3;
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No change at user-facing.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
57c22e57f9
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Upgrade to v0.10.0
- Drop v0.9.2 version compatibility
- Add patch for
`vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_common/patch_sampler_gather_logprobs.py`
as workaround of
f3a683b7c9
for v0.10.0 and also add e2e test `test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- Pin transformers<4.54.0 as workaround of
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/2034
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Test locally:
`VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE=true pytest -sv
tests/e2e/singlecard/test_offline_inference.py::test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- CI passed
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
There is a lot torchair specified logic in common code. It results hard
code maintenance. We will create a new torchair module to launch
torchair related logic there. I plan to add 4 PR.
1. Refactor worker (this PR)
- create torchair module and move torchair related code in worker to the
new module
3. Refactor utils
4. Refactor model_runner
5. Refactor attention
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
8188196a1c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove ETP/EP maintained in branch main. We drop this as there is no
relevant scenarios to use ETP now, and we may subsequently advocate
implementing expert tensor parallelism in vLLM to support scenarios
where the expert is needed to be sliced
This is a part of #1422 backport.
Fixes https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1396https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1154
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
We'll not maintain etp/ep in vllm-ascend anymore, and use the tp/ep in
vllm instead.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added and existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
fe8a2c544a
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
1. vLLM commit
45badd05d0
changed the pooling check logic which broken vLLM Ascend.
2. vLLM commit
3e04107d97
requires higher version of transformers. The transformers version bug
has been fixed by
e936e401de.
We can safe to remove the version limit now.
3. vLLM commit
217937221b
added a new input `enable_eplb` for FusedMoe Ops
This PR fix the broken CI.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
6a971ed692
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch supports pipeline parallel in V1 Engine
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users can run PP in V1
### How was this patch tested?
Manully test
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
31d5c1797f
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1、Sometimes loading torchair cache will fail because of the floating of
npu memory, so this pr add a new cache to save the old kv cache bytes to
avoid the possible crash while loading the torchair graph cache.
2、When caching is enabled and does not exist, the first compilation
introduces the overhead of Dynamo Gurad. So in this case, we will
compile them directly twice to skip them (This will bring 3-4 ms of tpot
optimization)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Add a new env `VLLM_ASCEND_KV_CACHE_MEGABYTES_FLOATING_TOLERANCE` to
control kv cache floating tolerance
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
1fd471e957
Signed-off-by: boying <897013703@qq.com>
Add static build_info py file to show soc and sleep mode info. It helps
to make the code clean and the error info will be more friendly for
users
This PR also added the unit test for vllm_ascend/utils.py
This PR also added the base test class for all ut in tests/ut/base.py
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
This PR aims to clean up the useless code for LLM setup. It helps to
make the code more clear.
1. remove useless `self.xxx` property
2. change `set_random_seed` to `seed_everything`
3. remove `set_custom_all_reduce`, it's only used for cuda
This is just a code clean. no change for any code logic.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR is used for resolved [issue
1147](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1147)
1. Move fused_moe code into one file `fused_moe.py`.
2. Integrate branch conditions into function `get_fused_moe_state`.
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
1. This PR has removed the env `VLLM_ENABLE_MC2`, because I think this
env is useless, we can make judgments based on the current scenario
without this env, it will only increase complexity.
2. This PR has removed the env `USING_LCCL_COM`, because this env has
already expired.
3. `additional_config.expert_tensor_parallel_size` has already expired,
and now we also use parameter `enable_expert_parallel`, consistent with
the vLLM.
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
With this PR, we can migrate to the native `data_parallel.py` in vllm
examples and remove the version in vllm-ascend.
At present, `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES` introduces considerable
difficulties; therefore, we must employ a temporary workaround and
manually specify the device.
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When profiling, it is often necessary to disable the call stack to
reduce profiling overhead, and adjust the profiler_level to level1 to
obtain more detailed operator and communication information.
Therefore, it is recommended to modify the default profiling
configuration.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No
Signed-off-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com>
