### What this PR does / why we need it?
In the w8a8 quantization code of `fused_experts`, the output of almost
every operator is assigned a new variable name. If we want to save NPU
memory, we manually `del` these variables to end their lifecycle, which
fills the code with `del` statements and looks inelegant.
Therefore, I plan to names the output of most operators as
`hidden_states`, thereby ending the lifecycle of the previous
`hidden_states`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Signed-off-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com>
This change ensures proper functionality for longer sequences by
correctly invoking the _set_cos_sin_cache method with self as the first
argument.
For example, with DeepSeek R1, if this change isn't made, the program
will crash when the input sequence exceeds 4096.
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
add notes for OOM in faqs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
---------
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR add new function of : aclgraph_batch_size can dynamic adjust to
different model; before this PR, the aclgraph_batch_sizes given from
vllm to vllm-ascend always too large, and that may result in ERROR while
running on different, with the information: "The resources are
insufficient".
Now, with this PR, the code can dynamic adjust aclgraph_batch_sizes
depend on the model hidden_layer_nums and parallel config, for example:
a. for Qwen2.5-7B, the aclgraph_batch_size length is 33 total;
b. for Qwen2.5-72B, the aclgraph_batch_size length is 11 total;
Signed-off-by: chris668899 <15105191595@126.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
Fix output tensor shape in vanilla_chunked_prefill function.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
None.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Run offline inference on DeepSeek models.
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add 0.8.5rc1 release note and bump vllm version to v0.8.5.post1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The root cause of the bug is that numerical computations involving NaNs
cannot eliminate them. We addressed it by using `masked_fill_` to
eliminate NaNs while avoiding memory-wasting `torch.where` approach.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
This patch was tested with vllm v0.8.5 and vllm-ascend master. I run
deepseek_v3 model with offline inference scripts
(examples/dp_offline/run_dp.sh & data_parallel.py).
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix function name typo, make `mask_fill_` to `masked_fill_`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Revert "Re-patch TritonPlaceholder on main to make CI happy (#753)"
because upstream main CI already merged:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/17446
- Keep 0.8.5.post1 compatible
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
--> Fix a typo in setup.py. Currently, it does not affect any
functionality or interfaces.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Bump vllm version to v0.8.5.post1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Optimize NPU memory usage.
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/723
vllm v0.8.4.rc2 and DeepSeek R1 can only support a model length of 16K.
When attempting to run with a model length of 32K, an "Out of Memory"
(OOM) error will occur.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: sunbaosong <13793883820@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Make CANN version bump separately from
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/708
- Upgrade CANN version to 8.1.rc1
- Add prefix to speed up download
`m.daocloud.io/quay.io/ascend/cann:8.1.rc1-910b-ubuntu22.04-py3.10`
- Address tail sapce for Dockerfile.openEuler
- Add note for `/workspace` and `/vllm-workspace` as followup of
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/741
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Co-authored-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Re-enable Speculative Decode test for vLLM v0.8.5
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- This PR proposes a P2P version of Disaggregated Prefill based on
llm_datadist which manages data transfer.
- This solution reconstructs previous offline single-node Disaggregated
Prefill solution, and supports multi-node and online serveing now.
- Currently this solution supports 1P1D situation of Deepseek hybrid
parallelism (P: TP+EP, D: DP+EP). Note that xPyD situation is considered
in the solution design, and will be supported soon within v1 engine.
---------
Signed-off-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
1. Improve inference speed and usability for deepsek models with NPU
graph mode.
2. Modify some codes to adapt to CANN 8.1.RC1.beta1.
3. Add a switch for NPU graph mode and its cache.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
This PR provides an experimental configuration to enable NPU graph mode
for Deepseek models. User can set
additional_config={'enable_graph_mode': True} to try this feature. Note
that this feature currently only supports for V0 engine.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
This patch was tested with the newest torch_npu 2.5.1
(https://pypi.org/project/torch-npu/#files) and CANN 8.1.RC1.beta1
toolkit&nnal&kernels
(https://www.hiascend.com/developer/download/community/result?module=cann)
released in 25/30 April.
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
After discussed with MindStudio about the quantization model format, we
decide to support another quant format which may used in new modelslim
tool, in which case, `quantization_config` may be removed from the
`config.json` file and `quant_model_description.json` will be used for
quantization configuration.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, using the latest quantization format
### How was this patch tested?
Test locally
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Provide accuracy test report for development branch release.
2. Models and datasets for accuracy test：
| Model | datasets |
|---------------------------- | --------------------------- |
| Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct | ceval-val, gsm8k, mmlu |
| Qwen3-8B | ceval-val, gsm8k, mmlu |
| Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | ceval-val, gsm8k, mmlu |
| Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct | mmmu_val |
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR will display the accuracy test report of the release versionin
docs/source/developer_guide/accuracy_report。
Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct.md
Qwen3-8B.md
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct.md
Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct .md
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Optimize qwen2_vl and qwen2_5_vl.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
Testing this PR on 1080p picture with tp=1, bs=1 on Qwen2-VL and
Qwen2.5-VL, every fa op's during time lasting from 11ms to 9ms, got
roughly 22% perf boost.
---------
Signed-off-by: zouyida2052 <zouyida@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zouyida2052 <zouyida2002@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zouyida2052 <zouyida@huawei.com>
Platform should only contain the function that based from vllm. This PR
move the unrelated function to the right place to make platform more
clear.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Deepseek v3 now adopt vanilla chunked prefill on MLA part which is
ineffcient for computing but necessary for chunked prefill. Since PR
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/543 bring v0 scheduler
into vllm-ascend, we can now adopt torch_npu._npu_flash_attention inside
the mla backend for more performance boost. Also there are some
redundant computation inside the rope, which is also removed. This PR
should bring some performance gain for deepseek eager mode inference.
---------
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix#674 to avoild KVCache overallocation and OOM risks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Signed-off-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add nightly CI for basic function and model usability
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
Replace torch function with reshape_and_cache fused op for better
performance. The `reshape_and_cache` function wasn't working because it
expected torch.int32 tensor, but a torch.int64 tensor was provided.
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update installation and tutorial doc
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
preview
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
As custom deepseek modeling do some changes to support graph mode in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/585, so i follow it to
change custom deepseek_mtp modeling.
And some modifications for k>1 were not carried over by the
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/429, now i add it.
In order to better take care of the MTP feature in the vllm-ascend
repository, I added cases related to graph mode(torchair), but i skip it
since torchair can not correctly clean up memory in vllmrunner.
Also i add some case for MTP quantization weights, but test weight is
not ready, so i skip it and i will open it when test quant weights is
ready.
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/648 did not completely
fix the sample
change(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/660) issue, I
added the relevant changes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
now, u can use following method to use mtp in deepseek v3/r1 float or
quant weights with eager mode.
```python
llm = LLM(
model="wemaster/deepseek_mtp_main_random_bf16",
tensor_parallel_size=2,
speculative_config={
"num_speculative_tokens": 1,
},
enforce_eager=True,
trust_remote_code=True,
disable_log_stats=False,
gpu_memory_utilization=0.8,
max_model_len=64,
)
```
or use mtp in deepseek v3/r1 float or quant weights with graph
mode（torchair）
```python
llm = LLM(
model="wemaster/deepseek_mtp_main_random_bf16",
tensor_parallel_size=2,
speculative_config={
"num_speculative_tokens": 1,
},
trust_remote_code=True,
additional_config={
'enable_graph_mode': True,
},
disable_log_stats=False,
gpu_memory_utilization=0.8,
max_model_len=64,
)
```
add notes:
1. now, we support k>1, so u can set num_speculative_tokens > 1 if there
is sufficient redundant computing power;
2. MTP is not supported in V1, we will support it when vLLM does it in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/13500.
3. if u run MTP failed by `segmentation fault`, u can follow v0.7.3
patch https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/236 file
`vllm_ascend/patch/patch_metrics.py` method
`__npu_async_metrics_collector_init__`
### How was this patch tested?
local tested passed and test by CI
Signed-off-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
Sometimes, user install a dev/editable version of vllm. In this case, we
should make sure vllm-ascend works as well.
This PR add a new env `VLLM_VERSION`. It's used for developers who edit
vllm. In this case, developers should set thie env to make sure which
vllm version is installed and used.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update openEuler dockerfile for COMPILE_CUSTOM_KERNELS=1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
`reshape_and_cache_siso` seems have some funcitonality issues, use torch
op combination replace this custom op by default.
---------
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix pip install cmd in installation.md
Followup on: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/661
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, doc only
### How was this patch tested?
Preview
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The torch-npu 2.5.1 are published:
https://pypi.org/project/torch-npu/2.5.1/
It's time to remove all torch-npu dev version from vllm-ascend code base
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, using torch-npu 2.5.1
### How was this patch tested?
- [ ] CI passed
- [ ] Manually test
- [ ] Grep all `dev2025`
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Eliminated duplicate `block_table` tensor initialization and cleaned up
unused code segments. This resolves an issue where the second creation
was overwriting the first, potentially leading to unexpected behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jade Zheng <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
vLLM Ascend side followup on:
[Core] Remove prompt string from engine core data structures
df6f3ce883
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
1. remove Chinese doc. The content is out of data and we don't have
enough time to maintain it.
2. Update feature support matrix. Refresh the content and add V1 status.
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
b411418ff0
this vllm commit change the sample usage. This PR adapt the change for
main and make sure it works for 0.8.4 as well.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Enforce eager mode in the V1 engine ahead of the upcoming CANN and
torch_npu releases.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
After this change, users will no longer need to manually set
enforce_eager=True.
### How was this patch tested?
Test it with regular offline inference examples.
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
