### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR integrate suffix decoding (https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04975)
from vllm (https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25784)
#
Suffix Decoding is a dynamic n-gram matching method that:
1. Uses suffix trees to generate speculative tokens quickly using branch
frequency counts.
2. Can keep a history of prior model responses, which tends to work very
well with repetitive agentic use cases.
3. Can be dynamically updated with newly generated tokens, and FIFO
eviction of older requests.
#
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This feature should be implemented as opt-in and remain seamless for
users who do not require suffix speculative decoding.
For users who wish to enable it, they must first install
arctic-inference:
`pip install arctic-inference
`
After installation, the suffix speculative decoding feature can be
enabled using the following speculative config:
`--speculative_config '{"method": "suffix", "num_speculative_tokens":
5}'
`
### How was this patch tested?
This PR is currently being tested on vLLM
main:83f478bb19
with PR https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25784
In our previous testing, suffix decoding achieved a 13%-30% throughput
improvement over n-gram on the sonnet dataset, tested on vllm-ascend
v0.9.1 with concurrency ranging from 2 to 40.
- vLLM version: v0.11.2
---------
Signed-off-by: fluctlux <38945811+fluctlux@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, there are two paths to judge the chip type in code,
`get_ascend_soc_version` use `get_soc_version` api in torch_npu, and
`is_310p` `use _build_info.__soc_version__`, which generate when
install. We need to unify the two paths.
We need to unify these codes based on the following points:
1. We need to ensure consistency in chip type judgment between compiling
and running states;
2. In compiling state, we need chip type to complete op's compilation,
but in running state, we only need device
type(910B/910_93/310P/910_95/etc) to make code branch judgement;
3. In compiling state, torch_npu may not have been installed yet, so we
can't use torch_npu's api.
Based on the above points, we have made the following changes:
1. When user set env `SOC_VERSION`, use it; when not set, query
soc_version by `npu-smi`;
2. generate device_type based on soc_version when compiling, and write
`__device_type__` instead of `__soc_version__` in `_build_info.py`;
3. In running state, use `__device_type__` to judge code branch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
When not set env `SOC_VERSION`, it will not be `ASCEND910B1` by default,
we will query soc_version by `npu-smi`. And env `SOC_VERSION` must be in
the list `soc_to_device` in `setup.py`.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix a bug caused by this pr:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/4223
The bug makes
vllm-ascend/vllm_ascend/patch/platform/patch_multiproc_executor.py patch
in a wrong way
### How was this patch tested?
Tested in a single node. When the environment DYNAMIC_EPLB is set to
true, the patch works correctly. When it's set to false, the patch do
not patch
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
Signed-off-by: 白永斌 <baiyongbin3@h-partners.com>
Co-authored-by: 白永斌 <baiyongbin3@h-partners.com>
There is a lot hack code for v0.11.0, which makes the code hard to
upgrade to newer vLLM version. Since v0.11.0 will release soon. Let's
drop v0.11.0 support first. Then we'll upgrade to v0.11.2 soon.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Drop VLLM_USE_V1 usage. This env has been removed from vLLM already.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fixes a compatible bug with `torch_npu.npu_fused_infer_attention_score`
which is discribed in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4020.
@momo609 tells us this solution.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
The environment is same with this issue,
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4020.
We modify the code according to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/3918.
And run below codes:
```python
# run with Qwen3-next-mtp
prompts = [
"Who are you?",
]
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.0, top_p=0.95, top_k=40, max_tokens=128)
llm = LLM(model="/home/model/Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct",
tensor_parallel_size=4,
enforce_eager=True,
distributed_executor_backend="mp",
gpu_memory_utilization=0.7,
speculative_config={
"method": "qwen3_next_mtp",
"num_speculative_tokens": 1,
},
max_model_len=4096)
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
prompt = output.prompt
generated_text = output.outputs[0].text
print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}")
```
Outputs:
```text
Prompt: 'Who are you?', Generated text: ' I am Qwen, a large-scale language model independently developed by the Tongyi Lab under Alibaba Group. I am designed to answer questions, create text such as stories, official documents, emails, scripts, and more, as well as perform logical reasoning, programming, and other tasks. If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to let me know anytime!'
```
Now, `torch_npu.npu_fused_infer_attention_score` is compatible with
Qwen3-Next.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
On Arm systems, os.sched_yield() does not take effect, causing the GIL
(Global Interpreter Lock) to remain unrelinquished and resulting in CPU
bound issues. This PR applies a patch to sched_yield in vLLM, making the
process execute time.sleep(0) instead to release the GIL.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Add eplb ci to check the change of eplb feature.
2.Add param checking of eplb params.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Qwen in A3.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
we notice that `patch_main` is never used. Usually the patch is for all
version. And if it's for specified version, we can use `vllm_version_is`
instead. So let's remove the useless sub folder in patch module to make
it clear.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
when using dynamic eplb, patch v1 executor to avoid create child process
failed.
### How was this patch tested?
deepseek in v3.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adapt deepseek-v3.2 to vllm 0.11.0, removing the useless patch.
The final goal is to remove all the patches and align the code arch to
vllm, thus we need to do the following work in next prs.
TODO:
- [x] remove patch on attention spec
- [ ] refactor the kvcache creation logic
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
1. CI passed with existing test.
2. Test pass with deepseek-v3.2-exp
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor KVCache as page_size_bytes is ineffective.
1. Currently the `AttentionSpec` is patched, but the `page_size_bytes`
is still using that in vLLM in runtime, thus the patch is not working
actually. Thus this pr removes the patch on `AttentionSpec`, and will do
the final fix in vLLM.
2. Use `MLAAttentionSpec` instead of `FullAttentionSpec` to reduce
`page_size_bytes` of spec, so that num_blocks in spec could double
### How was this patch tested?
Test pass with Qwen3-Next and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Modify the enable range of _merge_multimodal_embeddings patch. The
current patch is only enabled for offline inference on the platform. For
online serviceization, due to the addition of the worker sub-process, it
is not enabled within the sub-process.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: booker123456 <945658361@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. clean up v0.10.2 support in ut and e2e test
2. remove v0.11.0 period job, we're at v0.11.0 now.
3. remove uesless patch for deepseek v3.2. They have been done in vLLM
already.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to address the incompatibility of the `.masked_scatter_`
operation in the current `_merge_multimodal_embeddings` function on
Ascend. For now, it reverts to the previous version of the CPU
operation, which can be executed asynchronously on the device side to
enhance performance.
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
f225ea7dd9
---------
Signed-off-by: booker123456 <945658361@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR deletes ~2K lines of code about deepseek modeling. It falls back
CustomDeepseekV2 modules to original vllm implementations and adapts
some modifications in vllm about deepseek and moe.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
E2E vllm serving with torchair graph mode and eager mode.
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
759ef49b15
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: yiz-liu <136800916+yiz-liu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Really strange that `register_oot` doesn't work with `SharedFusedMoE`,
so we have to add this patch, for now.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
This PR won't have any effect in DeepSeek since we currently still stick
with the old `CustomDeepseekV2`.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
0cdd213641
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. update `CachedRequestState` as `NewRequestData` changed in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/22570
2. drop maintenance of vllm v0.10.0 in the branch main
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
92ff41abea
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove redundant imported `envs`, using `envs_ascend` instead.
```python
import vllm.envs as envs_vllm
import vllm_ascend.envs as envs_ascend
```
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
71683ca6f6
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Upgrade to v0.10.0
- Drop v0.9.2 version compatibility
- Add patch for
`vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_common/patch_sampler_gather_logprobs.py`
as workaround of
f3a683b7c9
for v0.10.0 and also add e2e test `test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- Pin transformers<4.54.0 as workaround of
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/2034
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- Test locally:
`VLLM_USE_MODELSCOPE=true pytest -sv
tests/e2e/singlecard/test_offline_inference.py::test_models_prompt_logprobs`
- CI passed
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
7728dd77bb
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove ETP/EP maintained in branch main. We drop this as there is no
relevant scenarios to use ETP now, and we may subsequently advocate
implementing expert tensor parallelism in vLLM to support scenarios
where the expert is needed to be sliced
This is a part of #1422 backport.
Fixes https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1396https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1154
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
We'll not maintain etp/ep in vllm-ascend anymore, and use the tp/ep in
vllm instead.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added and existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
fe8a2c544a
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
vllm has released 0.9.2. This PR drop 0.9.1 support.
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
b942c094e3
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR supports torchair graph mode with non-mla backend on both 800IA2
and 300I Duo platforms. The main change is to add
`attention_v1_torchair.py` to support specific attention related
operations that are required by torchair.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Before this PR, vLLM-Ascend only allows deepseek to use torchair. Now we
can also use it with pangu. Besides, we add a support model list to
control which type of models that can use torchair.
### How was this patch tested?
We have test it with PanguProMoE on both 800IA2 and 300I Duo platforms,
and model generates answer normally.
---------
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: tianyitang <tangtianyi4@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes a bug that use broadcast with cpu_group when running dp.
The `broadcast310p` patch will take effects for both cpu_group and
device group, but we only need it for device group. Hence a wrapper is
added to allow cpu_group use native torch broadcast and it solves the
bug.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
With this PR, DP on 310p runs normally and generates reasonable answers.
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Add static build_info py file to show soc and sleep mode info. It helps
to make the code clean and the error info will be more friendly for
users
This PR also added the unit test for vllm_ascend/utils.py
This PR also added the base test class for all ut in tests/ut/base.py
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
`stateless_init_dp_group` in vllm works with non-cuda platform now.
Remove this useless patch.
Which was introduced in vllm-ascend by
e74331a1ed
(v0.8.4rc2)
vLLM upstream merged:
3e472d882a
(v0.8.0)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add initial experimental support for Ascend 310P, this patch squash
below PR into one to help validation:
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/914
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1318
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/1327
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
User can run vLLM on Altlas 300I DUO series
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with:
- E2E image build for 310P
- CI test on A2 with e2e test and longterm test
- Unit test missing because need a real 310P image to have the test,
will add in a separate PR later.
- Manually e2e test:
- Qwen2.5-7b-instruct, Qwen2.5-0.5b, Qwen3-0.6B, Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-8B:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/914#issuecomment-2942989322
- Pangu MGoE 72B
The patch has been tested locally on Ascend 310P hardware to ensure that
the changes do not break existing functionality and that the new
features work as intended.
#### ENV information
CANN, NNAL version: 8.1.RC1
> [!IMPORTANT]
> PTA 2.5.1 version >= torch_npu-2.5.1.post1.dev20250528 to support NZ
format and calling NNAL operators on 310P
#### Code example
##### Build vllm-ascend from source code
```shell
# download source code as vllm-ascend
cd vllm-ascend
export SOC_VERSION=Ascend310P3
pip install -v -e .
cd ..
```
##### Run offline inference
```python
from vllm import LLM, SamplingParams
prompts = ["水的沸点是100摄氏度吗？请回答是或者否。", "若腋下体温为38摄氏度，请问这人是否发烧？请回答是或者否。",
"水的沸点是100摄氏度吗？请回答是或者否。", "若腋下体温为38摄氏度，请问这人是否发烧？请回答是或者否。"]
# Create a sampling params object.
sampling_params = SamplingParams(temperature=0.0, top_p=0.95, max_tokens=10)
# Create an LLM.
llm = LLM(
model="Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct",
max_model_len=4096,
max_num_seqs=4,
dtype="float16", # IMPORTANT cause some ATB ops cannot support bf16 on 310P
disable_custom_all_reduce=True,
trust_remote_code=True,
tensor_parallel_size=2,
compilation_config={"custom_ops":['none', "+rms_norm", "+rotary_embedding"]},
)
# Generate texts from the prompts.
outputs = llm.generate(prompts, sampling_params)
for output in outputs:
prompt = output.prompt
generated_text = output.outputs[0].text
print(f"Prompt: {prompt!r}, Generated text: {generated_text!r}")
```
---------
Signed-off-by: Vincent Yuan <farawayboat@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Yuan <farawayboat@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: leo-pony <nengjunma@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
1. upgrade vllm to 0.9.1. 0.9.0 is not supported for main branch now.
keep doc to 0.9.0 until we release the first 0.9.1 release.
2. disable V0 test for PR
3. move actionlint check to lint job
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
With this PR, we can migrate to the native `data_parallel.py` in vllm
examples and remove the version in vllm-ascend.
At present, `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES` introduces considerable
difficulties; therefore, we must employ a temporary workaround and
manually specify the device.
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Solve the bug that the graph mode is the same as p and d, and some other
bugs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Wouldn't be
### How was this patch tested?
Follow the end-to-end test
Signed-off-by: ningbenzhe1 <ningbenzhe@huawei.com>
Platform should only contain the function that based from vllm. This PR
move the unrelated function to the right place to make platform more
clear.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
Add dp stateless process group initialization path with hccl backend as
vllm-ascend patch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
---------
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
Format patch module to make it more clear.
Add the patch doc description, the new patch must follow this guide.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add notes for deepseek's patch and remove some of the unnecessary
comments
---------
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
