### What this PR does / why we need it?
The incorrect regular expression syntax `.*[UE4M3|ue4m3].*` actually
ignores all words containing any of the following characters: `u, e, 4,
m, 3, |`
```yaml
extend-ignore-identifiers-re = [".*Unc.*", ".*_thw",
".*UE8M0.*", ".*[UE4M3|ue4m3].*", ".*eles.*", ".*fo.*", ".*ba.*",
".*ot.*", ".*[Tt]h[rR].*"]
```
===fix===>
```yaml
extend-ignore-identifiers-re = [".*Unc.*", ".*_thw",
".*UE8M0.*", ".*(UE4M3|ue4m3]).*", ".*eles.*", ".*fo.*", ".*ba.*",
".*ot.*", ".*[Tt]h[rR].*"]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
9562912cea
Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
mooncake layerwise support pcp function
PCP (Prefill Context Parallelism) Support: Introduced explicit support
for Prefill Context Parallelism (PCP) and Decode Context Parallelism
(DCP) in the Mooncake layerwise KV cache transfer mechanism, allowing
for more granular control and awareness of parallel configurations
during data transfer.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
d7e17aaacd
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
As #2947 describe, we need to transpose kv cache layout after GQA kv
transfer when prefill and decode tensor parallel size are heterogeneous,
in the previous implementation, we use `npu_paged_cache_load ` +
`tranpose` + `_npu_reshape_and_cache` to do this work.
But obviously, it is not an efficient plan, the ops above need to be
called for each layer, which introduces 3 * layer_num kernel launch, and
6 * layer_num data movement between L1 Cache and HBM for one request on
decode node. Usually, decode node uses graph mode, so these op kernels
will be called between decode forward launched by an async thread in
mooncacke connector, this kernels maybe last for several decode forward
and TTFT will increase by 3~4 decode forward time.
In this PR, we implement an AscendC fused op
`transpose_kv_cache_by_block` to do this with only once kernel launch
and move data between L1 Cache and HBM only once.
After using this fused op, the time cost in transpose kv cacke layout
can be decreased to 0.24ms from 7ms in UT on 910C, and in PD
disaggregation scenario, TTFT can decrease about 90 ~ 110 ms in
qwen3-235B.
| request_num | original | fused_op|
|:----------------------:|:---------------:|:-------------------:|
| 1 | 643 ms | 578 ms |
| 128 | 1480 ms | 1368 ms |
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Use fused op by default, incase the op has bug in any scenario, provide
fallback choice using env to disable it.
**DISABLE fused op by add following env**
`export VLLM_ASCEND_FUSION_OP_TRANSPOSE_KV_CACHE_BY_BLOCK=0`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: lidenghui <lidenghui1110@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Using the cache load operator to replace the index select operator.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes a critical bug in the PD-separated inference pipeline
where KV cache on the Prefill (P) side was not being properly released.
The issue arises when multiple clients use the same x-request-id: to
avoid request ID collisions, both Prefill and Decode nodes append a
random suffix to the incoming x-request-id. A previous PR ensured
consistency by having the P-side pass its final request_id as
remote_request_id to the D-side via kv_transfer_param. However, during
KV cache cleanup, the D-side incorrectly used the local req_id (instead
of remote_request_id) to select the target P-side rank. This mismatch
caused the P-side KV cache to remain unreleased on certain ranks,
leading to memory leaks. This PR corrects the logic to use
remote_request_id consistently when determining the P-side rank.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
The fix was validated by running multiple concurrent benchmark instances
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
Signed-off-by: ghphotoframe <854746559@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
To support elastic scaling when using mooncake connector, we should
support to **configure different tp sizes for different nodes**.
As a result, we transfer the prefill node information, such as tp size,
through **the request's kv_transfer_params**.
The decode nodes **get the prefill tp size** through the request's
kv_transfer_params, instead of getting it from the configuration of the
mooncake connector .
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
Signed-off-by: yuxinshan <syx_ctyg@126.com>
Signed-off-by: CalvinXKY <kyxiezju@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
**Scope of Changes**:
| File Path |
| :--- |
| `vllm_ascend/distributed/kv_transfer/__init__.py` |
| `vllm_ascend/distributed/kv_transfer/kv_p2p/mooncake_connector.py` |
|
`vllm_ascend/distributed/kv_transfer/kv_p2p/mooncake_layerwise_connector.py`
|
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.14.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Rectify the problem that the pcp and pd separation and kv pooling
scenario.
In the pooling scenario, multi_nodes_meta_mapping is empty. As a result,
an error is reported when the remote_host information is obtained
through the get_remote_port_send_num method.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When the P node accesses the proxy meteserver, add the SSL certificate
and the CA certificate path to improve security.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
bde38c11df
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Drop vLLM 0.13.0 support, upgrade to 0.14.0
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The issue of the D node mistakenly sending the pull-end signal twice,
leading to the P node printing logger errors abnormally, has been
resolved.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch purpose to optimize the lint check term. The main idea is to
reduce unnecessary installation time.
1. The installation of vllm is not must, only append the path of vllm
src to the `PATHONPATH` is effective
2. This installation of `requirements-dev.txt` is not must, we have a
pre-built image `quay.io/ascend-ci/vllm-ascend:lint` with all the
requirements installed in advance.
**NOTE**: the conditions for triggering image builds are: 1).Daily
scheduled build; 2) Build when requirements are modified; 3) Manual
build. This ensures that the dependencies in our image are up-to-date to
the greatest extent possible.
3. The `mypy` was separated from the `pre-commit` hook for performance
reasons; we found that integrating `mypy` into the `pre-commit` hook
resulted in poor performance.
4. Reduce the CPU core consumption from 16 -> 8
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The end-to-end lint time was optimized from 20min/per PR to 8min/per PR
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
This PR addresses a request ID mismatch issue in the PD
(Prefill-Decoding) separation deployment scenario for vllm-ascend.
Upstream vLLM recently mitigated request ID collisions by appending a
random suffix to each request_id (e.g., req-123 → req-123-abc), refer to
[PR-27987](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/27987 ) &
[PR-29665](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/29665). While this
works in single-node deployments, it breaks compatibility in
PD-separated setups: the Producer (Prefill node) and Consumer (Decoding
node) end up with different request_id values, preventing the Consumer
from correctly retrieving the KV cache generated by the Producer.
To resolve this, this PR introduces a new field remote_request_id in the
metadata passed via mooncake_connector. The Producer preserves and
forwards the original (unmodified) request_id as remote_request_id. The
Consumer then uses this remote_request_id—instead of its locally
generated suffixed ID—to fetch the correct KV cache from the Prefill
node.
This ensures consistent request identification across PD nodes while
maintaining compatibility with upstream vLLM’s request ID deduplication
mechanism.
<img width="1279" height="781" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/274238c1-dab6-4d3a-9ee4-6e578679b762"
/>
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
Signed-off-by: ghphotoframe <854746559@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: jiangweixiang <jwx02384838@antgroup.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In PD disaggregation case, when P has multi nodes, mooncake fails to
send data. Fix the issue in this PR.
The details:
If a P rank does not need to transfer kv cache to any one D rank, D node
should send a message to P node to release the kv
cache in P node. If P has multi nodes, D node should know the
corresponding IP in each P node, then D node can send message to the
right P node. Otherwise, send data error will happen. This PR fix this
issue by providing P nodes IP to D node through Parameter
`remote_port_send_num`.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiaochao <w00642655@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaochao <w00642655@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The force-free secondary release request causes the node to crash. When
requests are pulled too quickly, they should not be added to the
delay-free queue.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
By ci
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Based on the RFC:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5604
This PR is a refactoring of vllm_ascend/distributed, moving all
kv_transfer realtaed codes into a dedicated folder, which has already
been done in vLLM
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NA
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: lty <linhebiwen@gmail.com>
