### What this PR does / why we need it?
Bump vllm version to v0.8.5.post1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Make CANN version bump separately from
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/708
- Upgrade CANN version to 8.1.rc1
- Add prefix to speed up download
`m.daocloud.io/quay.io/ascend/cann:8.1.rc1-910b-ubuntu22.04-py3.10`
- Address tail sapce for Dockerfile.openEuler
- Add note for `/workspace` and `/vllm-workspace` as followup of
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/741
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Co-authored-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Re-enable Speculative Decode test for vLLM v0.8.5
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- This PR proposes a P2P version of Disaggregated Prefill based on
llm_datadist which manages data transfer.
- This solution reconstructs previous offline single-node Disaggregated
Prefill solution, and supports multi-node and online serveing now.
- Currently this solution supports 1P1D situation of Deepseek hybrid
parallelism (P: TP+EP, D: DP+EP). Note that xPyD situation is considered
in the solution design, and will be supported soon within v1 engine.
---------
Signed-off-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Provide accuracy test report for development branch release.
2. Models and datasets for accuracy test：
| Model | datasets |
|---------------------------- | --------------------------- |
| Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct | ceval-val, gsm8k, mmlu |
| Qwen3-8B | ceval-val, gsm8k, mmlu |
| Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct | ceval-val, gsm8k, mmlu |
| Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct | mmmu_val |
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR will display the accuracy test report of the release versionin
docs/source/developer_guide/accuracy_report。
Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct.md
Qwen3-8B.md
Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct.md
Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct .md
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add nightly CI for basic function and model usability
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
As custom deepseek modeling do some changes to support graph mode in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/585, so i follow it to
change custom deepseek_mtp modeling.
And some modifications for k>1 were not carried over by the
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/429, now i add it.
In order to better take care of the MTP feature in the vllm-ascend
repository, I added cases related to graph mode(torchair), but i skip it
since torchair can not correctly clean up memory in vllmrunner.
Also i add some case for MTP quantization weights, but test weight is
not ready, so i skip it and i will open it when test quant weights is
ready.
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/648 did not completely
fix the sample
change(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/660) issue, I
added the relevant changes.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
now, u can use following method to use mtp in deepseek v3/r1 float or
quant weights with eager mode.
```python
llm = LLM(
model="wemaster/deepseek_mtp_main_random_bf16",
tensor_parallel_size=2,
speculative_config={
"num_speculative_tokens": 1,
},
enforce_eager=True,
trust_remote_code=True,
disable_log_stats=False,
gpu_memory_utilization=0.8,
max_model_len=64,
)
```
or use mtp in deepseek v3/r1 float or quant weights with graph
mode（torchair）
```python
llm = LLM(
model="wemaster/deepseek_mtp_main_random_bf16",
tensor_parallel_size=2,
speculative_config={
"num_speculative_tokens": 1,
},
trust_remote_code=True,
additional_config={
'enable_graph_mode': True,
},
disable_log_stats=False,
gpu_memory_utilization=0.8,
max_model_len=64,
)
```
add notes:
1. now, we support k>1, so u can set num_speculative_tokens > 1 if there
is sufficient redundant computing power;
2. MTP is not supported in V1, we will support it when vLLM does it in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/13500.
3. if u run MTP failed by `segmentation fault`, u can follow v0.7.3
patch https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/236 file
`vllm_ascend/patch/patch_metrics.py` method
`__npu_async_metrics_collector_init__`
### How was this patch tested?
local tested passed and test by CI
Signed-off-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update openEuler dockerfile for COMPILE_CUSTOM_KERNELS=1
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The torch-npu 2.5.1 are published:
https://pypi.org/project/torch-npu/2.5.1/
It's time to remove all torch-npu dev version from vllm-ascend code base
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, using torch-npu 2.5.1
### How was this patch tested?
- [ ] CI passed
- [ ] Manually test
- [ ] Grep all `dev2025`
---------
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
<!--
- Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this
section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster
reviews in your PR.
- Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance, the use case
and bug description.
- Fixes #
-->
This PR supports the access of vllm-acend to the piecewise_graph feature
provided by the v1 engine.
1. register unifiled_ascend_attention_with_output for piecewise_graph to
split graph.
2. support NPUGraph to accelerate kernel launch.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
<!--
Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such
as API, interface or other behavior changes.
Documentation-only updates are not considered user-facing changes.
-->
support npugraph to default， Users can disenable the npugraph feature by
configuring enforce_eager.
This has corresponding requirements for the versions of torch_npu and
CANN, and they need to support graph capture.
### How was this patch tested?
<!--
CI passed with new added/existing test.
If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please
clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so
that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in
the future.
If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or
why it was difficult to add.
-->
it turn to default
---------
Signed-off-by: Bug Hunter Yan <yanpq@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The pr will fix some bug about spec decode / MTP
The pr add a mtp e2e UT `test_mtp_correctness.py`
**vllm_ascend/attention/attention.py**
1. add support `self.attn_mask_cache` only has 1 element to cover scene
in which both spec docode and chunked prefill are enabled.
**vllm_ascend/distributed/parallel_state.py**
1. remove 2 assert because spec decode worker would use init_worker
twice
**vllm_ascend/models/deepseek_mtp.py**
1. remove unused params;
2. add support w8a8 in `CustomDeepSeekMTP`
**vllm_ascend/quantization/quant_config.py**
1. use `AscendUnquantizedFusedMoEMethod` instead of
`UnquantizedFusedMoEMethod`
**other**
1. replace `from vllm.logger import init_logger` to `from vllm.logger
import logger` all of the vllm-ascend project
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Signed-off-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
There was a bug when we release v0.8.4rc1 (openEuler image tag was wrong
set to 0.8.4rc1), according doc of docker-meta-action, it should be
append suffix:
```
tags: |
type=pep440,enable=true,priority=900,prefix=,suffix=,pattern=,value=
```
This patch just fix openEuler image suffix to make pep440 tag rule work.
This patch also remove the cache step because the cache step bring more
than 10mins export, but reduce less time in next trigger.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, docker image tag set to right
### How was this patch tested?
I test with in my fork repo by setting default branch:
- release a tag: v0.7.88rc1 (pep440 tag)
- The log show `--label
org.opencontainers.image.version=v0.7.88rc1-openeuler` is right rule
https://github.com/Yikun/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/14560411481/job/40842950165#step:9:205
Related: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/489
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
1. Add `vllm_version_is` function to check vllm version.
2. `ensure_kv_transfer_initialized` and `get_kv_transfer_group ` have
been moved to other place in vllm main branch via
3408e47159
, this patch fix the import error.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Backport: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/252
This support speculative decoding in Ascend, including speculating with
a draft model、by matching n-grams in the prompt、using MLP speculators
and using EAGLE based draft models.
Backport: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/423
spec decode MultiStepWorker support TP1DraftModelRunner fully, support
run the draft_model_runner with multi-step prepare on the NPU directly
and support draft_model_runner use MLA.
1. before this pr, `MultiStepWorker` would not step into the branch
using NPU prepare, but only into the branch using CPU prepare (`line 52`
of `vllm_ascend/patch/patch_multi_step_worker.py`). Although this has
`no effect` on the `correct operation` of speculative decoding and the
performance of the two branches is basically the same as of the current
version, I support entering this branch in this PR. In general, there
are two main changes in `patch_multi_step_worker.py`: first, the
`is_cuda_like()` check is removed and the `TP1DraftModelRunner`
rewritten in vllm_ascend is used; second, the
`supports_gpu_multi_step()` function is made to return true on NPU
devices when outer Multi_step_worker could work correct.
3. before this pr, `TP1DraftModelRunner` only supports Attention on NPU,
but not MLA. The relevant adaptation is in
`vllm_ascend/worker/draft_model_runner.py`. Although I don’t know why
the `input_positions` of `model_input.attn_metadata` in vllm-ascend
needs to be added in `execute_model`, it is done in `model_runner.py`,
so I also made corresponding changes. Otherwise, when atten_backend is
MLA, it will prompt that input_positions cannot be found.
4. I commented out two lines in `draft_model_runner.py` in `line118` to
support the scenario of K>1.
```
# lora_mapping=model_input.lora_mapping,
# lora_requests=model_input.lora_requests,
```
I added comments. In the future, when vllm-ascend supports lora feature,
the changes here can be restored.
TODO：
- [ ] revert the patch when the related issues are addressed in vllm
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added test.
- e2e test for medusa proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_medusa_correctness.py
- e2e test for mlp proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_mlp_correctness.py
- e2e test for n-gram proposer:
tests/singlecard/spec_decode/e2e/test_ngram_correctness.py
Tests for patched files:
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_dynamic_spec_decode.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_multi_step_worker.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_ngram_worker.py
- tests/singlecard/spec_decode/test_spec_decode_worker.py
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- add `HF_TOKEN` as global var to the runner
- add `HF_ENDPOINT` as global var to the runner
- change concurrency group, rely on current pr num
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR enable custom ops build by default.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Yes, users now install vllm-ascend from source will trigger custom ops
build step.
### How was this patch tested?
By image build and e2e CI
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Provide users with openEuler-based vllm images, so modify the quick
start readme
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
There is no need for performing any test.
---------
Signed-off-by: Icey <1790571317@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Add a new runner to the continuous integration system and keep the
original CI runner until the new runner runs stably
- Add distributed test cases
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
vLLM bumps numpy version to 2.x:
8427f70493
, this will cause a
`pip._vendor.pkg_resources.ContextualVersionConflict: (numpy 2.2.4
(/usr/local/python3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages),
Requirement.parse('numpy==1.26.4'), {'vllm-ascend'})` failure when vllm
ascend install. This PR resolved the issue by:
- Set numpy < 2.0.0 to resolve numpy VersionConflict
- Sync requirements and toml
- Reorder
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Closes: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/473
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix CI by updating mypy and pining numpy version
_the modification of model_runner_v1 is just to make CI happy_
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This pr upgrades torch-npu to 0320, so that #321,
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/267#issuecomment-2745045743
could be fixed, and #372 should be reverted after this pr
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
upgrade torch-npu to 0320
### How was this patch tested?
tested locally with long seq inferencing.
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Bump torch_npu version to dev20250308.3 to fix performance regression on
multi-stream case:
e04c580d07
.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
Update torch-npu version to fix torch npu exponential_ accuracy
With this update, the percision issue when setting `temperature > 0` is
fixed.
---------
Signed-off-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add dispatch job to leverage jobs to dynamic devices include 2 stage as
below:
The dispatch job will spend extra about `10s * parallel number + 30s`
time to wait other job launch container and release lock.
- **Stage 1: Acquire lock**
add a dispatch job, this job use lockfile to acquire locks and then get
device number dynamically
- **Stage 2.1: Launch container with dynamic device**
pass the device number via output and start the container job with
dynamic device
- **Stage 2.2: Release lock**
once the job started, release the lock.
In the backend, we use multiple path to setup multiple self host runners
as load balancer:
```
$ pwd
/home/action
$ ll | grep actions
drwx------ 6 action action 4096 Mar 7 08:55 actions-runner-01
drwx------ 6 action action 4096 Mar 7 08:55 actions-runner-02
drwx------ 6 action action 4096 Mar 7 08:55 actions-runner-03
drwx------ 6 action action 4096 Mar 7 08:56 actions-runner-04
drwx------ 4 action action 4096 Jan 24 22:08 actions-runner-05
drwx------ 4 action action 4096 Jan 24 22:08 actions-runner-06
```
```
adduser -G docker action
su action
pip3 install docker prettytable
sudo yum install procmail
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
- CI passed
- E2E test manully, triggered 3 jobs in parallel:
- [1st
job](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/13711345757/job/38348309297)
dispatch to /dev/davinci2.
- [2nd
job](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/13711348739/job/38348316250)
dispatch to /dev/davinci3
- [3rd
job](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/13711351493/job/38348324551)
dispatch to /dev/davinci4
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Recover vllm-ascend dev image
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed
Signed-off-by: Yikun Jiang <yikunkero@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add `HF_TOKEN` for downloading models that requires access rights from
huggingface hub. This will fix the CI error in #123 and #76
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
Enable CI on all branch.
Installing with the torch-npu-2.5.1.dev20250218 so that we could enable
CI on all branch and prepare for merging 0.7.1-dev to main
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
