What this PR does / why we need it?
there are two sets of sp implementations for moe and dense models. One
is called sequence_parallelism, and the other is flashcomm_v1.
We did the following things：
Merge two sets of code with the same implementation into one.
Remove the implementation of sequence_parallelism, as this solution
cannot support aclgraph.
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
e2e&ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
f225ea7dd9
---------
Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix issues mentioned in
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/2791 and some minor
refactoring.
1. Use Enum instead of string.
2. Avoid setting a new property to forward_context in
AscendFusedMoE.forward().
3. Enabling TokenDispatcherWithMoge.
4. Remove redundant code.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Qwen3-30B-A3B/Qwen3-30B-A3B-W8A8/DeepSeek-V3-W4A8-Pruing/deepseek-mtp/pangu-pro-moe-pruing:
1. Enable/Disable EP
2. Aclgraph & eager
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
9607d5eb44
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <12153182+weijinqian0@users.noreply.github.com>
Add missing barrier when no implicit synchonize by `repeat_interleave`
is available. Otherwise, the `non_blocking=True` copy of `output_splits`
and `input_splits` from NPU may failed to complete before later
`async_all_to_all` uses them.
### What this PR does / why we need it?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
ef7eefe17a
Signed-off-by: sdmyzlp <lrwei2@petalmail.com>
### Motivation
Currently dynamically experts balancing would stop-the-world.
Asynchronously expert load balancing would be better without flowing
problems:
Host-bound latency:
There are many cpu operations during EPLB such as
eplb-algorithm、creating p2p ops、and log2phy expert converting would
spend long cpu time, as ~1s.
Communication latency: The transfer time would cost much in the
situation without nvlink. As the weight of an expert maybe transfer to
multiple new positions, thus N times send/recv for one expert, with
result long latency. We had tested that batch_isend_irecv cost more
100ms for 16 experts weight transmission in A2 server of ascend.
SwiftBalancer would not stop-the-world anymore, in out test on NPU 1~2ms
cost for each layer while benefit 5ms-8ms decode latency with ep_size =
64.
The following updates have been made:
1、expert distribution recording with lower cost.
2、async cpu computing for eplb algo and other python operator.
3、new eplb algo with less expert rebalancing while almost the same
effect.
### Proposed Change
We will gradually migrate the EPLB logic to the VLLM community and
implement a generalized design. Relevant RFC:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/22246
The overall workflow involves:
<img width="801" height="302"
alt="474430541-23b06f58-23bc-44a3-a1be-00f268aeb15c"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1d73a459-1b23-4b0a-812a-bf0a75debfed"
/>
1. Record experts distribution during forward. We using expert_token_num
after disptach instead of topk_ids, thus we got much smaller tensor
shape to reduce cost of hbm recording and add-operator.
2. Do all-gather for experts distribution. Using all-gather instead of
all-reduce as less traffic volume.
3. Wake up eplb worker process with experts distribution when
num_iterations comes. Run eplb algorithm in eplb worker.
4. Generate p2p send/recv ops and other operator such as log2phy would
cost long cpu time.
5. Lanch ibatch_send_recv in async_stream before forward.
6. After forward, wait for the ibatch_send_recv finish, then do uapte
expert map and expert weights.
### Co-author
Co-authored-by: raindaywhu raindaywhu@raindaywhu@ 163.con
Co-authored-by: njuyuan yuanjl19@smail.nju.edu.cn
Co-authored-by: qmkakaxi wjh1594260677@qq.com
Co-authored-by: Skywalker-EP 173723846@qq.com
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
567939953b
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <z00858301@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <z00858301@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Replace prepare/finalize operation in fused_moe.py by
moe_comm_method.prepare()/finalize()
2. Replace unified_fused_experts by moe_comm_method.fused_experts() in
fused_moe.py/w8a8_dynamic.py/w4a8_dynamic.py
3. Add calling _select_moe_comm_method in spec-decode proposers.
4. Currently, w4a8_dynamic does not support gatherep, use all2allv
instead.
5. Remove redundant code.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
AllgatherEP switch is disabled in aclgraph/eager mode, just follow the
rules in modelrunner_v1._select_moe_comm_method()
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
7f6f2c1182
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <12153182+weijinqian0@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Move ops/comm_utils to ops/moe/comm_utils
2. Move distributed/tensor_parallel/gather_from_sequence_parallel_region
to ops/moe/comm_utils
3. Delete distributed/tensor_parallel
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
a1213fae5f
---------
Signed-off-by: wuweiqiang24 <1005334931@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wuweiqiang24 <wuweiqiang11@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[Feat]support dynamic quantization in allgather
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
5931b7e5d9
Signed-off-by: withHades <244036962@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: WithHades <244036962@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Move prepare/finalize operation from moe_comm_method to
/ops/moe/fused_moe_prepare_and_finalize
2. Adapt to token_dispatcher in moe_comm_method
3. Move
moe_comm_method/experts_selector/token_dispatcher/fused_moe_prepare_and_finalize
to /ops/moe
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
f4962a6d55
Signed-off-by: weichen <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <12153182+weijinqian0@users.noreply.github.com>
