### What this PR does / why we need it?
In the P node timeout release mechanism during PD separation, the req_id
that requires timeout release is transmitted from the scheduler to the
worker. If the KV cache between PDs is transferred too quickly, the P
node's req_id may be released twice. The first release is when the D
node notifies the P node that the KV cache has been pulled, and the
second release is when the scheduler transmits the timeout release to
the worker.
To address this bug, an intermediate component is introduced to manage
the release of req_ids.
Pull kv and forward2 may occur one after the other in timing. The
previous timeout defaulted to forward2 being before pull_kv.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
f225ea7dd9
---------
Signed-off-by: baxingpiaochong <771405853@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR addresses a critical issue where Node D (Device) failures cause
Node P (Processor) to hang due to inability to release KV cache.
**Trigger Scenarios:**
1. Node D fails mid-inference (e.g., network disconnection)
2. Node D rejects requests at a certain stage (e.g., via API server)
3. Load-test script termination causes Node P or D to abort queued
requests
**Root Cause Analysis:**
1. Currently, Node D sends a "KV cache pull complete, release approved"
message to Node P
2. This message is transmitted via the worker connector. If PD
connection breaks or requests are rejected upstream, Node D cannot send
the message
3. Node P will never release KV cache without receiving this message
**Solution:**
Following VLLM community's approach (NIXL connector timeout mechanism),
we're implementing:
- A timeout mechanism with comprehensive warnings
- Updated README documentation
- Reference: VLLM's optimization PR
[#20139](https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/20139)
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None
### How was this patch tested?
None
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
9607d5eb44
---------
Signed-off-by: underfituu <hzhucong@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
A new kv_role "kv_both" is added to run mixed deployment scenarios. The
mixed deployment will involve a decode phase, where with_prefill should
be false.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
c60e6137f0
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Added a new connector for Mooncake store integration to enable kvcache
reuse in scenarios with system prompts or multi-turn dialogues.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
5963b98b46
---------
Signed-off-by: LCAIZJ <leichao139636@163.com>
Signed-off-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Dreamerleader <2270923832@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Pz1116 <zpbzpb123123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lizy124 <1950471827@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: zouyida2052 <zouyida2002@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR is used to adapt the hostname format for Mooncake when using
adxl. When Mooncake uses adxl, it is necessary to set
```USE_ASCEND_DIRECT``` to True in the file
```/Mooncake/mooncake-common/common.cmake``` during compilation. The
mooncake_connector obtains this config by calling
```vllm_config.kv_transfer_config.get_from_extra_config```, determines
whether Mooncake is using adxl, and selects the corresponding hostname
format.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
d21a36f5f9
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Move ops/comm_utils to ops/moe/comm_utils
2. Move distributed/tensor_parallel/gather_from_sequence_parallel_region
to ops/moe/comm_utils
3. Delete distributed/tensor_parallel
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
a1213fae5f
---------
Signed-off-by: wuweiqiang24 <1005334931@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wuweiqiang24 <wuweiqiang11@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
LLMdatadist connector adapt the distributed KV aggregation for the main
branch. Change the P node from returning "finish sending" only when TP0
responds to returning "finish sending" as soon as each NPU receives it.
The D node will send a finish receive signal to the corresponding tp
rank of the P node.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
gsm8k test
2*A3 1P 1D
P: dp2 tp8 D:dp 4 tp4
P: dp2 tp8 D:dp 2 tp8
- vLLM version: main
- vLLM main:
cc99baf14d
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. Move prepare/finalize operation from moe_comm_method to
/ops/moe/fused_moe_prepare_and_finalize
2. Adapt to token_dispatcher in moe_comm_method
3. Move
moe_comm_method/experts_selector/token_dispatcher/fused_moe_prepare_and_finalize
to /ops/moe
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
f4962a6d55
Signed-off-by: weichen <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Pr0Wh1teGivee <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <12153182+weijinqian0@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces Oproj matrix tensor model parallel to achieve
decreasing of memory consumption. It only support graph mode in pure DP
scenario.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
oproj_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT increasing, saved 5.8
GB NPU memory per RANK. We got best performance when
oproj_tensor_parallel_size=4 without TPOT increasing.
performance data:
<img width="1442" height="442" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83270fc5-868a-4387-b0a9-fac29b4a376d"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| oproj_tensor_parallel_size | Split the o_proj matrix along the row
dimension (head num * head dim) into oproj_tensor_parallel_size pieces.
| No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, head num * head dim must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"oproj_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
eddaafc1c7
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zzh <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Delete redundant codes related to communication
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
not involve
### How was this patch tested?
not involve
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
6c7af8110a
---------
Signed-off-by: 刘哲续 <liuzhexu1@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: 刘哲续 <liuzhexu1@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In vllm version 0.10.1, a new KVOutputAggregator was added to the
executor, moving aggregation to the
executor(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/19555). This caused
mooncake_connector to break. This change aims to fix this bug and also
adds a policy to forcibly release the KV cache when the prefill node
times out.
This PR is currently linked to a PR in vllm
(https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/23917). The vllm PR aims to
modify the finish and send count confirmation in heterogeneous TP
situations.
The reason for deleting many UTs is that a lot of communication codes
have been deleted, so the UT as a whole will appear more concise.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
fa4311d85f
---------
Signed-off-by: baxingpiaochong <771405853@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The detail has been clarified in that issue :
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/2557
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
easy to test beacause we just need to echo the variable
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
6997a25ac6
---------
Signed-off-by: zzy-ContiLearn <1831242919@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: LCAIZJ <leichao139636@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
* **Unify execution paths:** Consolidates the quantized and
non-quantized execution paths into a single `fused_experts` function,
removing duplicated logic and making the control flow clearer and easier
to maintain.
* **W8A8 dynamic quantization:** Adds support for W8A8 dynamic
quantization inside the unified MoE kernel. Communication routines are
updated to correctly handle dynamic quantization scales for activations.
* **Weight pre-processing:** Prae-transpose the `w13` and `w2` weight
matrices (as implemented in PR #2025) so that quantized and
non-quantized models follow the same code path for the MoE gating,
up-projection, and down-projection operations.
* **All-to-all communication:** Adds an `all-to-all` collective
communication pattern. For large token counts on modern hardware,
`all-to-all` is more efficient than the previous `all-gather` strategy.
However, `all-to-all` is not really captured and replayed due to
multiple D2H operations which will trigger synchronization, and thus
raise error when capture graphs. We only use `all-to-all` when fallback
to `compiled_graph_for_general_shape`.
* **Dynamic communication selection:** The model runner now selects the
optimal MoE communication method (`mc2`, `allgather`, or `alltoall`) at
runtime based on token count and the Ascend SoC version.
* **Limitation:** `all-gather` is not yet supported for quantized
models, which means there is still something left to do on A2.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
No further test cases needed.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
d660c98c1b
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces LMhead tensor model parallel to achieve decreasing of
memory consumption, and TPOT performance improvement. It support both
eager mode and graph mode.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
lmhead_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT optimization, saved
1.48 GB NPU memory per RANK.
performance data:
<img width="1444" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c5ef0d3-a7c7-46fd-9797-4de728eb0cb0"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| lmhead_tensor_parallel_size | Split the lm_head matrix along the
column dimension (vocab_size) into lmhead_tensor_parallel_size pieces |
No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, vocab_size must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"lmhead_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
de533ab2a1
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zhangzihang <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The determination of attention state, padding, and other forward
metadata has been moved to an earlier stage within the input preparation
process. This change enables us to utilize a single all-reduce
operation, maximizing synchronization efficiency as early as possible.
The logic for synchronizing metadata—such as the number of tokens,
prefill status, and DBO status—across data parallel (DP) ranks has now
been unified and simplified.
For performance improvements, the all-reduce operation has been switched
from the `gloo` backend to the `npu` backend, which results in an
reduction of several milliseconds per step (**approximately 10%
performance gain for TPOT!**).
Additionally, the multi-DP server hang issue has been resolved, ensuring
no more hangs occur when `num_requests < dp_size`. Alas, a relief.
Finally, the miscalculated memory usage issue has been addressed by
removing the unnecessary `DummyCommImpl`, allowing the system to use the
real communication method when determining available memory.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
Maybe we should add an test case for multi-DP online server?
@MengqingCao
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
c5d004aaaf
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This method replaces the previous all-gather approach for small numbers
of tokens.
The key changes include:
- A new `AscendFusedMoE` layer that handles token splitting, local
computation, and final aggregation via all-gather.
- Logic in the model runner to dynamically select between the new MC2
method and the existing all-gather method based on the number of input
tokens.
- Sharding the MoE communication mask across tensor-parallel ranks.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
None.
### How was this patch tested?
Test case fixed.
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
b00e69f8ca
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
For dense models, by not applying tensor parallelism (TP) to the
attention module and applying TP to the MLP module, the allreduce
operations in the attention module can be eliminated, thereby reducing
computational overhead. However, this approach increases memory usage,
so the environment variable VLLM_ASCEND_ENABLE_MLP_OPTIMZE is used to
control this optimization.
- vLLM main:
b17109beea
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoxin-sherie <wangxiaoxin7@huawei.com>
1. rename `VLLM_LLMDD_RPC_PORT` to `VLLM_ASCEND_LLMDD_RPC_PORT` to make
the prefix the same in vllm-ascend
2. enable `VLLM_ASCEND_LLMDD_RPC_IP` env for PD feature.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adopt Mooncake TransferEngine for kv cache register and
pull_blocks style disaggregate prefill implementation.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
### Dependencies
1. Cann Dependencies
Using Mooncake TransferEngine with Ascend Transport requires CANN
version 8.2.RC1 or higher.（see detail
Mooncake[#502](https://github.com/kvcache-ai/Mooncake/pull/502)）
2. vllm-ascend
This PR depends on changes introduced by #950 (modifications to
`model_runner_v1`) and #1361 (updates to `schedule`), both of which have
been merged into the `v0.9.1-dev` branch and are expected to land in
`main` shortly.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
1c859a1387
---------
Signed-off-by: leichao.lc <leichao139636@163.com>
Co-authored-by: jianzs <zheng.shoujian@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zzy-ContiLearn <1831242919@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: fems14 <1804143737@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Dreamerleader <2270923832@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: chris668899 <15105191595@126.com>
Co-authored-by: Pz1116 <zpbzpb123123@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove redundant imported `envs`, using `envs_ascend` instead.
```python
import vllm.envs as envs_vllm
import vllm_ascend.envs as envs_ascend
```
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
71683ca6f6
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR refactors the MoE (Mixture of Experts) communication logic by
introducing a strategy pattern. It defines an abstract base class,
`MoECommMethod`, which encapsulates different communication strategies
for MoE layers. By decoupling the MoE implementation from any single
communication method, this change makes it simpler to add, replace, or
optimize communication strategies in the future.
Plan / Roadmap
1. Introduce `MoECommMethod`, implement `AllGatherImpl`, and adapt ACL
Graph handling to cover all scenarios (this PR).
2. Implement `MC2CommImpl` and `AllToAllCommImpl` to optimize
performance in specific scenarios.
3. Enable W8A8 / Int8 models to use `unified_fused_experts`.
Other notes
* Data-parallel (DP) communication currently does not work with vLLM's
dispatch/combine mechanisms; an alternative approach is required to
resolve this incompatibility.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
f7ad6a1eb3
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
we recently added disaggregated_prefill and ascend_forward_context
feature by
ba3dfbd59e
and
df0ec55162.
This PR fix some nit introduced by them to make the code clear.
1. drop `current_platform` usage. It'll lead unknown circular import
error in some case
2. update `set_ascend_forward_context` function to make the logic clear.
for example, remove V0 support in this function.
3. Remove useless `self.local_rank_across_dp` in worker
4. Remove `soc_info.py` to use `get_ascend_soc_version` instead.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
02f82fe438
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 816375e0c1071d0696dfab1a1ce35674f9f37aa0)
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Suppose that you want to start a prefiller instance with npus `2,3`
only. So you start the instance with `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES=2,3`.
The current programming will start two workers, whose ranks are `0` and
`1` respectedly. And they will pick the first and second ip addresses of
npus in the ranktable instead of the thirdth and forth ones. But
actually they are using card `2,3` and therefore they can not link with
remote instances when they attempt to transfer the KVCache.
Hence, at most 1 prefiller instance and at most 1 decoder instance can
work on a single machine since they always pick the first npu ip address
in the ranktable currently.
This pull request is proposed to fix the problem. This fix pick ips of
only those devices that are in `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES` from the
ranktable.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
If the user use ranktable generated by `gen_ranktable.sh`, they should
not face any change.
### How was this patch tested?
Qwen-0.6B 1P 1D, dp=2, `ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES=2,3` for prefiller and
`ASCEND_RT_VISIBLE_DEVICES=4,5` for decoder.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
ad57f23f6a
Signed-off-by: CaveNightingale <cavenightingale@foxmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix Qwen MoE accuracy bug in DP scenario.
Now the implentment of `FusedMoE` in vLLM use `All2AllManager` to
manager different all2all algorithm branch. And the default branch use
`Multicast` in `dispatch` phase and `all_reduce` in `combine` phase,
which are not implented in vLLM-Ascend. This leading to invoking into a
default implentment in `base_communicator`, with empty `dispatch` and
`combine` operations, thus causing the accuracy issue on it.
This pr is a temporary workaround, refacting all2all in vLLM-Ascend
could be a better way.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
ad57f23f6a
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
A refactoring of forward_context and model_runner_v1, add some context
which is necessary in model inference into forward_context, and refactor
dummy_run logic, make it more reasonable.
Some details for this PR:
Add `ascend_forward_context`;
Update mc2_v2 op, and support `active_mask` param;
Update scripts in examples dir;
refactor `dummy_run` logic;
Add soc_version for A2 and A3;
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No change at user-facing.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
57c22e57f9
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove ETP/EP maintained in branch main. We drop this as there is no
relevant scenarios to use ETP now, and we may subsequently advocate
implementing expert tensor parallelism in vLLM to support scenarios
where the expert is needed to be sliced
This is a part of #1422 backport.
Fixes https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1396https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/1154
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
We'll not maintain etp/ep in vllm-ascend anymore, and use the tp/ep in
vllm instead.
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added and existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.9.2
- vLLM main:
fe8a2c544a
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Follow vllm-project/vllm lint way:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/.pre-commit-config.yaml
Enable pre-commit to avoid some low level error AMAP.
This pr is one step of #1241, The purpose is make linting system more
clear and convenient, on this step, Mainly did the following things:
yapf, actionlint, ruff, typos, isort, mypy, png-lint, signoff-commit,
enforce-import-regex-instead-of-re.
TODO:
- clang-format(check for csrc with google style)
need clean code, disable for now
- pymarkdown
need clean code, disable for now
- shellcheck
need clean code, disable for now
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Only developer UX change:
https://vllm-ascend--1256.org.readthedocs.build/en/1256/developer_guide/contributing.html#run-lint-locally
```
pip install -r requirements-lint.txt && pre-commit install
bash format.sh
```
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with new added/existing test.
Co-authored-by: Yikun [yikunkero@gmail.com](mailto:yikunkero@gmail.com)
Co-authored-by: wangli
[wangli858794774@gmail.com](mailto:wangli858794774@gmail.com)
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
5358cce5ff
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In some cases, `dist._functional_collectives.reduce_scatter_tensor` can
cause its input tensor not to be released immediately after the current
layer ends. Instead, it will only be released when the GPU memory usage
of the current process reaches a certain threshold (approximately every
15 layers each time).
**Before Fix**
<img width="1441" alt="截屏2025-06-24 01 26 13"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/72d5dbb3-c8c8-4778-bf64-8db7bab8aff0"
/>
**After Fix**
<img width="1475" alt="截屏2025-06-24 01 23 43"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6c69cfcd-a469-4ee5-b8c6-210aeb3a5bdf"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.9.1
- vLLM main:
9ff2af6d2b
---------
Signed-off-by: ApsarasX <apsarax@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Solve the bug that the graph mode is the same as p and d, and some other
bugs.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Wouldn't be
### How was this patch tested?
Follow the end-to-end test
Signed-off-by: ningbenzhe1 <ningbenzhe@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix update_aclgraph_sizes when running MoE models.
---------
Signed-off-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
<!-- Thanks for sending a pull request!
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ
https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/contributing/overview.html
-->
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. This PR introduces native `all_to_all` communication operator to fix
`allgather` bugs when dp_size > 1. Besides, it adds a naive
implementation of force-load-balance when doing profile runs.
2. The operator `npu_dequant_swiglu_quant` only supports input
hidden_states with dtype `torch.int32`. This tensor occupies space of
`global_bs * seq_len * topk * hidden_size`, which might be very large as
`ep_size` grows. Therefore we need to disable this operator and use
original `swiglu` && `quantize`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By performing offline inference:
---------
Signed-off-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: angazenn <zengyanjia@huawei.com>
1. Fix format check error to make format.sh work
2. Add codespell check CI
3. Add the missing required package for vllm-ascend.
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- This PR proposes a P2P version of Disaggregated Prefill based on
llm_datadist which manages data transfer.
- This solution reconstructs previous offline single-node Disaggregated
Prefill solution, and supports multi-node and online serveing now.
- Currently this solution supports 1P1D situation of Deepseek hybrid
parallelism (P: TP+EP, D: DP+EP). Note that xPyD situation is considered
in the solution design, and will be supported soon within v1 engine.
---------
Signed-off-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: hw_whx <wanghexiang7@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: ganyi <pleaplusone.gy@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The pr will fix some bug about spec decode / MTP
The pr add a mtp e2e UT `test_mtp_correctness.py`
**vllm_ascend/attention/attention.py**
1. add support `self.attn_mask_cache` only has 1 element to cover scene
in which both spec docode and chunked prefill are enabled.
**vllm_ascend/distributed/parallel_state.py**
1. remove 2 assert because spec decode worker would use init_worker
twice
**vllm_ascend/models/deepseek_mtp.py**
1. remove unused params;
2. add support w8a8 in `CustomDeepSeekMTP`
**vllm_ascend/quantization/quant_config.py**
1. use `AscendUnquantizedFusedMoEMethod` instead of
`UnquantizedFusedMoEMethod`
**other**
1. replace `from vllm.logger import init_logger` to `from vllm.logger
import logger` all of the vllm-ascend project
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Signed-off-by: mengwei805 <mengwei25@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Adapt Disaggregated Prefill feature onto Ascend device
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
The test usage has been provided alongwith the PR, in
examples/offline_disaggregated_prefill_npu.py
To run it, do this
```
export PROMPT_DEVICE_ID=0,1
export DECODE_DEVICE_ID=2,3
python examples/offline_disaggregated_prefill_npu.py
```
---------
Signed-off-by: ZihuiQian <qianzihui@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: ZihuiQian <qianzihui@huawei.com>
