### What this PR does / why we need it?
vllm-ascend need to dump data during model execution to debug some
precision problems, here msprobe provide the corresponding abilities, so
msprobe will join vllm-ascend to make debug easier
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
```
'dump_config': '/path/to/config.json'
```
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
---------
Signed-off-by: Tjh-UKN <2559659915@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The first letter of the English title should be capitalized
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
Signed-off-by: herizhen <you@example.com>
Co-authored-by: herizhen <you@example.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds a load-balance dp proxy server which can be used in
external DP scenario without Disaggregated-Prefill enabled. What's more,
add a doc of external dp and load-balance dp proxy server.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
See the new doc.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Redundant experts bugfix
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
After configuring the path for experts_map, users do not need to
configure iinit_redundancy_expert.
### How was this patch tested?
The accuracy of EPLB was tested with and without the use of redundant
experts.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
---------
Signed-off-by: shenchuxiaofugui <1311027364@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add the parameter "register_buffer" for PD Aggregated Scenario in the
given example.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
Signed-off-by: Pz1116 <zpbzpb123123@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Correct the mistake in information documents
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
2918c1b49c
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
Drop VLLM_USE_V1 usage. This env has been removed from vLLM already.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
First-generation model:uses"LLama",subsequent models use"Llama"
The second"L"here should be lowercase.Other instances of "LLama"on
this page should be corrected accordingly
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: herizhen <you@example.com>
Co-authored-by: herizhen <you@example.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Corrected the errors in the information
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
ut
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add model feature matrix table.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: menogrey <1299267905@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- global_segment_size and local_buffer_size use constants for unified
management.
- Newly added support for input formats ending with GB, MB, KB, and B,
while being compatible with existing input methods.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
- Users can use new input methods
- The documentation has also been modified
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
---------
Signed-off-by: 李子琦 <liziqi_ing@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add adxl timeout parameter in kv pool user guide, avoiding timeout error
when initializing connections between devices.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
- vLLM main:
83f478bb19
Signed-off-by: Pz1116 <zpbzpb123123@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces a new model loader called Netloader, which leverages
high-bandwidth P2P direct transfer between NPU cards to achieve weight
loading. Netloader is implemented as a plugin through the newly added
'register_model_loader' function in vLLM 0.10. It facilitates the
process of weight loading by sending weights from a pre-loaded model
(server) to an empty model of a newly started instance (client). The
server operates concurrently with normal inference tasks through
sub-threads and the 'stateless_init_torch_distributed_process_group' in
vLLM. The client initiates a transfer request after verifying that the
model and partitioning method are the same as the server's, and uses
HCCL's collective communication (send/recv) to load the weights in the
order they are stored in the model.
Application Scenarios:
1. Significantly Reduces Inference Instance Startup Time By reusing the
weights of already loaded instances and performing high-speed transfers
directly between computing cards, this method reduces model loading
latency compared to traditional remote/local pull methods.
2. Reduces Network and Storage Pressure Avoids the need to repeatedly
download weight files from remote repositories, reducing the impact on
centralized storage and network traffic, thereby enhancing overall
system stability and service quality.
3. Improves Resource Utilization and Reduces Costs Accelerating the
loading process reduces reliance on redundant computing pools, allowing
computing resources to be elastically scaled and reclaimed as needed.
4. Enhances Business Continuity and High Availability In fault recovery
scenarios, new instances can quickly take over existing services,
avoiding prolonged business interruptions and improving the system's
high availability and user experience.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Netloader utilizes the existing --load-format=netloader and
--model-loader-extra-config to be activated. The
model-loader-extra-config needs to be input as a JSON string (as it is
now)
Afterwards, you can check whether the outputs for the same sentence are
consistent when the temperature is set to 0.
Signed-off-by: destinysky <kangrui10@126.com>
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: destinysky <kangrui10@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Add eplb ci to check the change of eplb feature.
2.Add param checking of eplb params.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
Qwen in A3.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Port #1916 and #2157 to master branch to fuse operators in deepseek moe
layers, which can reduce scheduling overhead on devices. Note that this
feature is valid only when `tp_size = 1` and
`multistream_overlap_shared_expert` is enabled with torchair graph mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Users can enable this feature with `--additional-config
'{"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true, "enable_super_kernel":true},
"multistream_overlap_shared_expert":true}'`.
### How was this patch tested?
E2E deepseek serving with 2P1D disaggregated prefill scenarios.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
when using dynamic eplb, patch v1 executor to avoid create child process
failed.
### How was this patch tested?
deepseek in v3.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Record expert map without dynamic eplb.
2.Add export PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 when using dynamic eplb.
3.change eplb doc
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?
Qwen3_moe in A3.
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Refacotr and integrate a unified `WeightPrefetchMethod`
- Integrate `gate_up_proj.weight` in quantized Attention modules
- Prefetching these weights ahead of matmul-like operators imporves
performance by reducing L2 cache transfer latency
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Add a new config in `--additional-config` for configuration:
```json
{
"weight_prefetch_config": {
"enabled": True,
"prefetch_ratio": {
"moe": {
"gate_up": 0.8
},
},
},
}
```
This feature is enabled by default, and can be disabled through this
configuration
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0rc3
- vLLM main: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: yuzhup <15705211260@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
- Refacotr and integrate a unified `WeightPrefetchMethod`
- Integrate `qkv_proj.weight` and `o_proj.weight` in quantized Attention
modules
- Prefetching these weights ahead of matmul-like operators imporves
performance by reducing L2 cache transfer latency
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Add a new config in `--additional-config` for configuration:
```json
{
"weight_prefetch_config": {
"enabled": false,
"prefetch_ratio": {
"attn": {
"qkv": 1.0,
"o": 1.0,
},
},
},
}
```
This feature is enabled by default, and can be disabled through this
configuration
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.11.0
---------
Signed-off-by: yuzhup <15705211260@163.com>
Signed-off-by: zhoux77899 <zhouxiang100@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: yuzhup <15705211260@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Support deepseek w4a8 per-channel quantization
2.The eager mode supports converting weights to the NZ format
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
#### How to get weights using Modelslim
##### Installation steps
git clone https://gitcode.com/Ascend/msit.git
cd msit/msmodelslim
bash install.sh
##### Generate w4a8 per-channel weights
cd /example/DeepSeek
Command reference: msmodelslim/example/DeepSeek/README.md
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
f225ea7dd9
---------
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Revise the EPLB feature guide content.Add eplb params to ascend config.
### Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
52d0cb8458
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <3337230449@qq.com>
# What this PR does / why we need it?
When processing a mix of large and small requests, the TTFT of responses
is significantly reduc\ed. Please refer to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/10235, which achieves the same
effect by simply limiting the number of prompt fills for long requests.
This solution can be applied to both AscendScheduler (V0) and vLLM
Scheduler (V1). Tests show that TTFT can be significantly improved when
handling such mixed requests. However, This capability is currently
missing when Ascend Scheduler is enabled.
This benchmark used the Qwen3-8B model, with a context length of 128K,
running on a single card.
Regarding dataset selection, the sharegpt_clean dataset is used, with
its content concatenated and cropped. Small requests with token=50 and
medium requests with token=10240 were constructed (there were also large
requests with token=102400, but these were ignored because when using
the Prefill First scheduling strategy, max_num_batched_tokens will not
be set to such a large value). When loading vLLM, set
max_num_batched_tokens=22000. This length can accommodate two
medium-sized requests and some short requests, reflecting an extreme
scenario where the budget is almost entirely occupied by longer
requests.
Next, we mix 990 small requests and 100 medium requests into one type of
load scenario (hereinafter referred to as 10%), and similarly generate
load scenarios with 5% medium requests and 1% load scenarios.
Performance tests were conducted separately for enabling vLLMScheduler,
AscendScheduler, and AscendScheduler (long prompt concurrency set to 1).
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
1dfea5f4a9
---------
Signed-off-by: Csrayz <jover@cmbchina.com>
This PR puts the calculation of shared experts into a separate stream,
overlaping with routing experts.
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
fbd6523ac0
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove chunked prefill for mla branch in mla , and change dtype of
prefill_mask to avoid accuracy problem
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
NO
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
ef7eefe17a
---------
Signed-off-by: SunnyLee219 <3294305115@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add an option of enable frozen parameter
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
68dbde5dbb
Signed-off-by: 1Fire4 <wangdingyi2@huawei.com>
### Motivation
Currently dynamically experts balancing would stop-the-world.
Asynchronously expert load balancing would be better without flowing
problems:
Host-bound latency:
There are many cpu operations during EPLB such as
eplb-algorithm、creating p2p ops、and log2phy expert converting would
spend long cpu time, as ~1s.
Communication latency: The transfer time would cost much in the
situation without nvlink. As the weight of an expert maybe transfer to
multiple new positions, thus N times send/recv for one expert, with
result long latency. We had tested that batch_isend_irecv cost more
100ms for 16 experts weight transmission in A2 server of ascend.
SwiftBalancer would not stop-the-world anymore, in out test on NPU 1~2ms
cost for each layer while benefit 5ms-8ms decode latency with ep_size =
64.
The following updates have been made:
1、expert distribution recording with lower cost.
2、async cpu computing for eplb algo and other python operator.
3、new eplb algo with less expert rebalancing while almost the same
effect.
### Proposed Change
We will gradually migrate the EPLB logic to the VLLM community and
implement a generalized design. Relevant RFC:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/issues/22246
The overall workflow involves:
<img width="801" height="302"
alt="474430541-23b06f58-23bc-44a3-a1be-00f268aeb15c"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1d73a459-1b23-4b0a-812a-bf0a75debfed"
/>
1. Record experts distribution during forward. We using expert_token_num
after disptach instead of topk_ids, thus we got much smaller tensor
shape to reduce cost of hbm recording and add-operator.
2. Do all-gather for experts distribution. Using all-gather instead of
all-reduce as less traffic volume.
3. Wake up eplb worker process with experts distribution when
num_iterations comes. Run eplb algorithm in eplb worker.
4. Generate p2p send/recv ops and other operator such as log2phy would
cost long cpu time.
5. Lanch ibatch_send_recv in async_stream before forward.
6. After forward, wait for the ibatch_send_recv finish, then do uapte
expert map and expert weights.
### Co-author
Co-authored-by: raindaywhu raindaywhu@raindaywhu@ 163.con
Co-authored-by: njuyuan yuanjl19@smail.nju.edu.cn
Co-authored-by: qmkakaxi wjh1594260677@qq.com
Co-authored-by: Skywalker-EP 173723846@qq.com
- vLLM version: v0.10.2
- vLLM main:
567939953b
---------
Signed-off-by: offline0806 <z00858301@china.huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: offline0806 <z00858301@china.huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces Oproj matrix tensor model parallel to achieve
decreasing of memory consumption. It only support graph mode in pure DP
scenario.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
oproj_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT increasing, saved 5.8
GB NPU memory per RANK. We got best performance when
oproj_tensor_parallel_size=4 without TPOT increasing.
performance data:
<img width="1442" height="442" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83270fc5-868a-4387-b0a9-fac29b4a376d"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| oproj_tensor_parallel_size | Split the o_proj matrix along the row
dimension (head num * head dim) into oproj_tensor_parallel_size pieces.
| No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, head num * head dim must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"oproj_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
eddaafc1c7
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zzh <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
support torchair mode
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
5438967fbc
Signed-off-by: zhangdepeng <zhangdepeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: p00465316 <panchao13@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: zhangdepeng <zhangdepeng2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR introduces LMhead tensor model parallel to achieve decreasing of
memory consumption, and TPOT performance improvement. It support both
eager mode and graph mode.
In deepseek r1 w8a8 PD disagregated Decode instance, using pure DP, with
lmhead_tensor_parallel_size = 8, we have 1 ms TPOT optimization, saved
1.48 GB NPU memory per RANK.
performance data:
<img width="1444" height="438" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3c5ef0d3-a7c7-46fd-9797-4de728eb0cb0"
/>
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
This PR introduces one new config in `additional_config`.
| Name | Effect | Required | Type | Constraints |
| :---------------------------- |
:--------------------------------------- | :------- | :--- |
:----------------- |
| lmhead_tensor_parallel_size | Split the lm_head matrix along the
column dimension (vocab_size) into lmhead_tensor_parallel_size pieces |
No | int | default value is None, once this value is set, the feature
will be enabled, vocab_size must be divisible by this value. |
example
`--additional_config={"lmhead_tensor_parallel_size": 8}`
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
de533ab2a1
---------
Signed-off-by: zzhx1 <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: zhangzihang <zzh_201018@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
The branch `br_release_MindStudio_8.1.RC2_TR5_20260624` is commercial
delivery version of modelslim in Q3, and has been verified available
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.10.1.1
- vLLM main:
7d67a9d9f9
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add release note for `v0.9.1rc3`.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
53415653ff
---------
Signed-off-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Update DOC. Guide users to run LoRA with ACLGraph.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
No.
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
de7b67a023
---------
Signed-off-by: paulyu12 <507435917@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
enable_shared_pert_dp is currently on by default. This optimization is
currently only valid for deepseek series models. The default opening
affects the accuracy of the qwen series models.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
use parameter --additional_config='{"enable_shared_expert_dp": true}'
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
d983769c41
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fixed the expression of msit for code clone
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
afa5b7ca0b
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.Shared Expert Sharding Strategy Update: Switched from TP-aligned to
pure DP for shared experts, enabling more efficient execution.
2.O_Proj AllReduce → ReduceScatter: Reduced communication overhead by
using ReduceScatter, made possible by pure DP sharding.
3.AllGather Postponed: Delayed to after QKV down projection to reduce
synchronization impact during prefill.
### How was this patch tested?
Adding ut case in `tests/ut/attention/test_mla_v1.py`
#### How to run
use parameter `--additional_config='{"enable_shared_expert_dp": true}'`
##### a.How to run eager mode
eg:
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/model_path
--trust-remote-code -tp 8 -dp 2 --enable_expert_parallel --port 8002
--max-model-len 5120 --max-num-batched-tokens 16384 --enforce-eager
--disable-log-requests
--additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"enable_shared_expert_dp":
true,"chunked_prefill_for_mla":true}'
##### b.How to run graph mode
eg:
python -m vllm.entrypoints.openai.api_server --model=/model_path
--trust-remote-code -tp 8 -dp 2 --enable_expert_parallel --port 8002
--max-model-len 5120 --max-num-batched-tokens 16384
--disable-log-requests
--additional_config='{"ascend_scheduler_config":{"enabled":true},"enable_shared_expert_dp":
true,"chunked_prefill_for_mla":true,"torchair_graph_config":{"enabled":true}}'
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
9edd1db02b
---------
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: SlightwindSec <slightwindsec@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Release note of v0.10.0rc1
- vLLM version: v0.10.0
- vLLM main:
8e8e0b6af1
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
