EngineX/xc-llm-ascend
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
2,783 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags
v0.18.0
Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
wangx700
22d0e1d3d7 [model_runner_v2]optimize the performance of the _topk_log_softmax_kernel (#7221) 
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Optimize the performance of the triton operator _topk_log_softmax_kernel
in model_runner_v2 to 1.04xH100，which is 7% of its original value.(issue
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5208)

- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e

---------

Signed-off-by: wangx700 <wangxin700@huawei.com>
 2026-03-16 16:49:10 +08:00
Ronald
c980e68d40 [Feature] support aclgraph for model runner v2 (#7110) 
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to support aclgraph for model runner v2, please see RFC
#5208. The PR contains these modifications:
- adapt to newest commit of vllm main branch.
- supply a unified interface of extra forward context for both model
runner v1 and model runner v2.
- implement graph mode for main model. 

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e

---------

Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
 2026-03-13 09:11:46 +08:00
shiyuan680
3b6b3c4214 [MODELRUNNERV2]fix penality ops (#7013) 
### What this PR does / why we need it?
fix penality ops for new version, and achieved a 10% performance
improvement

### How was this patch tested?
pytest
‎tests/e2e/nightly/single_node/ops/singlecard_ops/triton/test_penality.py
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2

Signed-off-by: shiyuan680 <917935075@qq.com>
 2026-03-11 17:13:34 +08:00
Ronald
f1ffb5fb19 [Feature] adapt to uva buffer and main2main (#6657) 
### What this PR does / why we need it?
vllm model runner v2 use uva buffer to prepare input data, but npu
doesn't support uva yet, this pr implement a uvawrapper class to mimic
gpu's uva backend. what's more, this pr make some modifications to adapt
to the newer main branch.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM main:
13397841ab

---------

Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
 2026-02-12 10:36:31 +08:00
SILONG ZENG
19b5d44ea8 [Lint]Style: Convert vllm-ascend/ to ruff format(Batch #10) (#6173) 
### What this PR does / why we need it?
**Scope of Changes**:
| File Path |
| :--- |
|`vllm_ascend/ops/layer_shard_linear.py`|
|`vllm_ascend/ops/linear.py`|
|`vllm_ascend/ops/linear_op.py`|
|`vllm_ascend/worker/worker.py`|
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_bert.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_deepseek.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_distributed.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_module.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_multimodal_merge.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_qwen3_next.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_qwen3_next_mtp.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_rejection_sampler.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_rope.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_triton.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_unquantized_gemm.py` |
| ` vllm_ascend/patch/worker/patch_v2_egale.py` |
|` vllm_ascend/worker/npu_input_batch.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/aclgraph_utils.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/attn_utils.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/model_runner.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/sample/gumbel.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/sample/penalties.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/sample/sampler.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/spec_decode/__init__.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/spec_decode/eagle.py`|
|` vllm_ascend/worker/v2/states.py`|
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.14.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d

Signed-off-by: MrZ20 <2609716663@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: SILONG ZENG <2609716663@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
 2026-02-06 15:35:06 +08:00
meihanc
fea197ad50 [Main2Main] Upgrade vllm commit to 0123 (#6169) 
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1. ✅ Upgrade vllm commit to: 0115
(8471b27df97c3eb79f891802fc0e858f8f7ac6a0)
Modify import paths due to the refactors：
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32245
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32060
Test result:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21034239336/job/60490156965?pr=5913
2. ✅Upgrade vllm commit to: 0119
(9a1f16da1e423ede2c2f52a9850cbfbb39cefe96)
Fix `WorkerProc.__init__() missing 1 required positional argument:
'is_driver_worker'` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/28506
Test result:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21156263050/job/60841668755?5569
3. ✅Upgrade vllm commit to:
0120(148117ea2e689cd43df4be6892671a17cdae5833)
1. Add `skip_compiled` param in `set_forward_context` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/30385
2. Modify `tests/ut/spec_decode/test_eagle_proposer.py` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/24322
change `self.max_num_tokens =
vllm_config.scheduler_config.max_num_batched_tokens + max_batch_size`
3. Modify UT import paths due to the
refactors：https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32060
Test result:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21204851770/job/60999046946
4. ✅Upgrade vllm commit to:
0121(f23fb5a7c1b61350c5c40ca1115d3bf8cf2b8cc9)
1. vLLM switched `uses_mrope` from target to draft model config, making
`positions`/`mrope_positions` mutually exclusive, breaking vllm-ascend's
direct self.positions access and tests missing
`draft_model_config.uses_mrope`.
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32048
2. Moved bs_to_padded_graph_size from CompilationConfig to
CudagraphDispatcher due to the refactor
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/30143
3. Remove unused `maybe_setup_kv_connector` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32077
Test result:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21217728738/job/61043738834
6. ✅Upgrade vllm commit to:
0122(8ebf271bb6d1e7e9b1a55be73d755ef1a57dbbe5)
Updating FusedMoEParallelConfig (added enable_eplb) and FusedMoEConfig
due to https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32414
Test result:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21249922546/job/61148613054
8. ✅Upgrade vllm commit to:
0123(dc917cceb877dfd13f98c538c4c96158047d98bd)
Setting temperature=0.0 due to the removal of the default temperature
value in https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32723
Test result:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/actions/runs/21280796875
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?

- vLLM version: v0.14.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d

---------

Signed-off-by: wjunLu <wjunlu217@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Meihan-chen <jcccx.cmh@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wjunLu <wjunlu217@gmail.com>
 2026-01-27 08:44:36 +08:00
shiyuan680
cea48c2a34 model runner v2 support triton of penalty (#5854) 
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Optimized operator performance and add ut test
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

### How was this patch tested?
test in qwen2.5 7b vl, ops time approved 90%
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef

this pr is for
# https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5208

Signed-off-by: shiyuan680 <917935075@qq.com>
 2026-01-20 12:26:05 +00:00
Ronald
e7e1a7dc05 [Feature] support eager mode in model runner v2 (#5210) 
### What this PR does / why we need it?
#5051 only implement a basic framework for model runner v2, but there
are still some bugs for e2e functionality, this PR aim to enable basic
functionality.
model runner v2 plans:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5208

- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
 2025-12-29 15:28:34 +08:00