## What this PR does / why we need it?
pick-from:https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/7452
### Problem
Embedding models produce inconsistent outputs when prefix caching is
enabled vs disabled.
### Root Cause
The attention router condition was too broad:
- All `model_runner_type == "pooling"` → `_forward_encoder_attention()`
→ uses `npu_fusion_attention`
- **But `npu_fusion_attention` does NOT support prefix caching**
- Result: Numerical mismatch when KV cache is managed by prefix caching
### Solution
Refine the router condition to check causality:
**Before**:
```
if attn_metadata.model_runner_type == "pooling":
→ npu_fusion_attention (no prefix caching support)
```
**After**:
```
if attn_metadata.model_runner_type == "pooling" and not attn_metadata.causal:
→ npu_fusion_attention (for true encoders)
else:
→ npu_fused_infer_attention_score (prefix caching support)
```
### Changes Made
1. **Fixed router condition** (`vllm_ascend/attention/attention_v1.py`
L968)
- Added `and not attn_metadata.causal` check
- Effect: Non-causal embeddings now use correct operator
2. **Simplified encoder attention**
(`vllm_ascend/attention/attention_v1.py` L864-877)
- Removed redundant causal branch (encoders never use causal mask)
- Reduced from 34 lines to 14 lines
3. **Added test** (`tests/e2e/singlecard/pooling/test_embedding.py`)
- Validates embedding outputs with/without prefix caching are consistent
## Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### Functional Changes
✅ **Yes** - Bug fix: Embedding models now produce consistent outputs
with prefix caching
### API Changes
❌ **No** - All public APIs unchanged
### Configuration Changes
❌ **No** - No new configuration required
### Backward Compatibility
✅ **Fully compatible** - Only fixes incorrect behavior
## How was this patch tested?
### New Test
Added `test_embed_models_using_prefix_caching_correctness()`:
- Tests: `Qwen3-Embedding-0.6B`
- Validates numerical consistency between runs with/without prefix
caching
- Uses long sequences to activate prefix caching
- Tolerance: 1e-2
- vLLM version: v0.18.0
Signed-off-by: underfituu <hzhucong@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fixed the issue where the DCP overlaps the MTP scenario in the ds3.2
scenario.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
cherry-pick from: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/7617
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fixed incorrect class attribute assignment and corrected it to instance
attribute assignment. Ensured reorder_batch_threshold only applies to
the current instance to avoid global pollution and multi-instance
conflicts.
Backport of #7586
Signed-off-by: LookAround <lixushi@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
Co-authored-by: LookAround0301 <lixushi@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to fix padding logic in eagle proposer for kimi25. Main
changes involve:
1. modify the way to obtain draft model attention builder and backend
2. add block table padding & related tensor slicing in common metadata
when `draft_step>1` for solving fia verifying error
3. replace block table in `update_graph_params` for solving fia
verifying error
- vLLM version: v0.17.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to support aclgraph for model runner v2, please see RFC
#5208. The PR contains these modifications:
- adapt to newest commit of vllm main branch.
- supply a unified interface of extra forward context for both model
runner v1 and model runner v2.
- implement graph mode for main model.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
**NOTE: This PR is re-pull of #7016 since ci mistakenly marked
unfinished pr as having passed.**
This PR aims to delete mtp_proposer. By fixing a bug in both dsv32 and
glm5, now it should be ok to remove mtp_proposer. The bug is actually
about unnecessary slicing of `slot_mapping`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
4034c3d32e
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR aims to delete mtp_proposer. By fixing a bug in both dsv32 and
glm5, now it should be ok to remove mtp_proposer. The bug is actually
about unnecessary slicing of `slot_mapping`.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
by ci
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: Zetong Li <slippersss@126.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
[Refactor][EAGLE] 7/N Merged PCP and disable_padded interface into
eagle_proposer.py
This pull request significantly refactors the speculative decoding
mechanism by merging Parallel Context Processing (PCP) and Multi-Token
Prediction (MTP) functionalities directly into the eagle_proposer.py.
The changes aim to enhance the efficiency and correctness of distributed
speculative decoding, particularly by enabling the Eagle feature to work
seamlessly with the disable_padded interface. This involves detailed
adjustments to attention metadata, input/output processing, and state
management to ensure proper operation in parallel environments.
1. The PCP and MTP features are migrated to the eagle_proposer.py
2. The Eagle and PCP features are integrated
3. Enable the eagle feature to use the disable_padded interface
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
Tests and UT
- vLLM version: v0.15.0
- vLLM main:
83b47f67b1
---------
Signed-off-by: lilinsiman <lilinsiman@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the incorrect use of the `output` parameter in
`_forward_fia_slidingwindow`:
```
# Original (incorrect)
output, _ = torch_npu.npu_fused_infer_attention_score(...)
output= output.view(batch_size, self.num_heads, self.head_size)
```
In the original writing, the `output `parameter was directly assigned a
new value, which is inconsistent with the interface definition,
resulting in the inability to directly update `output `when calling
externally.
```
attn_output, _ = torch_npu.npu_fused_infer_attention_score(...)
attn_output = attn_output.view(batch_size, self.num_heads, self.head_size)
output[:batch_size] = attn_output[:batch_size]
```
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No change.
Co-authored-by: GoCHug<gch59135228@163.com>
### How was this patch tested?
vLLM ascend version: v0.13.0rc1
Signed-off-by: acat-rw <892882856@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Added a check in the may_reinitialize_input_batch method to verify
whether the backend implements the get_supported_block_size method
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
no user-facing change
### How was this patch tested?
Only a few lines of code within the methods were modified, and the
format check test has been passed.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
---------
Signed-off-by: Debuuuuger <huangzr@cmbchina.com>
Signed-off-by: debuger <102402761+huangazazaz@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Debuuuuger <12110718@mail.sustech.edu.cn>
Co-authored-by: Debuuuuger <huangzr@cmbchina.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR upgrades the vLLM dependency from `v0.14.1` to `v0.15.0`. This
involves:
- Updating the `VLLM_TAG` in all `Dockerfile`.
- Updating the vLLM version in `docs/source/conf.py`.
- Removing conditional code paths specific to `v0.14.1` across the
codebase, which simplifies maintenance.
- Fix `TypeError: MMEncoderAttention.__init__() got an unexpected
keyword argument 'multimodal_config'` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/31972.
- Fix `_shared_experts: 'NoneType' object is not callable` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/32082 by
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/pull/6335.
- Fix `ReshapeAndCacheOperation setup failed!` due to
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/25954 by overriding attention
metadata slots.
This upgrade is necessary to keep the project aligned with the latest
features, bug fixes, and API changes in the vLLM project.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No, this is an internal dependency update and does not introduce any
user-facing changes.
### How was this patch tested?
CI is expected to pass with these changes, ensuring that all existing
tests are successful with the new vLLM version.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
dc917cceb8
co-authored-by: shen-shanshan <467638484@qq.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: wangxiyuan <wangxiyuan1007@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Fix the MTP test failure caused by accessing non-existent attribute
`forward_context.draft_attn_metadatas`.
**Root cause:**
In `AscendAttentionBackendImpl.update_graph_params`, the code
incorrectly accessed `forward_context.draft_attn_metadatas`, but
`ForwardContext` class doesn't have this attribute. The original code
passed this value via function parameter.
**Fix:**
Add `draft_attn_metadatas` parameter to the entire call chain:
- `update_full_graph_params` function in `acl_graph.py`
- All `update_graph_params` methods in attention backends
- Pass the parameter correctly in `eagle_proposer.py`
Also applied Gemini's suggestion to make `vllm_config=None` in
`AscendAttentionCPImpl.update_graph_params` for API consistency.
Related to item 9 in #5463
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
This fixes the CI test failure:
`test_deepseek_mtp_correctness[True-FULL_DECODE_ONLY-2-wemaster/deepseek_mtp_main_random_bf16]`
Signed-off-by: lico67373 <918688502@qq.com>
This reverts commit 8966a99710.
It breaks the test
`tests/e2e/singlecard/spec_decode/test_mtp_eagle_correctness.py::test_deepseek_mtp_correctness[True-FULL_DECODE_ONLY-2-wemaster/deepseek_mtp_main_random_bf16]`
- vLLM version: v0.14.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
### What this PR does / why we need it?
**Refactor: Unify full-graph parameter update logic**
This PR consolidates the scattered full-graph parameter update logic
into a unified approach, improving code architecture and eliminating
duplication.
**Key improvements:**
1. **Unified interface**
- Create `update_full_graph_params` as the single entry point for all
full-graph updates
- Replace multiple scattered update calls with one unified function
- Remove ~50 lines of duplicated if-else logic across
`model_runner_v1.py` and `eagle_proposer.py`
2. **Better architecture**
- Move update logic to respective Backend classes
(`AscendAttentionBackend`, `AscendMLABackend`)
- Each Backend manages its own parameter update logic internally
- Simplify caller code to just dispatch to the appropriate Backend
3. **Cleaner parameter handling**
- Remove unnecessary `pcp_size` and `dcp_size` parameter passing
- Get parallel configuration directly from distributed groups
- Consistent with how other parts of the codebase obtain these values
**Why we need it:**
- **Maintainability**: Future changes only need to be made in one place
per Backend
- **Code quality**: Follows DRY principle and Single Responsibility
Principle
- **Readability**: Cleaner, more intuitive code structure
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
**No.** This is a pure refactoring with no functional changes - same
behavior, cleaner code.
### How was this patch tested?
- All existing unit tests pass with updated mocks
- No new tests needed (pure refactoring, no behavior changes)
- CI validates correctness
---
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
Signed-off-by: lico67373 <918688502@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Drop vLLM 0.13.0 support, upgrade to 0.14.0
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: hfadzxy <starmoon_zhang@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This patch purpose to optimize the lint check term. The main idea is to
reduce unnecessary installation time.
1. The installation of vllm is not must, only append the path of vllm
src to the `PATHONPATH` is effective
2. This installation of `requirements-dev.txt` is not must, we have a
pre-built image `quay.io/ascend-ci/vllm-ascend:lint` with all the
requirements installed in advance.
**NOTE**: the conditions for triggering image builds are: 1).Daily
scheduled build; 2) Build when requirements are modified; 3) Manual
build. This ensures that the dependencies in our image are up-to-date to
the greatest extent possible.
3. The `mypy` was separated from the `pre-commit` hook for performance
reasons; we found that integrating `mypy` into the `pre-commit` hook
resulted in poor performance.
4. Reduce the CPU core consumption from 16 -> 8
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
The end-to-end lint time was optimized from 20min/per PR to 8min/per PR
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2c24bc6996
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
come from: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5463
Reason:
During the iteration process of the hardware version, there may be a
large number of iterations for the operators, which can lead to
short-term compatibility differences. Therefore, an intermediate
adaptation layer is provided to accommodate the short-term differences
in operators.
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
2f4e6548ef
---------
Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Add docstrings for Metadata and MetadataBuilder classes in the attention
module to improve code readability.
Related to #5463 (Item 11: Add some comments for CommonMetadata and
others)
**Modified files:**
- `vllm_ascend/attention/context_parallel/common_cp.py`: Added comments
for `AscendPCPMetadata`, `CPChunkedContextMetadata`,
`AscendMetadataForPrefill`, `AscendMetadataForDecode`
- `vllm_ascend/attention/utils.py`: Added comments for
`AscendPrefillContextParallelMetadata`
- `vllm_ascend/attention/mla_v1.py`: Added comments for
`ChunkedContextMetadata`, `AscendMLADecodeMetadata`
- `vllm_ascend/attention/attention_v1.py`: Added comments for
`AscendMetadata`, `AscendAttentionMetadataBuilder`
- `vllm_ascend/attention/context_parallel/attention_cp.py`: Added
comments for `AscendAttentionCPMetadataBuilder`
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Documentation only, no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: lico67373 <918688502@qq.com>
## What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes the `AttentionMaskBuilder` singleton initialization issue
introduced in PR #4779 and removes the unused `pcp_prefill_mask` field.
### Background
After PR #4779 made `AttentionMaskBuilder` a singleton with `@singleton`
decorator, the class constructor now requires a `device` parameter.
However, two initialization sites were still using the old parameterless
constructor, causing failures.
### Changes
1. **Fix singleton initialization**
- Fixed `AttentionMaskBuilder()` → `AttentionMaskBuilder(self.device)`
in `AscendMLAMetadataBuilder.__init__()`
- Fixed `AttentionMaskBuilder()` → `AttentionMaskBuilder(self.device)`
in `AscendAttentionMetadataBuilder.__init__()`
2. **Remove unused field**
- Removed `pcp_prefill_mask` field from
`AscendPrefillContextParallelMetadata` (never used in codebase)
- Updated related test assertions
### Related
- Issue #5463
- PR #4779 (Unify all mask generation methods)
- PR #5389 (Make AttentionMaskBuilder singleton)
## Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No. This is an internal refactoring.
## How was this patch tested?
- ✅ Local testing: No linter errors
- ✅ Unit tests for attention modules verified
- ⏳ CI pipeline
Signed-off-by: lico67373 <918688502@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
When using the swa parameter in fia, headDim does not currently support
256, and when gemma3's headDim is equal to 256, an error will occur.
Therefore, code rollback is required, and it will be incorporated after
cann supports it.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
Remove swa parameter of fia.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
---------
Signed-off-by: nsdie <yeyifan@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Mengqing Cao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Supported to use full-graph with Qwen3-Next-MTP.
In detail, we adatpted `AscendAttentionState.ChunkedPrefill` in main
model, and also adapted `AscendAttentionState.ChunkedPrefill` in mtp
model.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
N/A
### How was this patch tested?
We changed the test of Qwen3-Next-MTP in
`tests/e2e/multicard/test_qwen3_next.py` to make it a test of
`FULL_DECODE_ONLY`. Then run `pytest -s
tests/e2e/multicard/test_qwen3_next.py::test_qwen3_next_distributed_mp_eager_mtp_similarity_tp4`.
And this test passed.
```text
.
================================================================================================================================= warnings summary =================================================================================================================================
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:241
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:241: DeprecationWarning: builtin type SwigPyPacked has no __module__ attribute
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:241
<frozen importlib._bootstrap>:241: DeprecationWarning: builtin type SwigPyObject has no __module__ attribute
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
==================================================================================================================== 1 passed, 2 warnings in 271.89s (0:04:31) =====================================================================================================================
```
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5326c89803
Signed-off-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
In the current process of implementing attention updates, the FIA
operator shares a single workspace among different layers within the
same computation graph. To enable memory reuse, we adopt the
weak_ref_tensor mechanism. However, this approach may lead to precision
anomalies in certain scenarios. To address this issue, different layers
in the same computation graph are assigned independent workspaces.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
45c1ca1ca1
Signed-off-by: WithHades <244036962@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Improve the performance of Layerwise Connector, mainly includes the
following points:
1. Use event synchronize to replace stream synchronize.
2. Access metaserver when scheduling.
3. Transfer kvcache each Chunk prefill segmentation.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
By CI.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
---------
Signed-off-by: nwpu-zxr <zhouxuerong2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: liziyu <liziyu16@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: wangxiaoteng <wangxiaoteng@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Refactor the `capture_model` method in model_runner to directly reuse
the method from vLLM.
Currently, most of the logic in the capture_model method is similar to
that in the vllm code. Directly using the vllm method can reduce the
maintenance cost of the vllm-ascend code. Modify as follows:
1、refactor capture_model function, directly inheriting community methods
2、refactor initialize_aclgraph_capture function, move to
initialize_attn_backend
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: weiguihua2 <weiguihua2@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
#5051 only implement a basic framework for model runner v2, but there
are still some bugs for e2e functionality, this PR aim to enable basic
functionality.
model runner v2 plans:
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/5208
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Ronald1995 <ronaldautomobile@163.com>
Enable fia to support sliding window function and adapt to the Gemma3
model.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: nsdie <yeyifan@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We support to use full graph with eagle.
Change list:
1. Distinguish between processing graph_params and draft_graph_params in
attention_v1.
2. Adapt the full-graph mode in eagle_proposer, include:
1). If use full graph, make Fullgraph Wrapper when load model.
2). Build a new meatadata, set running mode in FULL and mark attention
update in dummy_run when in Fullgraph mode.
3). Fixed and fill any attn_metadata, such as
attn_metadata.slot_mapping.
4). Add a descriptor.
5). Set running mode and triggered update metadata.
3. Trans is_mtp_model to is_draft_model, and add the update of
workspace.
NOTE:
When set async_scheduling=True, the draft model will enforce execution
in eager mode.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou Liu <liu_yizhou@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Yizhou <136800916+yiz-liu@users.noreply.github.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Currently, MHA models (eg: minicpm-2b, Baichuan-7b) will encounter
errors when running in piecewise graph mode, with error messages similar
to:
```
(E89999): When layout is TND and PA not enabled, keyT(8) and valueT(8) must be equal to the last element of actualSeqenceLengthKV(5)[FUNC:CheckInputShapeWhenLayoutIsTND][FILE:prompt_flash_attention_tiling.cpp][LINE:3618]
```
The error occurs because the qkv in the Prefill stage is also padded,
causing the shape to be inconsistent with actual_seq_lengths.
Add unpadding logic for kv.
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
254f6b9867
Signed-off-by: Wang Kunpeng <1289706727@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Revert [KV-Sharing] Support KV-Sharing feature in CLA models (#4138) as
it causes deepseek v3.2 hang error
- vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
5fbfa8d9ef
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Support KV-Sharing feature in CLA (cross layer attention) models, which
sharing kv cache in some layers.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: MengqingCao <cmq0113@163.com>
RFC: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4629
Reason:
The metadata data class contains an excessive number of variables. We
will inherit the metadata of the community and simultaneously remove
some variables that are no longer needed at present.
Todo:
1. remove attn_state partly.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove Pangu Related Code
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
e2e & ut
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: weichen <calvin_zhu0210@outlook.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR fixes some incorrect `get_current_vllm_config` calling, which
creates empty vllm_config instead.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: Angazenn <supperccell@163.com>
RFC: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm-ascend/issues/4629
Reason:
We distinguish the branches based on the applicable scenarios of
pagedAttention and fusedInferAttention, making the code more clear.
At the same time, it is convenient for the subsequent iterations of
sliding_window and sinks and removePA ops after FIA is ready.
Todo:
remove PA ops after FIA is ready
add slidingwindow and ops for gpt_oss
replace FIA with FIA_v2
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian_v1 <weijinqian@huawei.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
Rename `_910B` to `A2`;
Rename `_910_93` to `A3`;
Rename `_910_95` to `A5`;
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <1183291235@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
We refactored the eagle_proposer.py to adapt the framework of eagle.py
in vllm-v0.12.0, to support the logit of padded drafter batch and
async-scheduler.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: anon189Ty <Stari_Falcon@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: drslark <slarksblood@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR adds back pa in scenarios of small batch sizes due to
performance consideration. Will remove pa once fia performs better than
pa in all scenarios.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
CI passed with existing test.
- vLLM version: v0.12.0
- vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: whx-sjtu <2952154980@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: weijinqian0 <1184188277@qq.com>
