### What this PR does / why we need it?
Remove hardcoded ASCEND910_95 usage in csrc custom-op host/tiling code
and
select the SoC target at CMake configure time.
- Probe CANN headers with check_cxx_source_compiles:
prefer platform_ascendc::SocVersion::ASCEND950, fallback to
ASCEND910_95.
- Export the selected enum/config string via shared compile definitions
(VLLM_ASCEND_950_SOC_ENUM / VLLM_ASCEND_950_SOC_CONFIG).
- Apply the shared macros to affected paths (moe_gating_top_k,
add_rms_norm_bias) to avoid per-file hardcoding.
- Keep behavior unchanged; this is an internal build-compatibility fix
for CANN 8.5 and 9.x.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
- vLLM version: v0.16.0
- vLLM main:
15d76f74e2
---------
Signed-off-by: linfeng-yuan <1102311262@qq.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
After removing codepsell a while, we discovered that typo had a problem
correctly recognizing certain misspelled words, so I suggested adding it
back.
- vLLM version: v0.14.1
- vLLM main:
d68209402d
---------
Signed-off-by: wangli <wangli858794774@gmail.com>
### What this PR does / why we need it?
1.replace moe_gating_top_k from torch_npu with custom op
2.enable the renorm function of moe_gating_top_k in softmax scenerio
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No
### How was this patch tested?
No need test
- vLLM version: v0.13.0
- vLLM main:
7157596103
---------
Signed-off-by: ZCG12345 <2097562023@qq.com>
1. What this PR does / why we need it?
This PR supports the moe_gating_top_k operator, which enables
post-positioned renormalization (renorm) on the basis of softmax.
2. Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No user-facing changes are required.
3. How was this patch tested?
This patch was tested with the test_npu_moe_gating_top_k test case.
vLLM version: release/v0.13.0
vLLM main:
ad32e3e19c
---------
Signed-off-by: ZCG12345 <2097562023@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: zzzzwwjj <34335947+zzzzwwjj@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: zzzzwwjj <34335947+zzzzwwjj@users.noreply.github.com>
